Limericks

Dear Friends,

The British royalty are not pacifists,
An aristocracy loves upraised fists,
Keep the people in turmoil,
While they cut off our oil,
Because in truth they are now Islamists.

There once was a foolish and indolent man,
Helping others as little as he possibly can,
A mouth without fight,
A loud parasite,
And then lost everything of which he began.

Mail in voting the candidates to parse,
Voter rolls as dirty as an unwiped arse,
Gerrymandering the districts,
No id to vote with no restricts,
And Democracy has now become a farce.

There once was a town called Hollywood,
Selling everything that was evil not good,
The capital of hedonism,
Lacking any humanism,
Hiding their crimes under a white hood.

The elite are not what they ____,
They undermining their own _____,
__________,
Converting,
And working on the Devil’s team.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Argument From Authority

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, as long as our bureaucrats wield the fallacy of appeal to authority, they can continue as criminals. Their authority protects them from consequences, just as bureaucracy’s distributed blame protects it and them from accountability. This way, the inept, stupid, and evil can work in darkness. Their actions are mixed in with so many others that accountability is nearly impossible, as long as they use the right number of paperclips to denote copies. In such a system, the adept are crushed by that same lack of accountability. So a system that is unaccountable selects for the inept, stupid, and manipulative. They are not Pareto’s minority but the majority. A destructive majority who can protect themselves with lies due to our not understanding the fallacy of appeal to authority.

Appeal to authority is a logical fallacy. It means believing something based on the authority of the speaker instead of the strength of their argument. This has been the traditional definition since it was used against the Christian religion. Since then, however, the progressives changed the wording to appeal to “unqualified” authority. Now the definition means belief should be based on the “legitimate” authority of the speaker not the strength of the argument. There is now no need to check the quality of the argument if the authority of the speaker is sufficient. This is because once they had cultural, social, and political power… they wanted to wield appeal to authority for their own ends. Nevertheless, the real definition of the fallacy is “argument from authority.”

Distributed blame is a blurring mechanism. It thwarts accountability, and so allows stupidity to sprout and grow. Those who make decisions that cost money, economic vitality, and even human lives, escape accountability due to distributed blame. The Holocaust was enabled by distributed blame. Each person in the machine destroying human lives was only a cog. The cog can’t be held accountable for what the machine does. But a cog isn’t a human being. It’s a tooth on a gear. A human being has agency, morality, and ethics. This means people with those tendencies tend also to be conscientious. Conscientious people need to add value, destroying value violates their internal compass. As a result, many such people leave bureaucracies. This selects for those who are willing to be broken cogs.

Criminals must be created by such a system. In a system where there is no accountability, bad decisions are not investigated or countered. They just keep on harming. People within such a system know that they are harming the very nation they supposedly serve. To reduce cognitive dissonance then, those people will dislike the nation and people they are harming. Once that paradigm has played out, why would they ever tell us the truth about anything? Ask yourself, would such people come out and admit their ineptitude, stupidity, and literal manipulation? Especially when they can say anything they want and we are obligated to believe them. This is because they are the legitimate authority. This makes the weight of their arguments irrelevant. We are to take their word due to their authority.

The answer then is to recognize the fallacy of appeal to authority and not get manipulated by it. Secondarily, don’t let the blurring effect of distributed blame remove accountability. Wherever there is bureaucracy there will always be distributed blame. Corporations have spent billions of dollars trying to solve that riddle. This is because over time, bureaucracy selects for the destructive. This warps the Pareto distribution so there are too many non doers and almost no doers. Once some point is passed the corporation collapses… because it isn’t a national government. A government can continue eating itself for decades until it has hollowed out the economy so much that it implodes. That’s why government bureaucracy eventually destroys itself, its sponsor, and becomes untrustworthy.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Law | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

There once was a faction of crime,
They lived by gall grift and grime,
A lying bunch,
Here’s a hunch,
They really should be doing time.

An autistic boy limping and acting antsy,
Is supposed to have been a neo Nazi,
Placing supernatural devices,
To trigger a national crisis,
But if you ask me he makes the perfect patsy.

City people are disconnected from reality,
They’re so smart they justify immorality,
The tail wags the dog,
Bureaucracy’s a bog,
And wander around lost in utter triviality.

Anti-Semitism is a distraction mechanism,
Keeping folks from seeing any realism,
A dirty disgrace,
They’re losing face,
Islamism is hiding the real villain, liberalism.

Criminals do run the world ______,
Exploiting patsies for political ___,
Keeping people agog,
Living in a miring ___,
Hiding in distraction as they pray.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Delayed Gratification

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, we teach our children that the ability to delay gratification is the single biggest predictor of success, yet as a civilization we have zero ability to delay gratification. This is illustrated by the astonishing national debt of every nation on Earth. There have been many empirical studies finding that the ability to delay gratification is paramount in living a successful life. Not simply in wealth but in all aspects of life. While the ability to delay gratification isn’t the only predictor of success, it’s at the top of the list. Moreover, others like diligence, education, and sticktuitiveness all fall out of delayed gratification. The Hermetic principle applies here, as it is in the large, so shall it be in the small. In this case, that which benefits the small also benefits the large.

The individual who is able to delay gratification can set aside money for a rainy day, withhold eating until safe food is available, and thus are tough. A car repair isn’t the end of the world, cholera doesn’t lay them down, and other problems that always arise can be dealt with. This is because such people sacrifice immediate wants for future needs. In doing so, their future needs are met such that they can deal with normal day-to-day disasters. Profligate people who spend not only what they earned today, but borrow against what they will earn tomorrow are in constant disaster mode. This drives their stress up, and as such they don’t live long. How can one deal with the day-to-day disasters with no savings, and debt up to one’s eyeballs? They can’t. Life is a rolling disaster.

Nations that are able to delay gratification set money aside for a rainy day, withhold from enacting stupid regulations, and so are tough. An economic downturn doesn’t cause general starvation, an outbreak of disease doesn’t shut down the whole system, and other normal issues are easily dealt with. Such nations sacrifice immediate wants for future needs. In these nations the day-to-day disasters are easily met. Nations that borrow, spend, and regulate are in constant disaster mode. In these nations the day-to-day disasters pile up until the whole institution collapses. How can a nation contend with a real problem when it is swamped by the normal ones? It can’t. Such a nation will borrow and spend until there is nothing left to borrow. At that point it will drag the whole society down with it.

People and nations that are unable to delay gratification are always blaming someone else, or the day-to-day disasters that visit everyone. Mind-boggling debt makes it hard to fix the car, or replace a bridge. Meanwhile, the savers, both personal and national, don’t even blink when a car repair comes in, or a bridge needs replacing. So the repair or replacement gets done with quickness and quality. On the other hand, the profligate spenders’ cars will be jalopies, held together with baling twine and rubber bands… as the profligate nation’s roads and bridges become ticking time bombs. The guy with loads of gambling debt will complain how the world hates him. So he robs a liquor store. The nation that wallows in national debt will complain they need more revenue. So they start a war.

What this means is that if you want to have a low-stress life that’s free from constant unsolvable problems, learn to delay gratification. Teach your kids this most valuable of skills. The same applies to the nation you live in. A nation that delays gratification so it has a national surplus, not debt, is more resilient to shocks. While it’s great to have a Lamborghini, if you can’t afford one, it’s best not to buy one. The same applies to nations. While that island is rich and would make great plunder, if you can’t afford the war, it’s best not to start it. Moreover, if the nation you live in is drowning in national debt, that nation is on the way to a mortal event. This is because as the day-to-day disasters are unmet, the system becomes ever less stable until some event, maybe small, destroys it once and for all.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Discerning Good From Evil

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, a fundamental difference between good and evil is that good is a force for creation while evil is a force for destruction. We see this paradigm all over. Often we lack the ability to define what we see as evil though we understand it in our hearts. This is because evil often couches itself as good. The true test, however, is to ask, “is this creative or destructive?” If something is creative then it is good and if it is destructive it is bad. Put another way, things that are good increase the stock of human goods, while evil destroys the cache of human goods. This is a way to discern them, when the good is called evil and evil is called good. Often, those with nefarious intent will claim we must destroy the evil, so the good can flourish. Pol Pot was of this type.

What about destroying evil? Wouldn’t that be good? That question revolves around, if evil is capable of eliminating evil. The question of discernment of evil set aside for a moment. Fire is destructive and if fire is used to fight fire, the strategy is to consume the fuel in as non-destructive a way as possible to starve the real fire. The fuel is consumed either way. In this we can see that it is a destructive mechanism. It destroys as efficiently as the original fire. The best that can be said is that a prescribed forest fire might limit the damage of an out of control forest fire. In either case, we have a forest on fire. Trying to destroy evil, then, is often the best way to usher in new and deeper evil. How many “people’s revolutions” have resulted in despotism? Most, I would wager.

The urge to limit creation is born of darkness. By darkness I mean the base human emotions, pride, gluttony, lust, indolence, envy, greed, and wrath. The glutton is a black hole of hunger. The prideful can’t tolerate a diminishment of their luster. The lustful seek material elation at cost to others. The lazy are ashamed of the diligent. The envious can’t stand anyone else getting ahead. Meanwhile, the greedy want it all to themselves. Lastly, wrath reduces everything it touches to ash. These dark emotions lead to destruction for their own purposes. This is why abortion must be legal, to allow the lustful to have their way. Billions in fraud disappear, for the gluttons and the greedy. Regulations and taxes drag on those trying to get ahead, to satisfy the envious. Laziness is itself destructive.

The urge to build is born of light. The light are represented by emotions and actions such as humility, delayed gratification, self-control, diligence, thankfulness, charity, and forgiveness. These emotions lead to creations that benefit all of mankind. To build a house it takes diligence, self-control, delayed gratification, thankfulness and a large dose of forgiveness. I have built several houses and so I know this from firsthand knowledge. Those homes now house people who had nothing to do with their creation, yet they are housed, and others will be until they are destroyed. Charity builds safety nets. Thankfulness creates connection. Self-control makes one strong. The ability to delay gratification makes a person wealthy. Then there’s humility, the king of virtues. It builds character.

We all understand some things are evil though we struggle to put a finger on why. This idea allows us to distinguish good from evil and why it is evil or good. War is universally understood as evil. This is because it is destruction. Dion removed the tyrant of Syracuse, only to be killed and a worse despotism took its place. Timoleon later removed that evil by building coalitions and systems to make it counter-productive. The US founding was an act of creation, not destruction, while the French Revolution was pure destruction. From this, we can see that destruction typically results in more evil, while creation results in good. Creating a family, a home, a community, friendships, a prosperous culture, well raised children, a civil society, etc. these are examples of goodness, destroying them is evil.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

Our legalist system is quite perverse,
The laws seem to work in reverse,
But we’re the jerks,
Here’s how it works,
It consumes trust to produce its inverse.

The elites have been struck by Cupid,
With ideas and hubris that are ill suited,
To make a world pure,
One thing’s for sure,
No amount of law or education can fix stupid.

Unemployment and hopelessness is a bout,
Once great Canada is in an economic rout,
A lack of trust,
It’s going bust,
And legalism has replaced morality without a doubt.

A cure for cancer they cannot make,
Too many careers would it take,
Research must go on,
Extracting for the Don,
And there’s billions of dollars at stake.

Law has been hijacked to its ________,
The stupidity of the elite make it ______,
A broken system,
Make all a _______,
Because legalist extraction is a curse.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in economy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Emotional Wrecks

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the left are emotional wrecks. Judged purely by their actions, they are obviously unhinged. The poor sots. People who have such little self-control and are so unstable probably shouldn’t be in stressful positions. Such actions as calling for violence against political foes are not normal. That’s how lunatics behave. Destroying a rodeo clown for wearing an Obama mask is an action of a deranged faction. Remember when they fired Rosanne Barr from her own hit show for wrong think? Only someone blind with fury would do that. Of course, when Gina Carano had the audacity to utter wrong speak on social media, she was fired immediately. Meanwhile, the same people who come unglued at minor provocations, literally call for violence against conservatives.

One thing everyone should learn is that you can’t be respectful to disrespectful people. Returning respect for disrespect only gets more disrespect. This is because disrespectful people don’t reciprocate. Reciprocation is a form of respect. Therefore, disrespectful people cannot be led by example. Indeed, they will pervert your respect into weakness. There is nothing that triggers a predator to strike more than apparent weakness. In other words, giving respect to disrespectful people will get you attacked. It is a form of throwing pearls before swine. As a result, the moment someone shows disrespect, especially someone in a position of authority, we must immediately withdraw all respect we may have once had for them. Reciprocation is the core of human heartedness.

People who are unreasonable cannot be reasoned with. Unreasonable people don’t want equality, it strains their brains to think for themselves, and their flailing emotions are more than sufficient to give them purpose. Reason is the way to rationalize wrongs… to the unreasonable. It is never a way to find a safe path through a maze of issues. Moreover, unreasonable people only see their own perspective. They are generally unable to have or show anything but contrived empathy. They whine about the plight of people who lived two centuries ago or across the planet, but hate their kin. They hold to such absurd psedo empathy and claim the moral high ground… from the gutter. No amount of logic, historical example, or reason will dissuade the unreasonable… because they’re unreasonable.

A crazy person will drag you down to their level and turn the insanity on you. Projection is the primary way they do this. They know how insane they are and think everyone must feel and think the exact same way, anyone who says differently must be evil. They project every neurotic impulse, violent urge, and outright rage onto everyone else. This is often because they have no other frame of reference. Someone who has only experienced crazy knows of no other way to be. The crazier they get the more entrenched they get in it. This goes on until it spirals into a complete dissociation with reality. Dealing with such people is like walking in a mag. 10 earthquake. The ground shifts under the feet faster than anyone can recover. This makes everyone around them liable to lose it.

The only way to deal with the unhinged is to ridicule them, ostracize them, and point out their insanity to sane people. Giving respect when respect is not reciprocated is dangerous. Moreover, trying to reason with the unreasonable is an exercise in wasting time. The more you try to interact with them the crazier you must become. It’s hysterical to pick on the unhinged. Like in Dumb and Dumber. They readily tell us where they are weak, so that’s where we should pick at them. Ostracize the nut-jobs. They bring nothing but drama and antics to anything they are a part of. Most importantly, don’t let the stupidity slide… point it out. Bring it up in conversation how insane they are and use examples. This is the only way to drive them to seek help. Ridicule, pick on, and ostracize them for their own good.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Mercy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

There once was a man who took the clot shot,
He thought was smart in a con he was caught,
Captured by an idea,
Complex as Ikea,
Turns out his heart exploded now he is not.

MTG is someone the elite hate and fear,
They refused to sit her on election year,
She wanted Epstein exposed,
The elite not so disposed,
And so they applied the wrap up smear.

Shopping to a woman is a high bar,
Blue lit isles stretch wide and far,
Filled with culch
I’d rather eat mulch,
So when we go to Target I sit in the car.

There once was an outfit called CNN,
A crowd of liars and a political fen,
They had the cat bird’s seat,
But pooped where they eat,
Now they are reinventing themselves again.

There are mortal consequences to _________,
Destroying the good with conniving _________,
So don’t ______,
It’s just a phage,
And protect your reputation with rigidity.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

There once was a faction of fraud,
Who smelled of two week old cod,
No lie was too deep,
No oath would they keep,
And hide corruption wink and nod.

There once was a medical system with trust,
They squandered it for politics now its dust,
A real bad shame,
But a pretty good game,
They made billions by poisoning and lying to us.

Everyone knows communism is great,
As long as they have a wealthy mate,
To subsidize profligacy,
With stolen technology,
Because self-sufficiency isn’t their trait.

Some say the protesters have been bought,
Others claim they are by an idea caught,
But there’s another answer,
It’s like a societal cancer,
They have never had an original thought.

Something smells fishy ____,
Inversion is abundantly _____,
Crony legislature,
Parasites by ______,
Controlling the stupid by fear.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Wages Of Ethics

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, it’s stupid to treat someone without ethics like someone who has them. Such action is the same as giving payment which the recipient hasn’t earned. It’s like a business paying someone to destroy their infrastructure. People who have shown themselves to be scoundrels in our personal lives are ostracized. No one wants to be around a user, liar, and taker. The normal reciprocation found in human relationships is exploited by people without ethics. Corrupt actions are the source of their corroding reputations. When dealing with people in our personal lives we are wise and smart enough to understand this paradigm… but when dealing with people in positions of authority, we become stupid. So we treat those in authority as if they have ethics… even after proof that they have none.

Ethics are reflected in actions. Someone who engages in stochastic terrorism, even rationalizing or calling for violence, is not an ethical person. Dehumanizing those who disagree is another sure sign of a lack of ethics. Moreover, exploiting the law for power, wealth, or to pervert justice is not what ethical people do. A judge who is consistently overturned because he or she rules by politics instead of law, can’t be acclaimed as ethical. Bureaucrats who detest those they “serve” are the opposite of ethical. We all know a corrupt cop when we see one, but how many of us recognize a corrupt prosecutor? Those who engage in corrupt acts are corrupt people. The same can be said of those who engage in ethical acts can be considered ethical.

To be treated as ethical one should prove oneself ethical first, or at least not prove otherwise. The ethical get a slew of benefits. When someone has never lied, their word is trusted. That doesn’t mean they are incapable, but the probability of them lying is less than that of someone who lies when the truth would serve them better. Moreover, once someone has a reputation of truthfulness, the cost of getting caught in a lie increases in proportion to the reputational loss. When someone is granted the benefit that should be withheld for only the ethical, to the unethical, it diminishes the value of ethics. Why ever tell the truth if a liar’s word is held in equal or higher esteem than a truth teller’s? In such a paradigm ethics becomes a liability, and corruption becomes an advantage.

When the corrupt get the wages of the ethical the whole incentive structure of the system becomes perverse. As I mentioned above, if lying has no cost, lying will become endemic. The same goes for every other short term advantage that corruption brings. If taking bribes has no cost then everyone will take bribes. In short, capitalism functions even in dysfunctional systems, but in a dysfunctional way. In the supply/demand view, if the cost of a thing goes to zero, you can expect the demand to rise in proportion. So if the cost of corruption goes to zero or near zero, the supply will rise to meet the increased demand. This translates into a lower standard of living for most, due to extractive economies, and high crime. The high crime comes from the people following their corrupt leaders.

Tolerating and worse, cheering unethical behavior in our leaders then is stupid. It helps no one in the long term but harms us all. In a collapsing society no one benefits. This is a result of bestowing the wages of ethical behavior to those who are corrupt. It removes the cost of corruption and thus increases the demand and supply. We all can recognize corruption when we see it, though many of us are willing to tolerate it if it’s on our side. That’s falling victim to a fallacy, because corruption is on no one’s side but its own. The answer then is to be utterly intolerant of unethical behavior in our leaders. Those who prove themselves corrupt by their actions must be removed from power. To do anything less is to invite societal collapse and the humanitarian disasters that follow.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Law | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment