Dear Friends,
It seems to me, if the government were going to foist some huge hoax on us, they would get rid of all the experts with the authority, knowledge, and ethics to undermine it. That’s swindling 101. You isolate the mark’s access only to the sources of information you control. That way you can manipulate what he or she thinks while they think it’s them all the way. That’s the way a game is played on a patsy. The more they think they are in control the better the game is working. If this is true, then when we see people with authority removed en masse it might be a sign a game is being played on us. This is especially true if right after those authorities are removed, a major disclosure is announced. Such actions should send up a multitude of red flags.
A swindler replaces the mark’s sources of information with his own. That way the mark can only know what benefits the swindler. Information in this sense becomes a maze that the con controls. The mouse then runs after the cheese and right into a trap. In a well-executed game the patsy even then thinks he or she had no other choices. That’s when a scam goes from run-of-the-mill to extraordinary. Even after the mark is fleeced they have no idea how it was done or that it even happened. That can only be done when the mark has no access to the truth. One would think it’s hard to get people to believe lies, but history shows differently. If the lies are all we hear, then how do we know they are lies? Moreover, if the truth is illegal, truth itself becomes a pseudo-moral wrong.
When swindling a whole population you need tools. Calling truth a moral wrong is one way to get people to self-regulate. That’s a valuable tool. Many people who feel they have a stake in the swindle, even if they are themselves the marks, will defend the lies… and zealously if they have to. The useful patsies will point to the lies as proof of truth, and the illegality of truth as proof of lies. Another tool of mass scamming is discrediting individuals instead of addressing their arguments. If someone is a hater, why engage with them at all? You’re just validating their hate… and so the truth is suppressed from the marks. Just vilify the truth-teller with slander and voila, their argument is irrelevant, they themselves become the target of debate. This has a chilling effect as well, because no one likes to be a target.
These tools are very effective at controlling information to keep the patsies in the game, but one person with the authority, knowledge, and ethics to come forward would upset the board. A scientist, for example, who has expertise in a field has knowledge coupled with authority that can’t be undermined by slander. That person is dangerous unless they can be purchased. So, if they have ethics, they become deadly to the swindle. In the private sector a scam artist will make sure to keep such people well away from the mark. In the public sector the swindlers can simply eliminate such people altogether. So if we notice a large amount of scientists and experts in a field suddenly disappearing, that could be a signal a swindle is about to happen or is underway.
In an unrelated story, it sure is odd how so many UFO scientists and experts have gone missing lately, isn’t it? Lots of government officials, scientists, and contractors have been disappeared in the last few years. A woman’s body was just discovered. She had been missing for a year. What makes it even more puzzling is that the government is now claiming UFOs are real. Right after nearly 20 experts in the field are missing… that seems strange. Obviously, the same people who assured us Covid came from a pangolin, MK Ultra was a conspiracy theory, and the Covid vaccine worked having no side effects, now tell us UFOs are probably real, and here is the footage to prove it. I would like UFOs to be real. That would be cool as heck. I don’t know though, something smells… as bad as the corpses.
Sincerely,
John Pepin
