Limericks – Cooking Up Absurdity

Dear Friends,

When the citizen is hated by their own government,
Crimes against humanity become overly frequent,
Aborted and replaced,
Culture is defaced,
As the odds of civil war are buoyed by resentment.

People propagandized with news prefabbed,
Speaking their minds without being nabbed,
What culture shock,
In an argyle sock,
They can walk around without being stabbed.

Democrats may be lower than sod,
Beating their base with an iron rod,
But they’ve an ace,
They win the race,
Because of their friend vote fraud.

If it’s crime that we want to stop,
Safe streets you just can’t top,
Send an angry email,
But nothing will fail,
Like a crazy Karen keystone cop.

To our cries the elites’ ears are deaf,
Eyes opened by playing without a ___,
Living by fraud,
Thinking they’re ___,
Cooking up absurdity like a sous ____.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Societal Myth | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Limericks – In The Abstraction

Dear Friends,

Central planning fails the masses,
Starving us in rose colored glasses,
Convincing extraction,
Is losing traction,
And shows the elites are naught but asses.

If you see crime in the EU better stay silent,
They’ll jail you unless you remain compliant,
Cry in your tissue,
It’s not an issue,
If you’re a pedophile cannibal Epstein client.

Some people can observe a lovely flower,
Examining the structure remaining dour,
But something’s amiss,
The blind materialists,
They don’t see its beauty and Godly power.

Though your life may seem like a bog,
Bumping and rolling along like a log,
But happiness does await,
With a blessed playmate,
Because there’s nothing as great as a dog.

Central planning becomes ___________,
Where elites are above the law’s _______,
Utterly _______,
Blind atheist,
And experiencing life in the abstraction.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Impregnable Redoubt of Our Courts

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the first thing despots pervert is the judicial system. From that vantage point, they can usurp power bit by bit. Moreover, anyone who questions a judge is immediately slandered and possibly imprisoned. This is because the legal systems in every nation on Earth have no effective oversight. In Brazil the courts have arbitrary rule. In the EU courts overrule the political system and the will of the people daily. Meanwhile in the US the Alex Jones trial and Jan 6th abuse under color of law proves that the US court system is utterly corrupt stem to stern. No place on this planet can someone expect a fair and unbiased trial. Why? People are people, everyone is self-interested, therefore no one is capable of rendering justice, only self-interested opinions.

Law is the manifestation of the State’s morality. That which the State deems immoral the State outlaws. The justification is always the public good. However, the reality is always that it serves some private interest. If it’s illegal to collect rainwater you can bet someone benefits from that law. Otherwise no one would have proposed it, nor would anyone have worked to push it through. People are too lazy to work for nothing. There is an old story of a king who put a gold coin under a stumbling rock in the road. Then he waited for someone to move the rock. No one did. The coin sat there under the rock because unless there is profit, people don’t act. The same is true of lawmakers. They don’t act unless there is profit in acting. Therefore every law must benefit those who pushed it through.

The courts then take those self-serving laws and enforce them. Doing so normalizes exploitative law. To minimize cognitive dissonance those in the judicial branch grow to despise the people they are tasked with abusing. This is because if we do something bad to someone else, even if by accident, we must align our actions with our mental picture of ourselves, or them… so we change our mental picture of them. We are good people, so they must be bad people since we did something bad to them. Otherwise, doing something bad to an innocent would make us bad people… and that’s just not possible. So the people in the judicial system whose job it is to abuse grow into the role of abuser. This facilitates the perversion of the legal system to the devices of would-be tyrants.

Normalcy bias works in the general population as well as the courts. Moreover, people resist change because each change represents a little death, and the work it takes to replace it. People like consistency. So we could say that people expect things to remain the same, and they actively work to keep it the same. Each step a State takes to becoming exploitative is then locked in by this process. It becomes more normal for the State to exploit, extract, and abuse. Those doing the extracting resist change due to normalcy bias and desire for consistency. Plus the people themselves learn to expect extraction, exploitation, and abuse. Even if we don’t recognize it consciously, we understand it innately and in the collective unconscious. Nevertheless, we hope there is some justice.

People expect the courts to mete out justice. It’s normalcy bias. That means we give courts the benefit of the doubt. The same courts that refuse us that benefit. Add to this the fact that courts are the final arbiter of any question. Law enforcement may be an Executive function but they are beholden to the judicial branch. If a politician gets in the way, he or she can be punished. This eliminates all oversight. The news illustrates that in industrialized countries the political system has become much weaker than the judicial system. This makes the court system the ideal vehicle to launch an attack on any nation and people. It’s an impregnable redoubt with unlimited firepower. Therefore, a faction lacking ethics, humanity, and control of the legal system will get unlimited power. This is obvious… if you look.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Judicial Sysytem | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks – A Dour World

Dear Friends,

The elite know just how you felt,
Their policies left a great big welt,
But the world is at stake,
There’s less pie to take,
So you’ll just have to tighten your belt.

Healthcare is all about physical wellness,
Making people well is their core business,
But something’s awry,
They fail and then cry,
Since the system’s contracted a mental illness.

The elites are still chanting revolution and fight,
Globalist elitists who do rule by guile and might,
A strange anachronism,
An elitist progressivism,
They stay left as the rest of the world moves right.

Once extraction is the role of government,
Redistributing it to those of political bent,
Laws become liquid,
Enforcement insipid,
And that state is what’s called demon sent.

As the extracted from get more ____,
And the elite get more crazy _____,
Smash the old ______,
For global progressivism,
Until everyone on the planet is dour.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Swindle of Socialism

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the deep problem with socialism and all its offspring is the foundational lie, that everyone can be indigent and rich at the same time. This is an example of what I call a glittering lie. A lie that is obvious but is so attractive it is believed anyway. A mundane example is when we buy a new car and think that it will make us happy. We know that in the long term it won’t, and indeed the payments could make our lives harder, but the idea is so attractive. Socialism is a glittering lie in this way. I suspect even the most ardent socialist knows in his or her heart that it can’t work, but they so want it to that they can’t help themselves. They are drawn to that foundational lie, like a moth to a bug zapper. The idea that one can loll about all day and at the same time be wealthy is quite magnetic.

A lie is a lie no matter how glittering or how much one wants it to be true. That is the reality of how swindles are done. Just as water seeks low ground, people seek easy money. If that were not the case, there would never be a pig in a poke, shell game, or a need for a bunco squad. The mark wants money for nothing, so loses the little money he or she does have. They lose it to someone who is working to get money for nothing. The swindler exploits the mark’s greed against him. They work hard to provide nothing. The same game is being played in the case of socialism. The socialist who seeks to run the despotism is exploiting the greed of the marks who throw themselves on bombs to usher in a new golden age. Maybe one that will last a thousand years.

The worker who picks up a hammer to smash is a mark in the socialist game. They have fallen for the foundational lie. The notion that indigence can lead to wealth. All the future layabout need do is smash the machine of wealth creation, then everyone will be rich. Nothing makes more sense than that! Yet it has always resulted in near universal poverty, not prosperity. Nevertheless, those who run the despotic machine of extraction that is socialism live like kings. Even in North Korea. There the apparatchiks are at the top of Pareto’s economic curve. Their high life is due to political favor, not merit, hard work, or entrepreneurship. This exposes the foundational lie of socialism, yet those who fall for it are blind to the example, and those who would be the apparatchiks adore that foundational lie.

Swindlers, like socialists, will go to great lengths to provide nothing for money. Such people eschew productive work for the swindle. This is probably for a myriad of reasons. Some possibly just like to pull it over on others, the thrill of a con, what they see as easy money, power, etc. A con artist will work so hard setting up a game that the same effort, applied legitimately, would make them filthy rich… instead of just filthy. This means the harder working, smarter, and heartless the swindler the higher they will go. The same is true of a socialist. It’s like Game of Thrones. That’s a swindle where most of the cons and patsies die horribly. This is because there can only be one Stalin, Mao, or Hitler. The foundational lie then is the bait they use to exploit human weakness.

This makes socialism a pig in a poke con. The socialist sells a bag with a squirming entity inside. He or she tells us it’s a piglet, but we can’t look… it might escape. So we buy it for supper. When we get it home we find it was a stray cat. So we go hungry as the swindler eats a nice meal. We are told that if we fight to give them unlimited power, we will eat for free. Then, once they have power, the marks go hungry as the socialists eat a nice meal. That is the nature of socialism. It’s sold on a glittering foundational lie, the notion that one can be indigent and wealthy at the same time. The truth is that only the political class will be indigent and wealthy… the rest will starve. This makes socialism a swindle. The leaders are the swindlers and the people are the patsies. Are you a patsy in their game?

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Mercy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks – Hearts Of Tin

Dear Friends,

Totalitarians demand our submission,
Surrendering to their ids’ commission,
There’s distributed blame,
It’s a self-delusion game,
Where they give each other permission.

The planners work diligently sending emails,
Managing the economy with an eye to details,
But complexity is tough,
It teaches us stuff,
Just as the Fed proves central planning fails.

I usually shop at the local Walmart,
Using the squeaky shopping cart,
It maybe the gin,
But I do fit in,
And me think me is pretty smart.

Such evil in the world we cannot ken,
It happens to us over and over again,
Central planning begets,
As bureaucracy abets,
And it makes monsters of mortal men.

Many people desire to mortally sin,
Exploiting the system from ______,
No self-awareness,
Plenty of __________,
As bureaucracy makes hearts of ___.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Moral Ownership

Dear Friends,

If I make a stone ax from a rock I find, cordage I twist, and a handle I hew… who is justly entitled to that ax? Central planners would argue that the moment it is created it becomes their property. That same argument was used by kings and emperors back in the day. It’s called the rights of kings. The Enlightenment did two things. It decimated the power of the Church and it obliterated the legitimacy of kings by falsifying appeal to authority. Today the term appeal to authority has been perverted to appeal to illegitimate authority. As if there are experts we should never question. Those same people argue to the head of a pin that the stone ax I made in a state of nature is their property. Rationalizing it as the needs of the many overrule the needs of the few. But is that just?

Are we entitled to the products of our own hands or are we indeed slaves to a king, despot, or bureaucracy? The definition of a slave is someone who is not entitled to the product of his or her own labor. They are property whose production belongs to another. Just as the output of a mechanical loom is the property of the owner of that loom. So we can reverse this chain of logic. If someone else owns your production, you are their slave. This is proven further if they control your body. If you are forced to take a shot they demand regardless of your thoughts, someone else controls your body. The fact that they allow you to keep some of your labor isn’t proof of freedom, it’s proof of manipulation. The central planners that run the world today assume the position and so rights of kings.

The Rights of Kings was a theory that the king had his power as the intention of God himself. This perverted Christianity and blasphemed at the same time… how very efficient. To illustrate the results of always getting what you want… I am reminded of the Simpsons. Homer was getting everything he prayed for, and so became arrogant. Then he began making demands of God. Justifying the sins of pride, greed, lust, envy, wrath, gluttony, and sloth (the lifestyles of royalty, elites, and despots) in the name of God is the purest form of blaspheming. So central planners both claim God doesn’t exist as they assume the rights of kings by popular vote. Then rig elections, ban opponents, and choose who can run. This ensures they have the rights of kings without the religious baggage. Language is their domain.

Central planners then changed “appeal to authority” to “appeal to illegitimate authority,” inserting the spurious notion that some authorities are above questioning. Legitimate authorities then must not be questioned… they are the experts, the professionals, and the science. Regardless of what the central planners say, no matter how absurd, they must not be questioned. They are the legitimate authorities that are above questioning. Just as kings and the Church were back in the day. This is because those who assume the rights of kings cannot be questioned, or else their authority will evaporate away. Central planners are like the driver who puts his car in the ditch, then complains a tree jumped out in front of him. Their hubris and arrogance are only matched by their ineptitude.

All this warping of logic, morals, and ethics is so that some can take from others and call it just. Kings called it the rights of kings. The Church called it the will of God. Today, central planners claim rule by experts is in everyone’s best interest… so submit. In most cases kings produced disasters. It was the rare king who did good for his kingdom. The same holds true for despots and central planners. If the ratio of failures to successes holds, then we can expect central planning to produce poverty, chaos, and war, while the central planners get rich doing it. Of over seventy-five Roman Emperors, only five were considered “good emperors” by Edward Gibbon. So far central planning has yielded even worse results. So I ask again, if you made that ax… who would it belong to?

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in economy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

In your stocking there will be coal,
Be hungry nothing’s in your bowl,
The government needs it,
We’re ruled by half wit,
Who put the whole world on our dole.

Their morals move like an ethics capo,
With the destructive power of a tornado,
Tyrannizing skillfully,
Self-blind willfully,
Let’s just call ’em our little Gestapo.

They say demographics cuts like a knife,
Nowadays women don’t want to be a wife,
A lonely existence,
But with persistence,
Progressives sold women on the slut life.

When you see them you think they are joshing,
Their arrogance and ignorance are just exhausting,
Captured by an idea,
More complex than Ikea,
Turns out Progressivism is the result of brain washing.

There just isn’t enough to go around,
To the elite the last of it is _____,
Give up on family,
Have no _________,
And fight for scraps with the _____.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

Changing the curriculum with a nudge and a wink,
Indoctrinating the children to be as hot as a mink,
Force ideology on us,
Truth ruins consensus,
Because socialism needs people too stupid to think.

Realists believe only what they see and can link,
Complexity throws us curves and is often a fink.
An asp’s kiss,
So know this,
Intangibles are often more important than we think.

Universities despoiled their reputations replete,
Selling useless degrees a scam you cant beat,
Student despairs,
Wisdom declares,
You should never poop where you cook and eat.

Something dark lay under the world you see,
Epstein, Fauci and validated conspiracy theory,
Lies to the sun,
Can trust no one,
It’s the outcome of central planning apparently.

Education is now indoctrination you see,
Just as materialists have minds not ____,
Soiling their _____,
In a bad mood,
But think they’re better than you and __.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Mercy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Reality, Criticism, Agreeableness, and Absurdity

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, to take a rattlesnake and put it in your bed in hopes it will become a child, is common today. When a person is disconnected from reality, they can believe anything. This is because reality can no longer correct them. Moreover, if many people believe it, most will go along out of agreeableness. There have even been studies showing this to be true. When a test subject is surrounded by actors, and the actors answered a question in a way that was obviously not true, the subject went along most of the time. This shows we have a strong tendency to go along to get along, even when we know the group is wrong. So an agreeable person will gladly put a rattlesnake in his or her bed… then wake astonished at the mortal snakebite.

When people are isolated from criticism and reality, they become free to believe anything. It’s criticism that grounds us. This is the prickly part, criticism, to have effect must contain a kernel of truth. When I was a child in school, I was picked on for having greasy hair. That motivated me to take more showers to eliminate that avenue of criticism. It worked. If your hair is not greasy, calling it greasy has no meaning, no power. Criticism then has the ability to motivate people to better themselves. Those who live in rural areas have no choice but to engage with reality on a regular basis. It snows so we have to shovel, drive to work on icy roads, do something useful for a living, and maintain a home that wants nothing more than to collapse around our heads and ears. That is contact with reality.

The person who lives in an ivory tower has all those things done for them. They need never contact the reality of life. That’s why the elite can claim they can smell us. It’s because we sweat. Those who never lift a finger never perspire. They are utterly disconnected from reality. This gives them a mindset of superiority. We only see the problems with their plans, they see the potential. There’s an oft repeated story about when the Obama administration took over GM. Elites went to the executives and laid out the ideal car. When told it violated the laws of thermodynamics the officials responded, We have the House, Senate, and Presidency, we can repeal those laws… There is nothing more corrosive of common sense then lack of criticism and living in an ivory tower.

Regular people have a strong motivation to go along to get along. The Asch Conformity Studies concluded that about 75% of people went along at least once with a lie and about 25% never went along. This means that people tend to follow the crowd. Then again, that is an adage for a reason. So, if the leaders of society make absurd claims, about 75% of people will be strongly motivated to go along and 25% will balk. Here’s the problem, it only takes around 20% of a population that is zealous, to control that population. In Nazi Germany at its height, only around 15-20% were actual Nazis. The rest went along to get along. They were epitomized by Sergeant Schultz in the sitcom Hogan’s Heroes. This tells us that it only takes a small amount of people to embrace absurdity, to foist it on the rest.

Sergeant Schultz woke up one morning to find a rattlesnake in his bed. The snake isn’t his enemy, it’s where it shouldn’t be. The people that put it there are merely stupid. Moreover, we are “obligated” to follow the dictates of those who live in ivory towers. Kings used to justify their rule by saying, if it wasn’t the will of God that I rule, then I wouldn’t rule. Our modern philosopher kings, bureaucrats, politicians, and other elites, claim their wealth, power, and education proves they are the most fit to rule, the same argument dressed in atheist garments. This brings us back to where we began, it’s absurd to put a rattlesnake in your bed expecting it to become a child, but not to someone disconnected from reality and above criticism, nor to someone who goes along to get along.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment