Limericks

Dear Friends,

 

There once were powerful doctors vile,

Creating viruses and injecting us with bile,

We obey their demands,

As they wash their hands,

But the blood won’t come off even with guile.

 

Fluoride in the water what a pity,

It shaves off IQ points itty by bitty,

Insanity it evokes,

But not rural folks,

It primarily effects democrats who live in a city.

 

There once was an obese ruler of Qin,

Though he was fat his people were thin,

He declared with a lisp,

Unlimited power is his,

And his eternal reward is with demons worse than him.

 

There once was a guy named Joe,

Who claimed to be in the know,

He said with a nod,

As he talked down to God,

If I could see it I bet my brain does glow.

 

There once was a scheme vile and malignant,

To make the administrative state dominant,

In a letter admitting their plan,

Penned in Wilson’s hand,

Since scum thinks the water holding it up is repugnant.

 

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in media, Mercy, philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Confidence And Humility

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, one of the biggest problems I have with the expert class… is their stupidity. Foolishness that can be summarized as the paradox of the preface. Where all human beings are subject to being wrong, even when we’re confident we’re right, so certainty is absurd. A common example is, “a book starts by claiming everything in it is true, but the author admits he could be wrong.” Wise people understand that they can’t always be right. Even someone who knows all humanity knows, about a given subject, only knows as much as humanity… and no more. Moreover, language is a poor vessel to carry certain ideas. Which makes censorship, laws for our own benefit and regulations to force change… literal absurdities, foisted on us by confident fools.

To be human is to be subject to error. Those then who think themselves always right, are stupid. As the certain in themselves, are fools, those who follow them are tools. Tools of disaster. Because even if a would be despot is right 99%, he or she is wrong 1% of the time. That 1% quickly fluffs up to catastrophe, when someone with unlimited power implements it. Humility isn’t a weakness, as many narcissists think, it’s wisdom in action. You don’t see many humble people ushering in genocides, revolutions or wars. That’s for the confident. Those who used law to force vaccination were confident they were right. The results are, perhaps millions of deaths from the side effects, and millions of children with heart ailments as well. Certainty leads to atrocities while humility leads to blessings.

Mankind is in our teenage years when it comes to knowledge of the universe. We think we know it all. So our experts think they know it all too. They don’t know what they don’t know. But in a century, they’ll look back at us an laugh, like we laugh at the doctors who used leeches in the Middle Ages. It won’t take as long because the rate of learning is accelerating. Therefore, our experts may have the best of intentions, but being ignorant of their ignorance, makes them overly certain of their conclusions. Thinking to themselves, “I know all there is to know about X, Y and Z.” Not considering, all there is to know, doesn’t include all that’s knowable… simply all that’s known. This is another way the certain, confidently lead us into disaster, after atrocity. Later, the humble lead us back out.

Then there’s the confidence that comes from the ability to manipulate language. As Kung Sung Lung’s famous analogy proved… “A white horse is not a horse but a black or yellow one is…” Illustrating the weakness of language and why it only approximates reality and thought. Because our very ideas of words change from person to person. Take the word dog. When you imagine a dog you probably imagine an archetype, based on a dog you saw or had as a kid, as I do. The thing is, we aren’t basing them on the same dog. So our ideas differ about a word as basic as dog. How much more so about the words, law, capitalism and government? Arrogant people use language to manipulate. Humble people use language to communicate. While wise people understand language is an expedient.

Certainty then is associated with foolishness… and humility with wisdom. No wonder the world is in the shape its in. The foolishly confident charge to lead, while the humble and wise stand back, unwilling to make a mess of things. Those who are certain never expect to create disasters after their atrocities. They confidently believe they will usher in a new Eden. Once they break a few eggs. That has been the mindset of every person who’s committed an atrocity. They’re confident in their truth. Never imagining they could be wrong, they don’t know all that’s knowable, or they could be manipulated. That’s why I say, stupid fools are certain, so they commit atrocities. That’s how we identify them. They censor, don’t listen, and are willing to commit any atrocity… to save the world..

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Are Our Courts Subjective Or Objective

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, objective law serves justice, while subjective law serves the powerful. Which is probably why law is usually subjectively applied. How can we tell if the law is being objectively or subjectively used? By observing several factors. Are the courts transparent? If they don’t allow cameras, microphones and non distracting video equipment (like cell phones) then they’re being opaque. Non transparency is a sure sign of a corrupt court system. Are the courts non partisan? Or do they pass judgments like, the 9 year sentence of a 68 year old mother of a slain War veteran… for documenting election fraud. Are the courts consistent? Even as violent rioters and arsonists in 2016 were let off, peaceful Jan 6th “trespassers” were given multi year sentences.

When exposing crime is itself a crime then the government itself is criminal. Because hiding a crime is itself a criminal act. If the courts break the law then… that makes them criminals. An objective court adjudicates the law as written and understood. A subjective court will rule on cases depending on the ramifications to the government, elite or themselves. Moreover, if the courts themselves don’t take law seriously… why should we? Their leadership, if followed, puts us on a path to chaos. Because when criminals run the criminal justice system, crime pays, and pays well. Where crime pays well, there will be lots of crime, and little commerce. Leading to a collapse in the nation with a subjective court system. While an objective legal system results in general and growing prosperity.

A judge that has a dog in the political fight, isn’t an arbiter of justice, it’s an arbiter of political favor. Judges are people. People are animalistic in that we don’t act against our own interests… knowingly. So, when a judge sees his or her sacred cow about to be slaughtered, they step in. That’s why it’s important that judges don’t husband sacred cows or keep fighting dogs. In the form of political preferences and class fraternity. Of course, there’s nothing like a good zealous political diatribe, against our founding principles… to show which dog a judge has in the fight. Clearly then, those judges that rule by self interests instead of legal precedent and law, rule subjectively. While those who rule without regard to class or political favor, only on law… rule objectively.

There is no reason a court needs privacy unless it’s to commit injustice in the name of justice. As judges usurp ever more power, they increasingly stand in front of the law. Law they’re supposed to follow. The main problem to this usurpation is public opinion. If the public were to see first hand the corruption in our courts, the courts would lose all credibility, and it’s credibility that courts rely on. That’s the only reason a court would need opacity. So they can maintain their corruption, and any documentation of it… gets the offender sent to prison. Moreover, a lack of transparency serves a subjective court while an objective court has no need of secrecy. Secrecy is for star chambers, kangaroo courts and despots. Making transparency a key means to deciding if a legal system is corrupt or fair.

What do you think? Are our courts transparent, fair and consistent? Recent news reports scream no, they’re not! Which means our legal system is subjective not objective. It serves the politically favored and not justice. When criminals run the legal system, that system is itself criminal, in need of cleaning out. The place to start would be to impeach all judges who have shown they have a dog in the fight. Put in consequences for judges that follow political expediency instead of the law. The criminals must be rooted out of our legal system. If its criminal to expose crime, then those that made it so, must be indicted. You can do something. Contact your senators and representative. Demand impeachments to get rid of corrupt judges. Tell them we want objective courts… not subjective ones.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, Law, Mercy, philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Public Servants

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the reason the term, “public servant” is no longer used, is because they are our masters, and masters chafe at being called a servant. Even for political appearances. That’s why a police officer becomes furious when told, “I pay your salary!” Because you don’t pay his salary, the money is taken from you at gun point. Try telling that to a mafia thug your paying protection money to. Its the exact same thing. Except one uses the power of the gun, by claiming the authority of a Constitution they despise, while as the other claims the power of the gun, in the face of the law. Public servants give orders and we obey. Moreover, they’re above their own laws and regulations. Since laws apply to the servants… not masters. That’s why calling a bureaucrats a public servant is a non sequitur.

How can you tell a master from a servant? It was easy in the Victorian era in England. The servant served the master. The master didn’t serve the servant. If we apply that logic to today. We see that our bureaucrats, politicians and judges, serve themselves… not us. Moreover, we serve them as they see fit. Just like a Victorian Earl would order around a maid. They give the orders and we carry them out. Their every whim is manifested as law. Regardless of Constitutional restraint. Since they’re in a pinky swear to follow it… they don’t. Why should they? The elite are above the law. Examples abound of their getting away with actions that would put you or I behind bars for decades. Like, perjury, not paying taxes, buying prostitution, drunk driving, etc…

Do you pay taxes willingly… or is the threat of armed agents showing up at your door, in a pre dawn raid, all the incentive you need? Do you sign off on the trillions in debt you and you’re kids are obligated to pay back? Heck, is your vote even fairly counted? These aren’t the qualities of someone who is a master. These are the attributes of servants. The servant has no say, is held to a higher standard, and is severely punished… to keep us in check. In many nations, that formerly claimed to be free, now simply posting your opinion on social media could get you imprisoned. In the US, make a joke that ridicules democrat voters as stupid, and the courts will send you to jail. The elite have eschewed Constitutional authority, for power which, “grows from the barrel of a gun.”

Both the Cosa Nostra and the government use violence and the threat of violence to coerce us. The main difference is the Mafia only abuses those in their sphere of influence. “Civilians” are off limits. Meanwhile the government abuses everyone. No one’s safe. Like the old saying goes, “Whether or not you take an interest in politics, politics will take an interest in you.” If you don’t take out a loan from a loan shark, stay out of gambling debt, and don’t befriend criminals… you’ll probably never have to deal with organized crime. Buy property, earn money or educate your children though, and you’ll necessarily interact with a “public servant.” Which only goes to show… organized crime and government are cut from the same butt rag. But government demands we wash our face with it.

Our public servants have become our public masters. Proven with their open hypocrisy. Even as bureaucrats lie under oath, like breathing, they exploit perjury traps as a legal weapon against the politically disfavored. Rendering hypocrisy into it’s most pure form. Government has become a tool of the elite to get their every whim met. Public servants are free to pass the most oppressive laws. Since those laws wont be applied to them. Only us. Any interaction with a “public servant” is fraught with peril. Masters are known for their surliness. Irk a public servant and you may get beat up by the cops then sent to prison. What’s the solution though? Less public servants. Limit government. Understand it can’t solve our problems. Stop saying, “there ought to be a law…” Then apply this mindset.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

 

Oh the irony when those in power,

Blame the weak for making things sour,

It’s so very rich

The car’s in a ditch,

Because the drivers couldn’t see the road from their ivory tower.

 

Anyone who discovers the fountain of youth,

Better keep it secret or be considered uncouth,

Money’s at stake,

Your life they’ll take,

If you cure disease and that’s the truth.

 

The elite are obsessed with censorship and speech,

Conniving to limit other’s thoughts voice and reach,

Calling the truth all lies,

Cutting us down to size,

And everything they say fills our heads with bleach.

 

They created the virus in a lab,

Closed churches and told us to blab,

Banning debate,

This you must take,

And millions have perished from the jab.

 

There once was a mockingbird media,

Vetting their stories through Wikipedia,

No one trusts us,

They complained with disgust,

And reported about a cave diver with claustrophobia.

 

There once was a faction so dumb,

They lived in a absurd phantasm,

The progressive tart said,

You’re not right in the head,

And up her derriere was her thumb.

 

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, media, Mercy, philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

limericks

Dear Friends,

 

The little Dickens’ boy is asking for more,

So government feeds him ideas that soar,

Labor does try,

To sell the lie,

That the roof can support the floor.

 

I was once waiting patiently on an aircraft,

The guy next to me was getting quite rash,

Screaming with a frown,

The thing was broke down,

But I’d rather wait than get in a plane crash.

 

Winning is all that matters to,

Elitist progressives in their slew,

Ethics are for losers,

Winning is for choosers,

And so they’ll do whatever they have to do.

 

The elite look with disdain from above,

Old people are the font of culture’s love,

The culture must be changed,

So they work hard to arrange,

And that’s why the elderly must be got rid of.

 

You believed the man on the stool,

Giving him years of unlimited rule,

To those who voted Labor,

Now you’re out of favor,

They made you the manipulated tool.

 

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, media, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Science Says

Dear friends,

It seems to me, a statement isn’t, “the science,” simply because an expert said it, statements only become science when they’re empirically proven, the data published and is repeated. Experts are supposed to know what the empirically proven data is, they aren’t supposed to pull data from their derrieres, and feed it to us. Yet that’s what experts do today. They’re so wicked smart they don’t need tests or results to know. They can think data up… a priori. That’s how they knew the vaccines were safe and effective. Not by rigorous testing and analysis but by thinking it up. Which is why it’s astounding the vaccine turned out to be a human health disaster. How could that have happened? No long term testing, but much thinking by the experts… The Science said, it should have worked.

Science isn’t an entity, it’s a process. Reality is reduced to its constituents, then those constituents are analyzed by hypothesis, testing/falsifying, retesting/falsifying then the results must be reproduced by another lab… before data is considered empirically proven. Even then there could be other explanations that fit the observed phenomenon better… but haven’t been thought up yet. Which means empirically proven theories are never cast in stone. Any one of them, could be replaced by a better explanation, any time. Making science an ever evolving process. The implications of this are huge. One is that everything we think we know for certain is subject to change. We could observe something that obliterates our understanding of any field of endeavor. Moreover, sooner or later… we will.

Today our experts fall back is appeal to authority. Because… How dare you question the experts! They’re the experts! Begging the question. But they’re limited by human knowledge. Since we don’t know everything, it’s impossible for an expert to know it all. Moreover, any question that’s answered authoritatively by an expert, must necessarily require expertise, in fields the expert is novice in. Expecting a human being to be omniscient is foolish. It’s elevating a supposed skeptic to a representative of an all knowing religion. The materialist religion. One who’s authorities wield the power of… The Science! Tremble before the expert. For their words have the authority of the Science! In other words… our experts rely on appeal to authority, and begging the question.

Science is an empirical endeavor not a rational exercise. While the hypothesis is rationalized, the testing is always focused on empirical results. The mind is capable of flights of fancy, and then rationalizes those dreams as reality… or at least a possible reality. That’s one way mankind grows our standard of living. In the regime of science however, those flights of fancy are supposed to be grounded by empirical testing, with an eye to falsifying the hypothesis. In matters of political moment however, that system is flipped, and the testing is designed to prove a flight of fancy, rather than ground it in reality. Allowing the absurdity plane to lift off and fly wherever the politically favored want it to go. Which is always to a place where they have more power, wealth and privilege… and we have less.

We live in a very technological age. I think we’re obliged to understand at least the fundamentals of it. Including economics, philosophy and the scientific method. Strip them of the gobbledy gook and they’re as understandable as a toaster. The jargon is to protect the kingdoms of the experts from barbarians. Science isn’t religion, though it’s treated as if it was. Science isn’t appeal to authority, although if we ask questions experts claim we’re bad people, in need of censoring. Even as science isn’t an entity. Science is a means to an end… not an end. Our treating science and experts inappropriately, is why science is stagnating, our governments are becoming despotic, and our education systems are useless. Learn what science is, and you’ll never accept, “The science says…” again.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, economy, Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Disband The FBI

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, at this point the FBI needs to be disbanded. The organization has become too corrupt to repair. It has to be eliminated, and if in a decade or so people are foolish enough, some other federal law enforcement agency can be created. How could I say the FBI is beyond repair? History, pragmatism and the Pareto distribution. The history of the FBI is one of corruption. From J Edgar the cross dresser and blackmailer to today’s FBI that specializes in false flags and frame jobs. They’re as corrupt as a dead hog next to I 20. If we judge a thing pragmatically… by results, then the FBI has to go. It keeps visiting oppression on us while allowing crimes to go unchecked. Finally, there’s the Pareto distribution. Which is the most damning reason the FBI and indeed the deep state is beyond reform.

The history of the FBI is one of utter corruption. J Edgar Hoover was a deeply disturbed man. The utter corruption the FBI it started with was sweetened by their history of failure. Ruby ridge was not only a disaster for the dead family, but highlighted the pure malevolence of the FBI. Of course who could forget the Waco siege. Started for nothing illegal but ending in the burning to death of dozens of people including children. If we go back to the FBI’s heydays, the 1940s… where were they when Alger Hiss was selling American secrets to the Soviet Union? He was a top man in the administration. What an intelligence failure that was! Or was it a failure? Maybe they turned a blind eye? We’ll never know, but we do know, at the time J Edgar had a dossier on everyone in power.

The FBI doesn’t as much stop crime… as creates it, then exploits it for political purposes. Take the Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping frame job. Where the FBI infiltrated a club and pushed them to commit a crime. The members said, “No your crazy.” The FBI put more and more infiltrators into the club, until the FBI infiltrators outnumbered the patsies, voted to do the crime… then indicted the marks for it! Getting Gretchen Whitmer a ton of votes in a year she had a tough race. Plus vilifying American citizens for speaking out against usurpation. Even then it took double jeopardy and denying them their Rights to get them convicted. The field agent in charge was sent to Washington DC to oversee the January 6 frame job. Which he did splendidly. Both are evidence the FBI is beyond reform.

The Pareto distribution applies not only to highways, income and creative output… but to ethics as well. In any organization then, 20% of the people will exhibit 50% of the ethics. The other 80% having the rest of the ethics, morals, standards, etc… So if an organization drives out the 20% with ethics, that leaves the 80% without them in charge. As the FBI has done. Which means, those ethical people are no longer a moment of inertia that has to be overcome, for the organization to become evil incarnate. The elite at all the three letter agencies have expunged those with ethics, morals and good from their fiefdoms. By forcing out the good, and leaving only the bad, those organizations have become bad. Which means the FBI, CIA, NSA, ATF, IRS, etc… all need to be eliminated, not merely reformed.

While those are all good reasons to dismantle the deep state, the most pressing one is the damage that it’s doing to the fabric of our republic, economy and society. They fray the fabric of trust by their corruption, they corrode the foundations of our republic with their usurpations as our economy is hollowed out by the political law enforcement. We need to be pragmatic. Instead of focusing on the sunk cost, let’s pry the rotting and dead hogs from the wheel well. They’re holding us back. If the bureaucrats are as smart as they claim, they’ll be rich in no time. So don’t worry about them. Worry about your future and that of your kids. Demand from your representatives and senators, to get rid of the deep state, the FBI, ATF, CIA, NSA, etc… for the sake of our nation, it’s people and the future.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, economy, Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Election Interference Under Color Of Law

Dear Friends,

It seems astonishing to me, that the expert managerial class and mockingbird media, fail to see the outright, open and notorious hypocrisy of Jack Smith filing election interference charges against Trump, as an October Surprise… to interfere with this election. Talk about self blindness, hypocrisy, or double standards. Maybe all of the above. He knows he has nothing to fear from Biden’s DOJ. They reek of political corruption like a hidden rotting mouse. Moreover, if his election interference works, he has nothing to fear. If it fails though, he might face consequences, for his openly engaging in election interference. Now that he has leprous skin in the game he’s all the more frantic that it works. Along with the rest of the corruptocrat crowd that runs the US today.

Hypocrisy used to be the most discrediting thing anyone could be accused of, let alone prove in public. Like Jack Smith’s has with his antics. Public figures used to go to great lengths to hide even the hint of hypocrisy. That’s why Judges pretend to be so upright, doctors pretend to be so smart and politicians wear expensive cologne, to hide the stench that surrounds them. Today hypocrisy is everywhere and so has become normalized. We don’t think a thing of it when an elite flies a private jet to a global warming conference. Where they begrudge us heat for our homes. In fact, many chuckle at the open and notorious hypocrisy. Instead of being rightly outraged at it. Our leaders have discredited themselves with their hypocrisy, and if we had a smidgen of wisdom, we would laugh them out of power.

The elite today utterly lack self awareness… being narcissists. They’re deficient in empathy, self important, are prone to fits of rage, entitled, only hang around with their “equals,” hate criticism, but love to criticize others. Doesn’t that sound like the ivory tower types? To them relationships are tools of power… not connections between human beings. What elite today eschews the opulence of power? Who chooses the interests of the nation over their own? Other than Trump. (Who’s lost millions maybe billions of dollars by stepping up). “Public service,” or more appropriately, Public Mastery, has never been more lucrative. Proven by the fact the most expensive neighborhoods in the US… are the suburbs of Washington DC. Beverly Hills is an open sewer compared to Spring Valley.

Simple reversal proves the double standards of the elite better than any argument could. Moreover, where there are double standards, there are in fact, no standards. That’s when and where law is merely a tool of power, not of justice. Use reversal… What censor would tolerate him or herself being censored? Police want to videotape us in public, yet want to make it illegal for us to video them, in public? Why the open hypocrisy? Unless the police know they are engaging in crime. Bastiat’s Law writ large. What about perjury charges? The elite wanted Roger Stone to go to prison for the rest of his life for “perjury,” yet perjure themselves all the time, and it would be vindictive to hold them to the same standard. What if Obama’s house was raided early morning by the FBI? Would that be cool?

That the elite are self blind, narcissistic hypocrites who see justice as did Thrasymachus… isn’t that astounding. Since that mindset is so self serving. What is astonishing, is the mockingbird media pretending they don’t see it, and our willingness to go along with the open corruption… like unconfirmed prosecutor Jack Smith’s rehashing of old charges, the Supreme Court has thrown out, to interfere with this election. The lack of outrage is because the hypocrisy has been so normalized we expect it. Plus, since Jack Smith has opened himself up to criminal charges, a just and rational AG is a threat… giving him a powerful incentive to make sure that doesn’t happen. As do all the corruptocrats in power. We’ve woken up to it though. That’s why Jack’s October surprise has fallen flat.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

 

There once was a man called Tommy Robinson,

The elite did their best to keep him in prison,

He cut them down to size,

Then exposed their lies,

And soon the elite will have had enough of him.

 

Labor proponents say you should stay the course.

Riding in to save the elite on a white horse,

Taxes, migration and crime,

Visiting more all the time,

And now the British are having buyers remorse.

 

France arrested Durov to protect,

Past norms and rights to reject,

Crush with finesse,

Destroy his business,

But now they’ve triggered the Streisand Effect.

 

There once was a politician Starmer,

A cross between a sheep and a farmer,

Smiling he pledged to fight,

To destroy British Rights,

And to imps he was quite a charmer.

 

There once was a man with a goal,

How to get there he just didn’t know,

Inversion my darlings,

By not doing things,

That would move him away from it though.

 

Sincerely

John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment