Outrage?!?

Dear Reader,  

It seems to me that, in the whole of human history the Elite have not been held to the same standard as the people. The Elite have been given extreme leniency in all manners. With few notable exceptions. Exceptions that make the point.

Take the story of Coriolanus, in Plutarch. In short, He was a hero of Rome then tried to get the People’s Tribunes executed. The Plebians, upon hearing this, clamored for Coriolanus’s execution. The Patrician’s begged for mercy, after all this man is Patrician. Mercy was granted. BIG MISTAKE! Coriolanus went to the Volscian’s. The mortal enemy of Rome at the time. Raised a Volscian army, and invaded Roman territory. Captured a Latin town and MURDERED all the residents. Then marched on Rome itself! At the gates of Rome Coriolanus’s Volscian army rested. Inside Rome the people quaked with fear that the mercy that they had granted Coriolanus had not been meted out to the Latins who had done nothing to Coriolanus, why should the Romans expect better? The mother and wife of Coriolanus took his children and marched out of the gates of Rome and rite through the enemy lines, and met Coriolanus in his tent. ‘Great’ thought the scoundrel. My family is now safe, I can reduce Rome without possible regret. Upon meeting with him, his mother and wife entreated him to call off his attack on Rome. Coriolanus refused Rome would meet the same end as the Latins. Not to be deterred, his mother and wife announced that they were ROMANS and with Rome lay their destiny. Spun and marched right back into Rome, with his children. Coriolanus was so upset that he turned his army around and marched back to Volscian territory. The Volscian King greeted Coriolanus graciously. Coriolanus had brought back a great deal of spoils. Then later the King had Coriolanus murdered.

What can we learn from this story about whether it is wise to give the Elite too much mercy?

Posted in Mercy | Leave a comment

Wise for a Prince but is it wise for politician?

Dear Reader,It seems to me that, if people do what is in their best interest’s. Then we can assume that people don’t do what is not in their best interest’s.

Take for example the politician who’s entire constituency is the poor or disadvantaged (P&D). It is in that politician’s best interest’s for there to be a great many P&D. Many P&D magnify the power of said politician. So the inverse is also true that very few P&D would probably loose this politician his/her seat. Few constituents mean few votes.

It would be in this politician’s best interest’s to enact policies that would increase the number of P&D. When those policies appear, (on an emotional level), to help the P&D, all the better. We have a situation where a politician is using Machiavelli’s maxim “a wise Prince [politician] thinks of a way that his subjects rely on him for everything and in every way will insure their loyalty,”

Therefore, it would be against this politician’s best interest’s to enact policies that serve to decrease the number of P&D. Again Machiavelli’s maxim that “the end justifies the means.” Both quotes from “The Prince” Niccolo’s treatise on how to be an effective tyrant.

Wise for a Prince but is it wise for politician?

Posted in polictics of class envy | Leave a comment

Safeguarding the Societal Myth

Dear Reader,

It seems to me that, when I was a child in Vermont the local societal myth was “I won’t bother you or yours, as long as you don’t bother me and mine.” The influx of people who didn’t share this ethos eventually undermined and flipped it to “If you do anything on your land that I don’t like, You will be hit with a lawsuit so fast your head will spin.” The first obviously human hearted, the second certainly not human hearted.

There was a critical mass of the population that moved in with the new ethos. They were largely, unduly enriched from trust funds. Upper middle class youth, the most dangerous people in the world. They have time and money to spend on what ever they fancy, like Nazism, communism, etc…The newcomers sought to force their vision on society, a vision honed in the bowls of universities. No matter the damage and friction to the workings of society.

Is there a way to prevent this abuse without restricting a persons liberties?

Posted in Societal Myth | Leave a comment

Human Heartedness

Dear Reader,

It seems to me that, The fundamental test of what is Human Hearted is by applying the Golden Rule, “Do unto others as you would have others do unto you.” It is that simple. If one wonders if a law, idea or attitude is Human Hearted, he can simply apply this scalar. It will reliably measure it‘s Human Heartedness.

One must however, have an open mind. Also being able to see from many different perspectives at the same time, to really be able to deem this or that is human hearted. Unless the answer is obvious. Even then the obvious can be misleading.

Human heartedness however transcends the Golden Rule, it also incorporates the concept of the perpetual improvement of the lot of all mankind. Ideas that lead to that end are also Human Hearted. These are two pillars of Human Heartedness.

One must have an open mind as to the means to this end. Forcing some outcome one thinks is human hearted is the antithesis of Human Heartedness. The means must be Human hearted for the end to be.

Isn’t the depth of a truth measured by it’s simplicity, that gives rise to it’s complexity?

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment