Creamy and the Central Banks

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the governments of the world are at the point where there is less and less wealth to extract, just as they need to extract more and more. This engine of extraction can only run until the fuel (the wealth of the nation) is spent… then that engine must stall. Once that happens, an economy that runs on extraction instead of production collapses. Zombie companies kept undead by government largesse turn to dust. This wipes away huge gobs of well-paying jobs. All because the fuel runs out. The thing about running out of fuel is that once it becomes apparent, many people will speed up… burning their remaining fuel at a higher rate. This may seem to be a suboptimal solution from our perspective, but in such cases emotion overrides logic.

I once had a guy working for me as a subcontractor. They called him Creamy. I suppose because he liked creamies. They were laying out a floor deck with 2 X 10s. The crew had set several up on their spots but hadn’t nailed them down. Creamy came along with 3 of them on his shoulder. We tried to warn him, but he was rushing. He stepped on the first one and it flipped out from under his foot. He darted to the second, which also shot out from under him. In a panic now, Creamy jumped to the last one… it flipped. Down he went 8 feet to a concrete floor with all the 2 X 10s landing across his back. I was shocked. He popped up like Inspector Clouseau and laughed it off. He always did. Our central banks are where Creamy was at the third loose 2 X 10. I bet they won’t laugh this fall off, though.

The reasons to extract are as myriad as the means to extract. Zombie companies require huge infusions of money extracted from living companies. This seems to make sense to the extractors since those firms employ so many people and at such high wages that their fall would lower GDP. Fraud becomes prevalent in an extractive system. Olson’s theory of The Logic of Collective Action tells us that the fraudsters will politic hard to maintain the fraud… while the people defrauded don’t have the incentive to fight back. Meanwhile, every penny spent can be justified by lowering the poverty rate (whether it does or not), saving children (even when it endangers them), and fighting hate (especially when it promotes hate). This perverse incentive is why extractive systems always need revenue.

The same system that hands out trillions in grift, waste, and fraud keeps track of every penny you and I earn. Their wrath should you or I keep an extra penny is boundless. Extractors’ wrath is asymmetric, as their forgiveness of fraudsters, grifters, and criminals is limitless. Birds of a feather, I suppose. Such a double standard is only understandable in the context of an extractive system. If extraction is the goal, then fighting that extraction would be the ultimate offense. Exploiting the extraction is simply the natural consequence. That’s why people, NGOs, and foreigners who steal from the taxpayer get a pass… until a Nick Shirley comes along exposing the game. A self-unaware extractive state would even pass laws to limit exposure of its crimes. They keep it up even as the extractable wealth runs out.

Systems go from production to extraction because central planning requires extraction while production requires distributed planning. The elites love power so prefer central planning and thus become extractors. Extractors justify their extraction by claiming it’s for the children, to save democracy, or some such cliché. Then they use that extracted money to do the opposite, out of stupidity, generally, not malice. The result is often the same. Cipolla’s outcome for the elites differs… the stupid are ruined and the malevolent are benefited. Nevertheless, our governments are wide-eyed and on the last 2 X 10, while it flips under their feet. They’re in panic mode and so have little ability to think logically. Soon they’ll drop and land on a concrete floor. Prepare your nest accordingly.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in economy | Tagged | Leave a comment

Limericks – Epitomizing Stupidity

Dear Friends,

There’s a reason people fight for a seat,
Those left standing go hungry in defeat,
Extracting’s a biz,
Their philosophy is,
Everything created belongs to the elite.

Browsing the comments of late,
Strong feelings are felt but wait,
The story’s not in,
But through the din,
The responses are filled with hate.

The mechanical loom would be the death of us all,
Technology and innovation can only bring a fall,
Buggy whip weavers and Ford,
While sacred cows get gored,
Raising our standard of living and the elites’ gall.

The stupid as Bonhoeffer once wisely said,
Are numerous certain and dangerous wed,
Harming themselves,
And everyone else,
But it turns out they’re just daft in the head.

A black hole of greed is the _____,
Their want is good all else is ____,
They envy us,
In an ivory ___,
As elites epitomize stupidity mate.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Mercy | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Rusting the Razor Wire

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, governments have a tendency to keep things that are dangerous away from us. That they are dangerous is the justification for every gun law on the books. Many chemicals are banned from public use due to how dangerous they can be. So I don’t find it at all surprising that many elites want to keep AI from the public. Not all elites… there are factions within the elite as there always are. Some want to capitalize on it, while others want it all for themselves, and every position in between. The CCP wants AI as a weapon of world domination, while Elon Musk wants open-sourced AI for the masses. These are two of the opposing positions. Nevertheless, AI is treated as a weapon. If it weren’t there would be no export controls on it. So at some point there will be a move to restrict it from us.

A weapon need not be a knife or gun… it can be sharp wit. The knife and gun are fallbacks should the wit fail. Wit, then is a weapon of intellect or thought. AI is a tool that leverages thought. So AI could be considered a wit weapon like a sling is a kinetic weapon. Moreover, wit isn’t the only intellectual weapon. The human species traded tooth, muscle, and claw for intellect. That trade has served us well in that we have become the only species that I know of that doesn’t live in ecological perfect competition. Intelligence broke the paradigm. That is why the elite believe AI is a weapon. It is the sling that can throw our ideas much farther and with more force than we ever could by hand. AI could be the sling in the hands of the little guy to be used against the Goliaths of the world.

Weapons of intelligence are very handy in the wild and under conditions of ecological perfect competition but excel in social settings where there are rules much like chess. In a state of nature one need only think a few steps ahead, but in matters of politics thinking many steps ahead while cornering one’s opponent matters. This means that AI can gives an advantage to those who wield it by increasing their ability to think more steps ahead. The flip side of the coin is that those who would manipulate must work all that much harder to keep their games hidden from their marks’ AIs. This logic also applies to corporations and states. Those who would manipulate us then would want AI to help them while keeping it from their would-be marks. People being people, some will exploit AI for crimes.

This brings me to a possible Hegelian manipulation. I’m not saying anyone is plotting this but if it happens remember: it has all the earmarks of a plot… What if there was an incident where some individual used AI to trigger a widespread emotional reaction? The person could be a patsy. The emotional reaction could be ridden by those who would restrict AI from us to regulation restricting our use of AI… keeping it to themselves. Only those with an authorized, State approved use could have access to unrestricted AI. These regulations and laws would of course be sold to us as being in our best interest. Take, for example the laws restricting ownership of weapons for public safety. Let’s face it, people will exploit AI to defraud and such, terrorism is a political crime done for politics.

In a new world order where there is a global government, AI could rust the razor wire. People are largely corralled by perception, not guns and knives. Guns and knives are used to give us the perception of being corralled. A weapon like AI could corrode that perception as fast as it’s established. That’s sufficient reason for globalists to oppose AI. So be on the lookout for a Hegelian game to be played on us. If it is, all opposing viewpoints will be slandered. Then there are those who believe AI is an existential threat to their livelihood. Despite the fact AI will increase demand for their services and lower their workload… (via the price/demand curve), their perception is what’s important. People spend money to get a return: a product, service, or leverage. Watch who spends to keep AI from us.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in International Power | Leave a comment

Limericks – Hypocrites Don’t Care

Dear Friends,

Convince men of absurdity,
With the media’s obscurity,
Smoke and curtain,
Once they’re certain,
Then they’ll commit atrocity.

Deep state Cornyn is a wet fish,
Permanent power was his wish,
But voters said no,
It’s past time to go,
Losing the power he does so cherish.

Governments like to make the scene,
Pretending to be a goodness machine,
But cuss and fuss,
I’ll never again trust,
The liars who sold Covid and the vaccine.

Marxists are always angrily on the attack,
Outraged that society is so out of whack,
Raised fist,
Know this,
When a socialist points three point back.

Atrocity doesn’t come out of ________,
The elites’ wrath with sharp teeth ____,
Liars and cons,
Making us ______,
And of us the hypocrites just don’t care.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Mercy | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks – Lies and Stuff

Dear Friends,

Many in Iceland think it’s a new day,
They barely voted the wolves away,
But there will be another,
Till elites get their druther,
Because slaves don’t really have a say.

The UN is portrayed as plutonic,
A friend healthy as a nice tonic,
Actions belay,
Intentions betray,
But in truth the UN is demonic.

The elites simply think we are dumb,
So they keep us under their thumb,
But they do project,
Their own sins detect,
Because the elites really are just scum.

Language evolves to be more simple,
But democrats have put in a dimple,
One word becomes three,
Cast in obscurity,
Since to them everything is but a symbol.

To some no is just never ______,
They snarl at us then they _____,
Terrible ______,
Evil is gleeful,
Manipulating us with lies and stuff.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Societal Myth | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Religion Of Marxism

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, Marxism is a religion in every sense but truth. People worship it as a socio-cultural belief. There are several shrines to Marxism, one is in Highgate, London. People still leave flowers to the man there. Marxism is a totalizing system. Moreover, it has symbols denoting the faith. Marxism bills itself as an anti-Christian alternative. Marxism has Marx as a savior, the proletariat as the chosen people, saints in true believers, capitalist society is the fallen world, heretics in reactionaries, an apocalypse in the Revolution, and even a heaven… a pure communist society. So, by almost every metric, Marxism and by default its offspring, socialism, progressivism, and communism are also religions. Marxism, however, is a materialist religion not a spiritual one.

A materialist religion is one in which there is no promise of an afterlife, punishment for evil, or reward for good. Everything is in the here and now. Therefore, no evil is unthinkable because there cannot be punishment for it. This gives Marxists an advantage against other systems. That advantage is a lack of ethics, morals, and limits. People who believe there will be consequences for evil actions in the afterlife will limit their actions. Meanwhile, someone who don’t have such ideas is limited only by their imaginations. Lenin had his men sneak into a village in the middle of the night and abduct a political enemy. Then they would torture him to death as a message. The only religions with greater leverage over terror than Marxism are those who literally advocate for inhuman behavior.

There are quite a few shrines to Marxism scattered around the world. One was quite interesting. It was the Georgia Guidestones. While it wasn’t overtly Marxist, it’s message of limited people and unlimited government was. It was destroyed a few years ago but that destruction never generated an arrest. That makes me suspect the people who owned it were involved, for whatever reason. Nevertheless, political systems don’t get shrines built for them… religions do. In this sense you could say that Karl Marx is Marxism’s Happy Buddha, Che Guevara is Marxism’s Angry Buddha, and Lenin is Marxism’s Hungry Buddha. Unlike most, but not all, religions, Marxism is defined by what it hates instead of by what it loves. Marxism and Marxists hate capitalism, Christianity, and populism.

Most religions are defined by what they love. Christianity is defined by the love God has for mankind, and the reciprocal love we should have for God. This is an example of a religion defined by love. Meanwhile, Marxism is defined by what it hates. This is a uniting factor for Marxists. Some people enjoy gathering to lament that which they hate. Many find fraternity in hate. Marxists, and indeed communists, socialists, and progressives all are defined by what they hate. This makes hate a uniting quality of these religions. This doesn’t mean individual Marxists are incapable of love… only that the religious doctrine is antagonistic. Since hate is their primary ethic, they are naturally opposed to any religion of love. The two are polar opposites of each other.

This brings us to why Marxists hate Christianity. Since hate is their primary driver and love is the primary motivator of Christianity, they are naturally opposed on a fundamental level. Christians are called to love their neighbors, family, and enemies. Meanwhile, Marxists are called to hate counter revolutionary neighbors and family members, as well as their enemies. The shrines to Marxism that dot the planet are signs that Marxism is more than a political ideology… it’s a religious system in a political dress. Marxism is difficult to get rid of as a religious system because it’s a materialist system. Violence is not a sin to Marxists… it’s a sacrament. So Marxism is a religion whether or not one admits it. Therefore, if one would fight against it, logic fails, while appeals to emotion and ethics succeed.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in International Power | Leave a comment

Limericks – Sucking Out All The Fat

Dear Friends,

There once was an alliance of might,
Leveled pointed and fired at the right,
An enemy of thine,
Is an enemy of mine,
Later to find that expedient allies bite.

We must treat everyone as a child of God,
But our respect is earned and not bought,
If they’re seeking retribution,
Then reciprocal attribution,
Attending a gunfight unarmed is nothing to laud.

Our elites just want you to know,
They always go with the flow,
Ever flexible,
And detestable,
Wafting as the political winds blow.

Britain was a true empire in every way,
But nowadays it gets poorer every day,
It was awhile ago,
Where did it all go,
Elites taxed and spent the prosperity away.

Birds of a dark feather and all ____,
Clawing down at us like a black ___,
It’s not personal you ___,
It’s profit for the elite,
Until they’ve sucked out all the fat.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

When Irresponsibility Has Power

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, if one can’t be held responsible, one mustn’t have responsibility. Responsibility or authority, invested in someone without accountability or consequences, can only end in disaster. This is because people are people… we are dissimilar in many ways, but in self-interest we’re blood kin. Authority, power, and responsibility all require consequences for unethical behavior and accountability for failure, or else those invested with them will exploit those powers. Saints are few and far between and usually busy themselves with improving the lot of Mankind, rather than living in opulence while lowering it. Moreover, saints hold themselves responsible, accountable, and their conscience applies the consequences. So giving irresponsible people authority gets us disaster and catastrophe.

People who are irresponsible are easily detected. Their lives are a mess, their homes are a disaster, and their relationships are chaos. Moreover, a truly irresponsible person will blame everything and everyone else for their failings. Such people are often a raw nerve. They go from zero to superluminal in one second flat. Often this is a coping mechanism to distract from the criticism that comes their way so often. Other times it’s a means of escaping consequences or accountability. The irresponsible person will do what it takes to escape responsibility. These are ways to pick them out from a crowd. Look for the chaos that surrounds them and you have identified them.

This isn’t to say that irresponsible people are lazy… quite the contrary. Many irresponsible people are very hard workers. This is because responsibility and a work ethic are related but by marriage. I have seen people work their fingers to the bone with terrible results. Such people consume more in inputs than they return in outputs. This is due to their failure to responsibly plan their work and self-correct as they work. They are diligent without diligence. I would also say that simply having the quality of irresponsibility doesn’t make someone a bad person. Often they are scatterbrained but good and decent people. They can’t help it if they cause disaster. No catastrophe caused by their actions is intentional… catastrophe just happens around them.

Irresponsibility generates disaster like a mechanical loom generates cloth… efficiently. Neither of them needs human input, they work on their own. The irresponsible person creates catastrophe as a consequence of daily routine. Often they work very hard to make those catastrophes much worse. Not because they want them worse, but because their irresponsible effort makes everything worse. This brings us back to why irresponsible people should never be allowed to have authority or power of any kind. This isn’t because they are bad people, indeed many are very good folks. It isn’t because they are lazy, many are very hard working. The problem is they’ll wear themselves out making chaos. It’s because they create disaster and catastrophe.

Putting irresponsible people in positions of authority is like taking Sinbad on a sea voyage… it’s not going to end well for the crew. Chaos surrounds them. Possibly the best way to identify irresponsible people is to listen to them. Many openly avow how irresponsible they are. If one can’t be held responsible because of hormones, they indict a whole class of people. where a lawyer gets away with a crime because of ignorance of the law, they’re not just admitting personal irresponsibility, but suggesting all lawyers are by association. When elites claim charging them with a crime is vindictive, for vindictively exploiting law for political purposes, they are exclaiming they are irresponsible. The examples go on and on… look at who’s in charge and remove the irresponsible.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in International Power | Leave a comment

Limericks – Not As Smart As They Think They Are

Dear Friends,

If you look closely I think you’ll find,
Marxists everywhere are in a bind,
A con they’re selling,
It’s worth telling,
That socialism is the enemy of mankind.

Modern women choose to live the Elinore Rigby life,
They have been convinced it’s terrible being a wife,
Then they stand shocked,
It’s not as they thought,
The bloom’s off the rose so solo they play the fife.

France would cancel its debt by fiat and pen,
Their profligate spending has led them to a fen,
Brilliance bask,
But I have to ask,
Who on Earth would loan them money again?

Plato is not known for his cupidity,
He is best recognized by philosophy,
But Dionysius trapped him,
Three times by his whim,
Though smart Plato epitomized stupidity.

The elites are selling a con like a used ___,
It will strand you and it won’t take you ___,
Change reality by edicts,
Tax and spend _______,
But just not as smart as they think they are.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The State Owns You

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the assumption of taxation is that everything belongs to the government, and they allow us to keep some of what we earn out of the goodness of their hearts. If you hew an ax handle from a stick, that ax handle is government property. If they so choose, they can take it or any portion of it. This is premised on the notion that you and I are the property of the State, therefore anything we create is the State’s property by default. They passed a Constitutional amendment to allow the government the right to tax us individually. Wilson said it “Will never touch a hair on a working man’s head.” This shows that our slavery wasn’t the way the U.S. founders set up the government, it’s an innovation from the Progressive Era. Today, we are all the slaves of the government to the degree it decides.

A slave is someone who is owned by another. A person can own a slave as can a corporation, or government. Moreover, a slave can be partially or wholly owned by another as can any other property. So you and I might be 33% slave, more or less, depending on how much tax we have to pay. That 33%, however, is only a perception because for any part of someone to be owned, all of them must be owned. So that hypothetical 33% government ownership of you and I is only part of the government’s ownership of us. The government must own 100% of us to allow us to have back 66%. This allows us to maintain the notion that we are free individuals with agency. This is in fact a fiction. A slave has no agency nor are such people free. We are property.

Property can’t own property. Anything property creates then becomes owned by the owner of that property. If the owner allows the slave to retain some profit from his or her creation, that is at the slave owner’s discretion… not the slave’s. Take for example the output of a loom. Does the loom own the cloth or the owner of the loom? If some of the profit from the cloth is put back into maintaining the loom, that doesn’t mean the loom is a free agent. The production of a machine or slave is the property of the owner of that machine or slave. That is the premise that allows taxation. The citizen is actually a slave of the government. That government then can reduce or elevate the slave as they see fit. In the end, however, we are still and always slaves to those in government.

Ownership and property are states of mind and a state of mind is not reality. This means that a human being can only be owned in mind and not reality. The difference between slave and owner is the willingness to commit violence. Even in those rare historical circumstances where someone willingly accepted slavery, power and violence were then used to enforce that subjugation. We are slaves to the government because the government has so few morals and ethics it is willing to use the power we invested in it and the violence it has a monopoly on… to enslave us. In doing so, violating its most basic duty and our trust. Nevertheless, every State on Earth considers its people mere slaves. The recent admonitions by the elites at the victory of the AfD in Germany illustrate their opinion of us.

The problem is, how can a human being be property? Only a human being or group of human beings can own property. That which owns can’t be owned… just as that which is owned can’t own. Therefore, calling a human being property is a category error. A State is merely a group of arrogant human beings. Therefore, a State can’t own its citizens. It can claim it owns us and so tax us, and exploit violence to keep us in line. However, a State being merely a group of human beings can’t do anything morally, legally, or ethically that a human being can’t. Indeed, a state claiming ownership of its citizens is a thing created claiming ownership of that which created it. Nevertheless, this is the paradigm we find ourselves in. We are only slaves to our governments… until we choose not to be.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment