Tyrants are now Our Friends

Dear Friends,

It seems to me that the Obama administration’s decision to redeploy the European missile defense shield is another example of a growing and dangerous trend.

Namely, the US caving in to tyrannical governments, to appease them and establish better trade relations. In this latest flap, the US has sold out Poland and Czechoslovakia’s interests, to those of Russia. Poland wasn’t that into having missile defense installations… until the Russian Georgian war over South Ossetia. That conflict was a neon light that Russia is becoming aggressive. Poland and the other former vassal states are rightly frightened. The Obama administration has made the triangulation that the interests of Poland and the rest of the Eastern European states don’t matter as much as those of Russia.

The same thing is being done on the other side of the world. The interests of Taiwan are being sold out by the USA to those of China. With almost a billion potential consumers, the Obama, as well as the Bush administrations, have decided to condemn Democratic Taiwan for cheap Chinese hammers and sickles. Junk from China outweighs the interests of a democratic ally once again.

Around the world the US is turning on allies to help tyrants. This is a very disturbing trend. Allies are hard to get when you have a reputation of turning on them. Enemies are easy to get under this scenario. In the past the USA has been a friend of governments that protect the liberty of their citizens. Today the US is changing it’s tactics. The US government is selling it’s soul to those that want the US gone.

The message is clear, democratic republics beware, the government of the US is no longer your friend. Ally yourself with some tyranny and you may be allowed back into the fold. Keep on the newly frowned upon course of action, however, (protecting the liberty of your citizens) and the US will be greatly displeased.

The future will tell if this proscription works in the best interests of mankind. Hard to see where this could go wrong… Helping tyrants and harming democratic republics.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Feigned Outrage

Dear Friends,

It seems to me that, to be amazed that the people who visited the financial crisis upon us are being given fat bonuses again, is foolish. I mean come on. Most Fifth graders know that you reward that which you want more of and punish that which you want less of. (They might not say it in the same way).

The same people who were on the board of directors and senior management of Leman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, Citicorp, etc… are on the board of directors and are senior management of the modern incarnations of these companies. They have not only, not been punished, for their corruption and/or foolishness, they are being rewarded handsomely. No group more than the politically connected. They have been slid into government jobs… Despite tax problems.

The people who are being punished are stockholders, bond holders, IRAs, pensions and workers who have lost their jobs. Not to mention tax payers and businessmen. Everyone BUT the people who are responsible. Retirees savings have been savaged. People who are getting ready to retire need to start over. The list of innocent people who are being burned by this politically generated, government sponsored, financial fiasco goes on and on. You and I are the ones being punished.

The most glaring example of the wrong people being rewarded is the SEC is being given more power? They were totally inept at everything regarding the meltdown! Inept is the most generous term to use. Their ineptitude was grandiose and shone like a billboard on Madison Avenue in the Madoff case. They did nothing leading up to the meltdown to protect banks, lenders, investors, taxpayers or anyone else they are charged with protecting. Instead they protected the people they were tasked to regulate. Market capture to the nth degree.

But as usual government ineptitude is being rewarded with more power. Another fiefdom is born. More bureaucracy to help support the foundation. Ironic in that it is usually the foundation that supports the roof. The SEC is supposed to get all kinds of new powers and more money. No way that could go wrong… Give more power and money to people who have proven themselves to be totally inept. Government is nothing but the Peter Principle.

So what are the lessons? To invest in markets is foolish because it‘s a rigged game, and only the politically adept are insured, (no matter how corrupt). And, to act in a way that could possibly bring down the financial system, as we know it, is still no big deal… The government and paid for politicians will protect them. The incentives are obvious. I would think they speak for themselves.

Apparently, We, through our politicians want more corruption in business. We want government deciding who wins and who looses in business. We want the government to protect the rich and powerful at our expense. And we are willing to turn a blind eye to ineptitude and outright corruption in our government. I am certain that our politicians will deliver on those promises!

But back to how can anyone be amazed. So how is it possible that the president of the United States is offended that his friends are being themselves? He was instrumental in setting up the incentives. I am sure he is as smart as a Fifth Grader… Or could it be politics?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

September 11, 2001

Dear Friends,

It seems to me that we should remember September 11, 2001 for the day it was. The events of that day defied the minds ability to conceptualize the reality of it all. Not that it was out of the blue but the suddenness of the terrorist attack on Western civilization was shocking.

Many people have tried to stop mankind’s progress. Today some of them even call themselves “Progressives” as a sophist way to misdirect their true aims. No matter what they call themselves they are anti progressive. To be progressive a civilization must be the archetype of three ideas. They must be progressing in science, philosophy, morality and economically. To think that throwing out thousands of years of religious thought is “progress” is to think that forgetting classic Grecian algebra is “progress” because it’s old fashioned, (did you know that Pythagoras lived more than two thousand years ago). Progress requires foundational material to build on… dynamiting the foundation is not progress. The people who lived thousands of years ago were just as smart, wise and hard working as we are. Truth is, they were probably smarter, wiser and harder working. They didn’t have the advantage of two thousand years of Scientific, Philosophical, Moral or Economic progress we have… They provide our foundation.

The radical Muslim terrorist is the modern barbarians at the gates. Like Attila the Hun they don’t seek to build they seek to subjugate. Like the Mongols that didn’t build anything, they lived on horses, drank horse milk, and swept through Asia to Egypt where the Crusaders tacitly helped the Egyptian army stop the Mongols. The Radical Muslim terrorist has no intention to build a civilization… he intends to destroy one. He has no concept that the person tricking him and his children into killing themselves while committing a mortal sin, will turn on him as soon as it fits his needs. He is a mere dupe. His children are cannon fodder to the tyrant. On some level he must know this…Yet he soldiers on.

September 11, 2001 is a tragedy for the people who cheered as it is a tragedy for the people who cried. The people who cheered have suffered greatly. They cheered for their oppressors. Dionysus was the tyrant of Syracuse. Hated by all he held power until Dion overthrew him. But Dion was outdone by the people’s fickleness. They, having only just regained their liberty, were jealous of Dion and let Dion’s enemies revile him politically. Then fell for the libelous spin and were rewarded by the return Dionysus’s tyranny. I fear the people in the Islamic world might follow in Syracuse’s footsteps.

The people who cried have forgotten. Forget the Alamo is the modern war cry. Hard to imagine how that could go bad. People the world over came together for the tragedy that would be the portent of many more to come. But the Elite decided that it was in their personal best interest for society to forget. To that end the unbiased media have been as helpful as the town criers of Syracuse.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Mexico

Dear Friends,

It seems to me that Mexico is having a real problem with violent crime. Everywhere you look there is some report or news article about heads being rolled into a disco, the bodies of policemen found mutilated, etc… We are told it is largely due to organized crime that is funded by drug money.

The more I think of it the less credibility this theory has. The level of crime that is attributed to organized crime is off the chart. Presumably the crime bosses have huge haciendas that they live in. It wouldn’t be terribly hard to surround the one one of the bosses is staying in with police. Then ask to talk to the boss. With the level of crime and violence they are involved with shooting will almost certainly start. Then the government has criminal acts committed in front of the police, IE, shooting at police. That there are no arrests made of the bosses cries out that the government is involved.

How much of the government? Quite a bit I would speculate. With the violence and atrocious acts committed and so little effective action taken on the part of the government the involvement must be pretty high. The US has sent millions and millions of dollars to fight crime in Mexico. The Mexican army has been fielded to carry out operations against the crime bosses… but there is no movement. The crime bosses seem to be winning. This would only be possible if elements of the government are involved with the crime bosses.

This level of corruption bodes poorly for the people of Mexico. They have seen their real wealth drop since 1900 dramatically. (Along with the rest of Latin America). People in the US should be buying things from Mexico… not from China. Not because China is bad but because of the proximity to Mexico. Why is the stuff that requires a lot of man hours of labor, thus requiring low wages, made in China not Mexico?

Two main reasons. Corruption in government and ease of doing business. What business man in his or her right mind would open a factory in Mexico now? When traveling to the plant you would have to have an corps of security guards to keep you from being kidnapped. Your workers would be subject to violence and kidnappings lowering their productivity. Lastly you never know in Latin America if another Hugo Chavez will come to power and nationalize, steal, your new factory before it has paid for itself.

So, despite it’s proximity to the largest market on Earth and a free trade pact with the US, Mexico is faltering. The government has too many corrupt elements. Like a wasp with nematodes crawling from it before it dies we are watching the death of a country.

It doesn’t need happen. Mexico could enact the NUMA. Mexico is teeming with good people. They could be tapped to start a NUMA. Stomp out corruption in government in Mexico and see how fast violent crime from organized crime disappears. Clean up the government and watch the economy ignite. Allow the people of Mexico to be free of terror and be startled at the productivity gains. In short Mexico has but one real problem… The rest stem from it.

Posted in Mercy | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Misplaced Compassion without Compassionate Action

Dear Friends,

It seems to me that one thing we have too much of in this world is misplaced compassion and not enough compassionate actions.

We constantly hear about the “plight” of this or that group. They have no chance… the cards are stacked against them. If only the world was more this or that. Which always turns out to be, a poorly thought out group of laws, thought up by some foolishly altruistic, egoistic and pollyannish committee. The imposition that is supposed to reverse the negative stereotypes and some actual stumbling hazards when enacted make them worse. Everything government seeks to help… it hurts.

The reality is that if government want to help people in various groups to succeed all it need do is get out of the way. No group of people are inferior to others. How hubristic to think otherwise. I would venture to say that ALL people who hold that there are some that are superior, better, have breeding. caste or whatever… classify themselves in the superior group. So to codify in law that a group certain is in some way in need of government assistance is to say in so many words that group is inferior. Thinking of incentives, what are the incentives to people who do and do not find themselves in this or that group?

Yet those that advocate the most governmental intervention are personally the least generous… statistically speaking. People judge others by themselves. We are all guilty of this little sin. When we feel a certain way about something we expect that others will feel the same way. So when people are not personally giving by nature they believe that others are as close as they are. Yet the plight of the needy is personal to them. Their greed makes their want and need for money paramount. So they identify with the group that they are told has none, (nothing is as scary to them). Seeing others as willfully ignorant of the plight of “the needy” they demand government action.,, To act themselves would be abhorrent.

Combine the two and the outcome is to keep some people poor while feeling good about it… The government is helping.

Posted in Societal Myth, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Smart or Stupid Capitalism?

Dear Friends,

It seems to me that the way proprietary software is written is an example of stupid capitalism. This will be shown to be true if open source becomes the standard. (Which I think it will).

The main reason proprietary software is an example of stupid capitalism is that they only open certain file types. Usually only their own. Being unable to open files written by other software forces users to use more than one software package to open multiple file types. Word is an example.

While Word is a perfectly usable and user friendly program it only opens other Word formats. It cannot even open Works word processor files! As more people have the need to open different file types with their word processing software they will have to migrate from Word to another more adaptable software suite like Open Office.

By trying to force people to use Word exclusively Microsoft is driving people from it’s products. Some people will argue, ‘They are doing pretty well today.” to that I’ll just say this, “They said a very similar thing to Livy.”

No matter how big a corporation is… it can fall. If recent history teaches us nothing but this we will have learned something of value. Foolish practices will bring down a giant faster than any outside chipping away at market share. When a corporation collapses it is fast and sudden. (At least to outsiders). Leman Brothers for example.

So while I don’t see Microsoft or any other giant in the software industry collapsing soon they are spreading the seeds of their demise. They see this article as foolishness. They believe their business model is perfection. If only they can monopolize the market a little more… They will be the incarnation of Marx’s end of capitalism. Then will collapse, dragging down the world economies with them, just like the banking sector.

Too big to fail is something we should watch out for. Capitalism has at it’s heart that, the closer to perfect competition there is in markets, the more efficient the economies will be. The more monopolies the more the inefficiencies.

Because where a monopoly sometimes can produce a given product cheaper, due to scale of production, they always quickly become bloated. Paying too much to executives, lowering the quality of their products and charging too much for their products. (Vista). It is human nature. You or I are no different. Put in those circumstances we will act the same. The trick is to keep people from being in those circumstances.

But blunt hammered regulation isn’t the fix. Neither is trying to control every aspect of business through regulation. Government can be the biggest promoter of the eventuality by getting high speed internet to as many of the people as possible. (With tax incentives to companies, deregulation of that industry, etc…)This will allow the market to equalize. Free operating systems like Linux are not for everyone but deserve a larger market share. They will get it as more people are able to down load at high speed. Virus protection alone is reason enough.

If Microsoft starts using smart capitalism they will maybe have a less dominant role in the market but will stabilize their market share. Today they are dominant in every way except for safety, stability, privacy, and price. The quality issues are stupid. The price is a reflection of the monopoly status and is the equilibrium price. The virus issues are from Microsoft’s products being so widespread. A virus that infects a Windows machine will spread to more machines faster simply because of the lack of other operating systems out there. Like disease transmission in the human world. The less people that are immunized the faster the transmission rate. But as a greater percent of the population are immunized the slower the transmission rate and the easier it is to control an outbreak.

In the long term Microsoft cannot maintain it’s domination of the market. The question will be how will it come down? In a crash or easing down to a third or more of market share… Time will tell.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

APK

Dear Friends,

It seems to me that the idea President Obama put forward, a civilian national security force, as he describes it, is interestingly worded. It did remind me of an idea I have had kicking around for some time.

The US military could add another branch of service. It would be for policing duties in other countries. They would be available for UN sponsored security missions. They would go in after the Army or Marines have cleared a town or village. They would be trained in cultural awareness, some rudimentary language skills for the territory they are deployed in and in all types of police duties. A volunteer force they would fill a hole in American military might.

Take Afghanistan for example. Instead of moving in an American Army fire base to hold a town… move in a platoon of American Peace Keepers (APKs). They would set up a police station. Then rent housing from the people of the town. They would hire cleaning staff to clean the police station and their rentals. Pay to set up telephone service to the town police station. Then let anyone who needs it, use the phone for free, within reason. Lastly they would hire a number of the village men to be deputies. The APK would immediately fire anyone who had been caught taking a bribe or otherwise being corrupt. Once they had set up shop the regular Army could be removed to safe areas for rest and refit. Eventually the deputies will grow to be marshals and take over policing duties for the town. Freeing up the APK to set up shop in another town or redeployment to another theater.

APK would take the tactic of Take Hold and Build to the next level. Like adding another dimension to the battlefield in an insurgency, one that you control. The Army would be released to do what they do best and the people left in charge after the Army leaves will be dependable. This would utilize the military in the most effective and efficient way possible. Why train everyone to take land in the face of enemy fire when you don’t have to? Why teach every soldier cultural awareness if you don’t have to? Teach those that have the aptitude for it, how to take territory from a stubbornly dug in defense, and teach others to be effective and honest international police?

One draw for potential recruits would be that the training would qualify someone to do high level police duties in the USA or anywhere. People who have that bent to them like a challenge. They not only don’t mind confrontation they seek it. This would give people who have the temperament for it a chance to shine.

I would hope they would be like Andy Griffith and suffer the occasional honest fool but deplore the dishonest rogue. Be light handed in dealing with the people in their charge and fair in everything they do. If they establish a reputation of integrity and generosity, then actually live up to it, it will give them an aura of protection. People, no matter their religion, respect fair dealings and love (if not like) people who are generous. The reputation of the APK should be paramount to it.

It is something to think about. Maybe not a whole branch of service but an arm of the Army or the Marines. One thing is clear… the Militaries of the worlds most powerful democratic republics should think about insurgencies. They are easy to get started when the conditions are right and easy to get funded. So the likelihood of them cropping up in the future is good. Therefore, so is the likelihood of fighting one, even if your governors are poltroons and cower from a fight… In fact that makes it even more likely.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Modern Sophists

Dear Friends,

It seems to me that Thrasymachus was an ideal example of the type of lawgiver the human race has had through out our history. If you recall the story of Socrates and Thrasymachus in Plato’s Republic. Thrasymachus argues with Socrates that justice is for the weak to believe and the strong to use, like a tool, to control the weak. He also goes on to say that justice is not only a tool to the strong, but is foolishness to actually believe, because it weakens the strong. With this Socrates two friends ask if Justice is a good that one should follow for the good it brings (extrinsic) or for an intrinsic reason, It is the highest good for example. Like brushing your teeth is a good we do to protect our teeth. Not for it’s intrinsic good. Or on the other hand like when we play. It is for it’s own sake and not for something we seek to gain in the future from the action, thus it is an intrinsic good. They asked if justice is an intrinsic or extrinsic good. To answer this question is why Socrates builds his fictitious Republic.

But back to Thrasymachus and his sophist philosophy of injustice. Even Thrasymachus admits the strong should pretend to be just, to keep the weak in line, and that the strong should look as just as they are unjust. The rulers that Thrasymachus imagines are the very ones we have endured for so long. People who pretend to be just. They hold up their arm in protest, screaming for justice, red faced. Indignant at the injustice in the world and pledging to put an end to it. While at the same time being as unjust as it is possible to be. Moreover pledging to use unjust means to achieve what they call just ends. Decrying Machiavelli all the while.

They never argue that people should be given equality. They always argue that people should be treated unequally. (To make up for past injustices). They argue that people should be put into groups to be better protected by the power of the State. They argue for diversity while denouncing other opinions as hate speech. There is no end to the injustice and hypocrisy of the modern sophists.

Textbook example of Thrasymachus‘s maxim that the rulers should appear just while actually being unjust. Calling for justice with indignation at the circumstances of a stranger smacks of insincerity. How can a person be indignant at the way a stranger is treated? I can be indignant at the way I am treated, I can be angry at the way a friend is treated, but how can I feel another’s pain that I haven’t even met? Then to act on this feigned indignation to force my version of justice on society is to be truly in love with oneself. Those that are in love with themselves focus inward and don’t see others as equals only as fools that need to be manipulated. (For their own good).

I am amazed that people who call for others to look at evil and discern the subtle shades of black. But when confronted by a world of color they staunchly see grayscale. They are incapable of seeing in any more than one dimension. Yet they must force their version of justice on society. All the while acting unjustly (not paying their taxes, etc…)and using unjust means (seizing the property of others, etc…) to their ends.

So I argue that these people are not just, but are in fact, are the heirs of Thrasymachus. Their rule has taken continents from prosperity to poverty. (while retaining the wealth of the Elite). Their rule has reduced empires to puppets. But they keep getting in power.

It is because their siren song is heard by upper middle class youth (the most dangerous people on Earth)… Weren’t the people present, at Plato’s discourse, the upper middle class youth of their day?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

US Health Care Reform

Dear Friends,

It seems to me that The democratically controlled congress has so poisoned the water regarding health care that they have sealed their own fate.

The Obama administration had as it’s cause celeb health care reform. By health care reform they meant setting up a framework for a single payer system. The democrats realize their improvident tinkering on the market supplied healthcare system and mismanagement of the two major single payer systems in the United States have broken all of them… badly.

Medicaid’s budget is careening to widen the US budget deficit in the next twenty years. The projected costs are astronomical. Medicare is even worse. They are all compounded by the Social Security bell curve in baby boomers. Combined, these three programs, Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security are projected to amount to over 45% of US GDP in twenty years.

This is entirely due to lack of foresight by the Democratic party that has been largely in control of these programs. The Republicans have tried to steer Social Security in a more sustainable direction but have been vilified for it by both the unbiased media and the Democrats. That is not to say the Republicans are not as foolish as the Democrats… they just want to benefit their constituents.

Knowing the dire straights the Democratic party has steered the US economy and the looming results of their poorly thought out great society programs they feel the only way to avoid blame is to take over the entire health care industry. Putting up a smoke screen to their ill-considered management. Then they can institute draconian rationing to drive down costs. Then blame Republicans for the need to ration.

80% of the total costs of health care are born in the last 20% of a person’s lifetime. So if government wants to lower the overall costs all it needs do is ration health care away from older people. Of course, being politically sensitive, this will be phased in slowly. It will take a decade or more to phase in the most draconian after the State seizes control of the industry.

The real driving factors of the double digit increase in the costs of US healthcare are not enough doctors, too much regulation of the industry, fragmented regulation among states, lack of tort reform and lack of market forces driving down costs.

The medical colleges in the US intentionally keep the amount of MDs they produce at a minimum. They claim it is to keep the quality high. The reality may be less altruistic. There is absolutely no reason the United States should import doctors from other countries. That is the hallmark of a third rate country. Not a world leader. The United States, in a more sane world, would be exporting doctors to third world countries, to improve the lot of the people in those countries.

Regulation in the US stifles innovation in insurance delivery. In Vermont the states regulation became so onerous that Kaiser Permanente, the not for profit insurance company, had to leave the state. Fractured regulation drives up the costs of any entity that does business across state lines. (This is why the interstate commerce clause was put into the US Constitution, not to regulate everything from nose picking to bedroom arrangements).

The elephant in the room of any meaningful health care reform in the US is tort reform. It would be an interesting figure to know what percentage of the health care dollar is spent on lawsuits both frivolous and accountable.

Lastly the market model breaks down in the case of healthcare. If told a certain operation will save the life of a persons child that person will rightly pay any amount for it. They are not in a bargaining position. Market forces presuppose that both parties to a transaction have at least some leverage. The buyer need not purchase the product and the seller has a certain cost of doing business. Both have incentives to both do business and to profit in their own way. When someone’s child’s life is in the balance there is necessarily no bargaining power on the part of the parent. The parent MUST purchase the operation.

The most important thing that will be lost with a US single payer system is the loss of innovation… But the Democrats will have avoided blame.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why We Need Lawyers

Dear Friends,

It seems to me that the reason we need lawyers in our society is that people don’t want to be held at their word. It is Hsun Ching’s maxim that the congenital nature of man is evil. By evil he meant purely selfish. Selfishness is our natural state. The civilization in us is learned.

Our civilization is learned and our selfishness is nature. The problem arises in that every incentive in our society promotes our being selfish and prevents us from being good. Take for example the child who, being a child, is out door throwing rocks. When he accidentally throws a rock through a window. The good child marches himself to the door, knocks on it and announces that he accidentally broke the window. The negative consequences flow from that virtuous act. Loss of outdoor privileges, possibly a spanking enmity from the victim of the rock incident and on and on. Now take the selfish child. He breaks the window and runs for it. If no one sees him he gets off scot free. There are no negative repercussions in his life. If he is caught he suffers no more, and probably less, than the virtuous child.

Especially the court system of the US promotes selfishness. Take for example the person who demands every right and privilege that could be afforded to him. That person enjoys a profound advantage over the person who goes along. The person who tries to be fair and honest in court is DOA. In the American court system perjury is not a high crime or a misdemeanor. It is nothing. The media and learned law professors were adamant about this point during the Clinton affair.

So if the incentives are set up to promote selfishness and our nature is selfishness then I wonder that any of us are civilized at all to any extent. The civilization in us is ground away. Yet we lament that some 20% of the population are sociopaths. They have absolutely no conscious. These people in our society have the advantage in any argument. They can screw over a friend for doing them a favor then expect him to pay for it. They are the avatar of selfishness. They don’t have the ability to see another’s point of view.

The fact is we are in a precarious situation. Our society depends on, at least some people, being honest and hard working. The problem of incentives goading people to abandon what they have learned is right must be fixed. Look at how sinuous and enmeshing the legal system has become. Like a vine that has overgrown the garden the US legal system has been fed and watered to the point that it has become a tangle that is quickly ensnaring our economy and our lives.

It is hard to hold people to any standard. We have been motivated by societal norms to be corrupt and selfish. All our lives we have been told to be good but encouraged to be corrupt. This tension passes through our entire civilization. Socrates argued against the Pre-Socratics, Rhetoratitions, and Sophists that it was the highest good to be a virtuous citizen. According to modern philosophers he won the argument. Well the argument might have been won but the battle goes on…

Posted in Law | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment