Limericks

Posted on October 17, 2024 by john

Dear Friends,

 

There once was a culture useless,

Where people were made hopeless,

No way out,

But don’t pout,

The CCP has plenty of fentanyl for all of us.

 

There once was a politician named Keir,

Demons, imps and leftists thought him a dear,

He’s not a despot,

He’s just a zealot,

And then went on to ban cigs, wine and beer.

 

There once was an elite so evil,

The demons were not their equal,

Without morals we win,

They said with a grin,

And set themselves afire for a sequel.

 

There once was an elite so self blind,

They talked loudly from their behind,

We’re the rational ones here,

They said with a sneer,

And then claimed to be gods of a kind.

 

There once was a faction from Hades,

The men liked to pretend to be ladies,

A hypocritical lot,

Covered in snot,

As they sucked the marrow from their own babies.

 

Tommy Robinson is the man of the hour,

The elite despise him from their ivory tower,

He makes them wail,

They put him in jail,

And they hate that he speaks truth to power.

 

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, economy, Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Digital Anything

Posted on October 16, 2024 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, one thing that’s being proved before our eyes, is that digital anything isn’t secure, robust or safe. Whenever anything is made digital it’s become less secure, in that it’s exposed to hackers getting at it, and making that data public. Less robust, since it can be changed at the push of a button. Plus, it’s less reliable, because we simply don’t know if anything digital is truthful anymore. The rational default should be… no, if it appears digitally, it’s probably a lie, and if the government says it, it’s definitely a lie. A road to Hell, always leads to Hell. That’s why we need to push back against the Hegelian manipulation that’ll be used to push digital currency. How can we expect digital currency to go different, than digital voting, banking or healthcare? We can’t. CBDCs will be a nightmare.

Digital voting has been a total catastrophe. When the ballots were on paper, verifiable and hand counted, the results were in within an hour of the polls closing. Even as digital has ushered in an age where it can take days. Now that’s efficiency… or is it? With digital voting, the results are subject to change, depending on the whims of the hackers that find their way into the machines. Of course, with digital voting, there’s no need of voter ID… digital has made the whole thing a theater anyway. Electronic voting has taken political agency from citizens and placed it in the hands of the elite. As the elite did with freedom of speech, jury sentencing and contacting our representatives free through the mail. We can say that digital voting has alleviated us of the burden of blame. Since it makes us pawns.

Social media is censored and politically correct ideas are promoted by digital magic. Rendering our ability to communicate subject to political intervention. To make sure we only talk about approved subjects in the approved manner. Else the elite claim we’re engaging in misinformation, disinformation, or maybe even malinformation. Call ’em what you will, they all mean, wrongthink. In promoting the power of the elite the digital age has been a demon send. It can make a lie appear to be reality. Digital technology has made surveillance, categorizing people and censoring, far more efficient. While it’s made communicating betwixt each other fraught with legal ramifications. Again, the introduction of digital technology to voting and communication has made them less secure, less safe and less reliable.

If we go to a doctor… Our personal information is on the Dark Web, or soon will be, due to the incessant hacking done to digital servers. You don’t even have had to do business with a company for them to have all your personal information… dangling on an unsecured server. Just waiting to be plucked by a smart hacker and sold on the Dark web. Soon, it’ll be impossible to take out a loan because we won’t be able to identify ourselves… short of DNA, retinal scan or a fingerprint. Instead of facilitating commerce, the introduction of digital technology has introduced a myriad of security concerns. There’s no denying digital technology has unburdened us of the need to think though. Weakening our minds accordingly. As any muscle left flaccid long enough becomes weak.

Instead of making information more credible, accessible and truthful, the digital revolution has made information more dangerous, unsecured, censored and manipulated. Given the history of digitizing things… can you imagine the utter catastrophe a digital currency would be? Combining the disaster of digital voting, with the censorship of social media, along with a total lack of personal security. The trifecta of prosperity liquidators. Then again, there are those who think, just because an action has always resulted in the same outcome… doesn’t mean it will, this time. Like jumping off a cliff… eventually, someone might sprout wings and fly. Wouldn’t that be great! Digital technology could make it appear to happen, as the bodies are hauled off. Maybe we should rethink the digital revolution?

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Lawless Society

Posted on October 15, 2024 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, if pointing out a crime is itself a crime, then you live in a lawless society. A nation where law is a means to oppress the politically disconnected and loot the treasury. Law doesn’t promote societal harmony, alleviate cultural stress or facilitate commerce. In such places law is no protection. It’s only a threat. Moreover, where the government itself abets crime, that lawless government is engaging in arbitrary rule. A type of rule where laws are randomly applied. Why is such a government bad? Because it could change the law, but doesn’t, so that law can be used despotically against the politically disfavored. Even as it’s not applied to the politically favored. So instead of eliminating a law that’s largely unenforced, the law arbitrarily enforce it. Then make it illegal to point their hypocrisy out.

That election instructions are written in multiple languages is open abetting of election fraud. To pass the citizenship test one has to have a basic understanding of English. Legally, only citizens are allowed to vote, so by printing instructions and directions in mandarin, Spanish, Urdu, etc… is openly abetting vote fraud. By the very people tasked with preventing election crime. So, when the crime of fraud is that in our face, how can we have any confidence in their word… or an election? Why not pass laws allowing illegal aliens to vote then? Because they need the votes… but not the political backlash. Though, if you or I were to cover the illegal instructions, we would be charged with a crime, for preventing a crime. In other words, if we point out the crime, we’re charged with a crime.

For years the police fought in court to be allowed to film us anytime anyplace, including at home in private, while at the very same time, making it illegal to film a police officer even in public. Not only epitomizing hypocrisy… but showing the police themselves must be engaging in crime. Else they wouldn’t care about being videoed in public. If we accept the premise of every elite’s statement about the legitimacy of mass surveillance. IE, “If your not engaging in a crime why would you care if the police are videoing you?” You and I have no presumption of privacy while in public, or even at home in our bathroom, if we have a cell phone with us… but apparently, a civil servant expects total privacy even in public. Because, to expose a crime by a public servant is itself a crime, in Amerika today.

Arbitrary rule, or the random application of the law, is proof of a lawless society. Instead of changing the law so the politically favored aren’t effected by it. An unjust government will simply not enforce the law on the politically favored. Then use that same law to oppress the politically disfavored. So the law is a tool. A tool that doesn’t apply to everyone equally. Once this starts it only gets worse. Because those in power will exploit arbitrary rule to their advantage. Enriching those with access and closing the door of justice more firmly to those without it. Because arbitrary rule is the perfect tool to loot a treasury. Clean it out and pay off the guards, your cronies and keep the lions share for the corrupt elite. Leaving the people destitute. Enriching the corrupt though is only one result of a lawless society.

Using inversion we can discern which way leads us away from justice. For law to be the avatar of justice, one must not go the way Thrasymachus urged Glaucon and his friends. That’s going the opposite direction. Hypocrisy being the opposite of justice. As is arbitrarily enforcing the law. We need to avoid going the wrong way as we embrace the right way. First we need to stop tolerating the criminal abuse of whistle blowers. Pointing out a crime is a heroic act… not a crime. The criminals need to be investigated, charged and tried. Not those exposing their crimes. Why do you think the elite always attack the source of information rather than disprove charges? Because they’re guilty and arbitrary rule allows them to escape justice. Demand our lawless governments become lawful again.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Posted on October 14, 2024 by john

Dear Friends,

 

Google is a company on the cutting edge,

Of making money from placing a wedge,

Lying for profit,

You can’t top it,

And the executives will end up on a ledge.

 

The love of migrants by the elite is infinite,

Islamists rapists and terrorists are a benefit,

Their culture to sow,

Not in Brussels though,

Proving the elites in the EU are hypocrite.

 

Our Rights are guaranteed in our Constitution tis true,

If we’re denied the document then our rights are subdue,

The judge said in a huff,

Enough is enough,

But he should be wary because his authority comes from it too.

 

There once was a faction of traitors,

Like a government filled with gators,

They grab from beneath,

Then pick their teeth,

And the progressives are the acme of violators.

 

The elite are corrupt as dog poop,

But here’s the latest foul scoop,

They do as they please,

Wont turn in the keys,

All to benefit the oligarchs in the loop.

 

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, media, Mercy, philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Progressive Crimes

Posted on October 13, 2024 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, progressives can get away with the most heinous crimes imaginable, and no one is ever outraged at them? It’s mind boggling. Over and over, the progressive faction is caught in a crime against humanity, and no one seems to care. Election fraud, rioting, arson, beatings, eugenics, using violence as a political weapon, notorious racism, lawfare, frame jobs, false flags, the list is endless. How is it they escape criticism for their crimes? No wonder the progressives are upping their game though. Being above criticism, let alone the law itself, why not? I think they get away with their crimes because they control the narrative, run the administrative state, and claim the moral high ground, from the sewer. These are the three legs the progressive edifice stands on. Kick any one out and they fall.

Progressive crimes against humanity are legendary. The Fascists saw themselves as the European version of the American progressive party. Moreover, to sharpen the point, during the Nuremberg trials the Nazis charged with war crimes and crimes against humanity, claimed everything they did was legal in the US, based on Buck v Bell. Therefore all the crimes of the Nazis can be laid at the feet of the progressive faction. They are horrible, but the progressive party in the US, has a pretty heavy burden of crimes against humanity as well. Buck v Bell? That was a progressive usurpation of power over the individual to clean the human genome. Then there’s the famous Korematsu, where the Supreme Court gave the president the power to arbitrarily imprison any group of people he deems fit.

A full accounting of the crimes against humanity committed by the progressive faction would be far too long to list. So suffice it to say, the crimes above, are the tip of the iceberg of progressive atrocities. Done in the name of ushering in utopia. Which is how they claim the moral high ground even as they commit inhumanity. Because their goal is so wonderful it justifies any atrocity. Do you think a Nazi death camp guard, a Young Turk, or other malignant psychopath thinks they’re the bad guy? Of course not! They think they’re the good guys. and the innocent women and children they’re raping, beating and murdering, are the bad guys. They firmly have the moral high ground in their own minds. Moreover, if those in charge of the narrative are of such a mind, that’s what the narrative will reflect.

The progressive faction has had a monopolistic control of the narrative for a century. “Journalists” are all taught in the same schools, with the same ideology… progressivism. They’re steeped in the ideology of elitism. Believing that only the experts should have a say. The rest of us should sit down, shut up… and let the adults run the show. As long as they had a monopoly the narrative was theirs. With the introduction of social media and private journalism, their stranglehold on information weakened. That’s why censorship is so important. Without it they lose control of the narrative. That narrative is one leg of their oligarchy. Lose it and the thing falls over. The two legs of, running the bureaucracy and claiming the moral high ground, are insufficient to hold up their oligarchy in the face of transparency

The progressive faction’s iron grip on the deep state isn’t due to merely owning the top, their ideology has oozed through the bureaucracy to the ground floor. In any bureaucracy of government it’s near impossible to find anyone who isn’t a progressive elitist. It’s handy, when engaging in crime, to own the police, prosecutors, judges… and press. The simple fact their crimes are unpunished allows the progressives to claim they are moral and just. Then amplify their claims of “morality” with their mockingbird media. While their three legged stool seems stable… it’s not. Kick out any of those legs and the thing collapses on its face. That’s why we should struggle against censorship, eliminate the deep state, as well as expose their crimes… and thus the malevolence of the progressive faction.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Posted on October 12, 2024 by john

Dear Friends,

 

There once were powerful doctors vile,

Creating viruses and injecting us with bile,

We obey their demands,

As they wash their hands,

But the blood won’t come off even with guile.

 

Fluoride in the water what a pity,

It shaves off IQ points itty by bitty,

Insanity it evokes,

But not rural folks,

It primarily effects democrats who live in a city.

 

There once was an obese ruler of Qin,

Though he was fat his people were thin,

He declared with a lisp,

Unlimited power is his,

And his eternal reward is with demons worse than him.

 

There once was a guy named Joe,

Who claimed to be in the know,

He said with a nod,

As he talked down to God,

If I could see it I bet my brain does glow.

 

There once was a scheme vile and malignant,

To make the administrative state dominant,

In a letter admitting their plan,

Penned in Wilson’s hand,

Since scum thinks the water holding it up is repugnant.

 

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in media, Mercy, philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Confidence And Humility

Posted on October 11, 2024 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, one of the biggest problems I have with the expert class… is their stupidity. Foolishness that can be summarized as the paradox of the preface. Where all human beings are subject to being wrong, even when we’re confident we’re right, so certainty is absurd. A common example is, “a book starts by claiming everything in it is true, but the author admits he could be wrong.” Wise people understand that they can’t always be right. Even someone who knows all humanity knows, about a given subject, only knows as much as humanity… and no more. Moreover, language is a poor vessel to carry certain ideas. Which makes censorship, laws for our own benefit and regulations to force change… literal absurdities, foisted on us by confident fools.

To be human is to be subject to error. Those then who think themselves always right, are stupid. As the certain in themselves, are fools, those who follow them are tools. Tools of disaster. Because even if a would be despot is right 99%, he or she is wrong 1% of the time. That 1% quickly fluffs up to catastrophe, when someone with unlimited power implements it. Humility isn’t a weakness, as many narcissists think, it’s wisdom in action. You don’t see many humble people ushering in genocides, revolutions or wars. That’s for the confident. Those who used law to force vaccination were confident they were right. The results are, perhaps millions of deaths from the side effects, and millions of children with heart ailments as well. Certainty leads to atrocities while humility leads to blessings.

Mankind is in our teenage years when it comes to knowledge of the universe. We think we know it all. So our experts think they know it all too. They don’t know what they don’t know. But in a century, they’ll look back at us an laugh, like we laugh at the doctors who used leeches in the Middle Ages. It won’t take as long because the rate of learning is accelerating. Therefore, our experts may have the best of intentions, but being ignorant of their ignorance, makes them overly certain of their conclusions. Thinking to themselves, “I know all there is to know about X, Y and Z.” Not considering, all there is to know, doesn’t include all that’s knowable… simply all that’s known. This is another way the certain, confidently lead us into disaster, after atrocity. Later, the humble lead us back out.

Then there’s the confidence that comes from the ability to manipulate language. As Kung Sung Lung’s famous analogy proved… “A white horse is not a horse but a black or yellow one is…” Illustrating the weakness of language and why it only approximates reality and thought. Because our very ideas of words change from person to person. Take the word dog. When you imagine a dog you probably imagine an archetype, based on a dog you saw or had as a kid, as I do. The thing is, we aren’t basing them on the same dog. So our ideas differ about a word as basic as dog. How much more so about the words, law, capitalism and government? Arrogant people use language to manipulate. Humble people use language to communicate. While wise people understand language is an expedient.

Certainty then is associated with foolishness… and humility with wisdom. No wonder the world is in the shape its in. The foolishly confident charge to lead, while the humble and wise stand back, unwilling to make a mess of things. Those who are certain never expect to create disasters after their atrocities. They confidently believe they will usher in a new Eden. Once they break a few eggs. That has been the mindset of every person who’s committed an atrocity. They’re confident in their truth. Never imagining they could be wrong, they don’t know all that’s knowable, or they could be manipulated. That’s why I say, stupid fools are certain, so they commit atrocities. That’s how we identify them. They censor, don’t listen, and are willing to commit any atrocity… to save the world..

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Are Our Courts Subjective Or Objective

Posted on October 10, 2024 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, objective law serves justice, while subjective law serves the powerful. Which is probably why law is usually subjectively applied. How can we tell if the law is being objectively or subjectively used? By observing several factors. Are the courts transparent? If they don’t allow cameras, microphones and non distracting video equipment (like cell phones) then they’re being opaque. Non transparency is a sure sign of a corrupt court system. Are the courts non partisan? Or do they pass judgments like, the 9 year sentence of a 68 year old mother of a slain War veteran… for documenting election fraud. Are the courts consistent? Even as violent rioters and arsonists in 2016 were let off, peaceful Jan 6th “trespassers” were given multi year sentences.

When exposing crime is itself a crime then the government itself is criminal. Because hiding a crime is itself a criminal act. If the courts break the law then… that makes them criminals. An objective court adjudicates the law as written and understood. A subjective court will rule on cases depending on the ramifications to the government, elite or themselves. Moreover, if the courts themselves don’t take law seriously… why should we? Their leadership, if followed, puts us on a path to chaos. Because when criminals run the criminal justice system, crime pays, and pays well. Where crime pays well, there will be lots of crime, and little commerce. Leading to a collapse in the nation with a subjective court system. While an objective legal system results in general and growing prosperity.

A judge that has a dog in the political fight, isn’t an arbiter of justice, it’s an arbiter of political favor. Judges are people. People are animalistic in that we don’t act against our own interests… knowingly. So, when a judge sees his or her sacred cow about to be slaughtered, they step in. That’s why it’s important that judges don’t husband sacred cows or keep fighting dogs. In the form of political preferences and class fraternity. Of course, there’s nothing like a good zealous political diatribe, against our founding principles… to show which dog a judge has in the fight. Clearly then, those judges that rule by self interests instead of legal precedent and law, rule subjectively. While those who rule without regard to class or political favor, only on law… rule objectively.

There is no reason a court needs privacy unless it’s to commit injustice in the name of justice. As judges usurp ever more power, they increasingly stand in front of the law. Law they’re supposed to follow. The main problem to this usurpation is public opinion. If the public were to see first hand the corruption in our courts, the courts would lose all credibility, and it’s credibility that courts rely on. That’s the only reason a court would need opacity. So they can maintain their corruption, and any documentation of it… gets the offender sent to prison. Moreover, a lack of transparency serves a subjective court while an objective court has no need of secrecy. Secrecy is for star chambers, kangaroo courts and despots. Making transparency a key means to deciding if a legal system is corrupt or fair.

What do you think? Are our courts transparent, fair and consistent? Recent news reports scream no, they’re not! Which means our legal system is subjective not objective. It serves the politically favored and not justice. When criminals run the legal system, that system is itself criminal, in need of cleaning out. The place to start would be to impeach all judges who have shown they have a dog in the fight. Put in consequences for judges that follow political expediency instead of the law. The criminals must be rooted out of our legal system. If its criminal to expose crime, then those that made it so, must be indicted. You can do something. Contact your senators and representative. Demand impeachments to get rid of corrupt judges. Tell them we want objective courts… not subjective ones.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, Law, Mercy, philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Public Servants

Posted on October 9, 2024 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the reason the term, “public servant” is no longer used, is because they are our masters, and masters chafe at being called a servant. Even for political appearances. That’s why a police officer becomes furious when told, “I pay your salary!” Because you don’t pay his salary, the money is taken from you at gun point. Try telling that to a mafia thug your paying protection money to. Its the exact same thing. Except one uses the power of the gun, by claiming the authority of a Constitution they despise, while as the other claims the power of the gun, in the face of the law. Public servants give orders and we obey. Moreover, they’re above their own laws and regulations. Since laws apply to the servants… not masters. That’s why calling a bureaucrats a public servant is a non sequitur.

How can you tell a master from a servant? It was easy in the Victorian era in England. The servant served the master. The master didn’t serve the servant. If we apply that logic to today. We see that our bureaucrats, politicians and judges, serve themselves… not us. Moreover, we serve them as they see fit. Just like a Victorian Earl would order around a maid. They give the orders and we carry them out. Their every whim is manifested as law. Regardless of Constitutional restraint. Since they’re in a pinky swear to follow it… they don’t. Why should they? The elite are above the law. Examples abound of their getting away with actions that would put you or I behind bars for decades. Like, perjury, not paying taxes, buying prostitution, drunk driving, etc…

Do you pay taxes willingly… or is the threat of armed agents showing up at your door, in a pre dawn raid, all the incentive you need? Do you sign off on the trillions in debt you and you’re kids are obligated to pay back? Heck, is your vote even fairly counted? These aren’t the qualities of someone who is a master. These are the attributes of servants. The servant has no say, is held to a higher standard, and is severely punished… to keep us in check. In many nations, that formerly claimed to be free, now simply posting your opinion on social media could get you imprisoned. In the US, make a joke that ridicules democrat voters as stupid, and the courts will send you to jail. The elite have eschewed Constitutional authority, for power which, “grows from the barrel of a gun.”

Both the Cosa Nostra and the government use violence and the threat of violence to coerce us. The main difference is the Mafia only abuses those in their sphere of influence. “Civilians” are off limits. Meanwhile the government abuses everyone. No one’s safe. Like the old saying goes, “Whether or not you take an interest in politics, politics will take an interest in you.” If you don’t take out a loan from a loan shark, stay out of gambling debt, and don’t befriend criminals… you’ll probably never have to deal with organized crime. Buy property, earn money or educate your children though, and you’ll necessarily interact with a “public servant.” Which only goes to show… organized crime and government are cut from the same butt rag. But government demands we wash our face with it.

Our public servants have become our public masters. Proven with their open hypocrisy. Even as bureaucrats lie under oath, like breathing, they exploit perjury traps as a legal weapon against the politically disfavored. Rendering hypocrisy into it’s most pure form. Government has become a tool of the elite to get their every whim met. Public servants are free to pass the most oppressive laws. Since those laws wont be applied to them. Only us. Any interaction with a “public servant” is fraught with peril. Masters are known for their surliness. Irk a public servant and you may get beat up by the cops then sent to prison. What’s the solution though? Less public servants. Limit government. Understand it can’t solve our problems. Stop saying, “there ought to be a law…” Then apply this mindset.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Posted on October 8, 2024 by john

Dear Friends,

 

Oh the irony when those in power,

Blame the weak for making things sour,

It’s so very rich

The car’s in a ditch,

Because the drivers couldn’t see the road from their ivory tower.

 

Anyone who discovers the fountain of youth,

Better keep it secret or be considered uncouth,

Money’s at stake,

Your life they’ll take,

If you cure disease and that’s the truth.

 

The elite are obsessed with censorship and speech,

Conniving to limit other’s thoughts voice and reach,

Calling the truth all lies,

Cutting us down to size,

And everything they say fills our heads with bleach.

 

They created the virus in a lab,

Closed churches and told us to blab,

Banning debate,

This you must take,

And millions have perished from the jab.

 

There once was a mockingbird media,

Vetting their stories through Wikipedia,

No one trusts us,

They complained with disgust,

And reported about a cave diver with claustrophobia.

 

There once was a faction so dumb,

They lived in a absurd phantasm,

The progressive tart said,

You’re not right in the head,

And up her derriere was her thumb.

 

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, media, Mercy, philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment