Progressive Supremacism

Posted on May 17, 2020 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, progressivism is, by it’s nature… supremacist. Listen to a progressive and ask yourself if he or she doesn’t harbor a feeling of supremacy. Progressives feel in their hearts they are superior to everyone else. Why else would they think they need to tell everyone how to live their lives? Why is it so important to them they never be questioned, that critics be silenced, that any limit to their power be removed, and the rest of us must submit to being lab rats to their grand progressive social experiments? A person who considers themselves equals, do not manipulate others into bending to their will, that is the bailiwick of a supremacist. Which leaves us with the primary question, if supremacy cannot be wrong, (since progressives are supremacists)… why do they so despise white supremacy?

I have mentioned before that hypocrisy is a sacrament to progressives. That is part of why progressives can hate a thing that epitomizes themselves, so vehemently, without a bit of cognitive dissonance. That is as natural to them as breathing is to a bird. This is a handy quality to have for a would be oppressor… it is also a primary attribute of a narcissist. Not saying progressives are all narcissists, just that progressivism has narcissism as a primary quality. Progressives narcissism is proved by their hypocrisy and their hypocrisy is validated by their narcissism. A narcissist believes herself superior to the common run of man. Disagreement with a narcissist only proves your lack of wisdom. Narcissism correlates with a feeling of superiority. Making the progressive mindset one of narcissistic supremacy.

Many argue that hypocrisy and narcissism are pathological mindsets. They are as self destructive as they are destructive of relationships, economies, societies, nations and cultures. Pathological ways of thinking make the absurd possible, empower the arrogant and call crimes against humanity, “breaking a few eggs.” Would you agree that it is pathological, to lie, manipulate human beings, steal, insider trade, exploit authority for personal ends, usurp power, seek arbitrary rule and destroy people for fun and profit? To a narcissist they are a way of life and perfectly acceptable, when they do it, but should someone else have the audacity to try to do it to them, they will react like a cornered weasel. Again proving their pathological mindset of psychopathic narcissistic supremacy.

This explains to a large extent why progressives so despise white supremacists, despite they themselves being supremacists, progressives have no ability to self analyze, have no self awareness and are pathological in their way of thinking. Yet, one would think they would catch some reflection of themselves in their depictions of white supremacists? After all, don’t white supremacists have the exact same qualities as progressives? The same pathological mindset, narcissistic supremacist attitude and lack of self awareness? I wonder if that falls under the category of ugly truth, one they refuse to look at, because the glittering lie (of their supremacy), is so enrapturing… or maybe because they know it’s a lie, but refuse to acknowledge it, since they don’t care… being hypocrites?

Since pathological hypocritical narcissistic supremacists cannot see themselves for who they are, it is up to the rest of us to do it for them. So that we don’t allow their psychosis to grow and become even more destructive. A supremacist is a supremacist, they have no place ruling a free democratic republic. Progressive supremacists then, in positions of power, are antithetical to the very founding of the United States and it’s Constitution. Which they, in their pathological, narcissistic supremacy, are devoted to destroy. The first step is to think for ourselves, stop listening to the manipulations of narcissists, psychopaths and hypocrites, and point out their hypocrisy and narcissism. They will come at us tooth and nail for it… like any cornered weasel. The alternative is to accept a supremacist as your ruler.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Covid 19 and the Hegelian Dialectic

Posted on May 15, 2020 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, we are seeing the Hegelian Dialectic used on us, yet few of us realize it. Hegel created the means to manipulate people into self harm via, “Problem, Reaction, Solution.” In an elegant system of psychotic manipulation… by fear. Let’s say the elite want to implement a biochip, or digital tattoo as Bill gates has proposed. The people would never accept such a thing. Those who eat nothing but organic kale, are unlikely to accept a Mark that includes cadmium, lead, arsenic, mercury and a few radioactive isotopes. They will gladly take such a Mark, if they are terrorized first, because our normal thinking goes out the window, and people will accept anything they are told will make them safe. This is the essence of the Hegelian Dialectic… create a crisis, generate fear, then offer your “solution.”

Once a goal has been set, the way to get there is by creating a crisis that generates sufficient fear, the people will go along with whatever evil experiment you want to do to them. Given enough panic the elite could create an island of Dr. Moreau… and the people, (Guinea pigs) will cheer it. This is the vital factor, that the problem the elite create be terrifying enough to get people to give up critical thinking and accept whatever solution you offer. If they are not afraid enough, the crisis will be proved worthless, and if they wake up before the goal has been achieved that whole affair will have been for naught. That is why the fear must be general, unavoidable and nebulous. Anyone who shines a light of truth must be controlled, by censorship, spurious logic by “fact checkers” and vilified.

A novel disease meets the first set of criteria, it is unknown and so generates a nebulous fear, no one is safe from a virus, so the fear is general, and with enough propaganda the fear becomes unavoidable. The more contagious the disease the better it functions as a means to control. People are naturally afraid of sickness, which makes manipulating us into blind terror by it… a simple thing. Once we are in a state of fear that fear must be massaged, husbanded and controlled. It must not be quashed by the cold water of reason, science and experience. That is why effective treatments must be made illegal, doctors and scientists who disagree with the politicians selling the fear, must be called science deniers, and videos of scientific authorities who disagree with the narrative of blind fear, must be removed.

Even a cursory examination of the outcome of the panic, caused by the present virus, shows how brutally effective disease is in inducing people to give up Rights for implied safety. During the Covid 19, or SARS 2 outbreak happening today, we have allowed our Constitution to be nullified. Our politicians and the administrative state now have arbitrary unlimited power… to arrest, force you to wear whatever they want, restricted travel, restricted speech, restricted ammo and gun sales, restricted freedom of assembly, outlawed Christianity and Judaism, eliminated the castle theory and have usurped effectively unlimited power. All in less than two months. What progressives have been laboring to do for over a century has been accomplished in a few fortnights.

I am a bit surprised I haven’t seen any other articles calling attention to the fact, we are being manipulated into self harm… by the Hegelian method. You would think it such an obvious corollary to our present circumstances some would notice. I suppose though, when you are panicked, it is difficult to use reason to recognize that the panic is induced for a reason, and that reason is not for your best interests, it is antithetical to them. The virus may or may not have originated in the Wuhan lab, that focuses on upgrading viruses from bats, it may have escaped unknowingly, and it may be natural, nevertheless, it has opened the door to despotism across the planet. You can count on the psychopathic, narcissistic hypocrites that rule over us to take full advantage. It is their way.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

What Will History Say?

Posted on May 13, 2020 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me… history will record this shutdown as a gargantuan mistake. Even if the totalitarian progressive faction wins, they will tell this as a time they received what is rightfully theirs… absolute arbitrary power over us, with a warning. The reason they will tell the truth, despite the burning in their throats and mouths the truth inflicts on them, is they will not want to repeat such a catastrophic mistake… and lose that usurped power. History will have much to say about how horribly our “leaders” have failed us in this “emergency.” We may discover in the future that the whole thing was a fabricated crisis to effect the election of Trump. While today that may be the stuff of conspiracy theories… psychopaths intent on absolute arbitrary power over the rest of humanity, are not to be scoffed at.

The World continued during the great plagues that exterminated up to 80% of the population. Those were plagues, this is less than the common cold to children, and only dangerous to the weak, old and infirm. No more so however, as it turns out, than the seasonal flu. The 1918 pandemic swept the world like wildfire. It surfaced in places without contact with the outside world, like remote islands in the Aleutians. Which is where modern “scientists” exhumed the bodies of 1918 victims to revive that deadly flu. Given the over the top reaction of the administrative state’s apparatchiks, if they were to release that virus onto the world, in three years say, the reaction would collapse the world. In stark contrast to the actual 1918 pandemic’s results.

As I said before… the outcome of an emergency is totally dependent on the reaction to it. If you step on a wasp nest, your reaction determines the outcome. Should you stand there and kill them as they land on you, you can expect many stings. If you run off a cliff, the outcome is drastically diminished for you. On the other hand, if you trot a few feet away and continue walking, they will largely leave you alone. From that example we can glean that the reaction is often more important than the cause. Shutting down the economy, along with arbitrary rules, set by unelected apparatchiks, is like running off a cliff. The outcome is drastically diminished for mankind. Had the government done nothing, I suspect no more people would have died of the Wuhan flu, but far fewer would have from the reaction.

Right now, while the populace is in a state of fear, initiated by the media’s call to panic, the administrative state is in it’s glory. They can finally exercise the powers they have so longed for. They stand before us, experts who cannot be questioned, even by other experts, and who’s word is law. They decide who can and cannot buy and sell based on their own random ideas. Going to the extreme of taping off isles in stores if those isles have verboten items in them! Seriously! I couldn’t have made such foolishness up if I tried. Through their sycophants in the media, and mad scientists on the payroll, they demand we accept whatever shot they want to give us. Openly talking about forcing us to get digital tattoos so we can buy and sell. The administrative state is in heaven.

Nevertheless, the actions of the progressive faction is waking people up. Absurdities like shutting down beaches, churches and salons, while keeping open liqueur stores, weed stores and abortion clinics cannot be justified and indeed are just the type of reaction to a crisis that makes it worse. Releasing violent criminals from prison while jailing mothers for taking children to the park, salon owners for cutting hair and pastors for violating the unconstitutional, arbitrary and oppressive edicts of the administrative state. By showing us who and what they are, power mad psychopaths interested in nothing but power and willing to do anything, even destroy the world economy for it. Will their machinations work? Let’s see how the people judge the reaction to the “crisis” this November.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, economy, Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Murdering Psychopath… or Simpleton?

Posted on May 10, 2020 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, if the story about the Governor’s office in New York, forcing nursing homes to take in covid 19 patients is true, Cuomo is guilty of first degree murder… for political gain. Very progressive indeed. The news item I am referring to is that there was supposedly, an edict from the Governor’s office forcing old people with the Kung Flu into nursing homes, despite the known fact that disease travels at super sonic velocity through a nursing care facility. How is that any different than putting a gun to someone’s head and pulling the trigger? You know what the outcome will be in both instances. The main difference then, is that shooting someone in the head results in one death, while spreading a deadly disease through a vulnerable population could kill thousands.

Why do you suppose Cuomo would intentionally spread the Wuhan Flu to as many vulnerable people as possible? What could be the upside of thousands of people dying? One possible upside to the administrative state is the fear such deaths cause. That fear can be massaged into unlimited power… you know, to “help” people. Inflated death numbers definitely plays into the fear factor… and Cuomo’s New York has the highest death toll in the US. Despite the fact Florida has more people, an older population and Miami is every bit as crowded as NYC. Yet the results in FL are exponentially better than NY? Perhaps because the governor of Florida didn’t force covid positive patients into nursing homes, instead barring them from long term care facilities, by testing everyone as they entered.

The reason Cuomo supposedly forced the most vulnerable places to take in contagious people couldn’t have been because there was no room for them. The US military under the orders of Trump had a medical ship docked in NYC harbor… that pretty much remained empty the entire time it was there. The temporary hospitals set up for covid victims went unused. Even as the Hospitals remained empty. Making it unlikely overcrowding in those facilities was the real issue. New York has plenty of respirators on hand, that are not being used, and a plethora of nurses laid off who could be of assistance as well. So a dearth of nurses and respirators couldn’t be the reason Cuomo forced old folks homes, that have zero ability to deal with such a contagious disease, to take infected people in.

Banning hydroxycloroquine in New York is another head scratcher. Especially given that the drug has a 90% success rate with severe symptoms of the Kung Flu. While he has “only” banned it in pharmacies so people trapped at home with the disease don’t have access to it, that ban has certainly had an effect on the death rate. The ban on a drug that is shown to be effective, forcing nursing care facilities to take in infectious patients, despite the fact there was plenty of room for them elsewhere, not to mention that at the beginning of the outbreak the democrats were unanimous, in telling people to mingle, would strongly indicate that Cuomo wants more people to die of this disease, and for the epidemic to continue for as long as possible… while giving the appearance he is concerned and doing something about it.

This is obviously predicated on the truthfulness of the stories about Cuomo, banning hydroxycloroquinine, forcing long term care facilities to take infected patients and that other facilities were indeed empty and nurses laid off. If they are true, it becomes hard to rectify these things without concluding Cuomo and the democrats want more people to die of Crono. A psychopath might make the calculation that old people tend to vote republican, so every old person that dies, is a democrat vote that will not be countered. Old people are a burden to the system, in social security and medicare. Since the suffering of others means nothing to a psychopath, unless they get enjoyment from it, it is no impediment to action. So, which is Cuomo, a murdering psychopath… or simpleton?

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, economy, Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Social Justice and Innate Intelligence.

Posted on May 8, 2020 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, when you modify a noun with an adjective, the very nature of the noun is changed. Would you say a “Train” car is the same as a “White” car, or “car?” They are not. Moreover, this tendency becomes more pronounced the more singular and conceptual the noun is. Would you say “Innate” intelligence is the same as “Military” intelligence? Modifiers modify the meaning of a noun. That is their roll in the English language. So, when someone put’s a modifier before an important idea, it means they are changing the very substance of that idea into something else… possibly it’s opposite. Like the term, “social” justice. The modifier social changes the innate meaning of Justice into it’s polar opposite… an ingenious trick of logic to manipulate people into favoring arbitrary rule.

Is the word “Love” subject to modification without destroying something fundamental about it? Is self love the same as love? Can you modify love with the words, social, economic, or racial? How would you take someone who said, “I stand for social love…?” Would you opine how wise they are… or think them foolish to yourself? What would social love be? Would it be love? How about economic love? Wouldn’t that be someone in love with money? Wouldn’t a person only interested in racial love be at heart a racist? Is racism good, when it is used to gain political favor for a particular race, that is called… oppressed? These and more are questions we should ask ourselves when we hear the terms, social justice, economic justice or racial justice.

So why modify a noun like justice? Isn’t the concept of Justice in and of itself good? Well, yes and no. It is pure, as conceptualized, but has been perverted by psychopathic leaders to become a tool to manipulate us. No discussion of justice would be complete without at least a passing mention of Plato’s Republic, and Thrasymachus’ diatribe against Justice as a means to “Justice,” but as a means of control. The thrust of his speech was that the rulers are not just, they use the term to convince the people that their rule, stealing and oppression, is rightful. The rulers need not be just or act just… only appear just. In fact this is exactly what progressives mean, when they modify Justice with social, economic, racial, etc… They intend to exploit Justice as a tool of oppression rather than a means to actual Justice.

Why is it that our ear rejects social love but not social justice? Because we have become inured to the term social modifying the concept of Justice for so long. Even though we still find the term a little off putting to the ear… because concepts like Justice, Love, Compassion, Reciprocation, etc… are not subject to modification without something fundamental changing. Like smelling rotten eggs so long you don’t notice it. You could notice the lack of that smell as a lightening of the air… but that is all, once you have become inured to it. Our innate unconceptualized knowledge of the English language makes such terms grating… unless they are introduced to us as self evident, and we are inured to them by much repetition.

Seems like a lot of work to me, to invent modifications to pervert the term Justice, only to gain leverage over the human race, but then again, I am not a “Great Man,” according to Thrasymachus. Great men, thankfully, are few, like Alexander, Napoleon, Duke of Wellington, Hitler, FDR, Mao, Stalin and Tamerlane, they explode onto the world stage, create huge amounts of suffering, go down in history as great men, then meet their eternal reward. Often it takes great men to stop great men, like Scipio Africanus and Hannibal. Nevertheless, To go to such great lengths, to change the very meaning of Justice to suit one’s own interests, shows a great man in action. Psychopathic to their core, lustful after power over humanity and careless of other men’s lives… very progressive.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Government Corrupts Everything It Touches

Posted on May 6, 2020 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me… government is a corrupting influence on business. The more power government has to effect markets, consumers and regulate behavior, the more perverting it is. While interfering with the economy is very lucrative, for politicians and corporate executives, it comes at a great cost to the people in our life outcomes. Politicians have a myriad of reasons, justifications and lamentations to explain to us, why they need to decide who wins and who loses, in an economic transaction. Often it is for our own good, because we are too stupid to reason for ourselves, not smart enough to know what’s good for us… and to “protect” jobs. No matter the justification, every interference is to benefit a politically favored player at the cost to society, the people and our economy.

In the meat industry there are farmers, feed lots, slaughterhouses, meat cutters and grocers. They all have a part to play in the logistics of getting meat created and into the mouths of consumers. Each is a value added enterprise. The feed lot fattens the farmer’s cows, the slaughterhouse kills them and does the initial packing, while the meat cutter further cuts it to consumer portions and the grocer sells them to the final user. Why doesn’t the farmer just sell his meat directly to the consumer? Because the vertical integration that would require is far less efficient than using Adam Smith’s division of labor. Each segment operating at optimal efficiency to keep the cost of food as low as possible. (So poor people can afford meat). While, if farms did it all, the cost would necessarily be higher.

Each segment of the supply chain works to lower the cost by being efficient… except when they aren’t. Efficiency is expensive and hard, but if government will grant you a lock on your segment of the supply chain, you can be as inefficient as you want. If the farmer no longer can, legally, go around the system. All it takes is a good lobbyist and some cash to lubricate the process. Once government steps in and regulates an industry, to protect politically favored entities, the entire paradigm of efficient production goes out the window. Once other firms see what you have accomplished, they will go the same route, lowering the efficiency of the entire nation’s economy. It should be obvious what the long term effects on a nation and the wealth of it’s people is… under such a system of incentives.

The meat industry is not alone in being regulated to inefficiency by government bureaucrats and politicians, every industry is effected. Some states have outlawed the sale of Tesla’s because it eschews car dealerships… ostensibly to protect the jobs at those dealerships, but in reality, to protect the wealth of the politically favored who own those dealerships. The milk industry is rife with regulation, preventing people from buying unpasteurized milk directly from farmers, supposedly to keep us “safe,” but really to protect the firms that process milk and prevent people from making cheese at home, protecting the cheese industry. Did you know you pay more for sugar in the US than anywhere else in the world? To protect the US sugar producers from foreign competition.

Like Milton Friedman said, Why produce a higher quality good, at a lower price point, when you can get the government to close down the competition instead? The more power government has, to intrude into private affairs, the more it will interfere with the running of the economy. Making it less efficient, and creating dangerous incentives. The high price of sugar in the US has led firms to use high fructose corn syrup instead, which has led to an epidemic of diabetes. Helping the medical establishment to great profits. There is little that can lower the economic outcomes of the people, more than a powerful government interceding, for the “good of the people.” Such governments have plenty of justification for their intrusions, “good intentions” they want us to only see, rather than the road they put us on.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, economy, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Science as the Handmaiden of Progressivism

Posted on May 3, 2020 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, our psychopathic rulers gave up on religion as a means to get us to follow blindly, then they tried using socialism, now they have moved onto “science” as the reason we have to follow them without a will of our own. The end is, and always was, total control. The elite have achieved this many times throughout human history and have ushered in some of the greatest crimes against humanity possible. Imagine forcing people to put their babies into the mouth of a bronze monster to be roasted alive, listening to the sound of sizzling flesh and screams of agony, magnified and enhanced by the bronze instrument of evil. That type of thing is only possible when the evil elite have total control of the minds and souls of the people. They had it before and by Lucifer they are going to get it again.

Religion bucked the elite off when Christianity came around. Pagan religions where people were sacrificed gave the elite unimaginable power back then. They had the power of arbitrary life and death. Christianity was a revolutionary idea. It upended the paradigm. Initially the psychopathic elite tried to exploit it to their own ends, but Christianity, if read and understood, openly and loudly proclaims that such behavior is evil. Once the Holy Bible was read by the common people, the cat was out of the bag, and that religion became utterly useless to manipulate the people into self harm. Then the elite had to change to something else to capture the minds of the people… making us stupid and obedient. So the psychopathic elite elevated atheism and made socialism the new mind control device.

Socialism has worked hand in hand with atheism for a few centuries and has wrought much evil in the world. Lenin sent his Bolsheviks to towns at night, to abduct a Menshevik leader, and bring him or her to the woods. They would make a small incision in the side of the victim, reach in his or her stomach, grab a bit of intestine and nail that intestine to a tree. Then the Bolsheviks would whip the menshevik until they crawled around the tree… tying themselves to it and left to die in agony. The message to other Mensheviks was clear. That tactic would not be possible for Christians who are taught and follow the Golden Rule, rendering Christianity useless to our psychopathic leaders. Atheism and socialism were the tickets… but have become so tainted, the psychopaths will have to find something else.

Science appeared like it would dissolve into the atheism/socialism brain bleach, but under Enlightenment principles, freedom of speech, the scientific method, and freedom to come up with innovative ideas without the threat of political retribution, it didn’t. That paradigm has been upended by the progressives. Now new ideas must be sent through the ministry of truth, to get the progressive faction’s blessing, else they are not allowed. The progressive faction, through it’s monopoly on the administrative state, the media that calls itself unbiased, universities and our corporations, decides who gets to speak, who has authority, what is allowed discourse, and most of all… what research gets funded. Hammering science from a rhombus, into a square, to fit into atheism/socialism.

Which brings us to today. We are told by people that we must follow them blindly, because, you know… science. Are you a science denier? Just as religion bucked the psychopathic elite, I hope and believe science will as well… eventually. Remember, the psychopathic elite exploited religion as a means of control, until that revolutionary, Jesus Christ of Nazareth came onto the scene. They crucified him for it… but that blew up in their faces. Sooner or later science will reject the control and being used as a means to oppress rather than enlighten. Once that happens, the psychopathic elite, progressives today, will have to come up with some other brain bleach to manipulate us into self harm. Anyone who actually knows science, knows… nothing in science is known.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Should Those Who Write Laws Be Subject To Them?

Posted on May 1, 2020 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, when those who make the law, are above it, law will become a way to oppress rather than a means to order. A progressive might argue differently. They could take a psudo-taoist approach and say, “only the unmoved can move,” to justify arbitrary rule. Which, while being a total bastardization of the core principles of Taoism, it is elegant in it’s ability to manipulate people into accepting oppression. On the other hand, I and a few others, nowhere near the reigns of power of course, believe that when those who write laws are not subject to them, there is no incentive to write smart, honest and fair laws, but instead to write laws that enrich those with political connections at the cost to the rest of us. Then again, a progressive might agree on the facts, but disagree on the morality.

Since so few understand, or even have heard of Taoism, I’ll give a quick overview. Lao Tzu was leaving the great society, when he was stopped by people, pleading with him to share his sage wisdom. He at first refused then finally relented. To do so he wrote down a list of euphemisms or wise and arcane sayings… the Lao Tzu book, also known as the Tao Te Ching. Euphemisms, each only a few lines long, are as slippery to the mind as Teflon is to eggs. Some are… “Only the unmoved can moved, the value of a jar is in it’s being empty, Hold onto the center, etc… These are supposed to be difficult and enlightening at the same time. They do not however justify arbitrary rule. Far from it, they teach that the Tao, or, the way to heavenly enlightenment and human heartedness, is a personal affair.

Laws are supposed to be a means of imposing order on society. That was their original intent. Because without order, we cannot live our lives. How do you buy and sell in a war zone? How well does the medical system work under a pandemic? How much profit is there in cattle that are stolen? In times of chaos, everyone is poor, while in times of order, there is general prosperity. That is the reason we have laws and police, to keep order in society, so that society can function. When criminals like Bonny and Clyde, John Dillinger and that lot terrorized the country, the FBI was empowered to take drastic measures to reign them in. While people may have liked John Dillinger burning their mortgages… they didn’t appreciate their towns and children being in the line of roving automatic gunfire.

Anyone not subject to the law, for whatever reason, be it hereditary aristocracy, political favor or have super powers, they will become arrogant. Seeing the rest of us, that are subject to the laws as lessers… and in fact we are, in the eyes of the government. The same government that has a monopoly on violence. Which means that no matter how unjustly the law is being applied, and the government sanctioned violence applied to your person, you have no Right to resist the beating. Else we would be subject to greater punishments should we survive the violence done to us. That state of affairs is tolerated by the vast majority of people, because it is supposed to lead to order… so we can have children, lives and jobs. Sadly, it is usually used to oppress and enrich, instead of provide order.

When was the last time an oppressor subjected himself to his own laws? Isn’t one of the definitions of a tyrant, someone who doesn’t subject themselves to the rules they apply, often with capital punishment to others? Despots justify their despotism by whatever means necessary. Why would someone who is willing to kill you, for having the wrong opinion… balk at lying? They wouldn’t. As Thrasymachus told us, to the powerful who are not subject to the law, Justice is a trick played on the hoi polloi, to keep us in line, as the powerful use it to take advantage of us. With that mindset, there is not much delta V to exploiting authority for personal or factional gain, thus violating one’s duty to society. Which was criminal to the ancient Greeks as well as Lao Tzu… but morally progressive.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, economy, Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

All Hail The Ministry of Truth!

Posted on April 29, 2020 by john

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, now we have a ministry of truth, Facebook, Google, Twitter and Youtube, as directed by the progressive faction, we can rest safe that our masters will protect us… from ourselves. Because as we all know, history has nothing but glowing remarks about ministries of truth, group think and lack of debate. The historic eras, Nazi Germany, USSR, Pol Pot’s Cambodia, the Mongol Empire, the Chin Dynasty, the Mayans, Carthaginians and Philistines… are those to be followed, and initiating a ministry of truth is the largest step that can be made in that direction. Of course, some people do not want to progress to utopia, but would rather return to limited government and liberty as the default. They stand in the way of progress and so deserve to be silenced, vilified and savaged… for having an opinion.

Who needs doctors, PHD’s and scientists debating medicine, when we have CEO’s, bureaucrats and politicians willing to make those decisions. Practicing medicine from the corporate boardroom, for nakedly political and self interested purposes… you don’t get more progressive than that! Like the time Youtube removed a video of doctors discussing their views on the Wuhan Flu. That was awesome. Those insolent doctors now know who is boss! Who do they think they are, only having years of practicing medicine at the front lines of human health, pish posh. Pitting their weak arguments based on logic, science and the best interest of the human race, against the sublime wisdom of the progressive faction, who’s textured arguments serve only their personal political interests.

The ministry of truth may not always be right… but they always speak the political truth. When Twitter deplatformed Zerohedge, for having the audacity to claim, with only a ton of evidence that a bioweapons lab in Wuhan, dedicated to upgrading deadly viruses procured from bats, for biological warfare against the US and funded by the Obama administration… could possibly have leaked the covid 19 pathogen. Well, they appear to have been wrong about that, but they were correct about hiding the information to protect the Chinese Communist Party. Else the frog might have noticed the pot is heating up. When the ministry of truth took their marching orders from the World Health Organization, not to wear masks before they told us to wear masks, it was the epitome of progressive.

Goebbels, the head of the Nazi German ministry of truth was amazingly progressive. Indeed, he and Hitler followed in the footsteps of great American progressives like Woodrow Wilson, for the ideas that led to their theories of a Master Race. Mao sent the Red Guard house to house taking all the people’s food. Which led to around 45 million people starving to death before Mao generously opened the storehouses. The Mayans polluted their own water supply with the bodies of their sacrificial victims, of course no one dared complain, they would be the next sacrifice. The Carthaginians fed 10,000 babies to Moloch before the first battle of Carthage. Around twenty years later… their fields were salted by the Romans under Scipio Africanus. What other historic examples could possibly be better to follow?

Goebbels controlled the radio and newspapers, but Google, through it’s monopoly on search, controls everything we see and hear, as Facebook manipulates us as it sees fit, while they both take their orders from the progressive faction. What Goebbels couldn’t have dreamed of, is the ability that Google’s AI has to predict thought crimes. It is the perfect enforcement mechanism for thought laws. Opening the door to that progressive innovation. Since all action starts with a thought, cut off the ability of the people to think for themselves, and all actions are controlled. That is the way to get to the Utopia that all progressives so desire… to live in a modern Nazi Germany, USSR, under Genghis Khan, Qin Shi Huang or Mao. Heck, we already sacrifice 52,000 babies to Moloch a month, shaming Carthage.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Who are the Modern Tyrants?

Posted on April 26, 2020 by john

Dear Friends,

I wonder, what makes a tyrant… a tyrant? Surely that is a question we as a society and people should ask ourselves. What is the quality that makes one a tyrant, as opposed to a jackass, and how does that quality lead to oppression? Some would say that only kings or despots are tyrants, while others would claim all white men or capitalists are tyrants. There are as many definitions of tyrant as there are political factions. What we need to do then, is do the logical equivalent of a Venn diagram, and see what qualities or attributes that all people called tyrants and oppressors share in common. Only then can we come to an understanding of what makes a tyrant, a tyrant, apply that lesson to modern powerful entities and thus avoid being tyrannized and oppressed by the powerful.

The progressive would point to the company town as an example of naked tyranny writ large… and they would be correct. The company town was an anathema to laissez faire capitalism… and a wad of gooey spit in the face of liberty. The “employees” of a company town are no more than slaves. The places were set up to insure the old song, “another day older and deeper in debt…” was true for as many people as possible. That is indeed a form of tyranny… showing tyranny need not arise from government. The workers cannot leave until their “debt” is paid. They are subjected to arbitrary rule and have no way of complaining or getting grievances addressed. They were also controlled by a single person who’s personal interests the entire enterprise served.

Someone from the Enlightenment might argue that hereditary kings are the true tyrants. Most people in a feudal system are serfs, while the noblemen are few and powerful, yet still subject to the arbitrary will of the king. Often, hereditary kings would be so inbred they would be half wits, endangering the kingdom and everyone within it. To put an end to tyranny, as practiced by kings, they were limited by constitutions. A contract between the king, (or other government) and people, upon which the powers of the government are limited to those enumerated. Protecting the people from arbitrary rule… in theory. Kings have arbitrary rule and the subjects are not free to speak their minds. A kingdom ruled by a tyrant king serves only the interests of the tyrant not the people at large.

In ancient time however they had a more discerning definition of a tyrant. Aristotle defined tyranny as a wrong form of government, in contradiction to right forms. He said the right forms are, monarchy, aristocracy and polity… while the wrong forms are tyranny, oligarchy and democracy. The ideal form is a republic, or blending of the right forms. The wrong forms have one thing in common, they all serve the interests of the rulers, not the society. A tyrant exploits his power to enrich himself at cost to the kingdom, the oligarchy exploits their authority to enrich themselves while under democracy the people vote themselves largess from the treasury… bankrupting the nation. In this case, we see that tyranny does not need to be a single person but could be any number of people, grouped to common purpose.

What do all these forms of tyranny have in common? They silence the opposition, they use arbitrary rule to enforce their power and exploit authority to enrich themselves at the cost to society. From the owners of company towns, Robber Barons, kings and despots to oligarchical hegemonies. If we apply this definition to the powerful today, (other than the administrative state), we can see who is tyrannical. Take the big tech companies, Google, Facebook and Twitter. They are modern company towns. They silence people they disagree with, exploit their monopolies to hold people, seek ever more power, act arbitrarily and without consequence… all to increase the stupendous wealth and power of their owners. Progressives used to hate company towns… but now they own them, it is a different story.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment