Dear Friends,
It seems to me, democrats don’t want to follow the law, they want the law to follow them. That is why this Supreme Court nomination will be so contentious. All of the major cultural victories of the progressive faction the last century, and this one as well, has been by getting the court system to order it by fiat, not through convincing people to agree. Obviously a perversion of the court system to political ends, but that is what we have come to expect from the progressive faction, and indeed all people that promote socialism. They have made the court system the defacto oligarchy. The court system itself had no small part to play, in their elevation from weakest branch, to the absolute power behind the throne. Continuing control of the Supreme Court is critical to maintaining their privilege.
There is an old story from ancient China. An emperor erected an obelisk outside the imperial palace. Upon it he inscribed the laws so that all would know them and they would apply to all. Someone asked one of Confucius’ disciples what he thought of the innovation? The disciple responded, he thought it a very bad idea. When asked why? The disciple went on, “People would argue to the head of a pin that the law does not apply to them. Rather people should be ruled by common morals and ethics.” We see his prediction manifested today in the immoral democrat party. When there was a hint that Trump colluded with the Russians the prosecutors pounced immediately. We have four years of evidence, more comes to light each day, that many progressives have done far worse, yet no prosecutions?
This highlights another factor of why this fight will be such a knock down drag out. For the last few decades, powerful progressives have been so far above the law the rest of us look like ants to them. That is an enviable position to be in… but an unstable one as well. To be and remain above the law one’s faction must control the court system and the prosecutor’s offices. To that end we see that Soros’ money has bought prosecutors across the US. Obama appointed judges always rule in accordance with the arbitrary wants of their faction. Roberts is their ace in the hole. He is clearly compromised as are many other republican appointed judges. If constitutionalists ever get a majority on the Supreme Court, that paradigm of the Court following progressives wants, instead of our Constitution, may end.
The one thing that the fight we are about to engage in says, unequivocally, that we only elect politicians to choose our lifetime appointed overlords in the Supreme Court. Those politicians have very little power anymore. The Legislature has ceded it’s power to the Bureaucracy as has the Executive as well. Between the Courts and the Bureaucracy, the Legislature and the President have become essentially redundant. Like the Queen in Britain. She still has an official title but in reality she is merely a figurehead. Progressives have evolved our republic into this chimera, a limited Constitutional Republic, bonded with an unlimited Marxist utopia. One where we elect politicians, to argue over who they will choose, who will be our lifetime appointed overlords. Since the Court has unlimited it’s power.
Showing that this fight will be about the future of our Constitutional Republic. Will we remain free with limited government, or shall we succumb to the glittering lies, emanating from the progressive’s Pandora’s box? Democrats will use violence, because once they win, they plan on using violence anyway. They do not shrink from it. As we have seen across our nation in the last months. They will lie, as they have been doing for four years, they will break every law that stands in their way, since they are above the law, and they will have a conniption fit on the floor of the Senate and House, the moment a constitutionalist gets nominated. All to protect their unconstitutional, immoral, diabolical and unethical privilege. I wonder, will the law continue to follow progressives, or can they be made to follow it?
Sincerely,
John Pepin
