Limericks

Dear Friends,

The elite will never tire of their beloved communism,
About humanity they’re filled with dark pessimism,
We are just too dumb,
So us under their thumb,
Working diligently until the globe is ruled by Marxism.

Cosmopolitan elites tell us we’re on the hook,
For history’s atrocities when they were the crook,
Others are to blame,
It soothes their shame,
To put the UK on the same path Rhodesia took.

There’s one thing we all know,
Republicans go with the flow,
Their voters sour,
Once in power,
RINOs always run the show.

Central planners think they’re smarter than you,
Doing your own thinking is a dangerous brew,
Leave the thinking to them,
Then say amen,
And accept the disasters that come by the slew.

They hate us but need to ____,
Inept at life they are the tool,
Milquetoast kinds,
Compromised _____,
Thinking dystopia would be ____.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in International Power | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Bad Donkey

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, a donkey that doesn’t protect the sheep isn’t much of a donkey. The reason donkeys are pastured with sheep and goats is for protection from predators. Otherwise the hay and forage a donkey eats would be a waste. This is an example of a symbiotic relationship. The farmer benefits due to having his sheep and goats protected, the sheep and goats are protected, and the donkey gets an easy gig. This is a classic win-win. If the donkey didn’t protect the goats but kept grazing, it would be a liability, not an asset. Profitable farmers get rid of such worthless donkeys. If the donkey turned on the sheep and goats, attacking them and letting coyotes in the pasture, now that donkey would get shot. That’s because it perverted its role and did the opposite.

The leaders of a nation have a first task, that obligation is to protect that nation. Their role is that of a donkey in a pasture. They keep the coyotes at bay so the sheep and goats can fatten up on the plentiful forage. That donkey who allows coyotes into the pasture, then vilifies the sheep who complain they are losing lambs to the coyotes, isn’t doing its job. It isn’t protecting the livestock but instead feeding them to the predators. In such a pasture the replacement rate won’t meet the death rate and the population in that pasture will decline. The truly evil donkey will then import more coyotes to replace the sheep and goats. The coyotes, however, don’t produce wool, nor do they clear brush, they just consume those that do. What do you think such donkeys deserve?

Some donkeys enjoy the chase so much that they chase their charges around the field. If the protector donkey doesn’t protect but instead pursues their charges around the pasture all day, the sheep won’t have a good wool crop in fall and the goats won’t clear the brush. This is what regulation does. It keeps the people running from regulation instead of fattening up on profits. Slowly, the economy becomes overgrown with useless firms that exist only to extract. Meanwhile, the sheep and goats can’t contribute to the profitability of the farm. The donkey still eats its share, even as the ability of the pasture to sustain the herd ebbs away. In this way a bad donkey can destroy not only a productive herd but a productive pasture as well.

In a pasture where the donkey is importing coyotes and is chasing the livestock around constantly, there will be strife. The sheep and goats will start using their horns. They have no other alternative. The system that was supposed to protect them, the donkey, has turned on them. They will reason that they are better off without the donkey than with the traitorous thing. So they might even put the horns to their own donkey. Of course, such action isn’t in the nature of sheep and goats. You really have to torture a ram or ewe before it becomes violent. Starve it in a poor pasture, run it around all day, and feed its lambs to the coyotes… and even the most docile of sheep will butt and bite. Not because there’s anything wrong with the sheep or land… but with the donkey.

This is the reason one must always have a good donkey in a pasture with sheep and goats. A bad donkey is not just worthless, it is a danger. It endangers the livestock, the peace, and the pastureland itself. That’s why when one finds he or she has a bad donkey in their pasture, it’s of paramount importance to replace it immediately before it can do more harm. Remember, the longer a donkey has been in a pasture the harder it is to get it out. Donkeys are after all, the epitome of stubborn. Moreover, I have to send my prayers and support to all those who have a bad donkey in their pastures. May God help you in dislodging them, evicting the coyotes, and getting your land back into production. Otherwise your pastures will become unproductive, overgrown, and crime-ridden.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

You see a society collapsing because,
Absurdities pile up as do the flaws,
The elite are a bit hazy,
Only in a place crazy,
Would you have to pass such laws.

Importing a culture of disrespect,
Shows a total lack of introspect,
You get what you allow,
Things go to pot somehow,
And we complain but don’t reflect.

They say Starmer could leave within the hour,
I have to wonder if they will be a bit dour,
He’s hid in his lair,
Not going anywhere,
Because globalists never give up power.

They don’t need no stinking badges here,
The deep state corrupts without a fear,
Who needs a President,
Rule without precedent,
And pervert everything Americans hold dear.

Once law has become insane,
The people are tuned to _____,
Elites get ___________,
Sanity gets drenched,
As despotism falls like ____.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Law | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

We Don’t All Think Alike

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, there are philosophies that are compatible, incompatible, and semi-compatible. One could use a vector diagram to determine the relationship between them. If the vectors (arrows) go in opposite directions, then we could say the philosophies are incompatible. If they point generally in the same direction, then we could say they are compatible. Those that are ninety degrees off may be called semi-compatible. When illustrated like this the idea seems obvious. If two philosophies literally have opposite goals, the vectors point in opposite directions, they are fundamentally incompatible. That should be obvious, but it’s blurred by spurious arguments. One such argument is that everyone thinks the same, wants the same things, and is motivated by the same ideas.

When I was a child I believed everyone thought the same. That’s the childish belief that all vectors point in the same direction. In other words, we all want the same things, think the same thing, and have the same likes. That is clearly not true. Otherwise there would be no need for the myriad of alcohols, TV shows, and car types. The fact that there is a requirement to meet different tastes in cuisine is proof we don’t all think alike. So the claim we all think alike is spurious. Yet we accept it without thought. This kind of fallacy blurs reality. Such blindness allows absurdities to be entertained. Crazy ideas like all cultures are equal, suicide bombers just want a better life, tribalism goes away once a migrant hits the shores of Europe, among others. Opposing vectors… oppose.

As I grew up I realized everyone thinks differently. I also thought we all at least had the same goal, just a different path to it. So at most some vectors would be perpendicular, but leaning in the same direction. I used to say, we both want to get to the other side of the barn, the question is which side do we go around? Now I realize that many people don’t want to get to the other side of the barn at all, they are happy right here (no vector). Still others would like to run in the opposite direction (opposed vectors). A few actually do want to get to the other side but have legitimate disagreements on which side to go around (parallel vectors). Then there are those who want change but have no idea what that change would be (perpendicular vectors).

Now that I’m an old fart, I suspect everyone thinks radically differently from each other. This is why a person’s philosophical vector could point in any direction. Moreover, that vector could change depending on environment. I suspect Trotsky’s vector changed after he fled to London. Plus a single person has a multitude of vectors depending on the level of identification. This allows us to recognize absurdities, people we can align with, those who we might align with, and identify those that are opposed to what we believe in. When a trans activist aligns with an Islamist, their vectors oppose in all ways but one. That one aligning vector being the overthrow of the West. This makes them poor allies, however, because their vectors are so opposed they must come into conflict at some point.

Once you understand that other people may have literally the opposite motivations, ideas, and feelings than you do, the world makes much more sense. In this paradigm, every vector has its own direction. Most align with the predominant local societal myth, but others can point in the opposite direction. If enough vectors align in opposition to the societal norm, the societal norm will change to suit the vectors. While this is an eclectic way to look at people’s motivations, thoughts, and goals, I think it gives a perspective that could help our understanding. If for no other reason than to recognize that everyone thinks differently. That alone is wisdom that many, including me, don’t learn until later in life. I also suspect we are led into all sorts of traps by the childish notion… that we are all alike.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

The West is committing Hare Kare,
Following the insane trans fairy,
A coalition of dumb,
Sucking their thumb,
While singing dancing and making merry.

The elite want the nation to work as a team,
Controlled by an enlightened moon beam,
There will be no border,
It’s a new world order,
And absolute despotism will be the theme.

There once was an elite that lied to us all,
Singing dancing and having a great ball,
But consequences happen,
And doors often open,
So eventually the dancers will have a bad fall.

Germany is trying to reproduce the Weimar,
Destroying the standard of living so bizarre,
Rule against the people,
Looking down on the sheeple,
And will result in the same kind of evil avatar.

Drunk with power the elite do cheer,
Totalitarian power for them to _____,
Are you sane asked the quizzers,
They are running with ________,
Which always ends in pain and a ____.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Family Formation

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, people should get married at a young age. There is no better way to eliminate the slut life and restore the nuclear family. Women and children would benefit immensely as would men. I would argue that by every measure our society would improve as would our standard of living. The argument people should wait until later so that they are more mature is spurious. I reason it’s spurious because history shows that when people married younger, they stayed married longer. Plus there are certain communities that marry young and stay married their whole lives as a rule. Some will argue the difference is cultural not the age of marriage. To which I agree, culture feeds back into the average age of marriage. Functional cultures build families, dysfunctional cultures build up body counts.

A civilization lives and dies around the family. If families aren’t formed and children aren’t born, that civilization ceases to exist. This happens regardless of how enlightened, scientific, or wise it’s purported to be. Without children civilizations cease to exist. Aldus Huxley claimed, tongue in cheek, that parents could be replaced by the factory, and industrial orphanages could replace the family. We all understand at some level, however, that such ideas are absurdities. Not only are parents necessary for the production of children, families are necessary for the nurturing, growth, and maturation of children into adults. The basics of trust, honor, and truth are first taught in the family… or not, depending on the family. Orphanages are famous for failing their charges in these matters.

Pragmatically, we need to look at the quality of life of people. The metric should be health, safety, and fulfillment. When we examine the health of people we find that married people are more healthy and live longer. But health isn’t the be all and end all of life. What is health if one is in constant fear of crime, death, or worse? When we look at crime statistics we find that married people are less likely to commit crimes. Even then, those crimes are usually in furtherance of family goals, like survival. From this it’s apparent that the more married people in a society the less crime there will be. Healthy and safe are important, but what about fulfillment? One could argue that Eleanor Rigby and Father Mackenzie are fulfilled, but I might argue otherwise.

Folks might argue that if people are older they are able to make more mature decisions about who their spouse will be. This should lead to more lasting and fulfilled relationships. In theory this makes sense but in practice it fails. When a theory comes into contact with reality and is falsified by reality, the Popperians abandon it. The idealists, however, find fault with reality. In this case, as the age of marriage has risen, so has the divorce rate. The two seem to rise in lockstep. I wonder if this is because as people age we become more fixed in our ways. If this is true then when we are young we are more open to connecting with a spouse, even someone who years later might seem unsuitable. Then, as they become more fixed, the two are more likely to form a common trajectory instead of intersecting ones.

This is becoming ever more important as the West and indeed the whole world appears to be entering Universe 25. The mouse experiment in plenty that resulted in extermination. We are becoming more like those mice every day. We grow more self-absorbed, narcissistic, and egotistic. It’s got to the point that women have several abortions in their lifetime, but no children. When they become old and no longer sexually attractive they disappear, alone and lonely. They have no children or grandchildren to comfort them, talk to, or get angry at. Society fragments into individuals who are not healthy, safe, or fulfilled. The answer is to marry kids at a young age, maybe right after high school. Go back to traditional systems that worked. We tried the slut life, it gave us VD, so let’s go back to what worked.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

In the brains of bureaucrats ideas set sails,
Regulating brilliantly and sending emails,
Their authority’s on loan,
Let this truth be known,
That wherever it’s applied central planning fails.

It’s a circular firing squad without end,
Hollywood has gone around the bend,
An ethical fry,
All done by,
Embracing an evil and demonic trend.

Globalist progressives aren’t going anywhere,
They run the world in ways despotic and unfair,
Propaganda makes,
Whatever it takes,
To keep them in power forever and everywhere.

May God protect our minds bodies and souls,
From the darkness and evil that always unfolds,
The deception is deceptive,
Polluting the collective,
So discernment should be our short term goals.

Unlimited power corrupts one from within,
Then self-destruction eventually starts __,
A drug addict’s bone,
To cling to a ________,
And discernment becomes alien to her and ___.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

I hear Labour now is just a wreck,
They’ve had a long and lonely trek,
Stayed tied to him,
But it’s hard to swim,
With a millstone around your neck.

There exists a faction of derision and hate,
Building consensus with both repro and bait,
An appeal to our dark side,
By evil that’s bonafide,
But that it always destroys itself is it’s best trait.

There are those who are easily disturbed,
With little self control their humanity curbed,
With angry verve,
A very raw nerve,
Who live their lives constantly perturbed.

The files must be hid no matter what,
Start a war disclose UFOs allow no but,
Whatever it takes,
Call them flakes,
The conspiracy is now that the elite like smut.

It’s best not to attach to a ____________,
Their fall will come sooner or _____,
Emotional _______,
Rubbing their necks,
And their past is a ticking detonator.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Mercy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Comedy Is Offensive

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, we live in a time that is offended by comedy. The elite understand their actions and platforms make them ideal targets. Like all arrogant spoiled children, they’re a raw nerve. Such people take offense at the least provocation but dish it out like its a free turkey dinner. The people I am referring to are globalist progressives. They would hound a rodeo clown to destitution for wearing an Obama mask but rationalize outright calls for assassination of Trump. The hypocrisy of such people is astonishing. What makes then the acme of what Bonhoeffer defined as stupid is their lack of discernment how their policies achieve the exact opposite of their goals. To such humorless people, comedy is acid in the face, and they would rather throw it than catch it.

Humor is a release mechanism when societal pressure gets high. We pick on the source of the pressure and in doing so lower it somewhat. This is especially true when censorship is putting people in jail for wrongthink longer than murder or rape. Such government absurdity generates huge amounts of societal tension. Humor in such a situation lowers the temperature and so the pressure. As the globalist progressive faction clings to power, like a drowning man to driftwood, they are in no mood to be made sport of. That’s when the elites lose all tolerance for comedy. In this way comedy becomes a one way street. Comedians can pick on one side but the other is off limits. If you see this, it’s a sure sign the globalist progressives have lost patience with humor.

People who are a raw nerve have little patience for correction, especially by being a laughingstock. Those who are easily offended usually are also not wise. They see humor as always caustic and never correcting. Though human societies have used humor to keep people inside guardrails forever. I’m sure Archimedes was the target of many a jabs until he successfully defended Syracuse from the Romans with his inventions. Just as Socrates was the subject of the play The Clouds, by Aristophanes. Ridicule has not only pushed at the innovators but scalded the despots and favorers of arbitrary rule. I’m sure many a joke was fashioned about Alcibiades, Coriolanus, and Stalin. Though, should a Stalin joke meet his ears, heads would fall off. Stalin was the acme of a raw nerve.

When you know your in the wrong, you don’t like to have it pointed out, even in jest. While an adult will admit when they find themselves in the wrong. Mature people understand human beings are fallible… including themselves. They are human beings and thus are fallible. The arrogant believe themselves infallible, however. This means that when they find themselves in the wrong they double down until violence becomes necessary to save face. This happens to even the most intelligent. The smarter someone is, the greater the absurdity they can rationalize, but there comes a point where it can’t be rationalized anymore, it has to be forced. So force is used. Ridicule, however, undermines the authority not only of the raw nerves, but of their underlings.

This brings us to why the globalist progressives so detest humor. Not only are they children with raw nerves, they fear their power is at stake should they allow their absurdity to be laughed at… and they’re right. That’s why any joke about the Dear Leader in North Korea is met with immediate public execution. The more absurd the lies, the less tolerance there is of pointing them out. This is why comedy is becoming illegal. If this isn’t proven, it’s at least strongly suggested by the fact the police in Europe are being pulled from rape, murder, and terrorism investigations, and instead dedicated to controlling wrong speak. What’s worse than a rolling societal disaster, out of control crime, and a collapsing standard of living? Pointing it out.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in media | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Hero and the Monster

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, what someone has done, anyone can do. This applies not only to great deeds but evil ones as well. Once an evil act has been committed, that means we are all capable of that act, whether or not we believe it. Very few of us are saints. Even many of the saints committed horrific sins, before they became saints. This is one of the aspects of the Epstein scandal that bothers me so. If they are capable of such profound evil then by definition I am. Had I been born in their shoes, raised as they were raised, then quite probably I would have been just as depraved, and maybe worse. So when I cast accusations at those who are credibly accused of sacrificing children to Satan, pedophilia, and even cannibalism, I accuse myself, and all of humanity.

It’s good to look at the great acts of the great people throughout the ages and recognize we are also capable of such acts of heroism. We, you and I, are made of the same stuff as Timoleon, Charlemagne, and Gandhi. The acts they did prove that we are capable of acting in such a way. You are able to be a hero given the right circumstances, and indeed, if push came to shove, you might very well be. The greatness in others is reflected in us. This is why we tell tales of Ulysses, Jason, and Lawrence of Arabia while imagining ourselves as them. This isn’t a vain exercise in naivete, it is self-recognition and building the neural pathways so that if the time comes… we will act as heroes. The same applies to the evil deeds done by others, they taint us as well as them.

We recoil at the horrendous acts of history’s villains. How could moral, ethical, and self-aware people not be horrified? Tamerlane’s slaughter of Hindus was a crime against humanity that dwarfs even Hitler’s atrocities. The Young Turks’ genocide of the Armenians included the crucifixion of pregnant girls. On October 7, 2024, Palestinians launched an attack against Jewish families, slaughtering them, raping them, and putting babies in ovens. You and I recoil at such acts. They are not those of civilized human beings… or so we think. The reality is, if you or I were pushed, we might act out in just as horrible or even more horrible ways. We are made of the same stuff as Tamerlane. So, then, what’s the answer? How do we make the world such that atrocities are never or rarely committed?

Discernment is the answer. Learn discernment, practice it, and teach it. The reason there are so few saints is that so few people learn discernment. Even fewer are born with the gift. Like all skills, it must be learned, and used. Very few people are born with perfect pitch, but most can learn the basic keys. Even if only by singing Do Ray Me… Discernment is the same. There are ways to learn it. Personally, I apply the Golden Rule. Do unto others as you would have others do unto you. From this position discernment is not difficult. This is because the Golden Rule enforces empathy. It bends the brain to think from the perspective of another. This is very difficult for some people to do, but it is essential for all of us to learn, if we would like to live up to our higher natures instead of down to our base ones.

Once you understand this, that we are all capable of the greatest acts… and the worst ones, you are on your way to wisdom. If you are repulsed by the evil in the world, then look inward. It is in you, and me. Just as that same evil is in everyone else. This means that if we push people far enough, their evil natures MUST come out. This is where discernment comes in. We use the Golden Rule to discern the perspective of others as best we can, then apply that newfound empathy to solve whatever problem there is. Moreover, it is up to us each individually to discern our own actions. In the end, we are not grains of sand in an avalanche, but human beings with the capability of heroically great acts.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment