Dear Friends,
It seems to me, we are being told, those who are violently trying to overthrow our Constitutional system, are patriots, while those seeking to preserve it are called traitors. Of course, one man’s traitor is another man’s patriot, and visa versa. A patriot to what and a traitor to what? Someone openly trying to overthrow our constitutional system, for an unlimited administrative world state, would call a person who favors constitutional rule, a traitor. While someone who favors constitutional rule, would call the person trying to overthrow our constitutional system, a traitor. It depends on one’s perspective, making the word “Patriot,” subjective, not objective. We can agree however, that the actions someone calls insurrection, traitorous or patriotic, are indicative of whether they favor our constitution… or not.
The riots of 2020 by BLM and ANTIFA, were barely reported by the main stream media, and when they were, they were called “fiery but mostly peaceful.” The flaunting of the progressives boogey man, the Wuhan Flu, by BLM and Antifa protesters, was applauded by progressives. Progressive mayors, governors and professionals refused to stop those riots, or call them anything but “patriots” speaking truth to power. Those small business owners who were destroyed didn’t have power, and those who have power were spared, but it is the thought that counts, in politics… I guess. BLM and antifa openly call, in their founding documents and on their websites, for the overthrow of the US constitutional system. Traitors to our constitution but patriots to the revolution. Shows what side the media is on.
The “riot” on November 6, 2020 however received dramatically different treatment. Progressives have long held that if one standard is good, a double standard must be twice as good. Hypocrisy being their primary sacrament. Despite Biden himself bragging he occupied the House when he was young, today, occupying a government building is the height of insurrection. It wasn’t when Biden, AOC or any other progressive has done it, but it is if constitutionalists do it. Re-labeling those who favor constitutional rule, as “white supremacists,” is genius marketing but exposes intentions. As evidence piles up it was planned as a false flag by antifa and BLM, to stop Ted Cruz from contesting the election, elected leaders calling for all “white supremacists” heads on a pike, grows ever more absurd… and shrill.
Even as progressive brown shirts continue to riot their violence is white washed. They rioted, excuse me, they “protested” in DC a few weeks ago, to a cacophony of crickets from the media. Chanting threats to burn it down… made disturbingly menacing by their earlier iconoclasm, vandalism and violence. Iconoclasm, destroying landmarks to American greatness, is clearly the acts of patriots… to the new world order, but traitors to the US Constitution. That our corporations backed them, paid for them and provided signage, shows our corporate leaders are true patriots to the cause… of the destruction of America, making them traitors to our Constitutional Republic though. It all depends on your point of view. One man’s traitor is another mans patriot.
When someone dedicated to the overthrow of democracy, individualism, capitalism, Christianity and objectivism, calls someone a traitor, that person so labeled is a patriot to our Constitution and a traitor to our would be overlords… an unlimited administrative state. Words can be used to clarify an idea… or muddy it up. We must be careful of putting our own definition, based on our perspective, on a subjective word. When we think someone called a “patriot,” is a person who favors government limited by a constitutional system, when they really mean, someone who favors a one world administrative totalitarian despotic state, we are confused, misdirected and manipulated. So, before you project your meaning on the media’s words, consider the perspective of the source.
Sincerely,
John Pepin
