Dear Friends,
It seems to me, a government that keeps track of every penny we make, but can’t keep track of a single penny it spends, must be dedicated to spending not improving the standard of living. This is made clear by the enormous amounts of fraud being discovered around the US. From Minnesota “Learing” centers to Californian day cares, billions in fraud is being handed out. Meanwhile, the legislature in California proves it’s on the side of the fraudsters not the taxpayers, by passing the “Stop Nick Shirley Act.” A law specifically to protect those committing fraud from the prying eyes of the public. This shows the government sees its role as extracting wealth from the nation to hand to those it favors. Obviously, this can go on until the wealth is all extracted, then the system will collapse.
The money extracted from you is taken at gunpoint. If you don’t believe that, try not paying taxes and see if armed men don’t show up at your door. They will and the consequences can be mortal if the interaction goes wrong. Ask Edward and Elaine Brown. They “leared” the hard way. Since tax money is extracted at the point of a gun, you would think they would spend that robber’s largess, judiciously. On the other hand, human nature being what it is, to reduce cognitive dissonance at robbing people, the bureaucrats might dislike us. To align their feelings with their actions. Then it makes sense they would squander that money as a way to disrespect us. Since their actions might make them hate us. This brings us to consequences. Will there be any for this clear violation of the public’s trust?
The billions in fraud are no longer in question. The question is if the federal government will do anything about it. You can be sure there will be bluster and maybe some people could be called before a congressional panel to be yelled at, but that’s where it will end. Wouldn’t you have liked to be yelled at for DUI, instead of losing your license for a year, berated rather than put in a drunk tank, or belittled before an audience as opposed to going to jail? Every day ordinary people face far more serious consequences for far less serious crimes. Your penalty for reaching across the counter in a bank and stealing 10 bucks would be far worse than for an elite that steals billions. I wonder if it depends on who the victim is? Steal from the elite and law is merciless, steal from the poor and it doesn’t care.
More to the point, steal from those with political favor and the machine of government goes into overdrive, steal from those without political favor and the machine stays idle. The taxpayer for example. Fraudsters steal directly from the guy and gal who gets up before dawn to work a ten hour day. That person today is a slave for the fraudsters for the first three months of every year. Swindlers have enforcers in the form of police who will shoot you for non-compliance. This makes the government itself an agent of the fraudsters. Nothing proves the point more than passing laws to protect the fraudsters. All of this builds an obvious and undeniable double standard. A double standard where the money of those stealing from taxpayers is inviolate but taxpayers are but mules.
Very few things infuriate people more than an obvious double standard. The same state government that regulates every aspect of their citizens lives, and hands out billions in embezzlement money, passed a law forbidding citizens from exposing it. While that law is a blatant violation of our First Amendment Right to free speech, I suspect that will not be an issue for the courts. In post constitutional America such things are ever unripe, laches, or moot. So the double standard will go on. The taxpayer will face the barrel of a gun while the fraudster faces a life of opulence. Protected by the same government that is merciless to the taxpayer. Meanwhile, that government forces you to self-report your personal papers in direct violation of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments… so politically favored fraudsters can get rich.
Sincerely,
John Pepin
