The Cult of Progressivism

Posted on October 28, 2020 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me… progressivism is a cult in all but name. I was watching a documentary the other day about cults and how they brainwash people. As I watched it I realized… the democrat party does every single one of those manipulative things. The means of psychological manipulation are the very planks of the democrat platform. Like any good psychopathic cult, they avow openly, if they can’t have it, (the US) they will burn it down. As Jim Jones ordered his followers to drink poison laced Kool-Aid. Cults expect people to shut down their sense of right and wrong because it “holds them back.” Cults are subhuman and create subhumans, yet we may soon be ruled by one… except for the fatal flaw in all cults. They need a cult of personality… an oligarchy simply will not do.

Cults replace the family like the democrat party seeks to replace the family with the state. Cults demand followers mirror the leaders just as democrat brown shirts in BLM, go around to outdoor diners, forcing them by threat of violence to mimic BLM rituals and pledge fealty to BLM. Cults dress to show their allegiance as democrats wear Black uniforms and “pussy hats.” Cults have a self serving worldview, as do democrats when they say our mortal enemies are our friends, like the CCP. Democrats control speech and thought through the media and social media as do cult leaders their subjects. Democrats avow their love of us… as they whip us with regulations and taxes. The examples of where democrats and cultish behavior intersect go on and on… and I am sure you can think of others.

Cults, like the democrat party and all socialist parties if we are to be fair, rely on a charismatic leader. They create a “cult of personality” around them. Hitler was a cult of personality just as Obama was. That Biden is not a cult of personality bodes poorly for democrat chances this year, despite their manipulations, lies, hoaxes, censorship and vote fraud. For the democrat plan to work they really need a leader who can be made larger than life. Given another cult of personality, the democrats would be able to close the deal and take total power. They could move us to a one party state in a year… given the Presidency, House, Senate and a charismatic leader. Lacking the leader, a cult is like a worm without a head. It is animated but not focused. That is one problem with being a cult instead of a party.

Like all cult leaders, the democrats have avowed if they lose this election, they will burn the nation to the ground. Very progressive of them. They never accepted the results of the 2016 election, so what makes anyone think they will grow up and accept this one, if they lose? Cults are not subject to rational thinking, they run on emotion and blind faith. Manson’s sycophants knew who to kill… they didn’t have to be told. Cults cannot be reasoned with just as we see the democrat party cannot be reasoned with. They do nothing in good faith like any cult. Everything is about them and their power over the rest of us. Cults create total dependency, that is why you never see a normal person dousing themselves in gasoline and lighting a match, to make a statement… but democrats and cultists do.

Being a cult has served the democrat party well for the last few decades, but the adoption of Post modernism has allowed them to become, truly malevolent. Their followers cannot be reasoned with since they believe truth is subjective. Spouting lies, that have been long disproved, from which no amount of facts can dissuade them. Democrats are so emotionally involved with their cult they see the rise and fall of the DNC as their own. Progressives even ostracize family that are not members of the cult. The progressive’s have all their ducks in a row… except for their cult of personality. Biden is not charismatic enough to be, Kamala Harris certainly isn’t either. They are both too slimy. That is the one flaw with being a cult… you need a Raniere, Hitler, Manson, Stalin, Jones, or Mao… to really pull it off.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Corrupt Administrative State

Posted on October 25, 2020 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me… the latest revelations of corruption in the bureaucracy, highlight why the administrative state is a perpetual threat to liberty. For a theoretical Administrative state to work, it must be an unbiased arbiter of the public good. That means it is blind to politics. A functional bureaucracy works in the public’s interest, not its own, a faction’s or an ideology… unless that ideology is the foundational ethos. It is not the right role of a bureaucracy to set policy because bureaucracy is not subject to oversight. It is a leviathan that grows, it never shrinks, it subsumes power, it never gives it up, and those within think themselves virtuous no matter how evil their actions. The worst kind of tyranny… one that thinks its oppression righteous, and so will not be limited by human sentiments.

The corruption cannot be denied, from the IRS silencing conservatives, to the FBI setting on crimes by democrats, while charging republicans for hoaxes. The bureaucracy has shown itself to be utterly worthless as an unbiased arbiter of the public good. How can people involved with a crime fairly investigate and punish themselves? The FBI is utterly corrupt top to bottom. How do we know this? Because of recently released texts where mid level FBI employees joked about needing insurance for their crimes, and that Trump was right, the FBI was corrupt. You don’t get any more damning than that. When even mid level investigators are knowingly involved. Even today, the executive branch bureaucracy refuses to follow Trump’s orders, showing how utterly unaccountable they are.

There was a Supreme Court ruling a few decades ago, empowering the bureaucracy to write laws, because the Legislative Branch had delegated that authority to it. The original lawsuit was about some regulation that the litigant claimed was unconstitutional, because the US Constitution only gave the authority to write laws, to the Legislative Branch with consent of the Executive. The Supreme Court found the Legislative branch had delegated that authority to the executive, so any law the bureaucracy now writes, is law. No need of the old cumbersome process, designed to slow the spread of oppressive laws, that was way too inefficient at achieving utopia. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the administrative state… moving the progressive team’s ball another twenty yards down the field.

The answer then is for the Legislature to take back that delegated authority. It seems obvious that authority, delegated by the branch Constitutionally given that authority, should be able to claw it back if they want. The Supreme Court however stands in the way of returning to Constitutional rule. A return to Constitutionally limited government is out of the question for most members of the Supreme Court today. Only Thomas would embrace it the rest would shrink at the thought. Because they have been immersed in the ideology of progressivism. They were taught by progressive professors, most of their friends are progressives and the culture inculcates progressive ideals subconsciously. Like the man who lives in a sewer, he smells nothing, it is only people who don’t… that can.

The administrative state then, judging by the empirical evidence, has an inbuilt drive to become authoritarian and oppressive, because it is unaccountable. The evidence of absolute corruption in the bureaucracy today, is as undeniable as their political bias, showing unaccountability leads to corruption. Bureaucracy sees it’s role as a benevolent overlord of us ignorant, stupid and helpless masses… in true supremacist fashion. Proving that the administrative state needs to be reigned in. The only way to do that, is for the legislature to legislate it, and an executive who favors a return to constitutionally limited rule. The Supreme court will try to keep power in unaccountable unconstitutional hands, but the legislature and executive together, could restore some form of Constitutional rule. If we vote right.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

A Progressive Innovation… Corruptocracy

Posted on October 23, 2020 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me… the democrat party has made the US into a corruptocracy. There has never been a political party that is so openly corrupt as the Democrat party today. It is astonishing. The Obama administration may go down in history as the most corrupt ever. If Biden doesn’t win. Of course, such open and verifiable corruption can only happen in a political ecosystem, with a media that is every bit as corrupt. The corruption is fed by the corrupt corporations that pay politicians to be corrupt, hides their corrupt actions and have been made the gatekeepers of information, leveraging their ability to silence the American people, through their monopoly control of social media. The corruption has become so bad it is oozing to the surface for everyone to see.

I like to give examples but a comprehensive list would far exceed the one page I limit my articles to… so here is a partial list of verified democrat corruption in the last few years. Hillary’s email server, the Russian collusion hoax, the special counsel, impeaching Trump to hide Biden’s crimes, Crossfire Hurricane, framing General Flynn, introducing hearsay as evidence and ruling on it, Adam Schiff’s lies, the utter corruption of the DOJ, State department, CIA, IRS, the abandonment of all pretense of justice by the court system, the whole Epstein affair, perjury by Comey, McCabe, Strzok and Brennen, destroying evidence, the Awan Brothers, Barbara Feinstein’s CCP driver, the corruption of our education system and Podesta’s stupefying choice of words in his emails.

Not to mention the newly discovered transgressions by the Biden crime family. From Hunter Bidens I macs he abandoned at a computer repair shop, to his partners, Tony Bobulinski and Bevan Cooney, have given thousands of emails showing that Joe Biden is bought and paid for by the CCP. The same people who created and released the Wuhan Flu, own the democrat presidential nominee. You don’t get more corrupt than that. The Biden crimes are astounding. Influence peddling, bribery, money laundering, selling US foreign policy to the highest bidder, who knows what shoe will drop next? At no other time in US history, could a person with so many verifiable unpunished crimes in his background, be able to stand for dog catcher, let alone President.

Everything is out for the world to see. The Hunter Biden Hard drive is exposing new crimes every day, their former business partners are verifying the revelations and releasing damning emails of their own. The scandal grows by the moment, even as the media misdirects with the red herring it is all Russian disinformation, and questioning the providence of the hard drive. With the witnesses though the crimes are getting harder to hide. The Intelligence agencies are getting into the act, going on the air to say Russians and Iranians are meddling in our elections… but they never mentioned the Chinese communists. I wonder why? Maybe because Biden is in the pocket of the CCP and the FBI knows it? They have had Hunter’s hard drive for a year, and have sat on it… like the Epstein tapes.

No one is perfect. Everyone lies now and then, everyone falls occasionally, that is why Catholics have the confessional. We are human beings, fallen and flawed. One thing that we also have though… is a sense of right and wrong. This allows us to recognize evil when we see it and to avoid evil people ruling over us. We used to despise people who are corrupt. That is one of the checks on a political party becoming corrupt. Yet, it would appear many of us have lost this most fundamental attribute, the ability to recognize right from wrong. Electing a president who is in the pocket of our mortal enemy, is idiotic, and people used to understand this fact. That many of us don’t, and still vote for the most openly corrupt political party that has ever existed, shows we “deserve the corruptocracy we get.”

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Poor Progressives

Posted on October 21, 2020 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, it must be terrible to be a democrat, and have so little belief in your own message… that you feel you have to censor your critics, silence truth, promote lie after lie, manipulate the media and engage in vote fraud. Imagine if they competed like normal people… fairly? They’d get shellacked. Progressives clearly know their message is not one that resonates with the American voter, so they adopt the republican message during the campaign, then the Marxist one after they win. Because even the most ardent progressive knows the average American will not vote for outright Marxism. It must be couched in glittering terms and coated in sugar for average people to swallow. It does say something about the message, that even progressives are afraid to openly admit who they are, and who they serve.

Of course, when asked if he will pack the Court Biden responds, he will not answer that question. Because he knows if he answered it honestly, yes, he will pack the court. Destroying the Constitution as a limiting document. Therefore our republic as well, fundamentally changing the nature, role and scope of the US government. If he were to admit that, most of his actual voters would turn their backs on him. So he doesn’t, and they can pretend he won’t… until he does. Then it will be too late. Biden even said the American people don’t deserve to know what he will do… once in power. In so many words! If you had a steadfast belief in your message and plan for the nation… wouldn’t you want it out there, so people could debate it and come to see it’s merits on their own? Why don’t democrats then?

If the Hunter Biden hard drive is indeed fake, as democrats claim… why not put it out there to be debunked? The fake story about George Bush’s military record, that CBS pushed in the last days of that election, was debunked in hours by bloggers, who noticed that the font it was typed in had been invented in the 1980s… it didn’t exist in the 1960’s when the document was typed. Therefore that document had to have been a forgery. It turns out it was. If that same level of scrutiny was applied to the Biden hard drive, if it is indeed Russian disinformation, then that will be shown quickly. That democrats and their apparatchiks in big tech, have gone to such great lengths to hide the information, shows that democrats know it must be true. Else they would put it out there to be quickly debunked.

Mail in voting is all about vote fraud, not the Wuhan flu, or easier access to voting for half wits, so inept, if we are to believe democrats, they are incapable of making it to a voting booth, or having an ID. Of course, everyone has an ID to drive, get an apartment, have a bank account, turn on your electricity, get a welfare check (except in CA), buy marijuana at a dispensary, or malt liquor. Apparently we are to believe the average democrat voter is an illiterate hunter gatherer… according to democrat leaders. Which begs the question, why would people who are that stupid, be encouraged to vote in the first place? Do they have that much to offer? Given they are too inept to get welfare or even buy weed? It also says a lot about what democrats think of their voters… else mail in voting is a means to vote fraud.

Personally, I would rethink my ideas and plans, if they were so detested by the people. People trying to get power by nefarious means while hiding their ideas, are probably not the highest caliber people. Someone who has so many scandals they have to use impeachment, Russian collusion hoaxes, and subverting the rule of law to hide them, shouldn’t be given unlimited power? It stands to reason that people who have so little faith in democracy, to allow it to work without engaging in systematic vote fraud, might be a little too eager for despotic power? Most of all, it must be awful to be a progressive, to know the ideas you believe are hated, the plan you have is malevolent and the power you serve is diabolical… so they have to use underhanded means to get power. Poor progressives.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Science, Philosophy and Morality Are Intertwined

Posted on October 18, 2020 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, if the science of a society exceeds it’s philosophy, that society must destroy itself. Nuclear weapons in the hands of the Mongols, Mycenaeans or Iroquois, would have ended the world. Not because they in and of themselves were evil, or stupid, but because humanity had not evolved to the Enlightenment philosophy, backstopped by Christian morality, that has served us so well for so long. The Enlightenment that gave us such philosophical concepts as, discourse as the arbiter of truth rather than appeal to authority, constitutions to limit the propensity of government to become tyrannical, the scientific method, and Adam Smith’s field of economics. As Adam Smith himself said, the free market’s benevolent invisible hand operates only where there are moral sentiments.

The Enlightenment also had the seeds of it’s own destruction buried within, ready for the right time to sprout and become a toxic weed, poisonous to the very advances of the Enlightenment itself. Communism, and it’s twin socialism, Utopian idealist totalizing philosophies that require people agree to a lie and stick with it. As Solzhenitsyn implied in his Gulag Archipelago. These philosophies, ostensibly are based on parts of the Christian ethos, are in fact a perversion, that not only runs counter to Christianity but to Enlightenment ideals as well. They lead to Post Modernism, which as we see, is identical to communism, except the victim class the elite are supposedly defending, are not the working class, they are now the oppressed class. A distinction that allows infinite sources of power.

These seeds of the Enlightenment’s destruction were and have only been held in check by Christian morality. As the atheist socialists, communists and post modernists chipped away at the fabric of Christianity, and the family, through their monopoly control of the media, education and culture. Which gave them the ability to put their anti Enlightenment, anti Christian and indeed anti human philosophy into effect. It was the Christian, do unto others ethos, that made the world turn away from slavery for the first time in human history. It is the Marxist post modernist ethos that has removed that check and so slavery is coming back. Slavery, while profitable for the owner, is corrosive to human heartedness. A society without human heartedness cannot discern good from evil. Give such people godlike powers…

No one can argue the advances we had made in science are the direct result of the scientific method. Without that advance of the Enlightenment we wouldn’t have the wireless let alone smart phones. Had Tesla been born in Mycenaean times, he could have been made a slave, and so would have had zero interest in improving the lot of his captors. One of the greatest minds to live, Archimedes, was killed by a Roman soldier for being lost in thought when called. His inventions have all disappeared from our knowledge but for what they were. Only under a system of thought that the market system inculcates, along with the ethos of a devout Christian, could we have reached the level of scientific advancement we have. So is it hard to understand that if we give them up… we are doomed?

Probably the whole human race will not die. We are a resourceful lot. A collapse that would come of our abandoning both the advances of the Enlightenment, and Christian morality, would be disaster for most of us though. Post Modernism posits that we can cut the branch holding us up and gravity will bend to our will. Just as socialist economics states, unequivocally, that a house and it’s foundation can be supported by it’s roof. (If the roof is strong enough). Belief in absurdity requires faith in liars. Liars who demand we accept appeal to authority, unlimited government by the administrative state and to believe the scientific method, math and history are all racist. What do you reckon… can our advanced industrial scientific civilization thrive after a return to Iron Age thinking, or not?

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Bypassing the First Amendment

Posted on October 16, 2020 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems astounding to me, how the progressive faction has managed to get around the First Amendment to our Constitution, so handily. Pretty sly of them. By contracting out their censorship and propaganda to the private sector, the progressive faction can silence any story they want. The absolute proof, beyond any reasonable argument, is the tech monopolies and MSM spiking and censoring the Biden scandal. They have indeed gone to great lengths to silence that story. Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, etc… malevolently censoring it. While the MSM, when they do mention it, call it debunked, or dubious. The scandal in and of itself is shocking but the censorship of it is terrifying. It is alarming to be faced with the choke hold the progressive faction has on the flow of information.

The scandal itself is mere fraud, influence peddling, bribery, perjury and money laundering. Run of the mill crimes. That they were done at such a high level, and there is incontrovertible proof in the form of Hunter Biden’s emails, shows systemic corruption. If the Bidens are subject to the law, they would be prosecuted… yet they have not been. Democrats are fond of saying, No one is above the law… as they break the law with impunity. Biden’s son Hunter, sold his influence to Burisma getting a prosecutor fired, to the CCP for 10 million a month for “introductions,” and in a myriad of other ways. Joe Biden, despite lying and saying he knew nothing, subverted his authority, to forward the desires of the people who had paid him and his son to do so. Epic in scope but mundane in plot. The censoring of it though…

The First Amendment to the US Constitution guarantees us the Right of free speech. I was taught that in school. It is common knowledge among Americans… or was. The government had no ability to censor an American… especially if we are addressing grievances to our government. The progressives, in their conniving, have figured out a way around that provision by outsourcing their censorship to the tech giants. Who in turn, due to their ownership of almost all main stream media, control them as well. The progressives have legislated their gatekeepers immunity from any lawsuit, and the courts inflating that immunity absolutely. Creating a progressive controlled monopoly on speech. They decide what we are allowed to say in our private conversations and thereby control what we think.

Granting themselves, or rather their proxies, complete immunity from lawsuits no matter how egregious their transgressions against the Constitution, free speech, society or justice… gives progressives power to control the narrative. It is the confluence of the progressive control of the courts, corporations and the bureaucracy that allowed them to create this workaround. It has been reported that the CIA helped start Google. Instead of creating a ministry of truth, progressives outsourced that job to the private sector. Like Google. Then gave them carte blanche immunity from lawsuits, placed above the law, and even our Constitution… in an effort to stop “fake news.” Progressives have managed to bypass our Constitution on it’s most fundamental level this way. Pretty Machiavellian of them.

That’s 1984 right there. We have a bureaucracy, that decides what can and cannot be said, based on how it effects the political establishment. It just resides outside government and therefore any Constitutional limitations. Leading to tyranny of both the body and the mind. Doublethink is commonplace in our main stream media today as is outright censorship. Mansplaining is evil but all sexes are exactly the same, all cultures are equal except Western civilization which is singularly evil, science is god except for biology, communism has never been tried, etc… The examples of modern Doublethink are rife. We are even monitored in our own homes by our “smart devices.” If we haven’t achieved Orwell’s nightmarish vision just yet, give the progressive faction this election, and we will be.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Packing the Court

Posted on October 14, 2020 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, when it comes to the democrats packing the Court, everyone is missing the elephant in the room. I hear pundits argue that republicans will just repack the Court next time they are in charge, and so forth. The real problem, the existential threat of packing the Court is, it will be the end to the Constitution as a limiting document. Our Constitution will no longer have any power to restrain the elite from whatever pathological idea that pops into their heads. Packing the court would allow the power mad faction that does it, to simply declare that their actions no matter how despotic, are “constitutional,” and they will have a majority on the Supreme Court that says so. Packing the Court would replace the US Constitutional system of government with a despotic oligarchy.

Many on the left think, if they pack the courts, the oligarchy will make it rain candy, and we will give up our cars for flying unicorns. They ignore the lessons of history… largely because they were never taught them. Those who should know better, pretend real Marxism has never been tried and so, this time… millions will not be murdered by their own government. This time, it will work out because they are so much smarter than Robespierre, Lenin, Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Idi Amin, Mao, Kim, Fidel and Hugo. This time, due to their supremacy over the common run of man, they will create utopia. A utopia where wealth will come to people without work, thought or action. No one will starve and no one will have to labor in the fields either. All progressives have this type of arrogant and naive bent.

While progressives believe wholeheartedly, that their leaders are saints cut from the purest silk cloth, they entertain extreme skepticism about everything and everyone else. When confronted with proof of malfeasance of their leaders, a good progressive will refuse to look at it, instead, without examination, declaring the information to be fake news. History that is inconvenient is erased, scandals by progressives are flushed down the memory hole, and democrat crimes are never punished. The mindset of a democrat is hard for a rational person to understand. This extreme dichotomy, between absolute trust and total skepticism, is as contradictory as it is hypocritical. I suppose it is because the lie glitters, while the truth is ugly, and they would rather embrace the glittering lie than the ugly truth.

Which brings us to packing the courts. For someone to go along with such a demonic idea, they would have to be arrogant, naive, and hold contradictory ideas without cognitive dissonance, making them hypocrites. Can you imagine the reaction of those who want to pack the court and establish absolute power over us… to being disenfranchised like that themselves? The streets would erupt with their fury. Because they have first hand knowledge of the workings of the mind, of someone who would dis empower others to that extent, and know what they would do. Shuddering at the thought of it being done to them. These are the people who, if they win big, will remove the guardrails of our constitutional republic. With total power in the hands of diabolical naive hypocrites.

Do you really think if given total power such psychopaths would ever allow another faction to wield it? Of course not! They would burn it all to the ground before ever allowing another to have it. Making the argument that republicans would just repack the court… moot. All other political parties will be outlawed. Instead of people fleeing to the US to escape despotism, we would flee from the US, to escape another Mao and his modern Red Guard’s atrocities. Mao said, Power grows from the barrel of a gun, and today’s Democrat leaders echo it. Showing they are cut from the same cloth… and it aint silk. Once installed, regardless if democrat voters like what their saintly despots do, or not, it will be too late. Because democrats, in their arrogant naivete, demanded overlords today.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Justice Delayed

Posted on October 11, 2020 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, if the old adage, “justice delayed is justice denied,” is true, then Barr and Durham have no interest in justice. When, as it turns out, Hillary decided to frame Trump for colluding with Russia to win the 2016 election, Barak Obama and Joe Biden used the apparatus of the bureaucracy, with the full knowledge and agreement of the top brass at those agencies, the FBI, DOJ, State, and CIA. Newly released and declassified documents prove their culpability. In fact, the evidence for the crimes of Obama, Hillary, Biden, Comey, McCabe, Brennen, Strzok, Page, etc… is documented and mountainous. Apparently, according to Trump, more will be coming that is far more damning than anything produced to date. Which will allow us to see the corruption Barr and Durham are hiding.

They claim that indicting people before an election would make the indictments partisan. They don’t want to sway the electorate with unnecessary information about how utterly corrupt and psychotic the democrats are today. That might cloud our thinking going into the election. Just as the democrats themselves are telling the American people. You don’t need to know what we will do once we are in power, you will find out after you elect us. Channeling Nancy Pelosi’s past stance when declaring Obama Care passed… “you can read the bill after you have passed the bill…” Barr and Durham would never want to effect an election, by exposing how deceitful, power mad and evil one side is… that would be partisan. They are above such political things… and justice as well, it would seem.

When Trump was accused of the hoax, it took the bureaucracy about twenty minutes to file charges. They framed a war hero, General Flynn and to this day the judiciary bends every norm to keep that innocent man in limbo, showing how utterly malevolent the judicial branch has become. Judge Sullivan has even brought in hearsay evidence, and ruled on it! With the absolute corruption of our bureaucracy by the democrats, three years is insufficient to bring charges. Today on Maria Bartiromo, she said mid level agents at the FBI went along, because they thought Hillary would win and no one wanted to rock the boat. That is a very generous description of their mindset when they broke the law. There are far more malicious intents that could be rightly attributed to them. Especially given the stonewalling.

Now the democrats are openly looking into removing Trump due to him being unfit because of Covid? Nancy Pelosi who has regular petite mals on air and Joe Biden who has dementia? They stand united in their belief that Trump is unfit to serve? You have to hand one thing to them… they have gall. They have so much gall, I bet any meat that comes within ten feet of them, is instantly digested. If there were any justice at all, both of them would be indicted over their roles in the Russia Collusion hoax. Even as Pelosi brags, “No one is above the law…” She flaunts that she herself is. This applies to all the top democrats. Adam Schiff is the most accomplished liar I have ever seen. Including Hogan on Hogan’s heroes… and he is fictional! Jerry Nadler however runs a close second.

Four years of judicial harassment, impeachment, and a special council to ruin Trump. All based on hoaxes and hate. The Russia collusion lie cooked up by Hillary to cover her scandals and the corrupt bureaucracy, at the behest of Obama, ran with it. Meanwhile, although the information had largely been exposed by Judicial Watch for years, there has been zero movement on indicting or prosecuting any democrat miscreant. Now the elections are upon us we are told, justice must be delayed again, because exposing the diabolical actions of the democrats might effect the election. Of course, if the democrats win, because their corruption was hidden, that would be effecting the election as well… but then the corruption would be swept under the rug. Apparently, where Barr and Durham think it belongs.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Vast Sociological Experiment

Posted on October 9, 2020 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the democrats are performing a vast sociological experiment on us, they are trying to see if they can get two utterly unelectable people, elected, through media control, their tech monopoly, censorship, lawfare and vote fraud. If it works, they will have learned there is no need of putting up someone electable again. They need only run puppets who will do the bidding of the oligarchy. The outcome could render democracy the lap dog of the progressive faction, else it could upend their plans for world domination, through an all powerful one party one world socialist benevolent administrative state. To that end, nothing is out of bounds or off the table. Which brings us to why they are performing this experiment on us, to see if they can tame democracy itself, to their selfish ends.

Progressives, socialists, Marxists and Nazis, all think of human beings as lab rats, to experiment on as they see fit. In their supremacist attitude they see no problem with using us to their ends. Who cares if a lab rat is sterilized, killed, maimed, tortured or implanted with painful devices? The progressive elite have every bit as much empathy for us… as a lab technician does a guinea pig. The scientist doesn’t consider the lab rat his equal, nor do progressives think us their equals. That is why they have so little compunction about using us in that manner. We see the results of their experiments in the past and today. The eugenics experiments of the progressive era for example. Where people, by the arbitrary criteria of the progressives at the time, considered substandard, were forcibly sterilized. Like lab rats.

The two are unelectable. Biden has more baggage than a world traveler. Past rape allegations that have never been cleared up, shilling for the credit card companies against the interests of consumers, corrupting foreign governments for personal profit, bringing up the Logan act against Flynn, his involvement in Obama gate, not to mention the scathing Senate report on his son. No republican could survive a single one of those scandals. Harris is even less electable. Her policy positions, releasing violent felons onto the streets, while demanding an end to the Second Amendment, shows she is an agent of chaos. During the democratic debates she took the most extreme and absurd leftist and despotic positions possible. If people knew anything about her… she couldn’t get elected dog catcher,

Which brings us to the grand sociological experiment. The parameters are set, two half wits, utterly unelectable under normal circumstances, running against a President with a proven track record of job creation, embroiling us in no foreign wars, while bringing peace to the world. All things being equal, Trump would win in an epic landslide, especially against a candidate who refuses to take a position else it becomes a campaign issue. Showing the positions he has are so extreme he dare not mention them. Because of the power of the tech monopoly on social media, the main stream media’s control of the narrative, the power of the bureaucracy to force through mail in vote fraud, and the progressive grip on education, enables the experiment. While their pathological ideology empowers them to do it.

The outcome of this experiment has huge implications for the future of humanity. Should the psychopaths in the oligarchy discover that they can manipulate us, to vote against our own interests, then they will drop the charade of Constitutional limits altogether. Why have any limit on their power if they don’t need to? They can rule as they see fit, experimenting on us, sterilizing those of us that don’t meet their arbitrary criteria, monitoring us in our bathrooms, and basically treating us like cattle. Many of us would prefer to live like cattle anyway and so they may get their wish. Personally, I would rather live as a human being, with agency… instead of a lab rat, guinea pig or cow in a field. I hope and pray there are enough people who think like me to ruin their vast sociological experiment.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Secret State

Posted on October 7, 2020 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, absolutely everything government does must be open to the public, else corruption can only result, and it has. By this I mean every office, every hallway, every conference room, phone, and even the bathrooms would have microphones, with all of them immediately available to the public via the Internet, and recorded for later reference. I should think this idea would be common among us commoners, yet we appear to prefer the elite monitor us in our bathrooms, rather than we know of their nefarious conniving, in our name, on their behalf. Obviously the elite are totally and vehemently against a policy of openness. Nevertheless, if everything government does is immediately available, and recorded, today’s astounding level of government corruption will be reduced.

The elite will immediately go to the national security argument, we must protect methods and resources, that is far more important than low crime, prosperity or corruption free government! I have to wonder though… with the United States still ostensibly having the Second Amendment, what nation in their right mind would invade it? That would be sending an army into a meat grinder. They would have to get past our navy first, the most powerful on the planet. “What about terrorism though,” the elite would say. Because the history of the FBI and CIA are so wonderful in stopping terrorist attacks, like 911, San Bernadino, the Florida night club attack, and now BLM and ANTIFA… well, now that I think of it, their record is pretty abysmal, isn’t it? Making the national security argument spurious.

The bureaucracy has used secrecy as the default position, to use the laws passed to protect the citizen from terrorists, to terrorize the very citizens they are supposed to protect. The FISA courts clearly have been abused to spy on politically disfavored groups instead of stopping terrorism. Secrecy makes the Bureaucracy utterly unaccountable, as proven by Crossfire Hurricane, the Hillary email scandal, the Russian collusion hoax, the Special Prosecutor and the total corruption of the FBI, CIA and DOJ to progressive political ends. All of which show unambiguously that the apparatus of government has become utterly corrupted by the secrecy. That secrecy has done nothing to keep us safe, but has empowered the most villainous of people, to amass unconstitutional power at cost to us.

The default should be total government openness with no exceptions. The national security argument is a red herring, designed to trick us into agreeing to become slaves. If everything government does, talks about and debates is open and available to the people, government must go to impossible lengths to hide it’s corruption. There was a recent controversy about a secret meeting given to senators about the coming Corona virus outbreak. Several sold stocks as a result, the republicans were chastised while Nancy Pelosi was not. An oversight I am sure. Regardless, there is no compelling reason that meeting should have been hidden from the public, unless insider trading was the point. That corruption would have been avoided, had that, and every other meeting, been open to the public via the internet.

They are our employees, and we pay dearly for their services. In what universe does it makes sense for the employee to order the boss? What firm would stay in business if the employees actions were hidden from the owner? What about employees that could do anything they want yet punish the manager for annoying them? Everyone can see that would be an absurdity, but we have been conditioned to accept just that from our government employees… their actions should be hidden from us as as the default, that they should order us around, and that they be above the laws they foist on us. That is the state of affairs the secret state has created… and we have allowed. Isn’t it time to at least consider the idea that government should be open as the default? Or is corrupt state oppression too scary to challenge?

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment