Limericks

Dear Friends,

Once there lived a man called Voltaire,
Deep into philosophy he would stare,
He said with a fright,
And some insight,
Absurdity leads to atrocity so take care.

Thune is an unimpressive politician,
Threading a needle with intuition,
He said herding cats,
I’ll empower democrats,
Making profligate spending an institution.

The unreasonable can’t be reasoned with,
Holding grudges, full of wrath and pith,
Chanting a refrain,
Inflicting general pain,
And running as fast as they can right off a cliff.

You will do and think in allowable ways,
Following woke the rest of your days,
Though it’s absurd,
Like a clean turd,
It’s inculcated by the system of Edward Bernays.

There once was an absurdist ______,
Though his ideas smelled of a ______,
A man of the age,
A woman enraged,
Who put the horse before the ______.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, media, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Elitists Are Terrible People

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, elitists are terrible people. By terrible people, I mean they look down on the rest of us, have no morals, and thus place no limits on their actions. Who am I calling elitists? That would be anyone that believes he or she should rule the world with unlimited power. This includes but is not limited to Nazis, Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, and globalists. These people all have central planning as a core philosophy. To believe in central planning one has to look down on the rest of humanity as incapable of minding for ourselves. Central planners can’t have morals because the very act of central planning and especially implementation requires evil be visited on others. There can be no better proof of a lack of morals than forcing others to one’s will. Unlimited action then is presumed.

In my worldview, a good person is someone who minds their business, helps when asked, and holds themselves to a higher standard then he or she holds the rest of mankind. Such a person isn’t a burden to humanity but a benefit. A terrible person on the other hand is the opposite. He or she is a burden on humanity in a myriad of ways. Their entitlement attitude is destructive of their own success. Terrible people always consider themselves victims even as they are handing out lashes to an innocent. No elitist person holds him or herself to a higher standard than others. That would be absurd, since elitists see themselves as smarter, wiser, and are better than the rest of us… so why would they? Moreover, elitists must lie to get power, because no one would give them unlimited power otherwise.

Lying and censoring are tools of elitism. They are also the tools of power. Both are the acts of terrible people. Liars trade on trust to manipulate. When the trust they are trading on is public trust of institutions, that trust lost is destructive of entire civilizations. Moreover, someone who would risk civilizational destruction for personal profit is the very acme of a terrible person. The elitist then is a person who must lie to gain power, censor others to hold it, and manipulate others as does a common confidence man, but with much higher stakes. Because otherwise common people wouldn’t stand for the extractive economy that all elitist centrally planned economies are. This brings us to another reason elitist central planners are terrible people, they are thieves under color of law.

The history of elitism is unequivocal, central planning delivers poverty to the people, and opulence to the central planners. The elite are the extractors. As the nation is sucked dry the people eventually wake up to the fact they live under an extractive economy instead of a productive one. At that point the people go from being the extracted from, to extraction avoiders. Examples are numerous of what happens after. People avoid the mechanisms of central planning extraction. Large scale tax avoidance, currency avoidance, and an underground economy is born. This happened in Greece, Argentina, and Weimar Germany. Given the epic history of central planning disasters, only a terrible person would to force it on a nation let alone the world.

To a terrible person their own lack of success is proof the system needs to be overthrown so they can rule over the ashes. That’s been the paradigm in all Marxist revolutions. Half witted but evil and overly educated people are disillusioned so start a communist revolution. Pretending to be populists so they can implement elitism. Rivers of blood have flowed from the hands of university educated monsters like Abemael Guzman the founder of the Shining Path, Pol Pot of the killing fields, and Lenin who exterminated the Kulaks. Modern elitists live by extraction, lies, and manipulation. You can tell this is the case when wrongthink and wrongspeak are punished more severely than the systematic rape of little girls. That is why I say, elitists are terrible people… they really are.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in business, economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

You cant kill a hydra by cutting off a head,
Religion and politics are incestuously wed,
Go for the heart,
That’s the hard part,
Because it requires killing the ideology instead.


Mancur Olsen was of the progressive faction,
A thinker of his time who got much traction,
When money’s at stake,
We notice, act and take,
And his book is the Logic of Collective Action.

Saints turn bad rot and begin to sour,
Censoring shouting and making us cower,
It’s not a club,
Here’s the rub,
All evil rises from an imbalance of power.

He want’s to live forever what the heck,
His telomeres are short age to wreck,
A genetic lift,
But what if,
He slips on some stairs and breaks his neck?

Faction has many heads but one ______,
Where ideology lay and hidden in the _____,
A rotted mess,
A ripped dress,
And their immortal power smothers in a _____.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Human Nature and Civilization

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the fatal flaw in all systems of human collaboration is our flawed nature. This applies to political, economic, and social systems. While our flawed nature is destructive of humanity, it’s not our fault that we have it. We are the product of millions of years of survival by tooth and nail. A paradigm where one only need to outrun the next guy to avoid being a meal. The result is we have an innate survival instinct that served us in caveman days, but is ill suited for us now. We don’t live by tooth and claw anymore. We live by intellect, social ability, and skills. In our paradigm, that egotistic feature instilled in us by nature damages our prosperity, health, and relationships. Many simply can’t help themselves. This shows us that controlling our nature is of paramount importance.

No technological civilization filled with barbarians could survive long. The chaos would topple any scientific regime. So we can say that for a technological civilization to build up, the people need to calm down. We might further say that the more civilized the people are, the greater heights of technology and science those people could achieve. Our flawed nature is a limiting factor to how high our civilization can rise. The more our flaws are allowed or encouraged by double standards, the lower the static level of our science and technology. If people were to become barbarians, the static level could drop below our current technology. If that were to happen, you can count on disaster being visited upon us… by ourselves. Like a kid with matches.

There’s a reason we don’t allow children to use firearms unchaperoned. The reason is because they haven’t the wisdom, or civilization, to use them wisely. The same goes for driving, drinking, and smoking. People who are ill-equipped to handle a right or privilege are denied them… until they mature enough to handle them safely. That some of us, even once having reached the age of maturity, still can’t handle them, is the result of our nature working against us. Some people eat too much, others are narcissistic, some are psychopaths, many are wrathful, etc… the flaws we carry are as multitudinous as we are. We can’t help it, because millions of years of reptilian brain training the id is difficult for the ego to overcome. History has shown that people who are mature can handle these things though.

Governments are simply a group of people. Therefore all governments have the same problems as people. They lust, like to gamble, can’t get enough, etc… just like individuals. Because all collections of people, are people. Therefore governments, corporations, and any group of people will exhibit all the flaws of humanity… more than an individual. A single person maybe an alcoholic, kleptomaniac, or pervert… but that’s usually it. A group of people will have all of the above and more. Assuming any group will be made up of only mature, self controlling, and civilized people is wide eyed. Put bluntly… it’s stupid. So we can expect governments, corporations, etc… to have all the flaws people have. This leads us to conclude that people in groups must be controlled at least as harshly as individuals.

Sadly the modern paradigm is that groups have distributed blame so people in them avoid punishment. Individuals, however, are held to the law by an iron fist. The result of this paradigm is that groups allow their ids to go wild. Even as individuals without the protection of a group are punished severely. That’s why corporations get billion dollar fines but no one is punished, politicians get away with the most heinous of crimes, bureaucrats lie under oath as part of the job description, courts seek juristocrasy, and even HOAs become little tyrannies. Because groups are people who are protected from punishment. The answer to this perverse incentive is to hold people in groups responsible for the actions of those groups. That’s the corrective action that would solve our human nature predicament.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, Law, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

Knowledge if history is a good thing,
Often much wisdom does it bring,
Single payer healthcare,
A government corporate affair,
Because these are songs that fascist sing.

The UK elites are irked and wear a pout,
Tired of being called an oikophobic lout,
So they wisely act,
To right the fact,
Arresting truthers to remove all doubt.

A government corrupt as a corpse,
False flags are the goal of course,
Whitmer’s kidnapping,
FBI entrapping,
Someone set a pipe bomb without remorse.

Vilifying and censoring by calling speech hate,
Taking out of context and redirecting fate,
It came out of a hat,
What to do now that,
Atheism is the established religion of the state.

There once was a corporatist with a _____,
He was a self-loathing sort of a _____,
Saying with a smile,
Do you like my style,
And head first into a spike he ____.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in business, economy, Group Politics, Law, philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

There once was a place called the surveillance state,
Order enforced by mic, camera, and gate,
Pressure grows vast,
Released in a blast,
And the despots end up in a cardboard crate.

Rent seeking is quite legit,
A way to enrich the unfit,
Here’s the rub,
It’s a big club,
But you and I aren’t in it.

The insanity is building up zest,
Nutty people doing their best,
But what’s this,
A crazy priss,
And one flew over the cuckoos nest.

No need to worry or think for yourself,
Elites will do it for a good little elf,
Just follow along,
Singing a song,
And put your humanity on a high shelf.

There once was a prurient _____,
Who made his money by _____,
A crazy fellow,
Not at all mellow,
And would think for main ______.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in media, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Reciprocating Loyalty

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, alienating one’s allies while empowering one’s enemies is a sub-optimal strategy for success. The Wormtongues of the world have an uncanny ability to get into the ear. Their verbal poison is as seductive as it is deadly. Even as those who would keep one on the correct path are vilified, marginalized, and finally tossed aside. In the life of Dion, after a great struggle and meting out great mercy… he entrusted the wrong people. Those wrong people opened the door for Dionysius, who meted out unmerciful horror. The Romans thought they had a fast friend in Attila the Hun. He was, after all, raised as a Roman. Their trust was shattered when he showed up at the gates of Rome with a Hun army. History, pragmatism, and good old common sense all agree that trusting the wrong people is disastrous.

There are general rules for life. If one seeks to play a game over and over again, he or she must behave in ways that allow the game to be played over and over. Certain rules must be followed to stay among the elite. In both paradigms, however, those rules go out the window when one party only wants to play once… and win. In this case, trust becomes a liability. Since the game is only being played once… the player who knows this doesn’t need to follow rules that allow more games, because it’s a one game paradigm. Such people epitomize Tolkien’s Wormtongue. They have no scruples, don’t limit their actions, and are focused on one thing. The rules most of us take for granted when interacting with others then don’t apply. Pragmatically then, this changes the game.

Pragmatism is the philosophy of doing what works. The pragmatist looks at the past and judges what has worked and what has failed. Then he or she applies what has worked. In the past giving power to a friend has often resulted in victory. Alexander and his generals for example. The pragmatist also avoids doing what has failed in the past. Dion’s forgiving of his enemies and giving them power proved disastrous. A crime against humanity not only for him but for the whole city of Syracuse. So… that’s probably something that should be avoided. An idealist, on the other hand, believes that just because something hasn’t worked that doesn’t mean it won’t work. That kind of person might hand the keys to the kingdom to a known traitor to garner loyalty, while alienating his friends.

Loyalty is hard to get and easy to lose. Moreover, loyalty must be reciprocated. There was a time in America when men who worked for a company had loyalty for that company. They believed in the products their company produced because they produced them. There was during the 1940’s-1950’s a belief that companies had loyalty for the worker. During the 1970s when corporations began offshoring jobs, those same workers felt stabbed in the back. Years of loyalty had been returned with a layoff notice just before retiring. Corporations reaped what they sowed. The result is that today no one is loyal to the firm they work for. Just as businesses are seldom loyal to their employees. This has created a huge inefficiency in the system. It all started by the disloyalty of the employers.

An executive would be wise then to empower only those who can be trusted, keep out of power those who cannot be trusted, and reciprocate the loyalty he or she expects. Maybe in an idealist paradise the disloyal can be rewarded without harm, but in the world of causes and effects, such actions are tantamount to self destruction. Moreover, as loyal allies fall away and disloyal enemies gain power, that leader becomes increasingly subject to the Wormtongues. People who are a Trojan Horse. This paradigm is at work even in games where the participants seek to play multiple iterations… but in a game where one or more seek total victory, rules don’t apply. The leader who alienates friends, rewards enemies, and returns loyalty with a slap in the face… is doomed by his own hand.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

Inequality is the watchword of the day,
Self appointed despots make them pay,
We do it for you,
Then crush us too,
Because Pareto curves their plans away.

As we’re watched from behind a curtain,
Prurient voyeurs watch every person,
On a high horse,
Hidden of course,
Projecting guilt on us makes them certain.

Looky close and you will see,
The UK has become a tyranny,
With id’s strong,
Better go along,
Else they’ll do away with thee.

Tommy Robinson makes the leftists blue,
He tells them things they already knew,
Exposing hypocrisy,
They hate him you see,
For attacking the elite instead of you.

There once was a man from DC,
He watched us from behind a _____,
Is he MI6,
A kooky kix,
Or a egotist hypocrite with a brain ______.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, Law, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Hubris Leads To Destruction

Dear Friends,

It seems the acme of hubris to me, for someone to think they should take over that which they could never have created. We see this in armed robbery, hostile takeovers, and nationalizations. When someone who was unable to create a thing usurps control they always run it into the ground. This is true judged pragmatically and historically. Historically, close to 50% of lottery winners have filed for bankruptcy within 5 years of winning. Many go on to have great lives, but that huge number of people who turn a windfall into a liability can’t be ignored. When Spain became richer than rich from looting Aztec gold the nation became indolent and then indigent. Logically, when someone gets a thing they didn’t create, the learning curve is steep, and the incentive to climb it is weak.

We all look at the role of others and mock them. Heck, I could be a CEO, says the janitor. Even as the CEO says, if I were a janitor I would do five times the work of those layabouts. This is because we see our labor close at hand and the efforts of others at a distance. We personally feel the sweat run from our brow into our eyes. That sting lets us know we work harder than anyone else. Others struggle under great mental weight. With no time for anything but conniving, struggling, and winning… whether or a corporation, nation, or their own start up, they believe everyone else is an anchor. This is why we see our ourselves as heroes and others as lazy. This absolutely natural mindset leads us to think we can run that corporation, nation, or firm much better than them.

That arrogant mindset of superiority to that which we are ignorant of leads many to seize control. Why should that idiot be allowed to run a firm that has so much importance to us? Forget he built it himself, his politics, ethics, or choices disqualify him… or her. So those with the political favor usurp power over the state, a corporation, or the entire economy. It’s bad enough when a half-witted third generation industrialist is handed the keys to an empire, then set themselves to obliterating it with every foolish decision they make. How much worse is it when someone saturated with the Dunning Kruger Effect seizes control of an entire economy? The first harms the workers, shareholders, executives, and themselves… the second destroys an entire nation of people.

Thrasymachus said law serves the strong against the weak. Put another way, law serves he who wields it, not justice. Postmodernists accept this as canon and have concluded from it then that they should wield power at all costs. Usurping everything they see is the natural consequence of that attitude. Postmodernists, however, are not the only ones to follow Thrasymachus’ code. History is replete with examples, Tamerlane, Genghis Khan, and Lenin are but three of them. The outcome must be the destruction of the seized property. No matter whether that property is a wad of money, corporation, or a national economy. The arrogant usurp then destroy everything they see, This destruction keeps a lid on how much or how fast and economy, philosophy, or science can grow.

As economies, corporations, and even science itself are usurped, they are destroyed… by those ill equipped to control them. So we could conclude that the more usurpation is allowed, unpunished, or encouraged, the lower will be the standard of living, rate of scientific advancement, and economic growth. Because the rate of destruction gets close to or exceeds the rate of expansion. If the predilection of the arrogant to seize that which they are unfit to run, is mitigated by law, custom, and culture, the rate of growth in all areas of life will increase, as a natural consequence of less destruction. So it behooves us to limit the ability of the arrogant to usurp that which they are unfit to run. To do otherwise is an act of self-destruction.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

There once was a deep stater Chris Wray,
He lied about how many were there that day,
Jan 6th insurrection,
Was a FBI inspection,
And he deserves to be indicted so let’s pray.

Who’s in charge these insane days,
Making decisions that are the craze,
Hiding from fame,
What’s his name,
He is usually called General Malaise.

There once was a corruptocacy called the UN,
As filthy and disease ridden as an old pigpen,
Scheming at night,
Conniving bright,
Dedicated to making the world a dystopian fen.

Heartlessness has no defense,
A soul that’s not worth a pence,
Lacking foresight,
Only want to fight,
And with a skull that’s incredibly dense.

The deep state’s above the law you _____,
Its members are corrupt and utterly ______,
It seeks to rule the world,
Leaving humanity knurled,
And without a whit of shame or ________.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Law, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment