The National Security Scam

Posted on April 18, 2019 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the entire reason for “national security,” driving the secrecy of the modern state… is to keep the citizenry ignorant of the abuses of power that the elite are engaged in. Lets face it, there is not a single thing the US government does on a Chinese made computer, that the Communist Party of China doesn’t know about. I bet China has the latest copies of US fighter jet plans before Lockheed Martin. Does anyone really believe Russia doesn’t have satellites capable of submeter resolution? If Area 51 is really protected for “national security,” so citizens are not allowed to come within miles, yet the Russians routinely fly planes over it as well as satellites, it becomes clear that the secrecy is aimed at the citizens of the United States, not some foreign power.

We keep secrets when we have something to lose if they become common knowledge. A wife cheating on her husband doesn’t want him to find out, so she keeps it a secret… a snake oil salesman doesn’t want his “customers” to discover there are no active ingredients in his “medicine,” nor does a sneak thief want his past jobs known by the police. More benevolently, secrets are held to protect innovations in products, methods of manufacture and other business matters, information that could damage a firm’s profitability if their competitors discovered them. Secrets are held by everyone for every purpose. For good and bad, secrets are an expedient, constructed to make our lives better, but more often than not, they lead to heartache, pain and suffering.

If we feel the need to keep a secret, there is always a target, the person or entity that we don’t want to have that knowledge. To that end, we might keep others in the dark, if they have a real likelihood of divulging that secret to the targeted party. The cheating husband targets his wife. He might even brag of his conquests to his golf buddies, but never to his wife’s sister, because he seeks to keep his wife in the dark. A secret only has utility when there is a target and that target is kept ignorant. Once the target learns the secret, the secret no longer has any utility, and indeed becomes a liability. This is why people so often go to great lengths to hide a secret from the whole world. Some live in utter terror their secret might get out, and then back to the target, existing in suffering.

To keep a secret, it is most efficient to misdirect the target into thinking the secret is being kept from another and so, since they could unintentionally divulge it, they too must be kept ignorant. Obviously, it is best if the target doesn’t even know there is a secret, but if he, she or they cannot be kept ignorant of the secret itself, they can at least be misdirected as to their being the target of that secret. Anyone who knows a secret is being held from them, as the target, has an overwhelming desire to find out that secret. It is in our nature and in our genes. If, on the other hand, we are told we cannot know a secret, because if we were to divulge it, and it would be impossible for us not to, our own interests would be harmed… we are far less likely to pry.

China and Russia have exponentially more detailed knowledge of every facet of US and European security assets than the citizens as well as secure facilities. Which means those things are patently NOT SECRET to them. Yet that knowledge is very much off limits to you and I. China knows about the NSA monitoring our every conversation, extra constitutionally, as was revealed by Manning and Assange, Heck, China almost certainly built the equipment for the NSA! So it follows that the secret was not being kept from China, Russia, Al Qeada or Kaos, but from you and I. WE are the target of “National Security” and it is proved by the arrest of Assange on nakedly political charges. This is why I wrote The Fourth Branch… to stymie the ability of government to abuse power, and hide that abuse.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Who Needs Democracy When We Have Google?

Posted on April 15, 2019 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the revelation that Google manipulates search results, to beguile people into voting for progressives and socialists… renders democracy obsolete. It is as diabolical as it is criminal. Dnesh D’Souza was sentenced to jail, for giving an extra 10 grand to a candidate, imagine how much worse, to swing up to 4.5 million votes nationally, by manipulating search results!? Google’s machinations may be the reason the democrats control the House of Representatives! The fact Google has the ability to twist elections, calls into question our very democracy itself. Because, how can we make self interested choices who should represent us in government, if we are manipulated into voting for whomever the elite want? We cannot, which diminishes democracy to a rubber stamp for our oppressors.

The way Google was caught, is that a researcher, Robert Epstein, set up a network of viewers, similarly to the way Neilson rates TV shows. They kept track of the results of their searches on Bing, Yahoo and Google, To the best of my knowledge they didn’t track Duckduckgo’s bias. The research showed that while Yahoo and Bing rated unbiased, Google rated very biased… to an extraordinarily high correlation. This, according to Dr. Epstein, gave the democrats between 800,000 to 4,600,000 votes nationally. In many close elections that is more than enough to swing an election. Epstein calls it the Search Engine Manipulation Effect, (SEME). This he explains effects “moderate republicans” to the greatest degree. Which gives this form of vote rigging a leveraged effect against republicans!

Dr. Epstein says that most people believe the results of a search are organic, and so assume that the results fairly and honestly reflect the facts of the matter… when nothing could be further from the truth! (As in the case of Google). This sneaks whatever message the search engine manipulator wants past the mind’s internal bias detector. Moreover, since search results are generally ephemeral, the manipulations are extremely difficult to detect. It was only by Dr. Epstein’s direct recording of them, via the Neilson method, that allowed the statistical analysis to be done. What it amounts to is, that the good doctor has proven Google’s manipulations swung the election in several republican districts, in California, to democrats, suggesting many more were thrown nationwide.

Ostensibly, the reason for campaign finance laws, is so one faction cannot get an underhanded advantage on the others. Google’s ability to exploit it’s monopoly status in search engines, to change the outcome of elections, makes campaign finance laws moot. Like making BB guns illegal while allowing Thompson machine guns. Campaign finance laws become irrelevant, who cares how much money a candidate has to spend, if Google can hide their message and only show voters propaganda pushing one side. Heck, given that ability, why even have elections anyway? They are just a sham, a fraud perpetrated on voters, to give us the appearance of democracy. When appearances don’t match reality, everyone lies to themselves, and a human catastrophe is always shortly at hand.

As far as I know, there has never been a democrat punished for campaign finance infractions, (despite being caught in some doozies), but several well known republicans have, which suggests campaign finance laws are arbitrarily applied. This fact, on it’s face, is evidence that campaign finance laws are really a means to suppress republican electability. Unless this is stopped, now that the progressive faction controls the monopoly search engine, and is exploiting it to commit election fraud with impunity, we can expect a rapid descent into oppression. There has never been a time, when a faction became all powerful, that oppression and suffering on a munificent scale didn’t follow. So, we have to ask ourselves, do we want democracy… or just the appearance of democracy.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Our True Enemies

Posted on April 11, 2019 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the lines of that old song were wrong, they should have said, “People are people so why should it be, you and I should get along [swimmingly]. Because if you think of it, how many people are you enemies with, compared to friends with? Everyone has one or two people they don’t care for, but by and far away, the largest percentage of people we know, we are on good terms with. That is part of our social nature. Yet, why are we at odds with so many peoples around the world, and they with us? Have you ever met a Russian, Ukrainian, Chinese, Japanese, Persian or Arab? I have met them all… and in my estimation, individually they are all good people. Just as Americans are individually good people. The problem is our psychopathic governments.

Take Imperial China. The Marxist regime, in name only, there meets the classic definition of an empire. Cut from the same cloth as Rome, Persia, Imperial Japan, Ottoman Empire or the USSR. They all used fear to control diverse people subdued by military power. Tibet would rather be a nation again, as it was before China invaded, and annexed it in the 1950’s. Who knows what the Mongolians think but we know what the Uyghurs want… independence. Moreover, China is in the process of annexing the South China Sea. They demand part of the Philippines, Taiwan, some Japanese islands, some northern states in India, part of Vietnam, and various other territories of other nations… and threaten the use of military power to get them.

Russia dreams of it’s glory days. The elite in Russia would love to become an empire again like the old Soviet Union under Stalin. The people would just like to have enough to eat, good jobs and low crime. Most would rather not have a reemergence of the gulags and gulags go hand in hand with empire. Empires cannot tolerate dissidents, that is why human life becomes so cheap and slavery by another name is so rampant. Empires all need a police state, if its name is not well known, that simply means it is good at what it does. Russia on the other hand is facing an expansionist empire to it’s East. One that in the future will threaten it. The Russian leaders are not fools. They know history all too well. Russian history is rife with invasions, often by allies, so Russia will never become too close to China.

Islam is not a nation but it is a form of empire. It is a philosophy that encompass all facets of life, religious, personal, social, criminal and political. A totalizing philosophy that demands absolute obedience, (as do all empires), the penalty for disobedience is usually death. Moreover, all others within it’s political boundaries are considered subhuman, (dhimmi)… for purposes of property, personal safety and freedom. Islam’s core tenet is that it will rule the world. This makes it an expansionist doctrine. One that is presently expanding into Europe. In Twenty to forty years, due to demographics, Europe will be an Islamic state, complete with Sharia law, and native Europeans on the way to extinction, as native Egyptians are now.

In every case above, the people are not the enemy, their psychopathic leaders pushing Lucifarian world views are. Yet it will be the people who go without to fund the war machine, who will suffer the casualties and deaths, morn the losses of loved ones… and face oppression from the psychopaths they helped to power. Meanwhile, those leaders who revel in the suffering, gore and death, will receive as their reward, more power to create more suffering, to control more people and expand their sphere of influence. No… the Russians, Chinese, nor Muslims are our enemies, their leaders however are. No matter how good we are individually, en mass we can be turned to evil, by psychopathic governments plying us with evil doctrines. People are not our enemies… evil philosophies and leaders are.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, International Power, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Hypocrisy… The Progressive Sacrament

Posted on April 8, 2019 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, hypocrisy is a sacrament to progressives, so much so it is the foundation of their every demand, action and desire… it has become the elephant in the room. Gun control is one example of their absolute hypocrisy. Progressives seek a disarmed populace, “for our own safety,” they say, yet not one of the progressive elite would consider giving up their armed security personnel. That would be unthinkable. Which is hypocrisy writ large. They seek to disarm others while maintaining their own. Some might argue, the elite need armed security, because their positions of power put them in harms way. To this I would answer, if I burned down my neighbor’s barn killing his livestock, and then supposed I should be above retaliation, wouldn’t that be an order of magnitude beyond hypocrisy?

The progressive elite see nothing wrong in burning down a man’s barn and killing his livestock… if it serves their purposes. Moreover, the purposes of the progressive faction always “align” with the interests of humanity as a whole. So they sleep well at night, in the certain knowledge of the justness of their hypocrisy. Since the man who’s livelihood has been destroyed, by their having to make a hard decision, so it only makes sense to tax the man to pay for their security, the pigs must be protected from his wrath. Don’t the progressive elite have a right to sleep safely at night? After all, they work so hard on our behalf, don’t we owe it to them? If they have need of destroying a man’s farm, or forcing him to plow under a hundred acres of wheat, so he will go hungry, he must accept it.

While Nancy Pelosi avows, “walls are immoral!” She surrounds her mansion with a concrete wall. Blatant hypocrisy there! It would seem that the progressive congresspeople like walls, around their property, just not around the nation. The progressive elite become incensed that anyone would want to control who and what enters the country. They loudly demand we have open boarders… thus dissolving the United States as a nation. I wonder how many of them would submit to the rule of a foreign nation or group of foreign nations… as they demand the rest of us do? While Clinton enforced Fidel’s iron fisted rule in the United States, by seizing Elion Gonzales with a SWAT team armored and armed with automatic weapons, to return the slave to Cuba… would Clinton submit to Gaddafi’s rule?

Even as doctors in the supposed socialist utopias of Europe, open dialogue to stop surgeries for people over seventy, the progressive elite are living to astounding old age. George Soros who is at, or pushing ninety, is as spry as a twenty year old. He is so fit, just a few years ago he beat the tar out of his nineteen year old girlfriend. The NYC police refused to charge him of course, because, you know, he is George Soros, he is above the law. The Obama care death panels, for which Sara Palin was so vilified by the progressive media, are becoming a reality, like in Europe, healthcare under government control must be rationed. Only the young and the elite get full access. The rest of us must keep ourselves going with herbs and roots… as long as we are not caught. Not at all hypocritical don’t you think?

The examples of hypocrisy of the progressive elite are everywhere. They have become common, like an elephant in a room we have walked around for years, we don’t even notice their hypocrisy anymore. It is like dog bites man. It happens every day, and as biting is in the nature of a dog, hypocrisy is in the nature of progressives. The few I have listed here, progressives demand we be disarmed even as they keep their armed security, they want open boarders for us but demand walls around their estates (to protect them from illegal alien crime), they want single payer healthcare that they know will end up with rationing for us, but not them, these are too obvious to disregard. Instead of ignoring the elephant we have had to walk around for so long, take a long hard look at it… isn’t it time to get rid of it?

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Civilization is Built Upon Reasonable People.

Posted on April 4, 2019 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, reasonable people can have discourse, but unreasonable people cannot be reasoned with. This is why unreasonable people often try to appear reasonable, and others will bend over backward to be reasonable, they believe their being reasonable will give their voice more credence and make them more identifiable. That is what is called “optics.” Civilization itself is built upon reasonable people. People will even shun someone who is unreasonable. No place is optics more important, or so we are told, than in politics. Yet… the case of Hillary’s obvious crimes, along with Obama’s corruption of the DOJ, FBI, IRS and State Department for political purposes, compared to the handling of the Trump collusion hoax, shows that being reasonable only gives advantage in civilized society.

Being caught in a hoax makes a normal person ashamed but makes a psychopath angry. This is one way to tell if a child or an adult is a psychopath. Obviously, shame is a reasonable reaction to being caught in a lie, while anger is an unreasonable one. Yet, we see anger in the reaction of the progressive media, democrats in Congress and pundits at being caught in the Trump collusion hoax… they are livid! Rather than apologize they seek to increase their investigations of Trump! By any standard, this is extremely unreasonable behavior. So, being caught in a hoax doesn’t make progressives the least bit ashamed, it makes them mad as heck. Have you seen a single democrat, pundit, or “news” organization, apologize for feeding the American people a lie for the last two years? Is that reasonable?

Even when a progressive is caught in a heinous crime they go unpunished. Take for instance the Jessie Smollett hoax. While it was designed and intended to get innocent people killed and brutalized, he went entirely unpunished for it. Imagine for a moment if a white straight Christian had fabricated a hoax, intended to get, [fill in the blank] people, killed and brutalized, in the outrage that would follow? That person would be forever a villain. He or she would be elevated to Hitler’s status as a scoundrel. Christians of all races and white people the world over would demand that person be punished to the full extent of the law. Which would be a reasonable reaction. Yet we see in the reaction of the progressive faction, unreasonable lack of shame, and even pulling strings to get him set free!

Reasonable or unreasonable positions? On illegal immigration and boarder security, the progressives stand for open boarders, zero enforcement of immigration laws, sanctuary cities, allowing illegals to engage in identity theft with impunity, giving aliens the vote, as well as releasing violent criminals back onto the streets if it keeps them in the country. To these ends the democrats have shown themselves willing to harm veterans, shut down the government and activate violent mobs, ANTIFA, to terrorize their political foes. In the case of abortion, the democrat position is, to allow afterbirth abortion up to two years of age, allowing babies born alive to die of neglect, screaming on a cold table, selling baby parts and removing all medical safety practices from clinics. Are these reasonable positions?

Most people seek to at least appear reasonable but the progressive faction has no such aims. They revel in their unreasonableness. Their willingness to exploit power to create power, corrupt institutions to decrease their accountability, glee in lying to the American people, lack of self awareness and anger at being caught in their lies… all are the traits of psychopaths, in short, extremely unreasonable people. To the progressive faction, being unreasonable is a sign of strength, while being reasonable is a sign of weakness. They exploit our reasonableness to manipulate us. What I wonder though is, at what point will people become so repulsed by the unreasonableness, and shun the progressive faction… if not, then at what point does everyone become unreasonable, and civilization itself breaks down?

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Colonizing Mars

Posted on April 1, 2019 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the one thing that potential Mars settlers can provide, that will be of great value… is content. Seeing the trials of those attempting to wrestle the Red Planet into some semblance of habitability, will be just the distraction people will need, as the zero unit cost of labor approaches. One thing Mars settlers will need, above all else, is a source of income. Mars is not in a great place to export goods or services to the Earth… so that avenue of profit is closed. It can provide fabricated goods to space cheaper than Earth, only in lofting them, the actual fabrication will still be cheaper on Earth. Yet without a source of income no Mars colonization can be successful. That is why I say, the one thing Mars settlers can provide that will be of great value to Earth… is content.

There are those who believe wholeheartedly that humanity must become a multiplanet species. They say this will insure the survival of humanity regardless of catastrophe. To that end Elon Musk is building an entire system dedicated to getting humanity to Mars. Others, like Bigelow Aerospace, are working on habitats. While this is admirable, and a necessary first step to making mankind a multiplanet species, it is not in itself sufficient. Many other things must be included in the planning. If we look at the history of the New World colonies, we find that if they were not self sufficient, they are eventually abandoned. Even though the air was breathable, the soil fertile and the climate moderate. The difference will be… Mars air is not breathable, it’s climate frigid and soil is toxic.

No matter the ambitions of the initial settlers, unless they can create a source of income for themselves, they will always be reliant on Earth. If they are reliant on Earth they can be recalled anytime the funding runs out. Barring some discovery of alien artifacts, that would bring a gold rush to Mars, there will need to be a source of income to make the whole thing sustainable. That is simply economics. Science cannot fit the bill, since science itself does not create profit, it is the utilization of scientific breakthroughs that garner profit. Moreover, little science can be done on mars that cannot be done on Earth cheaper. So for a Mars colony, or any off world colony to become self sufficient, it needs a form of income… The more the better.

Content is and will always be a source of income, because people have always and will always need distractions. In Ancient Rome it was the sports arenas and coliseums that provided distraction, today it is video on demand via the internet, television and print media. Both the ancient and the modern have the need for content to fill the coliseums and to keep Youtube afloat. Content is where the rubber meets the road. Even and especially in an economy that has a zero unit cost of labor, distraction will be prized. Moreover, nothing is more mesmerizing than reality. The reality of taming a planet will be the greatest show on Earth… that is in fact, off Earth. The potential profit for Mars settlers by providing content could fund the entire enterprise.

The means to profit then must be a top consideration if any off world colony is to function and be self sustaining. It will need to purchase supplies from earth, and that will be much easier if the Mars settlers appeal to Earth’s sense of self interest, rather than Earth’s sense of charity. Even getting mail to Mars will be insanely expensive… so if the Mars settlers decide at the outset, to monetize their trials and tribulations, then stream those burdens to Earth, for a profit, the entire enterprise is exponentially more likely to succeed. That is in the best interests of mankind as a whole, because if a Mars colony is created, becomes self sufficient and helps expand humanities presence in space then, God forbid, some catastrophe did happen on Earth, we would have an outside source of aid.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, International Power, media, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Gun Control is for Psychopaths

Posted on March 29, 2019 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, a society that upholds the Right of the individual to keep and bare arms, is a more civilized, mature, prosperous and courteous one as well. On the other hand, a society that bars the individual from owning weapons, is one where the people are barbaric, hedonistic, impoverished and rude. This follows like wet after rain. There is not one example in history where this was not the case. Take the example of empire, where the citizens were armed and given a stake, that empire flourished, and when those Rights were taken away, that empire collapsed. This is because every nation, city state or empire that has ever been, or ever will be, are the people that make them up. Where the people are mature, civilized, and courteous they are also prosperous.

People who need to be mature, are mature, and people that don’t need to be… are not. One thing that forces maturity is consequence. The more immediate the stronger the effect. You saw this in older generations, where people had immediate consequences for laziness, hedonism, risk taking and being a lout… like starvation, disease for which there was no cure, mortal injury and watching your own children die. These things made people much more mature, at a much younger age than people today. The new progressive “role of government” is to help people avoid the negative consequences of bad behavior. Which obviously encourages bad behavior… a decivilizing effect. Maturity comes with responsibility… and owning a gun is nothing but responsibility.

Where most people are armed, everyone will be courteous. When dealing with someone who has the ability to harm you, no matter your position, you or I, heck, any sane person will naturally treat others with respect. Which is a civilizing factor. Courtesy is like grease to a mechanism. Put more grease on any mechanism, especially one that is dry, and the lowered friction will increase it’s efficiency. In this case the mechanism is the economy. Imagine for a moment, how much easier it would be to do business, if everyone you dealt with was courteous? How much easier it would be for them… if you were courteous too? The reduced interpersonal friction would greatly improve everyone’s standard of living as well as economic position.

The threat of retaliation for maltreatment, makes an armed people a powerful discouragement to psychopathic abuses of power. Which is why those who seek to abuse others are staunch supporters of “common sense gun laws.” If psychopathic abuses of power are taken away, people will have more liberty, and where people are also courteous and mature, the three together will add up to great prosperity. That prosperity and increase in our standard of living comes at a cost though… to those in power. It takes away from their power to abuse us without consequence, lowers their ability to take an ever increasing slice of the economic pie, and diminishes them to no better than the hoi polloi. Those who seek power over the rest of us, the “great men,” cannot abide an armed people.

Which shows us the faction that stands firmly against the people becoming more mature, courteous, civilized and prosperous… they are the heirs of Thrasymachus. Psychopaths who seek to exploit positions of power to abuse others without us being able to retaliate. To stop such equality of power… a psychopath will go to any length. That is why we have gun free zones, and they never miss a chance to exploit tragedy, to enhance their power to abuse us. They demand we give them our total trust even as they openly avow, by their disarming us, their distrust of us! No where and at no time have an armed people ever been rounded up and exterminated, no, that honor has and will always be reserved for the disarmed, helpless, starving, oppressed and politically disfavored.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Transcending Our Station

Posted on March 28, 2019 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, only when we recognize that we are not special, can we actually be special. That is to say, if you were born in Germany in 1922, you would probably have been a Nazi, had you been born a white person on a plantation in 1835, you would have probably seen nothing wrong with slavery, had you been born a Roman in the Republican years, you would have gladly taken up arms against Volscia. or if you were born as a peasant in dark ages Europe, you would have followed in your mother’s or fathers trade. We are largely who and what we are born to be. Until we recognize that fact we are stuck in that paradigm. Once we recognize this however, we then have the perspective to transcend our station, (who and what we were born to be) to become someone greater… someone special.

The value of being able to transcend our station is enormous. The greatest degree of effect is on those born to the lowest stations, of course, but every person no matter what station we are born to, can find utility in transcending it. Imagine you are a boy born into a single mother family, your mother loves you but is out of her element controlling you, as a result you are not properly socialized. The strong likelihood is that you would then spend time in prison. Not because your mother was bad, or that you are diabolical, but because the situation you were born into put you in that position. The means to transcend that station then would be invaluable to you. Yet that ability starts with understanding the root of the problem then choosing not to be the person you were born to be.

A problem can only be addressed once it is recognized, until then it is not in the conscience, and thus doesn’t exist in the mind, so cannot be addressed. Everything that humankind has made, done or created has first existed in the mind of a person. Until someone visualizes something it cannot come into material reality. This goes for creating works of art or solving problems. Until people had to move heavy loads, there was no need of a wheel but once people had the problem, they solved it by imagining wheeled vehicles. Until we understand that we have a problem, that of following blindly in the role we are born to, we cannot get off that track. So let’s recognize that we are largely, not entirely, the person we were born to be. Then, we can move to the next step, transcending that station.

It is hard to accept that I could have been a Nazi, but part of wisdom is accepting difficult truths. Take Hsun Ching’s thesis, “The congenital nature of man is evil.” If we accept this as fact, we have to come to grips with the idea that we were born evil, and the goodness in us was learned. This is too hard for some to accept. They would rather live in the fantasy they are good, and everything they seek is good, no matter what they seek. Hedonism is an enthralling fantasy but it yields poor life results. Moreover, it leads to famine, poverty and want. Understanding that you yourself, had you been born in the right circumstances, could have been a death camp guard, is the first step to not ever being a death camp guard. It is only by acceptance and acknowledgment of our congenital nature that we can transcend it.

Transcending our station could be as small as not being so angry, being more agreeable, or less agreeable, being more courteous… to as large as becoming rich, writing the next great American novel, or invention. To transcend our station we need the perspective that recognizing, we are largely who and what we were born to be, gives us. As hard as that might be, it is preferable to wallowing in a mire not of our own creation, unable to understand why we are in it, and thus never knowing how to escape it. Such knowledge is of immense value to everyone. So, recognize that who you are and what you do, is largely because of the circumstances of your life, and you then have the ability to transcend those circumstances. For your own betterment and that of the human condition… become special.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Is Democracy Still a Thing?

Posted on March 24, 2019 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the revelation that Google manipulates search results, to beguile people into voting for progressives and socialists… renders democracy obsolete. It is as diabolical as it is criminal. Dnesh D’Souza was sentenced to jail, for giving an extra 10 grand to a candidate, imagine how much worse, to swing up to 4.5 million votes nationally, by manipulating search results!? Google’s machinations may be the reason the democrats control the House of Representatives! The fact Google has the ability to twist elections, calls into question our very democracy itself. Because, how can we make self interested choices who should represent us in government, if we are manipulated into voting for whomever the elite want? We cannot, which diminishes democracy to a rubber stamp for our oppressors.

The way Google was caught, is that a researcher, Robert Epstein, set up a network of viewers, similarly to the way Neilson rates TV shows. They kept track of the results of their searches on Bing, Yahoo and Google, To the best of my knowledge they didn’t track Duckduckgo’s bias. The research showed that while Yahoo and Bing rated unbiased, Google rated very biased… to an extraordinarily high correlation. This, according to Dr. Epstein, gave the democrats between 800,000 to 4,600,000 votes nationally. In many close elections that is more than enough to swing an election. Epstein calls it the Search Engine Manipulation Effect, (SEME). This he explains effects “moderate republicans” to the greatest degree. Which gives this form of vote rigging a leveraged effect against republicans!

Dr. Epstein says that most people believe the results of a search are organic, and so assume that the results fairly and honestly reflect the facts of the matter… when nothing could be further from the truth! (As in the case of Google). This sneaks whatever message the search engine manipulator wants past the mind’s internal bias detector. Moreover, since search results are generally ephemeral, the manipulations are extremely difficult to detect. It was only by Dr. Epstein’s direct recording of them, via the Neilson method, that allowed the statistical analysis to be done. What it amounts to is, that the good doctor has proven Google’s manipulations swung the election in several republican districts, in California, to democrats, suggesting many more were thrown nationwide.

Ostensibly, the reason for campaign finance laws, is so one faction cannot get an underhanded advantage on the others. Google’s ability to exploit it’s monopoly status in search engines, to change the outcome of elections, makes campaign finance laws moot. Like making BB guns illegal while allowing Thompson machine guns. Campaign finance laws become irrelevant, who cares how much money a candidate has to spend, if Google can hide their message and only show voters propaganda pushing one side. Heck, given that ability, why even have elections anyway? They are just a sham, a fraud perpetrated on voters, to give us the appearance of democracy. When appearances don’t match reality, everyone lies to themselves, and a human catastrophe is always shortly at hand.

As far as I know, there has never been a democrat punished for campaign finance infractions, (despite being caught in some doozies), but several well known republicans have, which suggests campaign finance laws are arbitrarily applied. This fact, on it’s face, is evidence that campaign finance laws are really a means to suppress republican electability. Unless this is stopped, now that the progressive faction controls the monopoly search engine, and is exploiting it to commit election fraud with impunity, we can expect a rapid descent into oppression. There has never been a time, when a faction became all powerful, that oppression and suffering on a munificent scale didn’t follow. I do wonder though… if the Google vote manipulation story is why Mueller released the report on Friday?

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Abetting Genocide… How Progressive!

Posted on March 21, 2019 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, hiding genocide, abets genocide, and as such makes two crimes against humanity. Now genocide is thrown around a lot today. Progressives claim that not believing in the fraud of anthropogenic climate change, is tantamount to genocide, which diminishes the power of the word. Even as progressives and the progressive media see no evil, when hundreds of Christians are slaughtered weekly in Nigeria, when Catholics are bombed in their churches in the Philippines, or even when the Imperial Chinese government bulldozes churches to the ground, to say nothing about the unending stream of antisemitic attacks, yet, in the only mass terrorist attack against a mosque in my lifetime, they are wall to wall coverage of it. Almost as if the progressive media believes that some lives are more equal than others, or are pushing a false narrative?

Violence itself is a direct violation of the Golden Rule. I think anyone civilized can agree that violence is wrong… unless in self defense. This is self evident because no one who visits violence on another would accept violence visited on him or herself. Showing that those who use violence are hypocrites who do not follow the Golden Rule. The Christchurch shooter(s) certainly wouldn’t want someone showing up, and killing them and their loved ones at a national socialist rally, yet they were happy to visit that evil on others. The subhumans who slaughtered the Nigerian Christians, many by burning them to death, would be very upset to hear that Nigerian Christians had burned their loved ones to death. Showing their hypocrisy and that they do not follow the Golden Rule.

People who hold human life in equal esteem show it by their actions, as those who hold some as more important, also show it by their actions. We know that people cannot be trusted to always tell the truth and most of us understand that actions speak louder than words. Someone can brag, they love popcorn, but if confronted with some they cover their nose and run from the room, we can reliably say they do not really like popcorn. The media is the same. No matter how loudly the progressive media argue they are unbiased, their biased reporting belies that claim. How can we rectify the difference between the reporting on the systematic genocide of African Christians, the bombing of Christian churches, the daily antisemitic attacks in Europe and the US, with that of the Christchurch attack?

The reporting about a national socialist killing innocents, is as much about pushing a false narrative as about ginning up sympathy for new oppressive laws, and unequal treatment of people based on their group affiliation. Already there are reports of people turning in their legal firearms in New Zealand. An odd thing, because those who turn in their weapons are the people least likely to use them in an attack, they are the ones most likely use them to stop an attack. While those who hide their weapons are those most likely to act out violently or sell firearms to those who will. Which leads us to believe that stopping terrorist attacks cannot be the goal, empowering terrorists to attack… must be. If we are to believe what the progressive media wants, by their actions, rather than their rhetoric.

Why would the progressive media hide the systematic genocide of Christians in Africa? Why would they not report with equal gusto about a church bombing in the Philippines that killed 20 Catholics? Why not report about the oppression of Christians in Imperial China? Why not report about the daily attacks against Jews around the world? Do those lives matter less than the people at that Mosque? Ask yourself, what group are they trying to garner sympathy for, and what groups are the progressive media vilifying? An honest answer will be startling. The very groups that are targeted for extermination are the ones the progressive media vilify, and those doing the slaughtering, are the ones the progressive media are trying to garner sympathy for. Abetting genocide… how progressive!

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment