Incapp.org

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, people without ethics are parasites to civilization. Civilization runs on ethics, without them what you have is barbarism. Not the common run of barbarism either but the total breakdown of order barbarism. Ethics then could be considered the blood of the corpus civilization. Those without ethics drink from that blood copiously and can continue to do so until they are discovered. Then, like a tick, they are removed and have to find a different group of people to parasitize. This is why parasitism is such an effective strategy. It is a low energy path to sustenance. One problem with this strategy is that if everyone becomes a parasite there will be no blood left and the civilization will descend into chaos. Parasites lead by example though, so they often increase in numbers.

Many people believe that civilization runs on law. This is a childish view. No matter how vicious, punitive, or draconian, law fails in the face of unethical people. The laws of Draco proved insufficient to maintain prosperity, order, and equanimity so had to be replaced. Draco supposedly believed that all violations should be punished with death but death being the ultimate punishment would have to suffice for the major crimes as well… yet failed to maintain order. Athens came to the brink of civil war under them. Solon saved Athens by repealing and replacing the Laws of Draco. Many people stop there but the story is deeper than that. Solon then led the people of Athens to ethical behavior by example. In that Solon then took a ten year self-imposed exile.

Under the laws of Solon Athens grew into the philosophical powerhouse we are taught. Was the reason Athens prospered due to the laws… or the ethics he inculcated through his life and example? Moreover, the laws were effectively the same when Pericles exploited the ostracism to get rid of a political rival and help establish a hegemony? He perverted the laws to do the opposite of their intent. He could do that because law is always insufficient to restrain ambitious men. Only ethics can restrain them because it causes them to restrain themselves. So Solon fixed despotic laws, yes, but more to the point he gave Athens an example of ethical leadership that they followed until Pericles. Pericles opened the door and Alcibiades took it to the next level. His lack of ethics made him a parasite no matter where he went.

Parasitism of civilization is a pyramid scheme. It benefits the first movers most and to a lesser degree each successive generation. Eventually, everyone will catch on and no one will have ethics for anything more than show. This is because once it’s obvious that ethics hobbles one, having them becomes irrational. In a civilization filled with parasites without ethics sucking the life blood from that civilization, being a parasite sooner rather than later is just self-interest. As ethics are violated, violations become the norm opening up ever worse violations. No one can do business in such a place. Machiavelli himself said that the people are better off under an orderly tyranny than a disorderly democracy. That’s because in chaos you are attacked, your business looted, and your children abused.

This provides the counter pressure to everyone becoming parasites. If people are educated properly that their self-interest and that of their loved ones lies in being ethical and enforcing ethical behavior in those around us, parasitism will be limited. Parasites will only be able to do limited damage before being found out and punished. It’s where a lack of ethics is tolerated and even lauded in some group that parasitism grows unabated. As foolish as it sounds, the cultural elite themselves sometimes promote parasitism. When they as a group get captured by a pernicious and perverted idea they can become their own worst enemies. Just as anyone can. So it is there that we must be the most vigilant. If we see a modern Pericles in the cultural elite, we must act… or maybe we should have.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, despots need an enemy to distract from their despotism. That’s why I predict the EU establishment will try hard to get a war started with Russia. If the people of Europe take the bait, the globalists will be able to remove two stumbling blocks to their global ambitions. One would be the native European people who would be sent to feed the cannons, even as hundreds of foreigners land by boat, bus, and plane every day. The other stumbling block would be the nation of Russia. Nation states are not compatible with a global government. This is especially true of a strong nearly self-sufficient nation with nuclear weapons. The proof would be if EU officials actually went to war with Russia… using propaganda, a draft, and false flags. Each step up to that point is a strong indicator.

Despots need a war with someone to distract the people from their lowering economic status, creeping enslavement, and civilizational destruction. War is the only thing that justifies these things in the minds of people. When there is an identifiable enemy, people will solidify, leading to a suspensions of judgment, creating a willingness to sacrifice. This happens even if the enemy is a fictitious narrative. The only thing that counts when such tactics are used is that the people believe. The hoi polloi must be corralled into only one way to think. They must believe the enemy is at the gates, that the threat is existential, and an all-out effort is needed to repel them. If the citizens ever realized the real enemy is their own government, the strategy backfires like a cracked cast iron cannon.

Europe is experiencing all of the above… their civilization is being deconstructed, their economy is being deindustrialized, as they themselves dehumanized. The elites openly say they are deindustrializing Europe. Deindustrialization is the result of policy, regulation, and taxes. The farms are being regulated out of business in the name of climate change. Nuclear power has all but been phased out in the wake of Fukushima and the waves of anti-nuclear propaganda. Then the EU elites in all their brilliance alienated the supplier of their natural gas. Even shrugging off the blowing up of their own pipeline. Such stupidity would shock even Bonhoeffer. Meanwhile, rape gangs prey on little girls with near impunity even after decades of public outrage.

The rise of the political right in Europe is a sign the despots need to act and act fast. Where they control the law, they are exploiting it to maintain their grip on political power. This is what distinguishes the left from the right. The left uses political power to gain political power while the right uses political power to gain economic power. Both are perversions of the right role of government, (which is to maintain the liberties of the people under their protection). So the globalists on the left are banning the right in Hungary, talking openly of banning the AfD in Germany, and engaging in censorship across the continent. The globalist leftists see the writing on the wall though. Those elections going for the conservatives are proof positive that the elites need an enemy.

For tin pot despots the US makes an ideal enemy. The despot says the US hates him… and thus any bad thing that happens can be blamed on the CIA. The US is unlikely to do anything about it as long as the demagoguery is limited to rhetoric not action. The US can’t be the enemy of European globalists, because EU globalists are parasites. China could serve as an enemy, but is a hard sell without a direct path of attack. Russia is an ideal enemy. Putin has been demagogued for decades, fertilizing the ground. War with Russia would be a great distraction. If the people fall for the con, the few children who made it past the abortionist’s knife will feed cannons. Europeans will be replaced and their civilization erased. The question is, am I right, and will the people of Europe fall for it?

Sincerely,
John Pepin