Limericks

Dear Friends,

The West is a great place as everyone knows,
But ruled by globalist elites wearing robes,
Proven by immigration,
Without integration,
Because those elites are rabid oikophobes.

Oikophobic elites have closed the pressure gate,
Pressure builds while they scoff and debate,
Tempers flair,
But beware,
It’ll blow sooner or later it’s now up to fate.

Bonhoeffer told us what they are,
Dunning and Kruger lit upon a star,
Oikophobic and woke,
A idea captured bloke,
But self destruction won’t get them far.

European culture they do reject,
Morals and ethics get no respect,
The police abet the crime,
Anger grows over time,
Until it triggers the Bubba Effect.

There once was an elite in the EU,
Smart as a whip and _______ too,
She said with a _______,
My head’s full of _______,
And went on to ______ ______ _____.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Cycle Of Leftist Violence

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the ongoing wave of progressive violence is the result of the leniency given their antics in the past. During the Biden administration, pro-life clinics were set on fire with leftist anti-Christian messages left behind… to zero prosecutions. Even as people were sent to prison for peacefully protesting abortion. The double standard was the point. Leftist violence, even arson, is tolerated by the powers in charge… while conservative constitutionally protected speech has been criminalized. The permission slip for violence was handed out to a faction known for its atrocities. ANTIFA is the heir to the RFB, or the Red Front Fighters League. They would go around and beat up anyone who went to a political rally other than theirs. Showing their long history of anti-democratic action.

Marxists and Fascists, two nuts from the same bur, steep themselves in violence. The Marxists normalize it then the Fascists take advantage. Some may argue, but today’s leftist faction is neither fascist nor Marxist… they’re progressive. This shows they don’t understand what the progressive faction is. During the Woodrow Wilson administration, one of the first true progressives, (who’s wife ran the White House due to his mental infirmity), the progressive movement was formed. Intellectuals reasoned, the centrally planned economy had to be superior to the chaos that was the free market but they also eschewed the “Revolution.” They believed in the rightness and inevitability of central planning. So if it is inevitable anyway, simply institutionalize it and speed the process up.

When the Soviet Union collapsed and central planning was proven a failure, again, the eggheads who paid no price for being wrong except for the damage to their egos, scrounged around for another way to justify central planning. So they came upon Woke ideology. A philosophy of power that says there is no truth, no justice, and no reason… only power structures. So they set themselves to control the power structure… not for their own benefit, that would be uncharacteristically honest, but for whatever downtrodden they see fit to elevate, and against perpetrators they deem fit to be trodden under. Moreover, they had the system to make the switch to global central planning in place, all they need is enough chaos to justify their taking over.

In comes the permission slip for ANTIFA and BLM to riot, commit arson, and now… political assassinations. The narrative that the left is peaceful and the right is violent is getting harder and harder to maintain, in the face of zero conservative violence, and waves of targeted leftist violence. Even though most of the leftist violence in support of central planning is covered up by the mockingbird media. Soft-peddling arson as “fiery but mostly peaceful…” and sloughing off progressive murders by saying, “Both sides do it…” Though we all know if there was actual violence from the right it would be international headlines touted as proof the right is violent, and leftist atrocities were justified. Then they could rationalize cracking down and installing their global hegemony.

This is why I believe the left is given a permission slip to violence… they are useful idiots for the globalist progressives. It doesn’t matter to the central planners what form of central planning comes about, communist, fascist, or progressive, all they care about is that the world come under the thumb of central planning. So they can make it like Star Trek… a utopia where people work for their social credit score… not money. All these wonderful ideas of the central planners are just a few atrocities away… as they always are. Because people who use violence to make themselves despots are cut from the same cloth as Pol Pot, Mao, Hitler, Tamerlane, Stalin, and the rest. Utopia is never just a few atrocities away because that’s the wrong direction. Violence and hubris lead to Hell… peace and humility lead to Eden.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, media, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

Some criminals many want to abide,
To deportations they object and deride,
Chaos in a mask,
Though would I ask,
When have the police ever let you slide?

Safe drugs are locked behind a pharmacy wall,
But dangerous ones are available in the mall,
Logic’s subversion,
Why the perversion,
Because bureaucracy fails us one and all.

A movement arose to morn the dead,
A genocide in Gaza or so it is said,
Many came here,
No Jew to jeer,
So they shoot up a church instead.

They told us we must be off our lid,
They would never come after a kid,
Time goes by,
And my oh my,
Judged by education it looks like they did.

Another day and other mass shooting,
Leftists are rioting and ________,
Do the __________,
Get no ___________,
And for you the political class is __________.

Sincerely
John Pepin

Posted in Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Two State Theory of Reality

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the Double Slit Experiment tells us that reality comes in two flavors, or states, a Wave and a Solid State. In that experiment, light was found to be both a wave, and upon observation or measurement, a particle. Therefore reality must have two states, a Wave State (nonlocal, potential, and un-collapsed) and a Particle State, (local, determined, and collapsed). Our science has plumbed the observable and measurable particle State. This idea seems to explain the logical paradoxes, physical singularities, as well as “supernatural phenomenon.” If there are two states to reality and our physics mostly only models the Solid State, then our scientists don’t even know half of reality even exists… let alone are able to model it. Moreover, this hypothesis is falsifiable, making it an actual theory.

The Double Slit Experiment has been around for over a century and its full implications are yet to be realized. The proven quantum erasure effect itself implies the Wave State isn’t local even in time itself. Moreover, the experiment has been done with protons, neutrons, electrons, and even molecules, showing the Wave and Solid States are fundamental to material reality. What else can we conclude? Up to now most scientists have disregarded the deep implications of that experiment. That reality comes in two phases, a Wave State and a Solid State. Moreover that the physics able to model the Solid State obviously can’t model the Wave State. On the other hand, we have examples of Wave State models that are applied today, like Maxwell’s vectors as opposed to Ampere’s Solid State equations.

Under this paradigm magnetic force may be a Wave State phenomenon. Perhaps even gravity will be discovered to be Wave State physics. One could imagine that when a neutron star collapses into a black hole, a physical singularity, the physics break down because it’s phase changed into a Wave State. The information is still there, stored in the Wave State. So it may be fully explainable with Wave State physics. What about UFOs? If they’re aliens, then they may have discovered Wave State physics and therefore technology. That’s why they are able to defy the “laws” of physics. They only defy the laws of Solid State physics… not Wave State physics. Even such crazy notions like the Mandela Effect could be some kind of macro quantum erasure effect based on Wave State Physics?

Then there’s the possibility that life and consciousness are both Solid State manifestations of Wave State phenomenon. Moreover, if consciousness is a Wave State phenomenon then that could explain why observation collapses the wave function? Waves interacting and one canceling the other out? What about telepathy, remote viewing, and such? If they are Wave State phenomenon, then observation, especially measuring scientific observation, would collapse them, making them un-observable in the Solid State. They can only be implied… like dark matter is implied by its influence on matter and not by direct observation. The explanatory ability of the Two State model is sufficient to make me leery. If something explains everything… it explains nothing.

The beauty of the Two State model is that it’s actually falsifiable. Experiments can be crafted to test the hypothesis and exclude it or elevate it to a theory. The experiments would have to be carefully crafted by folks who are smarter than me. The Two State Model of reality however is very compelling. We have examples of math that describes the same thing in both a Wave and Solid State… Maxwell’s Equations describe the Wave State of electricity, while Ampere’s describe it in the Solid State. Maxwell’s are vectored, nonlocal, and potential while Amperes are linear, local, and mechanical. Moreover, Maxwell sidestepped the Ampere force between conductors. This suggests there is indeed a Wave and Solid State. Human understanding could be elevated to another level if this is true.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Imbalances of Power and The State

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, there are a myriad of reasons to increase the power, scope, and role of the State… and all of them are spurious. The arguments sound logical but are in fact circular and meant to manipulate us into self-harm. Evil grows from an imbalance of power. Those who would subject us to the rule of Dionysus, claim they will level all imbalances of power. Well, all but their own. Creating an absolute imbalance of power that must lead to greater evil than the evil it was supposed to stop. Just as the Federal Reserve has created more and deeper recessions, the education department has gutted American education, and the energy department drove up the cost of energy. The solution to all problems according to those that fail is always… more power to them and less for us.

Government exists to level imbalances of power between States. A city state that has marshaled its people into an army has created an imbalance of power that it seeks to exploit, by invading another city state. Other “states” then must exist to limit that imbalance of power. Those rulers who would make war then follow Goering’s advice, ‘Convince the people they are under attack and vilify the peacemakers as unpatriotic.’ Stirring the citizenry into a war frenzy, so their children will gladly lay down their lives, allowing a despot to tyrannize their families. That pattern is as clear as stripes. It repeats across time, geography, and ideology. The elite argue they need an army to outmatch any others or else the people are at risk from other states. Then use that army to invade other states.

The socialist faction exists to level the imbalance of power between the worker and the business owner. Their reason for being is to elevate the power of the worker above that of the owner. They argue if not for them, the worker would face ever-growing deprivation until the workers are used up and tossed out like slaves in Arabia. Yet, not one socialist movement has ever elevated the workers for anything but a short time. In those short times, they have utterly destroyed entire classes of people, national economies, and waged wars of aggression to expand their leprous rule. The progressive faction is another central-planning ideology that promotes socialism by dribs and drabs. They created the education department, energy, USAID, agriculture, etc… all of which are total failures.

At the acme of the early Progressive Era, the central planners instituted the Federal Reserve… to address the imbalance of power between the banks and their depositors. It was sold as the end of recessions, bank runs, and inflation… it created the worst recession in human history, the worst bank runs ever known, while money printing has destroyed 92% of the dollar’s value. By any measure the Fed is a failure. It’s always behind the curve, lowering or raising interest rates too late, or to politically favor the progressive faction. As history shows that the Fed keeps interest rates low for Democrats and high for Republicans. The Fed did indeed address that imbalance of power between the depositor and the bank… in the bank’s favor. So they get bailed out when they fail and we pay the bill.

Despite State power always being sold as a way to limit imbalances of power, empowering an almighty state is the ultimate imbalance of power. So it can only result in evil. The Fed destroys the economy, Education destroys kids’ minds, Agriculture obliterates family farms, Energy drives up the cost of energy… in every way and by every measure State power fails to level imbalances of power. Instead State power only increases imbalances and the evil that comes from them. The answer then is to limit the power of the State. Don’t fall victim to Thrasymachus’ spurious arguments about how the State will balance imbalances of power. Because it doesn’t. It exacerbates them. The State partners up with the former abusers and empowers their abuses under color of law. So just say no to State power.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

Out of control is the CIA,
Looks like they killed JFK,
Corruption deep,
A fortress keep,
And it’s past time for it to go away.

Some judges are relics,
Not at all skeptics,
Rule by Kritocracy,
Adept at inaccuracy,
Because they just have no ethics.

There once was a scam so great,
It was written in the stars and fate,
Wilson was enthralled,
But what’s it called,
It’s the totalitarian deep state.

She’s a corruptocrat Hillary Clinton,
With money and power she is smitten,
I would confide,
But I fear suicide,
And we all know she belongs in prison.

A bureaucrat is one without a ______,
A cog in a cubicle they do their ______,
Regulating away,
Rights and our say,
And when they speak we smell a ______.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, media, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

On Endorsing Political Violence

Dear Friends,

It seems to me the moment a political faction endorses the use of violence, that faction has not only discredited itself but it’s put a target on its own back. That’s the epitome of stupidity. Such people should be disqualified for office simply due to lack of intelligence let alone their open malevolence. Show me a person who is absolute in their certainty and I’ll show you a fool. Moreover, someone so certain of the rightness of their actions they feel compelled to violence, is a dangerous fool. The faction then that engages in stochastic terrorism believes its atrocities are justified by their certainty, and violence is merely a tool to create justice. If their normalizing violence backfires, their control of the media won’t let anyone forget about the atrocity done to them… as it hides their atrocities.

We have been subjected to censorship, surveillance, and many nations have disarmed their citizens. A sure sign they “trust” us. My mother has a saying, “Never trust anyone who doesn’t trust you.” Which in this case would appear we shouldn’t trust nosy Nellies who censor and disarm us. Because no one ties your hands to make you safe, they tie your hands to make them safe from you. Such people will exclaim to the heavens how honest, virtuous, and doggone it, better people than the rest of us. And in their ivory tower they’ll believe every word of it. So is it such a big step to go from abusing all of our Constitutional Rights under color of law to killing people who disagree? Especially since most Democrats refused to condemn political violence… if they disagree with the victim’s politics.

Making disagreement on a political subject sufficient cause for public murder seems kind of stupid to me. Because those who make that argument are painting targets on themselves. Moreover, if they are assassinated, no one has the right to complain because they openly avowed, in the Congressional record… that political violence is acceptable. In essence, they are declaring open season on themselves. In your opinion, is there anything more stupid? Plus, to self-identify as being that stupid is itself stupid. Such actions are utterly discrediting, since who thinks giving stupid people absolute power could end in anything but tragedy? There’s a reason we don’t give loaded guns to five year old kids to play with in the backyard. So why give them nukes?

The faction that’s openly advocating for political violence believes they themselves are safe from it. Violence for thee, and peace for me, is their anthem. Their monopoly control of the media, NGOs, and bureaucracy give them a feeling of invulnerability. If anyone should even threaten one of them, the entire establishment will go into hyperdrive vilifying all conservatives. That same legacy media that claimed Jan. 6th was violent and the BLM riots were fiery but mostly peaceful can be trusted to give a sepia version of the news. Remember when Gabby Giffords was shot by a deranged leftist… the media attacked Sarah Palin for posting a target over Arizona instead of the attacker. This brings us to another reason endorsing violence is stupid, they aren’t safe from their own crazy constituency.

In Mien Kampf Hitler said he started the Brown shirts because the Bolsheviks were sending armed thugs to everyone else’s rallies and beating the attendees up. They were the precursor to ANTIFA. So no one else could have a political rally. So the Weimar government simply didn’t have rallies. His Brownshirts protected the attendees of his rallies though. But not without bloody street fights. The result was that his faction became the hegemonic faction at the time. This tells us that when violence is tolerated, the most violent get power. Clausewitz said that war is violence, and so the most violent have an advantage. Those advocating for political violence then should heed those words, because there may be people more violent than them only biding their time. Like in Germany in the 1930s.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, Law, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

118 donkeys think political violence is okay,
If the killer disagrees with what you say,
Did they think it through,
Are they sniffing glue,
What if an assassin disagrees with their bray?

When someone’s dumb it’s evident,
Have you met a fool who is prudent,
They dismiss,
Know this,
The stupid are supremely confident.

Turns out the experts are wrong again,
Failing predictions in paper and pen,
Centralized authority,
A powerful minority,
That’s lowered the lot of women and men.

When some are above the law,
While others are in its maw,
Thrasymachus was right,
Law serves might,
And the feature is now a flaw.

There ones was a progressive _______,
With character and _______ _______,
She said with a __________,
Assassination is __________,
So she put a ______ ____ ______ _____.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Economics and Appeal To Authority

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, what if the economy is in recession and the elite claim it’s not? The media will report all is well and the politicians will feel comfortable in their ivory tower, but the people will feel the recession. We need not be told we are suffering, we feel it firsthand, while the elite don’t feel our suffering at all. That’s why they are so willing to mete it out. Moreover, what if we have been in recession since 2022 and the administrative state has lied about it? The history of bureaucrats lying has a long and honored tradition. In fact, they lie when the truth would serve them better… so the possibility they lied is on the table. The fact the BLS just revised away all the jobs that were created under the Biden administration is another strong clue. Then there’s personal experience.

When you live in a cubicle insulated from the real world and the consequences of your actions… absurdity becomes normalized. People living in such an environment will often do things like circulate emails how to undermine the administration, act in ways contrary to the stated goals and means of the President, and invent reasons to go after those they dislike, criminally. If a bureaucracy were shown to be so utterly bereft of ethics, scruples, and filled with that much arrogance… it must be eliminated for the sake of the people and republic. Nevertheless, such a bureaucracy would stop at nothing to advance its egoistic agenda. So, covering up its economic failures with a few hundred lies, compounded over years, doesn’t seem like a wide river to cross. It’s certainly not as wide as the Rubicon.

It appears that nearly a million jobs turn out to be phantoms, non-corporeal careers, that vanished the moment they were observed. This gives us right to be alarmed. If effectively zero jobs were created during the entirety of the Biden administration, despite the tens of thousands of government jobs they opened up, that suggests more jobs in the private sector were lost. That’s generally seen as a sign of recession at least in the cyclical economy. Moreover, what else are they lying about? If they lied about the number of jobs created then maybe they lied about economic growth? At this point our bureaucrats are as trustworthy as a used car salesman with an odometer tool in his hand. So maybe we have been in a recession for years and the elite have tried to keep us in the dark.

Why would the administrative state, the bureaucracy, risk its reputation to hide a recession? Who knows the mind of another, but we can always ask, qui bono, who benefits? The obvious answer is central planners whose policies led us into recession. Clearly, they are the primary recipients of the benefits of hiding a recession from us. Then there are the bankers and Wall street that can arbitrage a recessionary economy into profits, as long as we’re kept in the dark. The bureaucracy itself benefits in that the damage their tsunami of regulatory friction does to economic activity is hidden as well. They all can claim, look at the economic numbers, the consensus is that we are in economic growth. We however have had the unsettling feeling in our gut that the numbers were wrong.

Job hunters and business owners alike fear the economy. Demand is collapsing, but mass layoffs have been staved off by mass deportations. Which drive up a firms’ cost of doing business, since an illegal alien costs a third what a legal American does. With no social security, workers comp, or taxes, hiring an American doesn’t make economic sense. So with illegals being deported, mass layoffs are off the table, for now. Demand is down and inflation has yet to eat its way through the economy. Continuing inflation reveals the brilliance of flooding the economy with money even as they shut it down. You have to admit, it is possible we have been in recession for 3-4 years now and the leading edge of the economy has bottomed out with the rest of the roller coaster following. If you agree… act accordingly.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, economy, media, philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

In The Republic Socrates put up a fight,
On the term justice he did shine a light,
Ages go by,
And oh my,
Turns out Thrasymachus was right.

There once was a banking system woke,
It fostered ideas that went broke,
A reputational risk,
A corporate whisk,
And their omelet is starting to smoke.

The elite see chaos as an investment,
Of that you’ll get no argument,
Migrants serve an end,
A tragedy you can’t defend,
So the crisis is the work of government.

Our leaders are innocent as a newborn pup,
With no time for sex they have a full cup,
Epstein’s a lie,
But I wonder why,
They would go to such lengths to cover it up?

The bureaucracy is filled with the _______,
Ever toiling spoiling and doing their ______,
Said a bureaucrat,
I’m _____ _____ ____,
Then fell flat ______ ____ _____ ______.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment