The Advance of Technology and the Maturity of the People.

Posted on July 31, 2018 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, with the advance of technology, it will become impossible to keep the genie in the bottle. Put another way, laws against firearms, tanks, bombs and other dangerous devices will become moot, when anyone can make them anytime they want. The way the elite are approaching the subject is to simultaneously make the people into children unable to think for themselves, or act in an adult manner, and create a surveillance state so we are watched by big brother all the time. While this plan might make sense in a static society where there is no technological advancement, it cannot but fail in one where people are tech savvy. Maybe a better way would be to encourage people to be mature self controlled adults, who employ human heartedness in our daily lives.

The surveillance state is only effective when the people being surveilled are unable to do anything about it. Where the people being surveilled have a skill set that allows them to interfere with their surveillance… they will. It is human nature. In a technological society a large amount of the people will necessarily have such skills. Those skills will also be widely available since innovators will always need access to education. That is why freedom of education will become important because government cannot pick innovators, they pick themselves. Eliminate access to technology and education, and innovators will no longer b able to innovate. Once innovators can no longer innovate… advancement, scientific, economic and in our standard of living stops… then declines.

Immature people do immature things while mature people do mature things. Someone childish might fashion a bow and arrow, then shoot the arrow straight up to see how high it will go. Where someone more mature, might consider the possibility that when the arrow returns to the ground, it could present a mortal danger. Give a fool a 3D printer with the ability to produce anything… and he or she will almost certainly hurt themselves, very very badly. Give that same 3D printer to an innovator however, and they can produce something that will improve our standard of living, advance our scientific knowledge, advance our technology or make something they can sell and become rich. The difference is not the tool, it is the user of that tool, and we have the ability to make that user an adult, or a child.

The founding ethos of the United States was that the people would self control. De Tocqueville called it self interest rightly understood. While self controlled individuals are better suited for a limited republic, they are unsuitable for an autocracy, even a benevolent one. So the elite have steadfastly changed our ethos from one of self control, self reliance and thrift, to one of selfishness, lack of self control and profligacy. Adults are able to live and work, where guns can be made on a desktop 3D printer, but children can not. Unless the elite take us back to the 1970 level of technology, the people they have created will be ungovernable. Moreover, as long as the people have such skills the surveillance state will fail, because the people will be able to go around it, and “children” will be the first to do so.

The creation of childish unruly people might have been a benefit to the elite before, but with the ability to 3D print almost anything at home, creating generations of children, selfish, without self control and profligate, will lead to violence. Of course, the violence can then be pointed at by the elite to justify even more draconian surveillance and laws, which can only work if the elite take us back a few decades in technology. That can happen fairly quickly though. Just license access to technology, limit education and voila, society loses ground scientifically. Promote hedonism, profligacy and stupidity and the collapse will quicken. On the other hand, if we want to continue to advance scientifically, maybe it would be better to go back to teaching kids to be self controlled, mature and thrifty.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Globalism Versus Nationalism

Posted on July 30, 2018 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, globalists of the one world government ilk, have invested a huge amount of money and energy in their conniving, in expectation of a munificent payout. Since their profit will be at our loss, the globalists need to stifle debate and get their scheme through, else the world will wake up to their machinations. They have invested billions buying politicians, controlling strategic positions of power and manipulating the media. The payoff will be nothing short of the total enslavement of humanity. Imagine the profit to be made! Billions of people live or die at the whim of our globalist masters, our entire productivity given to them, our children theirs for whatever they want, and all of humanity will be a conglomeration of lab rats. The best part is that class mobility will cease.

One of their more shady tricks was that globalists changed the definition of nationalist, from one who believes in the nation state… to bigot. Quite a coup that. In one fell swoop, they made everyone who believes in the nation state, by definition, a racist murdering bigot. Of course a Venn diagram of all racists, would both include globalists as well as nationalists, probably globalists to a much greater extent since elitism is a function of globalism, but that doesn’t matter. The globalists have managed to make those who seek liberty for the human race as the bad guys. The media dutifully uses the label nationalist interchangeably with racist. So, what is Nationalism, or more to the point, what did it used to mean?

Nationalism used to mean a person who favors the nation state. While a globalist is one who favors a one world government or free trade. It is therefore possible to be a nationalist globalist. Believing in both the nation state and international free trade. Nationalists believe in a myriad of nations, each a little laboratory, in which various kinds of governance can be tested. Those with the most efficient governance will flourish while those with defective governments will collapse. This has led to a steady improvement of human governance over the millennia. The plethora of nations is like a vibrant ecosystem of human governments, each working to improve itself relative to the rest, while a one world government would be like killing everything on the planet… but cockroaches.

Globalists, (like anyone selling a fraud) would rather vilify their foes than engage in debate. The real question isn’t, are people who prefer the nation state to the globalist vision, necessarily racists and bigots… it is, is the nation state better or worse for humanity? This question however is far too dangerous to the globalists. Under a global government, even one that is as perfect as human beings can make it… over time will become ever more oppressive. That is the natural evolution of all human governments, and all innovations in governance, from democracy to constitutionalism, are ways to stifle that predilection of government. So inevitably, the global government, no matter how well thought out, must become tyrannical… but then where will people flee to escape it?

Under the nation state system, if one nation becomes tyrannical, destroys it’s economy or engages in genocide, there are other nations people can run to. Under a one world government, there will be no place to run, but isn’t that the point? Socialists claim socialism hasn’t worked because of the nation state system. They say it can only work when the whole world is forced into socialism… because there will be no escape. People will have to make it work then. There will be no examples of nations where people are free and prosperous, to discourage the masses, due to their oppression and want. No one will know any better because information will be much easier to control under the globalist scheme. So it seems clear that the globalists need to vilify their foes… else the globalist scheme will be stopped.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

On Julian Assange

Posted on July 28, 2018 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, our acquiescence to the government’s of the world persecution of Julian Assange, for shining a light into the dark recesses of our utterly corrupt government’s, and their outright criminal actions… shows that we accept arbitrary rule. Attacking the messenger, for telling us bad news is often easier than addressing the bad news itself, and that is what we are doing here. Instead of looking at the deeply disturbing revelations that Wikileaks has uncovered… our unbiased media, governments, elite and anyone else caught with their hand in the cookie jar, attack the messenger, to distract from the message. Allowing evil people to hide their actions by attacking anyone who exposes them… is how great civilizations crumble. Is that really where we want our civilization to go?

The default setting for all government must be openness. As I have written before. The more light shone on government then, necessarily, the less corruption there will be. Those with a stake in the corruption however, (and don’t think for a second that there are not thousands of people, maybe even you, who have a stake in the corruption), will have a thousand reasons not to stop it, or at the most, trim it around the edges, taking out the most egregious violators. National security is always at the top of the list of “legitimate” reasons the workings of government must be kept secret. Those rascally Russians you know! When the reality is, the Russians and Chinese have complete sets of plans for everything we have ever built, nothing is secret from them… only us.

Julian Assange pried open some of the darkest places in government, exposing them to antiseptic light. That my friends is unacceptable, since the elite make so much money and wield so much power, from those caves of perpetual shadow. Put yourself in the place of the elite. If you were making millions of dollars a year, manipulating the price of stocks for example, would you want that lucrative side deal stopped? Let alone face punishment for it? If you are honest with yourself, you have to answer no, because only a saint would answer yes, and a saint would not get into that predicament in the first place. The light Assange shone in those long dark recesses… burned. Like sunlight burns a vampire, we all know how vampires loath the light, corrupt governments are no different.

It is persecution when someone is being made an example of and prosecution when law is applied blindly. When you are randomly picked up for speeding, that is law being blind, when the police target you rather than other speeders, even though some are going faster, law is no longer blind. This is so obvious. Can you imagine the government arresting Bill Moyer for a 60 minutes piece? The media that claims to be unbiased would snap their aorta saying, First Amendment! Yet others who have done exactly the same thing have been prosecuted… for what 60 minutes does? How does that follow? Freedom of the press only applies to some? Because 60 Minutes is a stooge of the corrupt government, it is not unbiased. We have even recently discovered… the media is largely a tool of the CIA!

Whenever someone is involved in a nefarious scheme, and it is found out, they point at the person who discovered it as the real enemy. The lucifarian elite did it before, when Planned Parenthood was discovered to be torturing babies to death, because it is more profitable, then illegally selling the parts. Instead of attacking Planned Parenthood for breaking the law so openly and without remorse, the government prosecuted the people who showed the world the evil… not the evil doers! The exact same thing is happening here. Instead of prosecuting those who broke the law, the governments of the world are persecuting the man who had the chutzpah, to expose it. If we allow this travesty of justice, we will be telling our psychopathic elite, they can do anything they want… and they will.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

New Idealism

Posted on July 27, 2018 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me… what used to be pragmatism has become idealism, and what was rationalism has become emotionalism. William James’ philosophy of pragmatism, often called the quintessential American philosophy, used to be strongly associated with progressivism, but if we accept the tenets of pragmatism, we can no longer associate it with progressivism. The same is true of what used to be called idealism, conservatism, is now more properly associated with pragmatism. Rationalism, which the progressives grabbed as their banner at the outset of that philosophy, has been done in by their embracing of post modernism, which doesn’t accept that there is any objective reality, and thus… rejects objective rationalism for subjective emotionalism.

Pragmatism is a normative philosophy that measures the value of an idea. Based on reason, applying a cold cost benefit equation to everything… being pragmatic. People had to structure their thinking along logical rational lines in accordance with reality’s feed backs. That is why they stopped bleeding people to make them better. It didn’t work. What’s worse, it could be demonstrated to make them sicker! Pragmatism is normative because it proposes a standard, a norm, a fixed measure, upon which to compare ideas and weigh their worth. Bleeding people, by pragmatic standards, is bad, because it yields bad fruit. Quintessentially American, in that the American ethos most of our history, has been in favor of the market system, a system that enforces a measuring mind.

Progressivism at it’s founding claimed rationalism as their core philosophy. They embraced all things cold… but not necessarily rational. From the planned economy to eugenics, they thought themselves gods, and mankind their guinea pigs. Progressives and indeed national socialists, Marxists and democratic socialists all thought science and reason had progressed so that they were now able to quantify, qualify and rationalize existence into a simulation. Then control as you would Sim City… or God. Despite their willingness to do what it takes, to make the lot of man better by propaganda and manipulation, when their actions became public… the public revolted. The American people rejected forced sterilizations, but the idea became virulent and crossed the Atlantic, metastasizing in Germany.

Pragmatism, being a normative measurement system by cost benefit analysis, doesn’t lend itself to bending to fit another philosophy. That would be like changing the length of a foot depending on the day of the week. It renders the measure worthless. Such a measure would no longer be normative but arbitrary. If we apply pragmatism’s cold calculation to progressivism, and all it’s brother and sister philosophies, National Socialism, Marxism, Democratic Socialism, etc… we find that the fruit they have always yielded has been bitter and poison. From the horrors of the French Revolution, famine as a political tool and gulags, to the generational punishment of North Korea, the results of socialism cannot be denied. By the standard of pragmatism then, socialism in all it’s incarnations, are bad.

Applying pragmatism to the market system however shows the market system to be good. The more places around the globe the market is allowed to flourish, the more places liberty, prosperity, health and wellness do too. Which means, libertarianism, constitutionalism and conservatism are pragmatic and progressivism, socialism and Marxism have become idealistic… the “new idealism.” Moreover, the new idealists now embrace their idealism along with post modernism. Post modernism is the philosophy that everything we do, say or even think, is utterly based on subjectivity, and there is no objectivity to be found in the world.. even in mathematics. So it is clear that the new idealists shun reason for subjective emotionalism. The philosophy world is turning upside down.

Sincerely

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Fraud of Shadow Banning

Posted on July 27, 2018 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, when companies like Twitter shadow ban users, for any reason, they are committing fraud. Fraud is a very serious crime and is usually treated extremely severely. Fraud is when a party to a transaction does not act in good faith. If the transaction happens, one party is defrauded and gets little or no value, in exchange for something of actual value. Therefore, fraud is immoral as well as illegal, because lying is implicit in fraud. This is how fraud is different than asymmetric knowledge. In asymmetric knowledge, one party has important information about a transaction, or one of the articles of value that will be exchanged… that the other does not have. Every exchange has asymmetric knowledge. What Twitter does when it shadow bans someone however… is an outright lie.

Fraud is always based on a lie. Telling someone they are buying a chicken in a bag, and when the person gets home… it turns out to be a cat instead, is an example of a well known fraud. It is called buying a pig in a poke. The seller claims there is a chicken in the bag, and it moves like there is a chicken in it, so the buyer, or in this case the victim, exchanges money, a thing of value, for the “chicken” in a bag. That it is actually a cat means the seller intentionally lied, since it is unlikely they mistook a cat for a chicken. Unless the seller also bought the “chicken” in a bag from someone else, who bought it from another, and no one looked… leading to a Schrodinger’s paradox. Which is unlikely. It is far more likely, using Occam’s razor, that the exchange was fraudulent.

The revenue end of business model of firms like Twitter is based on users. The more users the greater the value for ads and the like. Moreover, the more users are active the more provable the numbers of users. If I started a company and only had four users, all my own family, I could not demand the same price for ads on my site, as a site that has a million users… or as Twitter claims to have, nine hundred seventy million. Almost a billion users that the firm is getting revenue from. I wonder how many of those users, using Twitter in good faith, believing their voice is equal to everyone else on the platform… are being lied to? How many are shadow banned, and thus while they are using Twitter in good faith, increasing Twitter’s profit, they are being sold a pig in a poke?

Shadow banning is by definition a lie, it states clearly that some users of Twitter have been told their “tweets” have been reaching their followers, when in fact they have not. Which is obviously a lie. Moreover, it is Twitter’s management openly admitting that some users are more equal than others… while they tell their subscribers all are equal! Selling their service as such! Which is a patent lie, known by the executives and employees of that firm, to be a lie, perpetrated on people they are getting revenue from! Now, selling someone something that is materially different than what is promised, like saying all voices are equal, while some are less equal than others, is exactly that. Selling something that is materially different than what is advertised. Which is fraud.

The claim that users cannot be considered to have lost a thing of value is spurious. It is misleading because it discounts the value of a human being’s time. Minimum wage in the US is around Ten bucks an hour, so at the very minimum, we can say that shadow banned users of Twitter are defrauded ten dollars for every hour they spend on Twitter. If one percent of users are shadow banned, and the average user spends an hour a day on Twitter, that means Twitter is defrauding their users of ninety seven thousand dollars of value every day. I should think that is significant enough to open an investigation and prosecution. The elite would move heaven and earth to destroy you or I… for taking a ten spot. Are ten black dots more odious to the elite than ninety seven thousand black dots?

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Should Government’s Default be Secret or Open?

Posted on July 26, 2018 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the default setting for any action by government should be to immediately place it online, in a searchable database so any and every citizen has easy access to it. Today the default is the opposite, to make everything our government does, in our name and funded by us, to be a secret from us, only available by court order. Obviously openness stands in direct opposition to the present paradigm, of everything government does is by default a secret, unless someone has enough money to sue in court for access to information. Which anyone knowledgeable of human history, nature and governments knows, is a certain path to corruption. Sadly, the corruption becomes ever more difficult to deny, day after day of revelations about the Obama Administration… without naming him or it.

Right government, no matter how constituted, works for all of the nation, while wrong forms of government, work for the benefit of a single faction and their cronies only. Any form of government that serves itself rather than firms, shopkeepers, workers, grocers and plumbers, is one that by definition, is corrupt. It goes to the fundamental question of why have government at all? Is it so psychopaths can have an outlet for their perverted lust for power and dominion over others, so a cabal can amass huge fortunes beggaring the rest, or maybe to keep the average person down… by regulations, lack of political favor, poverty, wrong heritage, race or religion? The great thinkers of the ages answered this question unanimously with a resounding… no! Government must work for all.

People in charge, shady or not, will always have dozens of handy reasons their shenanigans must be kept in the dark. There will even be a very few that are legitimate. The reality always is however, that government conducted above the table will necessarily be less corrupt, than government conducted under the table. Take any example you wish. It is human nature to seek an advantage. If we can get a leg up, and no one will ever know, especially if we can make it illegal for anyone to know, it is only human to do it. Don’t kid yourself that you wouldn’t, even I don’t pretend to be superhuman, we are flawed since Eve and Adam ate of the apple. Do you really think that politicians are better human beings than you and I? All a politician need be is charismatic… morality is a liability.

Darkness begets corruption while light is antiseptic. The reason we don’t allow cameras in our bathrooms… is because we do things there we don’t want made public. Not necessarily bad things but embarrassing things. Alternatively, if we all understood that there are cameras in our bathrooms, we would be far more circumspect in what we do in them. Ragweed season would bring with it… terror. Clearly then, from this illustration, we can conclude that we modify our behavior, depending if we are in public or private, under the light or in the dark. Politicians are no different than you and I, (except a much higher percentage of politicians are psychopaths and sociopaths) and so will modify their behavior as well, depending if their actions are scrutinized or not.

So, if we do indeed want less corruption in our governments, we need to make it the default that everything government does goes on the Internet within an hour, unless flagged national security, then it must be reviewed by a court, and if found not to be sufficiently security related, immediately put on the Internet. Cameras should be in every lawmaker’s office, with direct feeds to a .gov cam site. So we can hear and see what our politicians are doing while on the clock. A Dollar General employee is on camera when they work, so why would we hold the most powerful to a lower standard, than we do the least powerful? That doesn’t make sense. To get it done… we must ignore the crocodile tears of our lawmakers, and demand it at the voting booth as special articles and ballot initiatives.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

A Great Turning

Posted on July 23, 2018 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me… we are at the beginning of a great turning. If not a historical repeat, our present age is at least a reflection of the shift from the Romantic Era, to the Victorian,. The Victorian era was largely due to a repudiation of the anything goes attitudes, and actions, of those in the romantic era. Today, we are at the end of an era similar to the Romantic… in that it is characterized by, lack of self restraint, the gross is elevated to the sublime, evil is called good and good is called evil. Our media epitomizes Kipling’s God of the Copybook Headings, reporting, “fire no longer burns and water no longer wets.” Like the youth at the end of the Romantic era, our youth witness the emptiness of hedonism, as well as the lies and intolerance of the Left… and are repulsed by what they see.

We are not taught history in school, we are indoctrinated in the dominant paradigm, and “history,” or “Social Studies,” as it is now called, is just a tool to harden the brain washing. As a result, most of us don’t really know anything about history. This makes it much easier for others to manipulate us. The history of the romantic era was far more bawdy then most of us realize. Romanticism was full of drugs, sex and even Satanism. Classics of literature from that era include, Rime of the Ancient Mariner, in which the entire story was written under the effects of Morphine. The ballad follows his “trip” while under the drug. (Which both normalizes taking drugs and romanticizes them as well). It was required reading when I was in school, a good anti drug message… not!

The dominant paradigm today, is identical to Romanticism in all respects… even including Satan worship, which has come out in the open. Satanists demand to put statues to Lucifer in the public square. Our culture lionizes drugs, as did the Romantics, remember when all the fashion models had the addict look? Our cultural, political, and astoundingly enough, scientific elite, shun the enlightenment’s advances, as the Romantics did Classicism. It could be argued that our hedonistic culture is a reaction to the staid culture of our grandparents. Just as the Romantic era was a rejection of the Enlightenment and Classicism. Moreover, the pendulum has reached it’s apex, in mindless egoism, emotion over reason, selfishness over self control, and a total lack of class… and is swinging back.

We see the beginnings of the return to sanity in the Walkaway movement. The dam has been breached, and our youth will start becoming ever more conservative as they witness the ruined lives, epidemic depression, lack of thankfulness, etc… that we are reaping from toxic post modernism. They are escaping the naked manipulations of leftists selling them hedonism, socialism, intolerance, bigotry and racism as virtues. They are looking at the wreckage our culture has created and find it revolting. As the initial trickle of youth, away from socialism, hedonism and nihilism turns to a torrent, the antics of those losing power will become ever more extreme. Recognize it for what it is though… the last gasps of a dying paradigm, desperately clutching at power that washes from it’s fingers like water.

They say that history repeats itself, or at least rhymes… In this case they couldn’t be more right. The times in which we find ourselves, at least rhymes with the end of the Romantic era, and the start of the Victorian. The parallels are too many to dismiss. Any long look at human history will reveal that human philosophies swing back and forth, from reason to emotion and back. Today we are ruled by emotion, but our youth, those kids with their pants down to their thighs, piercings from head to toe, adorned with tattoos that would make a 1940’s sailor blush… and sporting black lipstick. Those kids are the beginning of a new age of reason, classicism, Victorian or whatever repeat of history you want to use to name it. Perhaps the bandaged finger will not go, “wabbling back to the fire…” this time.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Our Elite’s Drive to Universal Hedonism

Posted on July 21, 2018 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, a hedonist might as well be a cluster fly, the ability to reason is totally wasted on him or her. Clearly, the life of a cluster fly is wholly insufficient for a human being. Yet there are many who only use their reason to devise ever more arcane ways to bring themselves pleasure. Should we find it astounding then, that hedonists when polled, say that life is empty, have a nihilistic attitude and express lower life satisfaction? What I do find astonishing however, is that our leaders in government, culture, society and business, all sell the same snake oil that the hedonist life is best. I recon that it must mean our elite are either vapid, in not knowing that hedonism is unfit for a human being, or they are selling us something they know is not in our best interests… and therefore are demons.

That is not to say that we should avoid all pleasure, it is to say, we should avoid ordering our lives around pleasures of the flesh. By all means, we should actively seek the pleasure of a job well done, a thing accomplished, of having read a good book, learned something new, helped our fellow man, praying, meditation and other elevating pleasures. Many pleasures are the result of one’s improving oneself. Such pleasures, as opposed to pleasures of the flesh, are worthy of a human being. The inner happiness of doing a good deed is predicated on the knowledge of good deeds, the human heartedness to want to help, empathy both to have awareness of another’s discomfort and to experience the joy of lifting that discomfort, as well as a soul to be able to feel such emotion at all.

While eating is pleasant and not eating unpleasant, both are states of being, not states of mind. A spider understands the difference between not eating and eating, but is lost at understanding a normative philosophy. As in, “do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” The nihilist might pervert it to, “do unto others before they do unto you…” And the hedonist might make it, “Do unto others as often as possible…” But the spider cannot comprehend any of them. Mere animals, with very few exceptions, are unable to have a state of mind, the entirety of their existence is in their state of being. Which, if you think about it, is both tragic and unburdening. It is tragic, in that the brute is unable to truly see the beauty of a flower, and unburdening, since it gives them the ability to be in the moment.

At best, the hedonist might have a century with which to embrace nothing but sensual pleasure, while an aesthetic, intellectual or religious, has all of eternity to enjoy pleasures of the mind. With the latest results of the double slit experiment, it becomes harder and harder to import existence as material, when it has been, and is being empirically proven… that our minds effect the very universe itself. The smaller the scale the greater our ability to effect it. A hedonist then, exchanges forever pleasure of the mind for a hundred years of enjoying only their state of being. One might argue that the hedonist, after dying and realizing the true nature of our universe, will simply turn to pleasures of the mind, but that argument rings hollow. Toss people in the middle of a lake and how many will make it to the edge?

Still, there are those who believe the life of a cluster fly best. Who am I to force them to change? I don’t have the arrogance to demand they adopt my point of view. Every one of us enjoys pleasures of the flesh. We eat good food, sleep under roofs, cool in air conditioning and warm in central heat. We make love, cuddle in a warm blanket on cold nights and enjoy soda. Any enlightened person understands, both, that we all enjoy sensual pleasures, and that we should not force others to eschew them, nor demand others engage in or condone them. Yet the elite normalize hedonism. They teach our children to be hedonists. People who’s personal lives are utterly disturbing seek to control everyone else’s. So I ask, if I can let you be what you want… why not let me be me?

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Tribalism and One World Government

Posted on July 19, 2018 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the very tool the elite exploit to factionalize us and thus weaken our ability to resist them, will be their undoing. I am talking about tribalism. The elite employ a myriad of ways to pit us against each other, manipulating us by our innate sense of tribalism. They keep us distracted, ala Nome Chomsky, by sports, they water down our ability to hold them to our Constitutions, by political faction, they pit Blacks against Jews, Chinese against Russians and everyone against whites, the globalist elite’s favorite psychopathic tool, is to manipulate us into harming ourselves by tribalism, so they can keep their hands clean. Yet that very tribalism they exploit to the fullest against us, should they win, will always be the burr under the saddle of their utopia.

We are tribal in nature. In the distant past our ancestor’s future was inextricably tied up with the tribe’s fortunes. Over the millennia that we existed that way it became ingrained in us that the fate of the group is our fate as well. Those that didn’t get the message died, and didn’t have kids, while those who stayed in the center of the group had plenty to make up for them. The result is that we have been programmed like lemmings to seek tribal communion. When we lived in hunter gatherer, and even primitive agrarian based societies, that core programming was very beneficial, but as our mode of existence has changed we have outgrown our need for strict tribalism, and in capitalist countries, have replaced tribalism with self interest, sometimes rightly understood… and sometimes mere egoism.

Our inner need to be members of a tribe has not dissipated however. The elite know this and have applied it to their manipulations. You see… the definition of tribe is mercurial. It could mean the tribe you grew up with in the Amazon, or it could be the football team you identify with. You might consider your tribe the political party you support or the race you belong to, one could be a member of the Elks Lodge or the Moose lodge, tribe could be defined as many things. Some still are helpful, while others are useless, and even stultifying. In the modern capitalist world, tribalism has been replaced with self interest rightly understood. Self interest rightly understood however does not lend itself to a people easily manipulated. It leads to self assured, competent, situationally and politically aware… individuals.

The elite manipulate us by leveraging our tribal inclinations. To keep us from identifying with our constitution, and thus the idea of what it is to be an American, they dangle glittering baubles to distract us, from what is important to what is not. They pit us against each other to weaken us politically. In this arena sports has been a resounding success. Many men are so enthralled with sports they know the most arcane factoids. They ignore the important by focusing on the unimportant. Men in Britain for example, will riot if their soccer team loses, but are sanguine when their little girls are raped and sold into slavery, as in Rotherham. Race has always been a means to separate us into little tribes, Progressives have used this tactic since the start of progressivism, only the race they vilify has evolved.

Tribalism however, will always be at odds with any one world government scheme, no matter how despotic it becomes. From it’s foundation, one of Marx’s foundational schemes has been, to change the very nature of mankind. Never mind the arrogance of making humanity one’s own lab rat, they believe themselves morally right in seeking to make us more like ants, than human beings. To that end they might fantasize about exploiting our tribalism, to collapse society, then claim it was our very natures that caused the collapse, and demand we submit to them, and throw off our tribal nature. In their hubris they might even believe it could work. In the end though, human nature cannot be denied, and is changed on geologic time scales, not single lifespans… no matter how many you slaughter.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Choice is Yours… Unlimited Government or Liberty?

Posted on July 16, 2018 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the question we are being confronted with… is whether or not we continue down the road of abandoning our founding ethos and philosophy, replacing it with the ethos and philosophy of Marx. We as a people, not just in the US but in Europe as well, are being plied with our ow largess to get us to choose Marxism. Not simply plied with payola for our vote, against the interests of humanity, but threatened with violence if we speak out, that we would rather liberty, prosperity and limited government… than oppression, famine and unlimited government. Today anyone who stands against the globalist elite, like the Rothschild banking empire, Rockefellers, Obamas, Soros, Epstein, etc… is destroyed. Your choice will decide if your grandchildren live well… or as slaves.

The democrat party is the party of Marx. They make no bones about it anymore. Openly booing God three times at their national convention firmly put them in the atheist camp of Marx. When democrat elites call for a Supreme court pick who is not swayed by our Constitution, they avow they are anti Americans. As they pass regulation after regulation putting the State firmly in charge of our daily lives, they prove they stand against liberty and for oppression. Every time a democrat Supreme Court “justice” evolves our Constitution, to pervert it’s meaning to their own ends, they show us that they care nothing for the rule of law but instead prefer arbitrary rule. Even hard core leftists in the democrat party are being thrown out for more reliable Marxists!

The republican party is the party of constitutionalism. Not all republicans, since even that party has been usurped by progressives who also seek a one world Marxist government, from which there is no escape. Yet, the platform of the republican party is, at it’s core, constitutionalist. So not even a vote republican will necessarily stem the tide of tyranny but a well thought out vote might help. The republican party, the party that was founded on liberty for everyone, and immediately took an anti slavery stance, has always been the party of limited government, liberty and prosperity, even when it was run by progressives. Nevertheless, a vote democrat is a vote against America, while a republican vote is generally a vote for our Constitution.

Democrats argue, just because every time Marxism has been tried, it has resulted in millions of horrible deaths by famine, state violence against it’s own people and crime, it will work if only everyone on the planet is forced into that system. They claim Pol Pot wasn’t a real Marxist, even though he implemented Marxist theory to the letter. They complain that Stalin gave Marxism a bad name, and that Fidel was the right kind of socialist, because when he came to power, he only slaughtered fifty thousand people in his initial purge. Democrats say socialism must have the right people in charge for it to work, so once they get that power, being the “right people,” they will make the planet a “utopia” (nowhere land), like the world has never seen…

So what should we do? Shall we abandon limited government, the market system, liberty and prosperity… for the as yet unattainable promises of the Marxists? Perhaps they are attainable now? Maybe history will not repeat itself, perchance it won’t even rhyme… this time, and their promises will come to pass. Global absolute tyranny is certainly an option some might prefer. Others might rather limited government, since man has proven himself incapable of having absolute power, corrupting him absolutely. We might prefer to remain in a state of liberty, the state that we are born into before government violence reduces us to subjects, or others might cling to the prosperity that the market system has given us. So the choice is yours… and you can make your choice reality by your vote.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment