Limericks

Dear Friends,

 

Robots have been calling incessantly for awhile,

Yelling Hello and waiting in an automaton’s style,

Don’t drop the connection,

There’s a general selection,

To type “FU” on your push button dial.

 

Harvard is destitute they want you to know,

The billions in the bank are just for show,

A billion a buff,

That’s not enough,

They want the dish washer to subsidize the CEO.

 

The dog ate my homework and dust was in my eye,

The devil made me do it, it was that other guy,

I trusted the wrong source,

That put me off course,

I’m a mockingbird journalist and I never ask why.

 

A man once sold his soul to be President,

Thinking it would make his life relevant,

But it’d be phony,

In name only,

Because he would rule in derangement.

 

The UK is overrun by aliens in torrents,

The courts hold them in with warrants,

There’s a resolution,

Labour has a solution,

Raise the welfare for undocumented migrants.

 

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in media, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Decentralize Power

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, if we want prosperity, fecundity, and health, we must decentralize power. Experts and elitists will say this is nonsense. Their entire paradigm is built around the notion that experts coupled with governmental money and power will improve the lot of Mankind. They believe that government has a valid role to play in improving people’s lives. These are core principles hammered into the heads of everyone who passes through the government education system. They are sacred cows, so to speak. We all know the best tenderloin comes from sacred cows. We have a century of experience living with an ever-increasing administrative state. A bureaucracy dedicated to improving the lot of mankind by government coercion, media manipulation, and bribery.

We are in the progressive era. It didn’t end with the election of Warren Harding and Calvin Coolidge. The Roaring Twenties, a century ago, was a short hiatus. The progressive era came roaring back in the 1930s and has been the dominant ideology of the expert class since then. Incorporating the Frankfurt School, the Progressives encouraged the Beatnik movement in the 1950s and the anti-war pro-communist protests of the 1960s. By the 1970s, people were tired of the communist foolishness so turned it off. The Beatles song Revolution had driven a nail into their movement back in 1968 and the fruit of that song was reaped in the next decade. Then the 1980s came and the Yuppy movement relegated the progressives to the dark corners of academia… where they schemed up woke.

After the fall of the Berlin Wall and the discrediting of communism by Ronald Reagan, Progressives became rabid. They perverted every institution with progressive ideals. The more unaccountable power in the hands of experts… the better. As Milton Friedman famously said, Once socialism had been discredited, the experts agreed we needed more socialism. Since then our governments have grown in power, scope, and reach. To such an extent our unaccountable elites molest children in government-run brothels, take copious amounts of cocaine, and start wars they have no intention of winning… just profiting from. Meanwhile, crime, unemployment, and drug addiction exploded in Western nations. Results measured against ideals win every time.

The result of all this unaccountable power has effectively proven progressivism a failure. If we measure success as a rising standard of living, low crime, and hopeful people. If, however, we measure success as the elite getting to play god with us as their lab rats… then yes, progressivism is a total success. I however believe the lot of the people is more important than the will of the powerful. If you agree with me, that the progressive paradigm has delivered misery, children who don’t know if they’re a boy or girl, and drug overdoses by the tens of thousands a year… then we might want to try a different paradigm? A system that aligns with the decades of prosperity and not those of poverty, war, and failure. That would obviously be to decentralize power.

The Roaring Twenties was a time of decentralized power… and prosperity. After Harding died, Coolidge’s policies slashed the income tax, cut wasteful spending, and he took government’s foot off the regulatory brakes. The result was worldwide prosperity. Reagan tried to do the same, but progressives in the legislative branch mitigated his efforts. Nevertheless, people prospered. Trump cut regulations in his first term. Then, despite the Deep State’s illegal attacks, the economy prospered. That’s why I say, we should try cutting unaccountable power. Instead of centralizing authority until we have communism, why not decentralize authority until we have prosperity? Mention this to your representative, and we can have a century of prosperity… not just a few years.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, economy, Law, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What’s Up With All The Hate?

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, racial animosity is being ginned up by the cultural elite. From Grok going off the reservation, to the calls for genocide of the Jews, racial hatred is at a high and rising. It comes from culture. Everything flows from culture… the good and the bad. The end is obvious, civil war, chaos, and poverty. Why would the cultural elite or the people telling them what to shill want such things? One could argue chaos is the ideal Hegelian problem, leading to the correct reaction, which invites the presumed solution. Then there are the Fabians, who want to melt the world so they can recast it in a more decorative shape. Even as the self-described Accelerationists just want to collapse the whole thing. Nevertheless, the cultural elites are moving the world towards hate and away from love.

Maybe the Grok thing was a pure accident, perhaps the increase in anti Semitic comments is reactionary to censorship and not a precursor to future actions, or there’s the possibility it’s all simply observation bias on my part. Observation bias is indeed difficult to identify in oneself, and therefore correct in oneself. We all live in a cave and only now and then poke our heads out to see what the weather is. So there is that possibility. That I’m all wet. Then again, I wasn’t the only one who noticed Grok. Nor am I the only one who notices the amazingly open racial hatred of several CNN pundits. This is made even worse by the glaring double standard in the establishment’s reaction to it. The one side is encouraged while the other is silenced… creating tension, leading to more hate.

Our colleges appear to be hotbeds of hate. Jews are beaten up on campuses and the administrators do nothing. DEI is simply a means to build tension that will eventually lead to hate. Even as the genocidal rant, “From the river to the sea…” is allowed. From my perspective in my cave, it looks like our universities are in on the whole ginning up racism and hate thing. The politically correct elite even openly call those of us who disagree with their elitism, “Deplorables.” Add in the double standard enforced by law and you have systematic hate. Any unbiased look at the courts’ treatment of the summer of love 2020, compared to Jan 6th and the aftermath, can’t help but be blinded by the light. Yes, our elites, cultural, educational, and legal are heating the world with hate… racial and otherwise.

It’s possible the elite are simply stupid. Ineptitude has been the running excuse for all their other failures. That they don’t know they are heating the world with hate, and using a pillow to smother any love that might open its eyes. There is that old saying, don’t attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. To be charitable then we could simply say our elites are stupid fools. To be less charitable we might say they are intentionally heating the world… for a reason. If that’s the case then in their horrifyingly bent minds, the suffering they are causing will be offset by the utopia they will usher in. An Eden that justifies any atrocity. Even open civil war fueled by racial animosity. Which is to say, whatever option is true… our elites epitomize the term stupid.

What end are our stupid rulers driving us to? Hegelians and Fabians have this in common, there’s an end game. Once the world is heated sufficiently to make us malleable, they’ll mold us into bricks. Single minded and stacked together to elevate an all powerful leader. Individual, corporation, and government all functioning as one global unit. A global Fasces, (a bundle of sticks bound together), capable of anything. Why do I think that? Because centralized authority is the goal of all elitists. That’s the very definition of elitist. To amass power into the hands of the elite and away from the populace. Just as populism is the ideology of distributing power away from the elites. Could it be that the hate we are being baptized in is to remold the world, or end it? Either way, don’t go along.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Double Standards And The Epstein Client List

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the obvious lies and cover-ups of the Epstein client list, matched against the life sentence for a Jan 6th victim, over thought and speech crimes, prove beyond any doubt, our government is utterly, totally and completely corrupt, top to bottom… and is almost certainly beyond redemption. I can’t think of a more despicable thing our government could do… than to protect elite pedophiles. That’s so far beyond reason it boggles the mind, which is why the elite think they can cover it up. Because the more audacious the lie, the more it’s likely to be believed. There is no way the US government, or anyone in it, comes out of this clean. No matter if they were sterile before jumping into this cesspool, they aren’t anymore. Because anyone who covers up child rape… is just as guilty.

If we give the government the most charitable answer why they are covering up the systematic rape of children… because there might be some names in that list who aren’t actual pedophiles. I have to ask, isn’t that the role of our courts? If there were any accusation of you or me engaging in that behavior, rest assured, the government would move heaven and Earth to get us into court over it… proving that excuse is absurd. The next least damning excuse, that the cover-up is to protect the CIA and Mossad… is damning as hellfire. I’m sickened and outraged that the US and Israeli governments would systematically abuse children, to get political leverage. Seriously? That makes them worse than the pedophiles they provide children for. Such people should be buried under a supermax.

Meanwhile, Edward Kelley, a veteran who fought for this country, is going to prison for life… over thought and speech crimes. Meanwhile the killer of Ashley Babbitt walks free. This makes perfect sense, because thought and speech crimes are far more dangerous to a pedophile elite… than murder. Wrongthink and wrongspeak lead to wrong actions. That’s why they’re much worse than child rape, murder, or infecting the world with a lab-made pathogen that kills millions. Kelley was convicted for a conspiracy theory. He complained to his friends (the conspiracy) that he would like to kill the officials responsible for abuse of his rights under color of law. Unlike the attempted murderers caught outside Supreme Court Justices’ homes with weapons, he was punished quickly and severely.

Judging by today… it would be impossible to argue that in Plato’s Republic, Thrasymachus was wrong and Socrates was right. A government that literally scoops little girls from the streets, to feed to elite pedophiles, so the deep state can get levers on them, is the epitome of corrupt. Harming the very people they are obligated to protect… to amass power. Then abusing constitutional Rights under color of law. Pretty much aligns with Thrasymachus’ idea that the law serves the strong against the weak, so they can call theft just. Put another way, Bastiat, in his book, The Law, explains the law as it works today. Law is a tool, so the strong can take from the weak. The problem with this as a core philosophy of government, as it is normal today, is that the narrative becomes ever more absurd.

As the stories get ever more absurd, the demands that we unquestioningly accept them become ever more strident. The bureaucracy had years to come up with a decent deep-fake “found” video, “proving” Epstein strangled himself with strangle-proof paper sheets. And we get irrelevant yet doctored footage! Meanwhile, the DOJ finally announces it’s going to investigate Comey and Brennan over Russia Gate… which is clearly a distraction. I bet the investigation will be a cover-up in and of itself. Meanwhile, a veteran who risked everything for this country is going to prison for life, denied the rights he risked death, dismemberment, and mortal burns to defend. Sent there by chicken-hawk pedophiles and pimps who exploit the law to their advantage. I’m surprised he didn’t get the death penalty.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, Law, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

 

The elite say my speech is sacrosanct,

But your opinion must be down ranked,

When truth they face,

They call place,

And spin around because they’re outflanked.

 

Merz Starmer and Macron do quite well,

Ever with the sniffles and are always swell,

Their energy won’t wane,

But they don’t like cocaine,

It’s common knowledge they only like the smell.

 

The elite are panicking what a sight,

Hackles up they’re ready for a fight,

But what’s this,

Something’s amiss,

They’re running out of Colombian white.

 

Satan is a truly brilliant villain,

Damning people by the million,

He manipulates us to think,

The good people stink,

While his followers put children in an oven.

 

Should the Nazis have been allowed to prevail,

Because of potential German Children’s travail,

Or let the Barbary Pirates raid,

Because they needed a slave,

I wonder, is it better to stand up to evil or let it sail?

 

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Elephant In The Room

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the fact everyone thinks differently is an advantage. Some people have no inner monologue while others, like me, have a constant chatter of a dozen or so voices vying to talk. Some people are idealists while others are pragmatists. Mankind has a diversity of ways of thinking. This is an advantage to us. But how is it an advantage for people to think differently, doesn’t it create chaos and strife? The advantage comes from the ability of a group of people to look at a problem from several angles, to get a better perspective. Disasters strike when the powerful demand we see the world the way they want, making us into bricks, to build a tower of Babel. Our natural tendency is to see other perspectives as flawed. Sages, however, exploit other perspectives to see the whole.

The three blind men and an elephant adage works here. Three blind men touch an elephant. One touches its trunk, another touches the leg, and the third touches the beast’s side. When asked later to describe the elephant, each gives a different account. Combine the accounts, however, and you have a decent picture of an elephant. A huge beast, with a snakelike trunk, that has stout legs. All problems are like the elephant and we’re like the blind men. We see them from our own Bacon’s cave, then discuss them in Bacon’s Marketplace, even as the philosophers attribute them to Bacon’s Theater. Each of us takes our own perspective as the only valid one. Because we see it. Combine our perspectives and we have a much better view of the whole. Focusing the diffuse, however, is a difficult task.

The first step to a society’s ability to combine the fragmented into a whole, is to allow all the perspectives to speak. If one of the blind men was told to shut up, the others may never know the elephant is huge, or has a trunk, or stout legs. Censoring an opinion then is blinding. Because it closes off a perspective, carefully discerned from someone’s Bacon’s cave. Moreover, censorship ensures the idols of the marketplace are wrong, because not all perspectives are included. Those without the understanding that everyone thinks differently, are quick to silence dissenting voices, because those voices make no sense to them whatsoever. How can we allow unintelligible “gobbledygook” to be spoken in the presence of our logic and reason? That’s why we’re so often blindsided.

We have ears, eyes, noses, skin and tongues. Each adds a perspective to our understanding of reality. What if those abilities were distributed among people instead of universal? Those who can taste would have to rely on those who can see, as they would have to rely on those who can hear. Vision would be absurd to the tasters, hearers, touchers, and smellers. Just as taste wouldn’t make sense to a seer but it would to a smeller. No one would argue that one sense should be excluded for being disinformation. Yet that’s exactly what many do when they censor others. Ignorantly cutting all of society off from critical, though misunderstood, perspectives. Ways of thinking, however, are distributed among people. That’s why we have to consider each when assembling the peices.

Therefore a diversity of ways of thinking is a strong advantage to the human race… an advantage that we often squander foolishly. When we allow others to be censored we are literally blinding ourselves. Then we complain loudly we walked into the doorjamb face-first. You would think after chipping a tooth a few times, we would learn to listen to those warning us to slow down, or we’ll run into the doorjamb. Because that diversity of ways of thinking is only an advantage if we use it. A bulldozer is of no use if we refuse to start it… though if operated it can do astounding things. Our diversity of perspectives is the same. It can show us wonders and save us from disasters… if only we pay attention. This is why uniformity of thought makes us into mental bricks… to build to a tower of Babel.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

 

There once was a Harvard professor defeated,

She claimed slander and she’d been mistreated,

She wrote about honesty,

The results quite zesty,

And as it turns out she knowingly cheated.

 

The elite say, above the law are we,

We do as we darned well please,

But you toe the line,

Or pay a steep fine,

While we help the politically favored flee.

 

Exposing republicans and democrats by flashlight,

Calling one a lion and the other a sloth has some bite,

But is it correct,

I might object,

A better description of democrats would be parasite.

 

Self awareness among democrats is rare,

Pointing out their crimes and flaws is unfair,

Stop the hate,

Believe it mate,

When being berated by a woman with green hair.

 

The elite want everything to remain the same,

Where truth is subjective and law is a game,

Something dark does tease,

Do you feel the unease,

And the elite have only themselves to blame.

 

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, Law, philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

 

The backstabbers always have a tell,

When not in power they seem so swell,

Clinging drifters,

Do-nothing grifters,

You know, people like Kash Patel.

 

EU elites are angry and woke,

Putin their ire does really stoke,

Start a major conflict,

By General Benedict,

‘Cause they’re all hopped up on coke.

 

The mockingbird media claims it’s reformed,

A payola press that claims it’s transformed,

But not a level head,

As Mark Twain said,

If you read the press you’re misinformed.

 

The UK was a wonderful place it’s said,

Neighborliness and stoicism were wed,

But times do change,

Culture rearrange,

And the UK is now run by a coke head.

 

NGOs were a brilliant despotic innovation,

Outsourcing government’s sly usurpation,

They made a resolution,

To nullify the Constitution,

And the corrupt protect them in desperation.

 

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Perfect Competition

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, no company on Earth wants perfect competition in its own industry, but every company seeks perfect competition in the job market. Why? It’s self-serving. Companies want cheap labor and expensive products. That paradigm allows for maximum profit with minimum effort. Profits are squeezed from both workers and customers, then funneled to executives. As seen with Wells Fargo, every few years, the executives get bonuses while the shareholders get fined. Why? Because the executives decide what the lobbyists will lobby for… not the shareholders. Government then becomes the tool of executives to keep competition at bay, while ensuring the competition for labor is ruthless. This is done by exporting industry and importing workers.

Perfect competition in economics is a state where no firm has an advantage over any other. Milk is near perfect competition, so to get an extra markup on your milk, how do you claim your milk is better than another dairy’s? Milk is milk, no matter who bottles it. It can be purchased by anyone, anywhere, from any number of dairies. So the price is just above the cost of production… and often dips below the cost of production. Ask a dairy farmer. Markets that are at or near perfect competition squeeze out extra profits from the company, in favor of the consumer. This wouldn’t be possible without the assistance of the state. Due to the logic of collective action, regulation undermines perfect competition, even as it ensures perfect competition in the job market.

Olsen’s Logic Of Collective Action is an economic theory. In it, people act in rational but pragmatic self-interested ways. The example often used is sugar. In the US there is a sugar tariff. This increases the price of imported sugar, so beet sugar and the small sugar-producing areas of the US can get extra profit. Most people prefer cane sugar for cooking, to beet sugar, though they are nearly identical. This amounts to a few pennies per bag of sugar for the consumer, but millions to the industry. So the industry lobbies heavily for the tariff, while the consumer could care less. This same logic drives firms to lobby for regulations. They lobby to increase barriers to entry by calling them safety requirements, licensing, and oversight by the courts. Each adds a barrier to entry that protects markets.

Even as regulation is exploited to keep markets tight, they are used to keep the labor market loose. By exporting industry to cheaper nations, corporations drive down demand for labor in the US. Meanwhile, they lobby the government to import unlimited workers, to mercilessly drive American wages to zero. If you learn a new skill and apply it, getting extra wage profit, the government will immediately import enough H1B foreign workers to drive that wage back down. Except it’s not even perfect competition. Because the foreign worker competing for the same job has free health care, welfare, and other government handouts… that the US worker has to pay for, taxed out of his or her wage. This makes Americans more expensive. So why would any firm hire an American?

The paradigm is that corporations and government collude to protect firms from perfect competition, while ensuring the job market is perfect competition for high skill, and negative competition for low skilled labor. This is explained by the logic of collective action. Where the little guy doesn’t have a high stake, so doesn’t complain, while the big guys do, so they exploit government coercion to protect themselves. This isn’t done for the shareholder, nation, or worker… but to benefit the executives, cronies, and captured bureaucracies. Left unchecked this paradigm will mine a nation out until it collapses. I think we can all agree, we don’t want to see this happen to the US, Britain, France, or any other nation. The answer then is to lobby government ourselves… despite the logic of collective action.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, economy, Group Politics, Law, media, philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

 

Better run that thought by the all-knowing censor,

There may be issues that require a magic tensor,

Wrongspeak a heinous crime,

Wrongthink crosses the line,

And soon any speech at all will require licensure.

 

The mechanical loom would starve the masses,

Labor would be lost the collapse of classes,

It didn’t work out that way,

Lives improve to this day,

But the solution has led to famine, war, and carcasses.

 

The warmongers are on the prowl,

Keeping the hours of an owl,

Whenever they show,

One thing we know,

Is they’re up to something foul.

 

Invaders crossing in small boats are just great,

But those UK fishermen are really bad mate,

Harvesting from the seas,

To feed humanity’s needs,

So your fishermen and tables will have to wait.

 

The administrative state has become a flam and a flim,

Chances of getting the truth are getting ever more slim,

Despotism and manipulation are wed,

And just as Machiavelli said,

Have a patsy do your evil for you, then get rid of him.

 

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment