Dear Friends,
It seems to me… a fundamental precept of any legitimate government is the consent of the governed. Lacking that consent, that government is a tyranny, no more no less. Extending that principle to conflict zones, wouldn’t it make sense then, to have the people in the conflict zone decide by ballot what they want? Instead of people with guns, tanks and poison gas? The first way is human hearted the second way is psychopathic. Which way do you think serves God and which way serves Lucifer? Any conflict could be decided by vote, and could have been for the last two millennia at least, but they are not. The most violent usually wins, not the human hearted. Which tells us that most governments at their core are illegitimate usurpers who couldn’t care less about consent. We are ruled by psychopaths.
Take the example of Nagorno Karabah. That longstanding conflict is about the genocide of the Armenians. Let’s just say what it is… rather than pussy foot around it. The war is about the genocide of a people who have lived there since before Christ. They are reduced to a fragment, of the once large nation that gets ever smaller, with every war of extermination. In the latest areas the Islamists have conquered, even Armenian cemeteries have been desecrated, dug up and removed… the erasure is so thorough. That is why the Armenians fled, and burned their homes to the ground, before they left the area ceded to the Azaris. If genocide was being done to any Muslim population the world would be livid. The Armenians are Christian however, and in the times, don’t have that level of political favor.
The Falkland Islands are another prime example of a needless conflict. The people there don’t emigrate to Argentina but Argentinians emigrate to the Falkland Islands. That is because people are self interested, no matter what politics we espouse, we will leave an area that is a disaster, to another place where we can live in prosperity. You would do that, and I would too, if it’s possible and we have the means. In every poll the people of the Falkland islands demand to remain a British protectorate. Yet the greedy psychopaths in the Argentinian government see that gem of wealth, so close, all they need do is reach out and take it, then they can plunder it’s wealth like they have Argentina’s for so long. Therefore, Argentina is constantly looking for a way to conquer the Falkland islands, out of psychopathic lust.
Taiwan is the ideal example of a people that would rule themselves, have shown they are capable, but they stand in the way of an empire. Why should the people of Taiwan bend a knee to the CCP? Their forefathers fled Fat Mao’s CCP decades ago. No one in their right mind would want to live in Communist China. Especially people who have grown up on stories of Fat Mao’s atrocities. Imperial Communist People’s China however has a different idea. The oligarchy, the communist party, and the despot, Xi, care not for the will of anyone but themselves. Human suffering to them is a tool, no different than a hammer is to a carpenter. It is their job to inflict suffering as it is a carpenter’s to drive nails. So we have the Imperial CCP gearing up to invade Taiwan… out of pure psychopathic avarice.
In the US the consent of the governed is no longer in vogue. The elite have abandoned such inconveniences for the Fat Mao model. Manipulating elections like a magician pulls a rabbit out of his hat, in both instances, the performer cannot allow you to see behind the curtain. Which is why the elite demand we shut up and accept their fraud. In all these examples, the elite have shown they could care less about the will of the people, and so are illegitimate usurpers. Shameless, power mad, heartless and conniving, those who rule our world today are the acme of psychopaths. The very pinnacle of malevolence. Like Psycho Killer Cuomo, Fat Mao, Fuehrer Erdogan or Poo Bear Xi, psychopaths rule against the will of the people. Who do you think our pathological rulers serve? God… or Lucifer?
Sincerely,
John Pepin
