Desperate Elites

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the desperation of European elitess is palpable. Their fear comes from the masses opening their eyes to their cultural replacement. So European elitess are openly calling for war with Russia. This is simply using an outside enemy to unite the nation behind them. Despots think ginning up war fever is easy. As Goering said, “Tell the people they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger.” In many times and places it is. In this time and in Europe, however, I wonder if the elites have so alienated the people they’ll find it’s more like 1917 Moscow, than 1938 Berlin. It was October when a world war toppled a Tsar. Because if the people see their own government as a mortal enemy, an outside enemy loses its uniting force.

Their declarations of pending war and as many as 50,000 casualties a month… prove they have no concept of what modern warfare would entail. If Russia were invaded they could use nuclear weapons. Of course the French and British could use them as well… ending all multicellular life in Europe and most of Asia. Quite a piece of work. I have to wonder if such proclamations are mere fear mongering? Where the elites try to scare us into submission. Then again I think we’re well past that. They pushed the fear button so much and so hard during Covid… it broke. So I worry they are laying the groundwork for a false flag. Like Operation Northwoods was supposed to be. Until Kennedy nixed it. It could be then that the elites are planning a mass casualty event for us to gin up war fever.

Nothing says it’s a war of defense like when your armies are thousands of miles away invading a foreign nation. With a NATO army now in Finland and soon one in Ukraine, a classic pincer is set up. A false flag is all that’s needed. Except for those darned kids with their social media and alternative press! If the narrative can be maintained, and kept pure, war is inevitable. Then the elites can send European kids to die, which will give room for the settlers to settle in. Once most of the next generation of European youths are gone, the culture can be re-engineered. Because the elites care not who they rule, only that they rule. European culture then has to go. This means those kids that survived the culture of abortion, will be sent to die… and the elites fear dies of the culture with them.

Obviously, if Russia is threatened or perhaps invaded at all, they will toss a few nukes at the invading nations. With hyper-sonic delivery systems, European elites will be astonished watching Europeans die in nuclear fire and of radiation poisoning… from the safety and comfort of their bunkers. Then again, if they don’t and fight it out on the ground, as the elites in Europe seem to believe they will, what’s to keep the settlers from taking over back home? They detest the European elites as much or more than anyone. Plus they have weapons stashed in their places of worship for just such a chance. With the army away and the citizenry disarmed by a fearful elites, the upper hand is guaranteed. Why serve traitorous elites? They turned on their own people so why would the colonizers trust them?

Starting a war, even with a successful and narrative controlled false flag, is a lose lose for the elites. If the people go along they have to live out their lives in a bunker ruling a silo. If the war goes as planned and the migrants take over… they’re out. But in my view, the most likely scenario is that the elites do a false flag and it’s called out by the alternative media and magnified by social media. The elites are discredited even more and some are threatened with prison for murder. Of course no one will go to jail for killing a few hundred of us… look at the Las Vegas shooting. Yet the loss of power will be just as devastating to the psychopaths that run the world. Though I could be wrong. Under any scenario, however, the elites are stupid to start a war… though that hasn’t stopped them before.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, International Power, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

The elite claim they’re full of virtues,
High minded ideas they did seduce,
Singing globalist refrains,
One question remains,
Are the elite stupid or just obtuse?

The demands for despotism build up like phlegm,
Even as patriotism Marxists roundly condemn,
So they always picket,
Here’s the dirty secret,
They want us to live under communism not them.

Our wrongspeak is what gives them hell,
As we call out their absurdist lies as well,
Liberty’s flaw,
A hypocrite’s law,
And the dross won’t stop till we’re all in a cell.

Some people are just a raw nerve,
Lacking confidence agency and verve,
They complain very loud,
Hidden in a crowd,
Without ever knowing who they serve.

Idle people make leaders nervous,
Making them think there is a surplus,
But here’s the crux,
Even with lives deluxe,
All nations like people need a purpose.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, media, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Law Serves The Unreasonable

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, villains don’t follow the law, they exploit the law, while patsies follow the law and are exploited by it. Why? Because the law serves the politically favored unreasonable. Even as the politically disfavored reasonable are trampled under its jack-booted feet. Courts bend over backwards to protect the rights of fiends, like Diddy, while passing default judgments on Alex Jones for wrongspeak. This isn’t anything new. Pericles used the ostracism to get rid of his political enemies. Law is most often used as a way to benefit the strong at cost to the weak. Those few times in history when it has followed justice instead of Thrasymachus, have been beacons of prosperity, peace, and an increasing standard of living.

Law can serve one of two forms of justice, legitimate justice or Thrasymachian justice… but it can’t serve both. In Plato’s Republic Thrasymachus was the chief foe of Socrates. Thrasymachus the sophist argued that justice is merely the advantage of the strong over the weak. Or to put it another way, that those with political favor exploit law to enrich themselves. History shows this to be true. In most times and places law has been used to enrich the few at the expense of the many… and justified as the needs of the many overruling the needs of the few. The Bolsheviks claimed they were righting the capitalist and Kulak wrongs… as they gutted screaming Mensheviks and nailed their living innards to a tree. The trick is identifying justice from malevolence masquerading as justice.

How do we identify true justice though? The idealist judges with their heart while the pragmatist judges by outcome. Both are wrong. The way to identify justice from malevolence is by asking yourself, is anyone suffering a fate I wouldn’t want for myself? Apply the golden rule and reciprocal attribution. Then we can see that no matter how glittering the goal, cutting someone’s intestines out while they scream for mercy, and nailing them to a tree… then whipping them until they tie themselves to that tree by their guts… isn’t justice, but malevolence. Torture isn’t reciprocal to intellectual disagreement, nor does it follow the golden rule. Making such actions clearly identifiable as unjust. Moreover, when law is used as a means to exploit, law becomes unjust as Bastiat warned in his book The Law.

Bastiat followed another detested philosopher, Edmund Burke. Both criticized those who thought they could rationally reorganize society. Then rule it from a central authority. Burke is hated in many intellectual circles today even as Bastiat is intentionally ignored. Because they both told uncomfortable truths to power… that if it’s unlimited it becomes despotic. There are no philosopher kings and there never will be. Because people will exploit the law to their own ends and Thrasymachus will be proven right again. As the French Revolution illustrated in living color… red. The unreasonable Jacobins exploited the law while the reasonable people were exploited by it. Because in truth in most places and most times… law serves those who have the political favor to exploit it.

The old adage it’s better to seek forgiveness than permission only applies to those with sufficient political favor to avoid punishment. Meanwhile the same bungle will be used to justify the destruction of someone with political disfavor. Take for example General Flynn’s fabricated charges of perjury… while there were no charges for Brennen, Comey, or Clapper for actual perjury. Showing that law in the US today is Thrasymachian. It serves the strong. Law either protects the weak from the strong or it abets the strong to take from the weak. How do we make law serve justice instead of Thrasymachus? Stop being reasonable in the face of unreasonable people. Be tenacious. People who refused the vaccine mandate lost their jobs but those who kept fighting are now rich… be like them.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

UK Bureaucrats aren’t right in the head,
With Islamic rape gangs they are in bed,
Wouldn’t ban a terrorist,
But here’s the twist,
They would ban Ukip and Reform instead.

The leftist ideology is above examination,
Spreading bad notions like contamination,
Marxism fails every day,
We must have it anyway,
Because communism is an abomination.

The definition of evil changes by the hour,
Until all the best ideas begin to get sour,
I’ll be uncouth,
Here’s the truth,
It boils down to an imbalance of power.

Climate change isn’t going away,
As we watch it unfold in dismay,
But bad data is erased,
The urgency is based,
On the needs of the elite today.

Republicans cry no mas in a terrible wail,
They assure us the checks in the mail,
But what’s this,
A Judas kiss,
Because you can count on republicans to fail.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Logical Singularities Point To New Science

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, consciousness isn’t the hard question, life itself is the hard question, and once we figure it out we’ll understand consciousness. I wonder if there’s more to reality than we are able to interact with by mere physical means. What if life, consciousness, and other unexplainable phenomena happen on another level? Like the quantum but instead of being small it’s something else? Moreover, if we apply the rules of the quantum plane to this hypothetical plane, maybe observation collapses it into material reality. As a wave becomes a particle upon observation. Maybe there’s a quantum erasure effect on a macroscopic scale, where reality is rewritten as in the quantum eraser in the double slit experiment? What we have in unexplained phenomenon are examples of logical singularities.

A logical singularity is where logic breaks down, as in a physical singularity is where the math describing it breaks down. Kung Sung Lung’s White Horse analogy is apt here. In it he describes a white horse as not being a horse but a black or yellow one is. In doing so he is overtly attacking universals, and subversively attacking the ability of language itself to convey true thought… but more importantly for our discussion, he does it by building a logical singularity. That great sage lived around 300 BC, so we can presume logical singularities have been around since the dawn of time. Yet the materialist ideology states that only the material exists and all material existence can be modeled by math. A theocracy that breaks down when confronted with logical singularities.

The fact that logical singularities exist and are so widespread is because our material based science isn’t correct. Just as the math that breaks down in a black hole is insufficient to describe it, not that the black hole itself cannot exist. These holes in our understanding prove we don’t have the whole picture. Moreover, to believe we do is the acme of expert hubris, leading to the Dunning Kruger Effect. Even as James Webb breaks cosmology, quantum physics breaks Einstein’s physics and as his physics complemented Newtonian physics, our understanding of reality is proven to be less rigorous than we had thought. Reality itself has proven to have tricks up its sleeve that our brightest minds hadn’t counted on. Proven and highlighted by the logical singularities that surround us… like life itself.

I am firmly of the opinion that philosophy leads technology. The Harappan people of the Indus Valley were contemporaries of the Egyptian pyramid builders. They had running water and a slew of other technological innovations not seen again for thousands of years. Yet upon their disappearance their astounding technology fell to ruin. Because the people who moved into their abandoned homes didn’t have the philosophy to understand let alone maintain those systems. The Romans were more advanced technologically than Medieval Europeans… yet Medieval Europeans created capitalism, the industrial revolution, and the scientific method. All these innovations led to our technological age and the closed-minded hubris of our experts.

What we need then to understand the logical singularities that surround us, is to accept a different philosophy. As someone in one dimension can’t imagine two dimensions, let alone a third, because these are not imaginable… until they are. Philosophy is the same way. Science, technology, and our understanding of reality are hampered by our philosophy. If we brought a Roman to today, he or she might be amazed at the technology but they would be shocked at the philosophy that allowed it. They couldn’t explain why the Earth revolves around the sun or the chemical makeup of steel, these were logical singularities to them. Singularities that were overcome by a different philosophy… which is what we need. One that allows for explanations of our logical singularities.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

Atheists have got themselves a divorce,
Everything’s material not faith of course,
But I have to look askance,
Saying it’s not a political stance,
Is like saying the cart pulls the horse.

Everyone is stupid but me,
Look at them can’t you see,
Wise as a cow,
Limit them now,
With fingers pointing back by three.

The certainty of their position is truly stout,
Their open mindedness is beyond a doubt,
Emotional fizz,
Here’s what it is,
The stupidity that Bonhoeffer warned us about.

The narrative must always insist,
That the truth be hidden in mist,
They cut us down to size,
When we listen to their lies,
That turn an empath into a narcissist.

Universities have made themselves a laughing stock,
Everyone knows they’re teaching is just a crock,
Captured by woke,
Now going broke,
And Harvard is the worst of the lot.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

There once was a city called the Big Apple,
With Broadway, Wall Street, and many people,
A hub of commerce,
Making it worse,
That it committed Seppuku without scruple.

The rulers dance and drink their malt,
While distracting if he’s worth his salt,
Never admit defeat,
When it comes to the elite,
Every problem is someone else fault.

Climate change has got to be bad,
Anyone who disagrees is just a cad,
There’s consensus,
It’s because of us,
Or else we’ve been well and truly had.

The experts are the smartest in the room,
Not to be toyed with they explode in a boom,
Manipulations do tire,
They tend to backfire,
And lead such egoists to their ultimate doom.

Mr. Hedges sounds like a demagogue,
Aiming at something in a hate filled fog,
But is it the capitalist sour,
Or having too much power,
He can’t tell since the rabbit chases his dog.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in media, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Power Of Silent Prayer

Dear Friends,

It seems to me a woman in Britain has been arrested several times for silently praying, which tells me, silent prayer is very powerful… else the elite wouldn’t have arrested her for it. Otherwise who cares if she silently stands there in the cold? The average person would walk right by and not even notice. The authorities, however, did notice. I have to wonder how they suspected her of illegally praying silently in public to improve the lot of mankind? A heinous thought crime if there ever was one. It has to be that some aspect of that silent thought triggered them, viscerally, to go after her. When asked by the police if she was committing a grievous thought crime, praying silently for the unborn, the woman brazenly admitted she was. The police immediately arrested her for it.

You or I wouldn’t have even noticed the woman. We would have walked right past her. Unaware that she was thinking thoughts the elite have banned. The elite knew though. I suspect it’s like some people are allergic to poison ivy and when they come in contact with it they have a strong reaction. While others aren’t allergic to it at all so brush against it with impunity. It could be that many of the elite are strongly allergic to goodness and any contact makes them break out. That could be how they targeted the woman. It could be that silent prayer, something that doesn’t affect you or I, makes them break out like poison sumac does to those allergic to it. If that’s the case, then silent prayer is as powerful as a deadly poison to those affected by it.

The authorities could not only feel her silent prayer, like a firebrand applied to their scrotum, but they worried her silent prayer could save a baby or two. To the British elite, a baby in the loving arms of a mother must be almost unbearable. The pure love and connection between a mother and her infant has to scald far worse than any silent prayer. This makes their despotic action bordering on an atrocity… justified. Like any other atrocity is justified, because law serves the strong at the cost of the weak. The elite are the strong, economically, politically, and legally, meanwhile, no one is more weak than an unborn baby. The law then is there to justify the wants of the elite, and they don’t want to be burned by silent prayer and a mother’s love for her newborn baby.

Even as silent prayer and a mother’s love for her child brings searing pain to the elite, as proven by their reaction to it… war, suffering, and hopelessness bring joy to the vacant place where their hearts should be. This must be the case, since they have set these things as their goals. Where there isn’t war the elite make war, where there’s no suffering the elite create suffering, and where there’s hope, the elite take that away. The elite replace careers and families with drugs, welfare, and diversion. I have to wonder if another reason the authorities so detest silent prayer, is that it might bring hope, alleviate suffering, and soften people’s hearts against war? It seems like silent prayer in public is what the elite truly fear. If that’s the case silent prayer in public is deeply powerful.

Apparently the woman has been caught before engaging in public wrongthink. Had she taken it the next step, to wrongspeak, the authorities wouldn’t have been so lenient. Because then not only would her silent prayer burn the elite like hellfire… but her wrongspeak would induce others to wrongthink. Without sufficient control over wrongspeak then, it could cascade into full scale freedom of conscience. The outcome of which could be disastrous to an elite that feel searing pain at silent prayer. Moreover, that silent prayer could diminish suffering, stop wars, and even instill hope. Outcomes that the elite are terrified of. So if you want to stop wars, instill hope, diminish human suffering, and scald the elite… pray silently in public at every chance. By their actions the elite have told us it works.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, Law, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

A book filled with conjecture and envy,
Loved by the elite lacking empathy,
A idealist trope,
Was the guy on dope,
Arguing for class hate based on jealousy.

Evil begets evil or so they say,
Hatred escalating day by day,
What pomposity,
Another atrocity,
And both must stop for the evil to go away.

There once was a king Martel,
He really gave the Islamists hell,
Attacking their loot,
He gave them the boot,
And fathered Pepin the Short as well.

There once was a narcissistic lot,
Spreading hate by twit and bot,
Enforcing right-think,
By ostracism’s stink,
While sleeping on Satan’s cot.

Wrongthink in the UK will cause a fight,
Selective enforcement is elitist might,
In jail for opinions free,
The other’s on the BBC,
As the double standard proves Thrasymachus was right.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Problem of Asynchronous Power

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, asynchronous power is the source of all injustice. Because injustice cannot exist when power is equal. Some see the problem of asynchronous power and believe the solution is to use it to punish, instead of eliminating the problem altogether. Their reasoning is that if there’s a disparity they should use it to fix the wrongs and set things right. Others simply want to exploit asynchronous power structures to expand their ego. There are those who may say that asynchronous power is everywhere and so questioning it is like questioning air. Yet we do question air. We have decoded its very atomic structure. We use reductionism on everything so why not asynchronous power? If it is indeed the source of all injustice, then how can we fix it?

Asynchronous power is everywhere. The problem of asynchronous power isn’t new, the ancients struggled with it as well. It surrounds us, in the family, business, government, and the power can be political, monetary, or any number of things. Moreover, there are times when asynchronous power is absolutely desired. As in the case of a parent and child relationship. The problem arises when that disparity of power is abused. Often we see it abused in the family, where a youth is started out with the goal of seeking asynchronous power to exploit. This is usually the case in broken homes. In healthy homes, however, the model is quite different. Asynchronous power is used to protect, nurture, and love. That is the better example. We all follow examples.

If lightning hits you, that’s tragedy, but if a king orders your execution for a speech crime… that’s injustice. Moreover, if your power is equal to the king’s the order is nothing but hot air. It’s when someone has authority over another that injustice is possible. There are general injustices and personal injustices. We have all suffered them. Plus, we have all inflicted them. Injustice can be inflicted on those with more power… if it’s done clandestinely. You could say that the more injustice there is, the more there will be. This means that the opposite is probably true as well. The less injustice there is… the less there will be. How do we get to a place where there’s ever less injustice though? One way is to follow Confucius’ advice, that leaders lead by example.

When Confucius was in Lu state, the Duke of Lu ordered the sage come visit. During the visit the Duke asked Confucius how he could get his people to stop drinking to excess, lusting after each other’s wives, and gambling… to which the sage replied, ‘You could lead by example and stop doing those things yourself.’ The next day Confucius and his disciples escaped Lu state. They fled due to the asynchronous power of the bacchanalian Duke and the wise man. The way is clear but it requires ethics, courage, and a spine… the elite lack all three. Nevertheless, injustice comes from the top and flows down, so justice must start at the top and flow down. The normal paradigm however is that injustice and violence to keep people in line flows from the top… and resentment from the bottom.

The more injustice we see the more likely it is that when we have the upper hand… we’ll be unjust. Because we copy what works in our society. Mencius had the golden path and Aristotle the Golden Mean… in both, the wise person isn’t overly virtuous, or too despicable. The sage chooses the middle path in the society he or she find themselves. In Sodom the golden mean was far different than in Victorian England. Nevertheless there was a mean in both places. If the mean then is to abuse asynchronous power, then the incentive is to abuse power and that will be the norm. If the incentive becomes not to abuse power, then that will become the norm. We’re all leaders in some way. Start by leading by example in your own sphere. The mean in society is what we make it… by our examples.

Sincerely,
John Pepin

Posted in Mercy, philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment