Limericks

Dear Friends,

 

There once was a bully on the block,

Viciously he attacked to stay on top,

Holding a cold beer,

He said you better fear,

Until someone came and cleaned his clock.

 

There once was a bureaucracy so deceitful,

They lied even when a lie was unhelpful,

The FBI agent said with a moan,

As he slathered on cologne,

The other maggots around me smell awful.

 

CCP elites are known to be zealous,

Their secrets to them are precious,

A nuclear calamity,

Double up security,

While our elites look at the cover up and are jealous.

 

There once was a gal name Kamila,

Her mind was as sharp as vanilla,

She said with a harrumph,

Don’t vote for Trump,

And I’ll do for you what I did for North Carolina.

 

Violence is often senseless,

Happening when we’re careless,

Look up straight,

Smile and be awake,

And always maintain situational awareness.

 

Propaganda is a great tool,

Effecting the mind of a fool,

Though all of us play,

The fool in our day,

And given enough it makes even the intelligent drool.

 

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Faction And Fallacy

Dear friends,

It seems to me, the fallacy the progressive faction falls for is, the fallacy of popularity and its opposite, the fallacy of unpopularity. Both are a form of the appeal to authority fallacy. While conservative factions tend to rely too much on the fallacy of common knowledge. If a popular person says anything… the progressive faction follows in lockstep. If however an unpopular person says something, it’s to be considered a lie, no matter how provable. That’s why democrats dwell so much on persons and so little on policy. Meanwhile, republicans follow common knowledge, like a dog does a scent trail. The problem with appeal to authority, popularity and common knowledge is, they’re often wrong. While discourse, investigation and attempts to falsify lead to real knowledge and truths.

Appeal to authority and it’s siblings, appeal to popularity and the dismissing of the unpopular, are fallacies in that they usually lead to wrong conclusions. If Goebbels came in from outside, soaking wet and said, “It’s raining out there.” Would you disbelieve him because he was the Nazi propaganda minister? Maybe, but one thing we know, if it was Trump, democrats would ridicule him for it. Climate change is based entirely on appeal to authority. Despite the IPCC email scandal, proving the IPCC is a propaganda outfit, progressives are all in. Because they believe their beloved authorities who claim climate change is man made. They’re the authority, and we like them… so they must be right. Sadly, they’re not right, experts are wrong more often than not. Making mindless belief a fools errand.

Appeal to common knowledge is also a fallacy in that it often leads to wrong conclusions. In fact, this is one of Francis Bacon’s Idols. He called appeal to common knowledge the Idol of the marketplace. While he apparently meant, the misuse of language that leads to misunderstanding, I mean it to be our common lack of omniscience. Because we don’t know everything, even as a species, let alone a community, or person. At one time it was common knowledge that leeches cured disease. While appeal to common knowledge can’t be malicious, manipulative, or egotistical like appeal to authority, it can lead to wrong conclusions. Because what passes for common knowledge today will probably be considered foolishness tomorrow. Since our understanding changes over time.

These fallacies have in common that they are a lazy man’s way of thinking. Common knowledge is common and so must be right… right? If someone is popular and has authority, they must be wicked smart… right? In both cases… wrong. No one or group of people is omniscient. Some may think they are, but those people have fallen into their own Bernay’s trap. There’s no shortcut to understanding and knowledge. School and education is only a starting place. Since so much of what I was taught back in the 1970’s is now discredited. How much more so the things taught in the 1920’s? Moreover, in a century, much of what we take for granted today, will be thought childish. Instead of strolling down a well trod trail, that leads to error, it behooves us to cut trail, to the truth.

An idea based on a fallacy is a fine place to start an investigation… to see if there’s merit. Talk about it with an eye to understanding the idea. Finally, seek to falsify it. If an idea passes all these tests, it’s probably true on some level. Then, hone the idea until it has an edge, and use it to cut to other truths. When we use mind crutches we do ourselves and the future a disservice. Because we act on poor data leading to poor outcomes. This is one reason progressives fail to see their failures and conservatives fail at change. Both factions base their aim on wrong information leading them to miss their target. So, instead of basing one’s opinion on an authority who probably has an agenda, or common knowledge that’ll change in a few years, let’s think, talk and experiment… to find real truth.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in media, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

 

There once was a court system so foul,

On the face of God they made a scowl,

The judge said in a huff,

Your Rights aren’t enough,

And under the color of law the tyrants did prowl.

 

There once was a fake prosecutor named Jack,

In the pay and working for the faction democrat.

He said in a guffaw,

As he broke the law,

Election interference is what I’m at.

 

The time to reform is here today,

Hold them down and put them at bay,

The powerful few,

So what to do,

Put RFK in as head of the CIA.

 

Equity means the politically favored get special gratuity,

Equality means the politically disfavored get opportunity,

The ditz just said,

I better get ahead,

And so Thrasymachus was right the elite seek inequality.

 

There once was a fake federal prosecutor Jack,

The man is a corrupt unconfirmed political hack,

He used the color of law,

To effect a political brawl,

And if justice be served he’ll get a legal whack.

 

Brainiacs are capable of handling diversity,

Holding to a weak position with tenacity,

A career is made,

By a smart knave,

Who can brilliantly argue for absurdity.

 

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Political Associations

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, political associations exist for the benefit of the associates, and for no other reason. If a political association then stops benefiting one or more of the associates, then it’s no longer legitimate. The illegitimacy is doubled when a political association actually harms an associate. In that case the political association must be disintegrated. Because it no longer serves the interests of the associates. If the conditions are such that it benefits the associates to reintegrate the association, then so be it, but under a different paradigm. A system that protects the interests of all the associates. The only way a political association can be maintained, that harms it’s associates… is by force. Which redefines an association, as a bad association, while those that benefit are good associations.

A political association must be between equals. Any other association can’t be political it must be something else. Only equals can reach an agreement that benefits all associates. An association where one party has all the power, like Britain, is one where the parties are not equal, nor is the system fair, or just. Because the result will always benefit the strong at cost to the weak. Making it not so much an association as the epitome of Thrasymachus’ philosophy of injustice as justice. Any association however can be subverted by one or a few parties to their own benefit. At cost to the rest. In fact, I might argue, that is the normal evolution of political associations. They start fair, then the stronger party gains strength, and the weaker party becomes weaker, until the system becomes a sewer.

A lopsided association is one that drains the wealth, rights and humanity from the weak, giving it to the strong. Clearly, a political association that benefits only one associate and harms the rest isn’t fair. It could be called just in the Thrasymachian sense though. Where justice exists only as a means to theft. Theft of rights, property and persons. A political association that abets theft isn’t one anyone on the losing end wants to be associated with. Moreover, a political association can’t be based on force, that’s a master slave relationship, not a free association of equals. Which allows us to identify a political association from a master slave contract. Are the parties equal, is the system fair, or does it benefit one party at cost to the rest? Moreover, is it enforced by force, or mutual consent?

A political association can be a national government, an international agency, a faction, a fraternal organization, all the way down to a local D&D club. They exist to serve a need of the members. Such associations pop into and out of existence more often than do virtual particles in quantum physics. While most are ad hoc, many are long term, and degenerate to be enforced by violence. Often called the state’s monopoly on violence. In these associations the equality of the participants is mitigated by force. The greater the political inequality, and the greater the harm, the more illegitimate the association becomes. This paradigm usually evolves, until it becomes intolerable, and some of the associates violently dissolve the association. Because equals hate becoming slaves.

Are all the political associations your in legitimate? The EU harms its associates. Italy has been banned from sending migrants to Albania, and then back home, should it be deemed safe. Instead, the absurd standard for foreign nations is, safety in every corner. While in Europe, no one’s safe anywhere. Is the PRC, North Korea or even the US a free association of equals? Can you leave your country and drop your citizenship? Do you have suffrage, or is there so much propaganda, election fraud and or intimidation, elections are for show? Are the laws equally administered? Does the association benefit or harm you? These are the fundamental questions we need to ask ourselves. If the answers aren’t to our liking, it’s up to us to change the paradigm… as equal associates in a political association.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, International Power, Law, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear friends,

 

Multinational corporations are a confusion,

Few work while many prefer a diversion,

Imagine that,

He cut the fat,

And brought X into a more efficient Pareto distribution.

 

There once was an employee at Twitter,

She dwelt in anger and was ever bitter,

She said with a squeak,

How dare you speak,

And censored us like a bad baby sitter.

 

There once was a media of elves,

Diligently putting ideas on shelves,

They’re in the fight,

So try as they might,

They just can’t help themselves.

 

The elite just want to dumb us down,

Those IQ points only make us frown,

Toxin protects enamel,

Like flies do a camel,

And had we been smarter we might have stopped the meltdown.

 

There once was a corporate culture so raw,

Satan himself was impressed at the flaw,

They said with a sigh,

Oh yea we lied,

But it doesn’t matter because we’re above the law.

 

There once was a pretty girl with gumption,

Starting a farm was an act of presumption,

She did it anyway,

And is farming today,

Proving the folly of misbegotten assumption.

 

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in media, Mercy, philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Modern Science Fiction

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the reason modern science fiction is having a hard time connecting with audiences, is that the stories aren’t relatable. People don’t identify with the characters. We can certainly empathize with the struggles of a clone, alien or android, but we don’t identify with them. Keeping a curtain between us and the stories. Moreover, those unidentifiable characters are usually a stand in for some marginalized segment of our society. Further alienating many who just want to be entertained and not preached to. Further, there is the propensity of studios today, to have women play the hero role. Which is all well and good, but it shows a fundamental misunderstanding of the role of the heroes myth, in human cultures. All adding up to expensive productions that don’t appeal to anyone.

When its done right science fiction meshes potential innovation with human stories to explore the big questions. Not with an eye to answering them but intending to expand our thoughts. In an almost Socratic method. Logan’s run, Babylon 5 and Star Trek TOS fall into this category. In Logan’s Run, ideas like death, what is a good life, a rigid versus complex society, and the nature of friendship are all explored naturally, as a natural consequence of the scenario itself. Instead of contrived. Babylon 5 is world building at its best. Exploring the nature of power, authority, just action, and even alcoholism and drug addiction. Of course, Star Trek TOS, is legendary for its story telling. Making philosophy available for everyman. These are only a few of the science fiction stories that elevate.

Many times the stories are antithetical to the scenario. When this is the case, the story has to warp to the scenario or the scenario has to warp to the story. Star Trek Picard I consider in this category. It both warped the scenario and the story. Leaning heavily on nostalgia, and listless in theme and execution, I’m surprised it did as well as it did. Then there’s Star Trek Discovery. I have a hard time getting through a single episode. Many new science fiction is so inhuman hearted, they’re unwatchable. Because the authors are trying too hard, to shock, and not tell a story. Some of the Korean Science Fiction is like that. Too gory to enjoy. There are many other examples I’ve seen, but they’re so forgettable, I’ve forgotten them.

The fundamental reason for the existence of the heroes journey is for young men to navigate the path from boyhood to manhood. Young women by the fact they are women are desired. Young men, on the other hand, have to earn desire. To sharpen the point further. Men rate women’s attractiveness on a bell curve. While women rate men’s attractiveness on a power curve. Which means almost all men have to earn attractiveness. We’re not born with it. That’s where the heroes journey comes in. In the heroes journey a boy becomes a man. Whether by defeating a dragon or a puzzle. The story structure illustrates the need to take risks and go on adventure to get the girl. Which is always the real goal. Treasure is only a means to that end. Which is lost if the girl goes on the journey instead of the boy.

Good science fiction challenges us intellectually, philosophically and metaphysically… but doesn’t claim to have the answers. Only more questions. If people feel the desire to be preached to they’ll go to church. Moreover, action adventure alienates boys and men when the hero is a girl. No matter how pretty she is, a boy can’t identify with a girl on a heroes journey. In fact, the prettier she is the less they identify with her, and the more they want to win her. Which is impossible if shes the hero. Then there’s the clumsy attempts to illustrate how horrible our culture, society, nation and ethnicity are in the eyes of the storyteller. More than once Stargate SG1 did this and it diminished a great show as a result. If producers want to connect with audiences, I would offer, give them what they want, not what you want.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in media, philosophy, Societal Myth, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Downstream From Culture

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, even as Andrew Breitbart said, “Politics is downstream from culture…” I believe, all outcomes are downstream from culture. From likely life outcomes, to seemingly unconnected qualities, like intelligence. The culture someone is born into and raised in decides who and what they’ll become. The older I get the less I believe genetics is the final factor. It could be argued that within the “Overton window” of probable outcomes, genetics plays a role… but not in determining what falls within that cultural Overton window’s view. You don’t see many Zulus becoming rocket scientists, not because of any deficiency in them, but their culture is antithetical to it. Just as you don’t see many NASA scientists able to kill an antelope with a spear. The cultural incentives are different.

The idea of an Overton window is a political term, meaning the area of allowable political thought. I’ve lifted it and applied it to the area of likely life outcome. The cultural Overton window of probable life outcomes. Someone raised in the culture of an Amazon tribe without contact with the outside world, may have the genetics to be a genius, but the culture is insufficient for that outcome. They may become a medicine man, midwife or tribe elder, but they won’t find an error in Einstein’s equations. The Overton window of probable life outcome then, of someone raised in the Amazon in a hunter gatherer society, will be far removed from the Overton window of someone raised in a household of college professors. The primary difference is in culture… not genetics.

Likely life outcome then is downstream of culture. If we accept this as the case, then wouldn’t it behoove us to list those traits that lend a people to be happy, healthy, and prosperous? Then put them in our culture? If those are indeed traits that we value in ourselves and in others. If we can’t figure out how to navigate towards a happy, healthy and prosperous culture. We could identify those traits that lead us away from prosperity, health and fulfilled lives… and go the opposite way. That at least would get us generally in the right direction. Once we get closer maybe we can recognize those qualities that will get us all the way there. Qualities like, a work ethic, honesty, empathy, trustworthiness, curiosity, and love of family. These traits have always led a people to prosperity, happiness and health.

If we accept this as true, that the Overton window of likely life outcome, is based on cultural incentives, and that culture can be changed… then we should examine why our culture aligns with our wants… or is at odds with it. Our culture doesn’t seem to value hard work as a reward in it’s own right. The culture actually dissuades young people from having a strong work ethic. Leading to poverty and lowered GDP. The problems associated with obesity and lack of exercise are causing a health crisis. The curious are now conspiracy theorists. Add to that, out of control crime, as well as poor family formation, and we have a culture that makes people poor, sick and depressed. The exact opposite of the culture we should be striving for.

Our culture is the result of the cultural elite’s efforts. They’re the ones who decide if the culture will be toxic or wholesome. Ask yourself, “How many TV shows, movies and news casts… are wholesome?” Do our children’s movies raise them or lower them? Are we surrounded by beauty or ugliness? Why? Why is it our cultural elites foist a toxic culture on us. The results are, birth rates below replacement, depression, diminishing general wealth, dropping life expectancy, and hopelessness, along with it’s leprous triplets, drug use, crime and alcoholism. Why indeed. Why not use our purchasing power to make our toxic culture wholesome? Identify and eliminate the agenda that’s driving the culture to be toxic. Because joy, health and prosperity are downstream from culture… as is politics.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

 

The scientists are so wicked smart,

They can make a nuclear reactor from a fart,

If the data doesn’t fit,

What to make of it,

So they chop and hew the data apart.

 

To question the elite may seem uncouth,

But atrocities are getting long in the tooth,

It may sound strange,

People do change,

When an open mind encounters the truth.

 

Labor may start a blue ribbon commission,

To understand their problematic transition,

They said with flare,

Look over there,

And now the British voter’s back is a pincushion.

 

There once was an elite in charge,

Who shilled a con immensely large,

The world’s at stake,

They said with a shake,

And made millions in the carbon arbitrage.

 

Elitists believe elitism is unstoppable,

Government force makes everything solvable,

They’re on our side,

Then openly lied,

We’d like to stop beating you but it’s just not possible.

 

There once was a man who lived in a cave,

He struggled with facts and couldn’t behave,

He said with a grin,

You can’t take me in,

And lived in the dark forever a knave.

 

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Today’s Enemy

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the problem with obliterating an enemy is, today’s enemy will be tomorrow’s ally. Take the example of the Japanese. On December 7, 1941… they became America’s number 1 enemy. So detested and vilified that nuclear weapons were used against them. Today however, Japan is one of America’s closest allies. Which goes to show, the blood spent, on all sides of every war, is blood spent for nothing. Today we’re at war with tomorrow’s friends. People we will rely on for our very lives, we’re slaughtering with gusto today. Insuring there will be few available to come to our aid. If China invades Taiwan, and the US, Japan, Vietnam and the Philippines join to stop the aggression, everyone killed will be a future friend. Because those Chinese kids brain washed won’t be brainwashed forever.

Some will immediately argue, oh yea, you’re surprised a puppet government is an Ally? Which is a valid argument if the Japanese government today was a puppet. While the government may not be a puppet though, the elite are captured by Keynesianism. It fits their worldview. Which is why most people and cultures adopt any theory… it fits the narrative running in their heads. That worldview wasn’t installed by the allies after WWII. It led to the Japanese industrial revolution. Today, I believe, the Japanese people think of America as a big drunken friend. Someone who means well, but is drunk, so makes a lot of mistakes. Though, I don’t want to put words in the mouths of, or thoughts in the heads of Japanese people. So, no, enemies become friends regardless of installing a puppet government.

Notice how I included Vietnam as a potential ally of America? In the 1960’s, the US fought a decade long protracted war in Vietnam, to keep the present government from coming to power. By collapsing the house of cards, that was the result of the severing into north and south Vietnam, after WWII. Then the failure of French Indochina, due to the outrage at the presence of former Nazi SS soldiers, in the French Foreign Legion. Leading to the introduction of US advisors. Then the dance went on, and on, killing thousands. Enemies then are be friends today. Even as China was an ally during WWII but is an existential threat today. Why an existential threat? Nuclear obliteration is existential. Moreover, it doesn’t allow for enemies (who no longer exist) to turn into allies, in a decade or two.

The there’s the example of the Sabine women. The story is legendary and much modern fiction steals from it. The Sabin women were daughters of the Sabines men who had fought for a decade against Rome. The story started when Romulus, the founder of Rome, who had opened Rome to all people across the peninsula… found that only men came. A city of only men would be powerful and rich but short lived. So the Romans had a festival and invited all the surrounding people (the Sabines) to attend for free food and drink. At a prescribed time the Roman men ran into the crowds and abducted the young women. They married and became families. Then the Sabin men waged war year after year to get their girls back. Until a final war when no quarter would be shown.

This would be a fight to the death. For either the Romans or the Sabines. Probably both. The many years of hate and bloodshed had hardened their hearts. Just before the battle started… the women, now the matriarchs of healthy, happy and prosperous families, ran between the armies. Trailing their children and carrying their infants in their arms, they screamed, “If you are to kill each other, kill us first! What will become of us if our fathers, brothers, and husbands are all dead?” With that, the years of hate and animosity drained from both armies… and the husbands, brothers in law and step fathers came together, to adore their families. Thereafter the Romans and Sabines were close friends. Because war is the killing of a future friend, so he can’t help you, when you most need it.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in International Power, Mercy, philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

 

The PRC is an empire in all but name,

Economic power is its claim to fame,

Time is short,

LSTs are in port,

All that’s left is for Xi to start the game.

 

Europeans want the mass migration to abate

Finally seeing their tortured terrible fate,

So they stand up now,

Get behind the plow,

But the sad reality is it maybe too little too late.

 

The sides begin to align,

The good and the malign,

The struggle starts,

For minds and hearts,

And a lake of fire awaits those who take the sign.

 

The brilliant are the very few,

They’re better than me and you.

Bow to them,

The smart men,

And live in perpetual doom.

 

The narcissistic censor doth speak,

To silence the weak and the meek,

He knows best,

Quiet you pest,

But the breath of the censor doth reek.

 

The elite are citizens of the world it’s said,

Smarter, wiser while high born and bred,

They are the few,

Better than you,

And the globalist utopians live with demons in their head.

 

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, International Power, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment