Dear Friends,
It seems to me, if someone worked hard to promote the extinction of the Blue Whale, they would be vilified. If someone tried to exterminate the sand piper, they would be considered evil. Moreover, those that advocated for the whales or sand pipers are lauded as heroes. Except when it comes to mankind. Those who demand we go extinct are acclaimed as progressive thinkers, even as anyone who stands against the extinction of humanity, is called a speciesist. The classic definition of a double standard. How someone can hold such opposing points of view without brain crushing cognitive dissonance is beyond me. It’s the epitome of relativism. I suspect, those who hold that mankind should go extinct, but the kangaroo rat shouldn’t, are actually entirely consistent. They hate people. They’re genocidists.
Calling someone a speciesist is like calling a rabbit selfish for not hopping into the pot. Moreover, those who so despise humanity they seek its extinction and replacement with AI, are never the type that lead by example… are they? There’s another word to describe the wholesale slaughter of people… genocide. So the elites who seek to replace us with AI or just get rid of us altogether are calling for planet wide genocide. People like Bill Gates, Larry Page and Dave Foremen among others. They gaze at us sweating masses and consider the rest of us less worthy to exist than the spotted owl. That’s why they never lead by example and jump into the pot themselves. They have no intention of jumping in after forcing us. So, if we’re speciesists, what does that make the anti humans? Genocidists.
Glaring double standards can only exist when their glare is covered by bull feces. Like going to great lengths to save endangered species while seeking the extermination of another species. As we all innately understand, when there is a double standard, there really is no standard at all. The “standard” is a means of control. As Thrasymachus said, a way to facilitate the strong taking from the weak. Until the strong have everything and the weak have nothing… and are happy about it. Or else. Fulfilling the Pareto distribution’s prophecy by conniving instead of merit. In this case, I suspect, the empathy the anti humans show the bengal tiger, isn’t empathy at all, but a spectacle they put on to distract us from their true purpose. To exterminate humanity.
Sometimes, what appears to be contradictory ideas are actually quite mutually supporting. The desire to protect all species, while seeking the destruction of humanity aligns perfectly… if you consider people with such positions, actually seek the destruction of mankind. The “protection” of others is a means to that end. It’s not all humans they want to rid the world of, just us unenlightened stinking legion. The new Eden they create for the few that survive the culling, won’t need to endeavor to get to heaven… they’ll already be there. That’s why the elite calling for depopulation wouldn’t lead by example. They don’t want to share our fate. They only want rid of us. So the world can be better for their children, and they’ll be lauded as heroes who made the hard decisions for the best of everyone… left.
There’s something diabolical about the whole anti human faction. Hypocritically coming up with words to vilify self interest, like speciesism. The genocidists. Claiming that advocating for the expansion of humanity is bad, because it makes a moral statement about the existence of mankind. While ignoring they themselves are villains of the highest order. Proved by their anti humanism. The genocidist will wisely advocate for the extermination of mankind to save the sand piper, that hasn’t the moral capacity nor intellect to understand what they did for it. It’s not for the Sand Piper though. They do it for themselves. To fulfill their sadistic lust to manipulate people into self harm. Genocidists for all intents and purposes. Their hypocrisy, villainy and diabolic nature can’t be overstated.
Sincerely,
John Pepin
