Limericks

Dear Friends,

 

The lust for power is ever ample,

War of conquest is but a sample,

The immoral in sashes,

To rule over the ashes,

As the elite lead us to sin by example.

 

Western governments are on a cruising roll,

Making loans using phones and taking toll,

Corruption is trending,

In government spending,

Because graft isn’t a side effect it’s the goal.

 

There once was a court despotic,

Making rulings that were chaotic,

The judge said with a sneer,

I’m the tyrant here,

And violated the law in rulings idiotic.

 

There once was an outfit called the FBI,

Corrupt as heck and prone to lie,

Breaking the rules,

Laws are for fools,

And are soon to get their comeuppances by and by.

 

There once was a system of NGOs,

Into which billions of dollars flows,

Run by corruptocrats,

Others by dingbats,

But they tied up the taxpayer in bows.

 

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, Law, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Revisited Injustice: A Cure for Judicial Corruption

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, if a Supreme Court (SCOTUS) decision isn’t unanimous, then it should be revisited every five years until 100% agreement is reached. This would minimize the power of faction to pervert the Constitution. Absurd rulings like Korematsu, Buck v. Bell, and Wickard, among others, would be revisited until a true consensus was reached. These rulings have been amazingly corrosive to our republic. Moreover, they highlight the arbitrary nature of law in the US. The Nazis cited Buck v Bell and Korematsu as legal precedent for their crimes, imprisoning people without charge and forced sterilization, all of which are legal in the US based on SCOTUS rulings, (depending on the President’s political favor). Proving why every SCOTUS decision should be revisited, unless it’s unanimous.

If we look back at Supreme Court rulings that have created a mess of our Republic, they have all been contentious. Generally five to four, leading to a wholesale rewriting of our contract with the government. Today, what was unthinkable in the founding years is normalized, so we don’t even notice. The First, Second, and Fourth Amendments are effectively neutralized by SCOTUS. The income tax forces us to expose our personal papers for the perusal of government officials. The Second Amendment is a shambles. Even as our Right to worship, and speak as we wish, was canceled during Covid and by literal government censorship under the guise of quelling “Misinformation.” Making our modern legal system a perversion of the one our Founding Fathers had in mind.

During the Nuremberg trials of Nazi war criminals, the defendants cited SCOTUS rulings as legal justification for their actions. Which is pretty damning of those rulings… even forgetting the actual American victims of those decisions. Like when SCOTUS ruled against honoring treaties with indigenous Americans, because they had land at stake. That was another decision that should have been revisited every five years, until settled. Another absurd decision, proved by the fact it’s been revoked, was Roe v. Wade. Where the judiciary voided the Constitution to allow for abortion. Leading to millions of unborn babies killed. Chevron was another ruling that’s been revoked because of its harmful effects. Any decision by SCOTUS that’s contentious should be revisited every five years.

Rulings by SCOTUS that are contentious proves a real question of law is at stake. A five to four ruling means the question isn’t settled, far from it, such a ruling means the question is hotly debated. Which is a poor foundation to rewrite our Constitution wholesale. The reason I chose five years is because that’s how long it takes for a ruling’s effects to be felt. Plus it’s not long enough for despotism to gain a toehold. Wickard v. Filburn has been in effect so long the perversion has oozed to every corner of government. Disentangling it would be a monumental task should anyone be brave enough to take on that hydra. Had it been revisited every five years, it would be gone in short order. Showing us why justice forces us to revisit contentious rulings every five years.

Justice isn’t the natural state of mankind. Even a cursory glance at history proves that fact. Places and times where justice has partially invaded the legal system are singular in their prosperity. Confucius taught about the “Sage kings,” whose reigns were characterized by justice, human heartedness and… prosperity. As we can see by more recent history, every group of human beings is subject to political manipulation, leading to law being used as a means to power, instead of as a means to justice. As unwise people will kick down Chesterton’s fence, shallow judges will rule based on ideology, instead of law, precedent, and our Constitution. Such malpractice is now the norm. Which wouldn’t be possible had SCOTUS revisited their absurd rulings every five years until they were settled.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Judicial Sysytem, Law, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

 

Take care beware and hear,

Climate change draws near,

Do as they say,

Take our rights away,

To pay for their product, fear.

 

The cultural vandals are screaming unfair,

Doing the impossible all it took was to care,

The globalists had it sewn,

Populists changed the tone,

And now the people have become aware.

 

The death of science is now here,

Stabbed and killed by political fear,

Ostracism’s test,

Elites know best,

So falsify your findings with good cheer.

 

There was a faction that sold poverty and despair,

They dressed it up as if we wanted to be there,

You’ll own nothing,

We’ll own everything,

And no soup for you because bugs will be your fare.

 

There once was an elite so perverted,

Laughing at those they’d converted,

Hide their crimes,

Worthless slimes,

And like unto animals they’ve reverted.

 

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in media, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Three Degrees To The Jews Or Christians

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the circular reasoning game is chic today. It’s become a modern game to find a way to twist every bad thing as the fault of white or Jewish people. Where does toenail fungus come from? It’s a Jewish conspiracy! Where do ship worms come from? They’re a remnant of colonialism. Why are Jews being targeted across the planet? The Elders of Zion. Why is it okay that the Rotherham rape gangs are targeting little British girls? The legacy of slavery. It’s like the game six degrees to Kevin Bacon. A game that’s as easy as it is fun for all. Have a headache? You have three degrees to blame it on the Jews or Christians. The one is as good as the other. Because it’s just a game… promoted by the globalist progressive faction. A game that leads to stupidity, malleability and finally… atrocity.

Is slavery a purely Christian problem? To answer that, first we have to ask, why slavery is such an anathema today. Before colonialism, slavery was everywhere. In Asia, Africa, the Americas, the only continent that hadn’t seen slavery was Antarctica. Because slavery is simply one person exploiting another by force. If we are merely animals then what’s wrong with that? It’s only if we’re all created in the image of God, that slavery becomes a sin. It’s a sin to enslave, (remove by force the agency) of an avatar of God himself. That idea came from Christianity and spread throughout the world via colonialism. Today that anti slavery morality is taken for granted. Which makes it ironic that the same people who outlawed slavery… are vilified for it, by three degrees to the Christians.

The Elders Of Zion might be fiction, but that polemic has been cited to justify many atrocities against the Jews. I wonder though, what’s wrong with Jews living in their historic homeland? Some argue that the Jews only recently came back about a century ago, so they are newcomers, and should be forcibly pushed out or extinguished. Yet those same people don’t argue that recently arrived Muslims in Europe, or violent illegal aliens in the US, should be forced out. The elite’s protestations are always self-serving. Few globalist progressives would argue that the Trail of Tears was justified… even as they claim the mere existence of Jews constitutes genocide against the Gazans. Which justifies acts of violence and outright atrocities, (like Oct 7). Justified by the game, three degrees to the Jews.

Have you noticed it’s a one way game? Try to use it to blame any other race, religion or ideology and the gate keepers will smack you down. That’s called hate speech, victim blaming or mansplaining. Which is a clear double standard, and as we all know, a double standard means there are no standards at all, only power at play. Which is to say, law is being used as a tool of the powerful, not as a means to justice. The media is pushing a narrative not the truth… even as both are designed to normalize hatred of politically disfavored groups. If Jews and Christians are guilty of every crime under the sun, then our liquidation is a matter of self defense. Just play the game, three degrees to the Christians or Jews, and that’s all the explanation you need to justify atrocities.

The game of three degrees to the Jew or Christian is designed to generate hate. Blaming a people for all the sins of the world doesn’t generate love and compassion. So why would the world’s elites promote a game that manipulates people into hate? Hate is a means to political power,.. it’s not personal, it’s business. It’s the business of control. Take your greatest rival and use the game to deligitimize their very existence. Then, once enough of the politically disfavored self loath, you strike. Taking and holding power by the knife. The Young Turks scapegoated, as did Lenin, so did Pol Pot. Vilifying, normalizing hate, then acting to eliminate the politically disfavored group, works. The only defense against it is to ridicule the game, and players, mercilessly. Exposing them as Pennywise clowns.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Unholy Allies

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, if a seller boycotts a customer, the customer isn’t harmed, however, if a customer boycotts a seller, the seller is ruined. Which goes right back to the reporting of the supposed trade wars. Which is simply another distraction from the successes of Trump’s first few months. Instead of reporting on the drop in illegal immigration, increase in jobs, and the quality of those jobs, deportation of violent illegals, as well as cutting Fentanyl importation. The payola press keeps the goal posts moving, hoping we don’t look back. Trump’s moved the ball a thousand yards down the field, without scoring a touchdown, let alone a field goal. Because the elite have rigged the game. Which is why the press is talking about tariffs, and not Trump’s wins, the CCP or Islamism.

The media’s deep and abiding concern for the potential welfare of the American people today is in stark contrast to their lackadaisical attitude during the Biden years. I say potential, because the payola press isn’t harping on actual issues Americans are facing… but potential issues. We groaned under the weight of the Biden years inflation, without a peep of sympathy from the press. Back then, the narrative to the very real inflation was, “Transient.” Which was of course… wrong. Even as the inflation they’re all agog about now is potential inflation. If economic theory falls apart, and inflation stops being a monetary phenomenon, and instead becomes a market condition. Nevertheless, the payola press is using American consumers as human shields, to protect the CCP.

I judge by actions not by rhetoric. The mockingbird media has until now shown a total indifference toward the plight of the US worker. No, that’s not entirely true… they’ve actively labored to diminish the power of the people, while increasing the role, scope and reach of government. That’s why I judge harshly any sudden shift in the narrative, ie, “inflation isn’t a problem and if it is it’s only transitory anyway…” which is now, “inflation will kill us all because of Trump’s tariffs!” That sudden change in story and tone sets off my BS detector. Not simply because the narrative doesn’t jibe with economic theory, but because liars lie… all the time. I suspect the new narrative is to protect the CCP, not us. Just like the narrative in Europe is, the random Islamist knife attacks prove Islamists are the downtrodden.

The real beneficiary of the full throttle propaganda push to vilify Trump’s tariffs is the Chinese Communist Party, the CCP. Their entire economic model is built upon parasitising on the US economy. In hopes of killing it and replacing the US as the hegemonic power on the planet. Even as the globalist progressives see the US as the biggest obstacle to their vision of a world government, like Star Trek. As avowed by George Soros himself. Then there’s the Islamist faction. Who’s religious obligation is to wage war until the world is under the house of Islam. With that alignment of purposes, and the payola press under their monopoly control, the three devilish factions have united to destroy the US and indeed the West. They figure they can fight it out among themselves after America has fallen.

As long as the three factions have the US and West as their enemy number 1, they’ll stay united. That’s why tariffs are vilified but out of control inflation isn’t. Why praying in silence is a jailable offense but burning down a Tesla dealership, calling for death to America, or destroying a statue isn’t. Because, judging by actions, not rhetoric, the media serves the globalist progressive faction, that is allied with the Islamists and CCP in destroying the West and America. The ironic part is, they are all parasites. Parasites who are so stupid they seek to kill their host. A million percent tariff on zero is nothing, while cutting off the food supply to a tape worm may be fatal. Which is why the mockingbird media is going full Bernasian to protect their allies, the CCP and Islamists.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, International Power, media, Mercy, philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

 

There once was a corruptocrat named Comey,

His morals and ethics were always a bit phony,

He bragged aloud,

His perjury proud,

And everyone knows he belongs in the pokey.

 

The administrative state is doomed to fail,

A growing dead weight in the nation’s pail,

Bureaucratic might,

A terrible sight,

Because it’s despotism’s dog wagging tail.

 

The elite daily prove Thrasymachus was right,

Justice is a tool of those with villainous might,

Rubber stamp elections,

With IKEA directions,

Is like the blind controlling those with sight.

 

Elections are supposed to be a rubber stamp,

For the elite’s demands not an off ramp,

So sit down and be quiet,

They didn’t pay you to riot,

Because slaves have no say in any camp.

 

The coordination is shocking tis true,

Paid for rioters without a single clue,

Shouting rhetoric,

Who pays for it,

The money comes from me and you.

 

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Law, Mercy, philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

 

Idealists don’t really want to win,

If it means they must live in sin,

Do it my way,

Or I won’t play,

And take my ball and play with him.

 

Subjective thought crimes are all the rage,

To keep the populists in a deep dark cage,

Outlaw them here,

Instill us with fear,

But calling despotism democracy won’t well age.

 

The UK thought it had moats,

But they’re on anything that floats,

A magnet does draw,

So remember this saw,

Shut off the welfare, shut off the boats.

 

There once was a Seattle court crazy,

Its grasp of law was a bit hazy,

Sure it was right,

On a batty night,

And it could have been bad but it was too lazy.

 

There once was a judge named Barrett,

With the brains of a well cooked carrot,

She said with flair,

How is my hair,

And chewed through our Constitution like a ferret.

 

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Judicial Sysytem, Law, philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Savoir Faire

Dear Friends,

When I was a kid, I watched a cartoon about a Quebecois mouse named Savoir Faire. He, it’s said, is everywhere. The cartoon was cute but the name is interesting. Savoir faire roughly translates to, “Know how to,” or directly into English, “to know is to do.” Which is curiously similar to Lao Tzu’s idea of action through inaction. In that to know is in itself to do. Another way of conceptualizing this idea is through Mencius in his idea of the golden mean, the central path in whatever society the “jen man” (human hearted person) finds himself in. He knows so he does. Then there’s the Christian idea that the person baptized in faith and working forthrightly, can but do good works. He knows so he does. This idea flows through many other philosophies and religions as well. Exposing its deeper meaning.

To know is to do, or Savoir Faire, knowing how to steal food the mouse simply did. He lived his ideal life because he knew how to. Thus he did. This applies to us as well. If we were to know how to live our ideal lives, we simply would. There would be no effort involved. We would know how, and so we would live life without effort, naturally. Lao Tzu’s Tao. Translated Tao means, “The way.” The way to enlightenment, the best life and prosperity. Lao Tzu said that only the unmoved can move. In other words, only those who are grounded can emote true action in the world. Grounded in what? The understanding that, to know is to do. Because once you know, everything you touch is colored by that knowledge. Savoir Faire is everywhere… all you need do is look for it.

Knowing how to do, or Savoir Faire, is what the little french mouse did. He knew how to steal food so he did. Not only couldn’t he help himself because Savoir Faire, to know is to do, but he also knew and so was able. As in the Christian ethic, that the saved person lives in grace, not under the Law. In that the act of accepting salvation imparts a knowledge of how to do good works, a human heartedness. Such that everything the saved person touches is blessed. Even the evil works. Because to know how to do makes one capable. One who doesn’t know then is incapable no matter how much they struggle. Take the example of a skilled basket weaver and a skilled layabout, weaving a basket. The basket weaver knows how to and so weaves a great basket. While the layabout doesn’t and so doesn’t.

The idea of “class” embodies the concept of Savoir Faire. While class is as rare today as gold latrines, you see examples in old movies. In Sound Of Music, the Baroness had class. She knew how to act and so acted correctly. Even when she was devastated by it. True knowing, Savoir Faire, leads to class in action, because to know is to do, and competence (as well as prosperity, enlightenment and class) comes from knowing how to do. That little thief of a cartoon mouse was a far deeper character than most realized at the time. Certainly me. His name and actions carried timeless truths whether the writers understood it or not. Though they probably did have an inkling. Savoir Faire, the Tao, and human heartedness are things we should strive for. For our own good.

Savoir Faire then leads to effortless advancement. While not knowing how, leads to frustration and failure. Moreover, true knowledge leads to success, because to know is to do. Which is why so many of our elites attempts at creating an Earthly Eden, have yielded a temporal hell. Because they lacked Savoir Faire. They didn’t know so didn’t do. Even as many people who eschew power, do it because they have Savoir Faire. They know how to do good works and so do good works. Such people don’t need to marshal huge resources to their command. They simply act in the world and goodness follows their footsteps like a trail. Where can we find Savoir Faire? In the Holy Bible, Plutarch’s lives and philosophy, not in inhuman hearted things like politics, power or coercion.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

 

Normies like us can’t even ken,

A monopoly faction like a fen,

The faction that trashes,

To rule over the ashes,

As Madison warned in Federalist #10.

 

There once was a demon named Karl Marx,

Writing his fiendish polemic in Paris parks,

He said with a grin,

All that lives is sin,

And set to destroying all life even aardvarks.

 

There once was a government of grift,

To the cronies and corrupt it was a gift,

Raid the treasury,

Political treachery,

And it was always sure to blame shift.

 

Labour and Tories won’t try to make a dent,

They’re spineless and make a bad government,

A single thread,

But as Trump said,

Fixing illegal immigration just took a new President.

 

There once was an elite Hegelian,

With a thought process totally alien,

He said with a smile,

Beware my wile,

And lived a corrupt life Bacchanalian.

 

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, Law, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Pawl To Progressivism

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, our courts have become the pawl in the winch that is globalist progressivism. Just as a pawl only allows a winch to take up cable, our courts only allow the deep state to take up our rights. They rule that enlarging the deep state is perfectly constitutional, no matter how much it violates the plain wording of our Constitution. While at the same time ruling that any diminishment of the deep state is unconstitutional. Regardless of how that diminishment brings the State into compliance with our Constitution. They were always supposed to be a pawl, but in the other direction. It was quite a feat to flip the courts into doing the opposite of their intended constitutional role. Make no mistake though, the judges who have committed this crime know exactly what they’ve done.

When Obama gave the “Dreamers” legal status, despite breaking the law, everyone agreed it was an unconstitutional order, the courts however, opened the door for him. When Trump sought to bring US immigration enforcement back into compliance with our Constitution, the courts freaked out and shut him down. Because feelings were elevated over Constitutional rule. SCOTUS has bent over backwards to give authoritarian powers to Presidents it liked. Such as when FDR imprisoned American citizens of Japanese descent without charge or trial. Jimmy Carter established the energy department with the stroke of a pen… but what do you bet if Trump tries to eliminate it, the world would have standing. Heck, the pawl might even find, it’s unconstitutional…

The only reason a court system would operate in such a manner is if the judges are captured by an idea. In this case the glittering lie of globalist progressivism is what’s so mesmerizing. The promise of globalist progressivism is wonderful, no war, crime or poverty. They believe they’ll usher in a Star Trek like utopia. All they need do is commit a few atrocities first and heaven on Earth will result. Basically, the globalist progressives have the same mindset as Pol Pot, Mao and Lenin. Their goals are so worthy, they justify any atrocity. A judge with such a way of thinking can’t help herself. If the law is a means to improve the lives of mankind, then why wouldn’t she do everything in her power to make the US and the world a utopia… just like Pol Pot’s Cambodia?

Our courts role under the US Constitution is to protect the Constitution from usurpation, not protect usurpers from the Constitution. In other words, it’s supposed to be a pawl, limiting government, as the framers envisioned it anyway. Today’s experts and elites know better. Like when Ruth Badder Ginsburg told a foreign audience, if she was drafting a constitution, she would follow the South African model. Experts at the time had reached consensus that the South African constitution was the ideal. Until the genocide of white farmers started. Now they’ve memory holed that assurance. Though progressive globalism is still the untarnished ideology of many judges today. That the world must be under the stern hand of experts, trained and bred to be world leaders.

Leading to now, where our courts have become a pawl in the winch of global progressivism. Those judges who are usurping power in the name of globalist progressives, are certain history will show they were right. Their utopia won’t end like all the others, in rivers of blood… no, they’ll bring in a world totalitarian government by experts. A thousand year Reich… with no war, no crime and no rights. As many experts have said in the past, the US Constitution stands in the way of their vision. Which is how judges justify, in their own heads, being a backwards pawl, limiting attempts to reign in government, and allowing any usurpation that comes along. Because they honestly believe the world would be better off, as an inescapable planetary prison, watched over and administered by experts.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment