How You or I can be tricked into becoming a monster.

Posted on January 10, 2019 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the greatest atrocities have been done by regular people, just like you and I. To say, “If I were born in Germany in 1926 I would NOT have been a Nazi!!” is the acme of hubris. We would all like to think we would have been a Dietrich Bonhoeffer, but more likely, any one of us would have been a Auschwitz guard. There was after all, only one Bonhoeffer, and many guards. Yet, to say someone definitely would have been a Nazi, is to deny free will. What this tells us of the human condition, and of ourselves, is that we are capable of great evil. That is part of being human. Yet we are also capable of noble acts that transcend our humanity. Both extremes are characterized by a mindset. That mindset is one of questioning our role, or not, in any political and philosophical paradigm.

We all have a spark of the divine in us. Even those who signed on to become SS Totenkopf brigade. We know this because, the communiques sent back from the Baltic States regarding the breakdown of soldiers, tasked with machine gunning innocent people into ditches. Mental fatigue was rampant among those soldiers. Presumably, the worst of the worst, dedicated zealots to the cause of the Master Race. Men recruited from insane asylums to select for psychopathy. Even they would break down at committing such unspeakable acts of cruelty, yet the slaughter went on, because regular people followed the dominant mindset, and few questioned it. Few, except Dietrich Bonhoeffer, and those like him. This shows that even the darkest soul has a glint of light.

Yet even the brightest soul can be tricked into the most heinous of evils. Take the killing fields of Cambodia. Where upon winning the revolution, Pol Pot marched the entire population of Phenom Penn into the rice fields, and began systematically slaughtering people, in an attempt to create utopia… by eliminating the wrong kind of people. In that orgy of inhumanity, little fifteen year old girls, mean angels on any other stage, went down lines of bound men and women, and placed a bread bag over the heads of the victims. One by one, suffocating people, pleading for their lives… as they watched the bread bag get ever closer. Imagine the evil that can darken the soul of a little girl such??? This can only come about when people do not think critically, and morally, about what they are actually doing.

In every case where people become monsters, for the greater good, they have become captured by an idea. An evil idea to be sure, but one that masquerades as good, that holds out the promise of utopia, at the end of a long dark bloody corridor. When Alexander ordered the slaughter of every man woman and child in Persepolis, his greatest crime according to Plutarch, those soldiers who carried out the orders were every bit as guilty as Alexander, for that sin against humanity, because they knew in their hearts they were committing acts of evil. If not for our ability to lie to ourselves, and deny that which we know in our hearts is evil, psychopaths couldn’t raise armies of conquest, revolutions that create Hell on Earth, inquisitions, and every other organized evil… couldn’t happen.

Question everything, not just the dominant paradigm, but those that seek to replace it as well, for it is in those that evil often masquerades as good. Great wickedness always begins with small evils. The death camps didn’t spring up overnight. They began by people believing uncritically and acting in small ways. Those small acts of malevolence slowly grew, to greater and greater crimes, until the concept of death camps became palatable. Eventually, in an attempt at “mercy,” the Death Camps were set up, to “alleviate the suffering” of the Jews in the Ghettos. Social lies compound upon social lies, until everyone has convinced themselves that the greatest good can only come about, by committing the greatest of atrocities. That is how you and I can be tricked into becoming monsters.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Welcome to the machine.

Posted on January 7, 2019 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the larger the political entity, the less it needs to cater to the needs and wants of it’s citizens, while the smaller the political entity the more it must be accountable to it’s citizens. No great revelation there. When we examine the goals of the various political factions in this light, however, we can come to some useful conclusions. Some factions seek to make the political entity ever larger, others seek to make the political entity stay the same, while still other seek the smallest political entity possible. Obviously, the individual is the smallest possible political entity, and the one world government being the largest achievable at this time. Those who seek the largest political entity also seek the least reactive to it’s people, which allows them to be unaccountable.

During the time of Herodotus, the city state was the dominant paradigm, with notable exceptions. Them being Egypt and China. Either of them probably being the first example of the nation state in existence, a paradigm that would grow, to conquer the world even as armies of conquest marched across the land. The city state allowed many political experiments to be conducted at the same time. Some city states like Syracuse, under Dionysius, were tyrannies and others like Athens, were democracies, while still others were representative republics. The rise of the nation state was largely driven by wars of conquest. While the rulers of a large political entity are less accountable to the people, that larger political entity is better able to defend itself, from the depredations of aggressor states.

Most, if not all the political innovations, up to the rise of Marxism, have been aimed at increasing the accountability of the rulers to the people. Constitutionalism, democratic republics, representative government, separation of powers, etc… have all been implemented to limit the power of the rulers over the people. This has been done with the express desire, to create a Just system of government, even though the nation state is often too large, for the people to really control their government. Since the start of the Twentieth Century the trend has reversed. Rather than limiting the power of the rulers, the new goal seems to be to limit the power of the people, to effect their governments. The same people who are demand ever less individual representation also seek an ever larger political entity.

Since this information is common knowledge among the educated classes, we can conclude that those who seek the largest political entity possible, the world government, cannot believe that accountability to the people is important. Those on the other hand, who seek a smaller political entity, believe that accountability of the rulers to their citizens, is of paramount importance. The Enlightenment idea of natural Rights and the sovereignty of the individual, are the epitome of this, and the modern and post modern idea, that the group is the correct level of political representation, is the opposite. The two notions, that the group is the correct way of looking at representation and creating the largest political entity possible, create a system where the individual becomes a replaceable cog in the machine.

Any system that is the largest political entity possible, and the the group is revered over the individual, is one where you and I are mere sprockets in a vast machine, ordered and run by rulers instead of representatives. One that ignores natural rights and the sovereignty of the individual. The result of an ever larger political entity, and group representation, rather than individual representation, has only resulted in rulers that are unaccountable to the people. Which is the definition of tyranny. The elite are demanding ever more power over the individual. So we must ask ourselves, what do we want to live under, a system where we are machine parts, or one where we are sovereign individuals with Rights? Choose well, else the norm will become, Welcome my son… to the machine.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What is the quality of Justice where the elite are not held to any standard?

Posted on January 3, 2019 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the poor are held to a much higher standard of personal and public conduct, than the elite. You would think in a sane world, those with power to damage the economy, oppress us and even lead to the deaths of millions, would be held to a high standard while those with zero power to damage anything or anyone but themselves and their immediate associates, would not be held to the same high standard… but the reality is the exact opposite. While those with political favor, the elite, can get away with virtually anything they want, the poor go to prison for anything. Why is this? Because of the power the elite wield. The poor on the other hand are held to a very high standard, because if the hoi polloi were allowed to be as corrupt as the elite, the economy would collapse.

After Hilary was let off multiple felony charges, a 21 year old seaman was charged with a felony, for taking a selfie while aboard a nuclear submarine, and sending it to his girlfriend. He used the “Hillary defense.” Then went to jail because he was not a member of the ruling class. An even worse example is the famous pedophile Jeffery Epstein, with his Tiberius’ island, has hosted many elite, like Bill Clinton, Prince William, etc… who have been there and participated in sex slavery for fun and profit. When Epstein was arrested, he was given a slap on the wrist, and his island is still operating as far as I know. Yet if an average person asks a woman out on a date, who isn’t interested, he could find himself charged with sexual harassment and get sentenced to prison for it.

That the elite are above their own laws is a historical fact. What king held himself to his own laws? None ever. Leading by example is such a rare quality that it is basically unheard of. The elite never lead by example but by force and compulsion. One of Confucius’ main tenets, was that good leaders lead by example, while evil rulers use violence to force the people not to follow them into utter decadence. As Thrasymachus said in Plato’s Republic, (and I paraphrase), justice is a ruse so that psychopaths can rule the sane. This has been the paradigm from time immemorial. Given the long and established precedent of the tyrants held to no standard, while the poorer someone is, the higher standard of conduct they are held, is nearly impossible to break.

At it’s most fundamental level, the elite must inflict draconian punishments on the poor, for failing to follow any of the uncountable and unknowable laws and regulations on the books, because if the poor followed their rulers to corruption, the economy would crash. For any economy to work, Capitalist, socialist, feudal, or even hunter gatherer… there must be trust and chaos must be kept at a minimum. In a state where the people follow their leaders into corruption, there is nothing but chaos, crime, violence and therefore poverty. Machiavelli knew this and in his book, The Prince, he explained how a stable tyranny was better for “the people” than an unstable democracy. In a stable tyranny there is constancy and business can be done, but in an unstable democracy, there is chaos and people starve.

So we live in a world where the powerful can break the law at will, while the rest of us are below it’s protections… which was Madison’s definition of tyranny in the Federalist Papers. We have the entirety of human history proving this to be the case. Recent examples being even more heinous than ancient ones as in the pedophile to the stars. Rulers have always been reticent to lead by example, since that is hard, while bossing people by violence and force is much easier. Moreover, it allows the rulers to meet their every want and desire. Obviously, if the rulers allowed the economy to collapse, their own fortunes would follow, and that is unacceptable to a psychopath. As a result, we live in a world set up for the elite, by the elite, and for the elite… to allow them to do anything they want. Is that just?

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Stock Market and the DNC

Posted on December 31, 2018 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the timing of the stock market rout in November and running to Christmas, is telling. Immediately after the democrats won a few seats in the House, the market began shaking, and that trend accelerated as the democrats gained more seats after the voting was done. By the time the democrats were awarded 30 seats the market was in a full correction. We will have to wait and see how the markets react in the new year, but we have some powerful anecdotal evidence, that despite Wall Street’s assertions to the contrary, they believe that when democrats are in power… the economy is going to be bad. Shockingly, the same trend happened when the democrats won in 2006, then set themselves to destroying our economy… and succeeded beyond anyone’s expectations.

When democrats stopped a bill that would have addressed the sub prime housing market they effectively brought us the 2008 recession. It was common knowledge at the time, that repackaging bad loans with good ones, then selling the derivatives as mortgage backed securities, would sooner or later explode in our faces. Democrats saw no downside to the economy tanking on a republican’s watch, and so stopped that bill. They won and we lost. Once Obama was in office, the Federal Reserve began monetizing the debt, to counter Obama’s economically destructive laws and decrees. For several years printing 85 billion dollars a month! Giving it to the banks. That is enough money to make 85 thousand people millionaires… a month! Yet the economy never made it back to 2008 levels under Obama.

Why would Wall Street Executives get out of the stock market just because the democrats won an election? Because Wall Street Executives know that the democrat party is all about power, not authority or helping others, but naked power, to harm others without being harmed. Wall street executives understand that the democrats will tank our economy the first chance they get, to amass power and withhold authority from Trump. They are willing co conspirators to the democrat party’s crimes. Being the friends and allies of the progressives, corporate executives know they will be taken care of… just like they were after 2008, when the Federal Reserve was printing enough money to make 85 thousand ordinary people millionaires a month, and gave it to the already rich Wall Street Executives.

Democrats are all about gaining power. If ruining the lives of thousands or even millions of people is a path to that power, then ruining those lives is something the DNC will gleefully to do. Destroying the economy, is a bridge they are all too willing to cross, as we have seen in the past. Flooding our nation with unvetted immigrants, who we know will kill people, steal, rape and bring in drugs, but they are reliable democrat voters, so the democrats will shut down the government to keep them coming in. Moreover, the chaos illegals create can be used as a bludgeon against republicans. The party that booed God three times at their convention, goes to spirit cookings, has pedophilia art adorning their walls and cannot tell the truth, even when the truth would serve them better, will cross any bridge for power.

So, upon examination, it’s clear why the market has tanked in the last few weeks, the allies of the progressives know the fix is in, and are getting their money out, before the democrats obliterate our economy. The suffering, hunger and violence that will result, are prices the democrats are willing for us to pay, to amass power in the hands of people without empathy, a conscience or human heartedness. Their allies on Wall street know what they are and rightly fear them. Their own allies tremble, because they know the lengths the democrats will go, in order to get revenge, like they did Nixon, it took three decades, but they got him for prosecuting Alger Hiss. The democrats will use their ill got power to destroy and punish, it is in their nature. So… the stock market rout is a taste of things to come.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Socialism… Empathy or Envy?

Posted on December 27, 2018 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, socialism is not, and never has been about empathy, but has always been about envy. George Orwell knew this truth all too well by his close association with socialists in his day. One thing is self evident, that is, philosophies based on bad intent… must be malevolent. Since socialism is based on envy, “bad intent,” it must be malevolent. As predicted, history shows unequivocally, that socialism is always malevolent to some portion of the population. Self aware socialists know their own hearts, and the malice that fuels their socialism, but most are not self aware, and let the malevolence of envy drive them, as they lie to themselves, that they have empathy for the little guy… even as they despise the poor. This is why socialism is both pernicious and evil.

It is pretty easy to prove that progressives despise the very people they claim to be in support of. For one, people who identify as progressives give very little to charity, while people who identify as conservatives, give far more to charity. Which correlates very well with empathy. Moreover, is it empathetic care for someone to trap the poor and their children, in a cycle of poverty? Progressives seem to think so. While libertarians and conservatives seek to allow the poor to rise to the top of their potential, leaving poverty, socialists of all stripes, progressives, Nazis, European conservatives, Marxists, democratic socialists, etc… need to keep the poor, hungry, angry and violent, so they can create more poor, and thus reliable socialist voters and soldiers.

Have you ever noticed, every government program that has ever existed, actually does the exact opposite of what it was intended? Those that actually work are both a rarity because it could lead to the elimination of that program. There is one thing government programs seek above all else… immortality. Obama, the noted socialist former President, eliminated the welfare to work program, that was responsible for getting so many people off the dole and into a job. He eliminated it by fiat because it was getting people out of the cycle of poverty. It actually worked and so had to go. Clinton had only agreed to it as a political expedient to Gingrich and the republican controlled House anyway. Think about it, if any immortal government program worked, wouldn’t that, by definition, lead to it’s ending?

Democrats, especially now that old party is captured by radical Marxists, globalists and post modernist progressives, have always professed a love for the poor, while at the same time avoiding ever touching the unclean masses. How many socialists do you see hanging out with the poor, unless it is to whip them into a voting bloc, or a Marxist revolution? You don’t, because the poor are tools for getting at the people they envy, not to hang out with. Like Rousseau. He partied with the elite in Paris while despising them, and most probably himself as well, all the time. Progressives like to hang out with the beautiful people. As in Animal Farm, the Pigs moved into the house, slept in the beds and hung out with humans… not the animals. Socialists are the modern versions of the Pharisees.

If socialists allowed capitalism to eliminate poverty, what need would there be for socialists? That is why, progressives drive government to do everything in it’s power, to increase the number of poor people. Unlimited immigration of people from the third world is one way. It both increases the gross number of the poor, and lowers wages for natives, driving millions from middle class to lower class, plus driving up the total demand for welfare. Not to mention the chaos. All of which builds a reliable voter base. Just as government programs out of self interest, must make the problem they are tasked with fixing worse, while appearing to try to make it better, Socialists of all colors, pretend to love the poor, as a political necessity… so they can exact revenge on those they envy.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Free and Fair?

Posted on December 24, 2018 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the media is an unreported political contributor, to the DNC. In the 2018 election, the media’s open and clear bias that under girded every article they reported, was a strong contribution to the DNC success in taking back the House of Representatives. Their support would have costed billions of dollars, if a true tally were made of the hours they spent on air, hammering on Trump. If anyone else did a one hundred thousandth of that they would at least be charged, literally, Dnesh D’Sousa went on probation for giving twenty thousand dollars to a republican campaign. So we have a political system, where one faction gets the benefit of nothing but good press, (unreported campaign contributions) and the other, nothing but bad press, and that is supposed to be a free and fair election?

Watch any of the media conglomerates, (conglomerates because all of them are owned by three corporations), any night of the week, and not only during the nightly news, will hundreds of millions of dollars of campaign contributions is heaped on the democrats, while nothing but vitriol is vomited upon republicans. The campaign contributions don’t stop when the news is over, they only ramp up, during prime time. The only two television shows that showed conservatives in a positive light, were canceled, despite great ratings. Which suggests, they were canceled for political reasons, not economic. Meanwhile the shows that vilify republicans, casts men as buffoons and promote social justice, are innumerable. Which, each night, must add up to many millions of dollars.

The media that calls itself unbiased, even makes up stories out of whole cloth, and passes them on as news, like CBS fabricating documents to smear George Bush three days before an election, which we wouldn’t even know about, except for what the progressive media conglomerates call, “fake news.” From the Rolling Stone fake Rape story, the “exploding cars” of NBC fame, to Jason Blair at the New York Times, the media is not above fabricating stories when it suits them. So, these are just a few of the ones we know about… how many are fabricated that we do not? No wonder the media that calls itself unbiased, hates the new media, their lies are being exposed. What do you suppose is the value of a fraudulent story destroying the brand of a foe… reckoned as campaign contributions?

The main stream media carried the water for Barak Obama his entire term in office. Imagine the main stream media’s reaction… if Trump were to be caught sending weapons to Mexican drug cartels? Weapons that had killed hundreds perhaps thousands of Mexicans and also a US boarder patrol agent? They covered it up for Obama. After the Benghazi terrorist attack, Obama sent Susan Rice out on her lying round of the media, who listened wide eyed, that it was because of a video, and reported it as if true. Meanwhile they knew all along, as we do now, that it was a lie to cover up Obama’s earlier lie, that he had ended Islamic terrorism. Just that one Sunday, the value of the contribution to the Obama campaign must have been in the hundreds of millions of dollars, unreported of course.

The double standard in prosecution of campaign finance violations is the icing on the cake. Al Gore was caught openly flaunting campaign finance laws, and famously said, “There is no controlling legal authority…” and skated, setting precedent for democrats. Later, Dnesh D’Souza became a felon, for a violation of less than a twenty thousand dollar donation to a campaign, setting precedent for republicans. The DC double standard. As perhaps trillions of dollars worth of unreported campaign contributions go to the DNC, and campaign finance laws are arbitrarily enforced, depending on political affiliation, it would appear that the system is set up to silence everyone but the democrats, even as they allow the democrats unlimited access to the minds of the people. Free and fair eh…?

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, Law, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Post Modernists As The Arbiters of Truth

Posted on December 20, 2018 by john

Dear friends,

It seems to me, the chief advantage that progressives have, is they became the arbiters of education…and now truth. People who didn’t see education as a means to advance the child’s ability to engage in the marketplace, but of political indoctrination, seized control of our education system, and now kids graduate high school unable to read, tell time, make change without a calculator or find the US on a globe. Now post modernists, who believe that there is no empirical truth, that even sciences such as mathematics are bigoted, because they were created by the patriarchal hegemony and as such are mere tools of that evil order, have become the arbiters of truth. We can expect the results of post modernists as the arbiters of truth to yield just as bitter fruits as progressive education has.

Since the failure of socialism was the quintessential lesson of the twentieth century, progressives had to find another reason to fight for socialism, so they came up with post modernism. Since empirical reality had loudly proclaimed, socialism doesn’t work, socialists would disavow empirical reality itself,instead creating an “oppressor and oppressed classes” philosophy as a totalizing world view. Rather than separate the human race into bourgeoisie and proletariat, and pit the groups against each other,they would separate the world into oppressors and oppressed, and pit them against each other. The unemployable intellectual, now could lead an ANTIFA mob against the oppressor class and strike a blow for the oppressed… since marshaling a hoard of peasants into a revolution is off the table.

By denying objective reality, postmodernists deny it’s ruling on socialism, and so assuage their anger at empirical reality. Post modernists deny mathematics and science as tools of the patriarchy, deny even the differences between male and female, they take the position that absurd is normal and normal is absurd. Openly stating there is no objective truth… Those who believe there is no objective truth, only subjective power, obviously cannot be trusted, and yet that is a core philosophy of postmodernists, who have become the arbiters of truth, like Snopes. Now the post modernist can justify becoming autocrat, not for economic justice, but for social justice. To force the oppressor class to make amends for it’s oppression, regardless if any of the people punished,are actually guilty of oppression.

Pragmatism makes the claim that a philosophy can be judged by the fruit it yields. Progressivism,socialism and communism have yielded nothing but vile and bitter fruit. The education system has become a standing joke, and in an advanced society, where we wield the very forces of nature itself, it is sub optimal to have poorly educated people. Yet we do.Progressives have taken our schools from the 1950’s, where marksmanship was taught in our schools, kids graduated able to read,write, do math then create the Space age and computer revolutions.Today our kids graduate without having the common sense not to eat Tide Pods. This trend has accelerated since the education system has adopted the post modernist Common Core curriculum. It cannot be denied the fruit is bitter and vile.

Which brings us to the salient point here, that if progressive and post modernist doctrines had to stand in the arena of ideas, and fight on level ground, they would be laughed out of existence. But for their ability to grab the minds of people, children in the case of education and adults in the case of “fact checkers,” their ideas would wither. The absurd philosophy of post modernism could only come about in the context of an education system captured by a psychopathic political faction. They succeeded magnificently in their gaining monopoly control of our education system, and the fruits are bitter and vile, are we going to allow them to become the final arbiters of truth too? People who openly avow there is no objective reality, only subjective power,telling us what to believe… What could go wrong?

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Time as an analog of the Collapse of the wave function.

Posted on December 17, 2018 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, time is a macro manifestation of the collapse of the wave function. Time has three parts, that which has happened, (the wave function has collapsed),now, (the point of collapse), and the future (a wave potential). Just as on the quantum level, “matter” acts as a wave until observation collapses the wave to a particle, time behaves the same way, but on a scale we can see. We know what has gone past and we know what is happening now, but the future is a murk of possibilities. Even as the future passes now, and again, now, and again, now, in the very short run we can predict the potential, but long tailed events can overturn that potential future, tossing our predicted life into a tailspin. We have no control over what has happened, the future is impossible to know, but we have control over now.

Just as the observer effects the observed on a quantum scale, we effect the future on the macro scale,by our reactions to events. When faced with tragedy, we can collapse into alcohol and drugs, or we can ride the emotion, as an elephant driver does an elephant, to do great good. The elephant has the power, and that power can be wielded for good or ill, depending on where we drive it. In this way we effect the future. If we use that power to make the world worse, then we have effected the future for ill. If, on the other hand, we use that power to do good, we have also effected the future, for the better. When we think about it, how would each future make us feel about ourselves? Moreover, if on the off chance there is a Heaven, making the world a much worse place is not the best path to get there.

Once the wave form collapses, it cannot be uncollapsed, just as the past cannot be undone. To dwell on the past, letting it hold us from a better future, for whatever reason, is a path to reacting badly to the suffering of the world. It is called the past because it is past. It’s hold over us is only in our minds, a bit like entanglement, except we can break the entanglement of the past from our future. To relive the past, dwelling on it, is trying to uncollapse the wave form, it cannot be undone and therefore is a waste of valuable time, energy and thinking power. Yet we remain  entangled with it both good and bad. Because it has given us so many good things we fear letting go of the bad. Those things that have made us stronger, better people and more resilient, are the only memories we should remain entangled with.

The future is a wave form until it collapses at the moment of now. At each collapse, we can pull it a tiny bit closer to the future we want. Often, heck, always, it is a stretch, but each stretch makes us that much more likely to get the future we desire. Because of the observer effect on quantum waves. As we strive for which we want, our consciousness itself effects what we are given. Tom Campbell is doing research in this area. Therefore we actually have the ability to get what we want but we have to reach for it with intention. According to Campbell that intention and effort effects the quantum universe to give us that, for good or ill. Because often we desire and intend to get that which is not in our best interests. It is our effort and intention in the now that changes our options in the future.

Time is an analogue of quantum theory’s collapse of the wave function. Time operates exactly the same way, but backwards. As the particle, (electron, neutron, photon, etc…) acts as a wave until observed, time acts as a particle, the past particular, until the moment of now, and as a wave to the future. This is evident in the double slit experiment. At the moment of observation, the now, as the time wave changes from the particular to the possible, the photon goes from a wave to a particle. We are actors on both realms. Our observation collapses the wave function, on the quantum level, and our experience of now, collapses the time wave function. Our point consciousness is entangled in our past, yet we have the ability to disentangle ourselves from it, as our consciousness gives us agency on both planes.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, media, philosophy, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Boeing’s Stupid Capitalism

Posted on December 15, 2018 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, Boeing’s opening a plant in China, is a symptom of a much larger problem with corporate governance. The incentive systems within the modern corporate structure are pernicious at best and outright counter productive at worse. Obviously because of regulations. Government regulates corporations, and as I have pointed out many times in these articles, regulation only exists to give a politically favored participant the upper hand in an economic exchange. They create, nourish, and husband, the corporate system while the corporate system, feeds the political system payola. Corporations are not controlled by people with skin in the game, as firms were years ago, they are run in many cases by political zealots.

The corporate system was “intended,”to allow diversification of ownership of large firms, from the bourgeoisie to the proletariat. The first shareholder owned firm,that I know of, was the British East Indies Company, and it paid a handsome dividend as well. The idea was that a professional class of people would run large firms for the benefit of the shareholders. Having relatively unaccountable professionals would lead to better run companies, that would be more productive, in the long run. In fact the case has been quite the opposite. The modern creative destruction paradigm is, firms are created and grown by an entrepreneur, then sold to Wall street, where the “professional” class slowly destroys the firm, such as IBM, Apple, Digital, etc…

Instead of making the economy more efficient, the corporate system ended up exchanging the bourgeoisie for the new class, which was the goal of people like Woodrow Wilson all along. Rather than unaccountable Bourgeoisie, owning and controlling the means of production, the ownership became more diversified, as the control became more concentrated. Concentrated in the hands of people, who often have politics as their main driver of action, rather than the best interests of the shareholders. The administrative system is their nursery, school and parent. The new class’ power comes from the administrative system and so they pay it homage. This creates a feedback loop, government promoting the corporate system, and the corporate system promoting government.

The corporate system could not be what it is today however, without it’s lap dog, the government. The corporate and political systems go hand in hand. Both run by the new class… the administrators, bureaucrats and corporate executives. The bureaucrats regulate their brothers and sisters, and their siblings in turn, open their doors to ex government officials. This is facilitated by the fact they have the same indoctrination, and therefore the same goals… as Woodrow Wilson’s favorite book, Philip Dru Administrator, is based on. Unlimited government by a professional class, unelected, unaccountable and ruthless in their task of making the world a utopia. They are cut from the same psychopathic cloth, as was Caesar, Hitler, Stalin, Mao and Lenin, who also were not afraid to break a few eggs.

So, the corporate government system, has taken control of the means of production from the hands of people with skin in the game, and given it to political zealots, intent on a one world government utopia. Which is facilitated by a captured bureaucracy that in large part agrees with the goal, and end to nationalism and a start to a glorious new globalism. Against the tenets of their own ideology, they have accepted post modernism as their philosophy, as an expedient, to forward the goal of global socialism. Boeing opening it’s plant in China will lead to a transfer of aviation technology to China, we all know this, no one more so than the new class executives at Boeing. So why do it? To forward the goal of globalism, at the cost to the shareholders, who are the hated bourgeoisie anyway.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Mercy, philosophy | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Faction that is capable of anything…

Posted on December 13, 2018 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the progressive faction that is now in control of the democrat party, is capable of anything.They have jailed people to cover political lies, sold weapons to drug cartels and blamed gun dealers for it, lied about a terrorist attack for political purposes, hacked reporters computers, corrupted their own internal election, lied under oath, facilitated a sale of the US strategic commodity, uranium, to the State they themselves claim is our greatest adversary, fabricated a dossier colluding with foreigners both British and Russian to get a special prosecutor to undermine their political enemy, hid top secret emails on a private server that the Chinese and Pakistanis had access to, wielded the IRS, FBI, DOJ and CIA as political weapons, as well as a multitude of other crimes.

As I discussed in an earlier article, silence is a byproduct of fear. Like Machiavelli said, it is better to be feared than to be loved, and the progressives, following in the tracks of their intellectual fathers, Lenin, Stalin, Marx and Mao,will do whatever it takes. They have no fear about breaking a few eggs to make that omelet. So, the faction that demands power, and by power I mean the ability to harm another while they cannot do anything to you, psychopathic power, has no qualms about abusing the authority invested in them, to gain power. That power then allows them to wield fear as a weapon to silence anyone who becomes a problem. Like Seth Rich. If authority is given to someone who is trustworthy, that authority will not be leveraged into power, but if given to a psychopath…

Lets face it, how can you trust a word out of the mouths of the democrat party, when it comes to elections?I mean… seriously? They even perverted their own election to get the outcome they wanted, so why wouldn’t they pervert an election with people they have no empathy or common cause for, and openly despise? Presumably they didn’t openly despise Sanders. It has been proven that the DNC rigged the election for Clinton against Sanders.That fact, in and of itself, requires the democrat party to regain some measure of trust, after a long and hard period of chastisement and good actions… not given total trust, especially over those who didn’t break the law or morality in their internal election. That, I would think, is common sense.

When Obama had the film maker jailed to protect his lie about the Benghazi terrorist attack, on the anniversary of 911, had our government, media and judiciary a whit of virtue left, they would have called him on it in no uncertain terms.As Trump cannot even run the government without the courts getting in the way, those same courts allowed Obama to walk all over our Constitution, exceeding his authority on multiple occasions, shows unequivocally, that the faction Obama belongs to, controls the apparatus of government and the media. People who are so callous to others that they would jail a person to cover a lie, a political lie at that, are almost certainly psychopaths, or at least sociopaths.Who we all understand are capable of anything.

The entire apparatus of the US government and our main stream media, are captured by the progressive faction. A faction that we have established is capable of anything.They now control the House of Representatives in an election that was, to say the least, strange. It was marred by outright vote fraud in multiple states, vote harvesting made legal in California and,shockingly, led to the ouster of every single republican in that state. Is it any wonder that all alternative voices to the progressive, post modernist main stream media, are called fake news? The faction that will stop at nothing to turn authority into power is nearing it’s goal. It is up to us to wake up and turn this ship around, else we and our children will live under the rule of psychopaths, with the ability to watch you in your living room.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

.

Posted in economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , | Leave a comment