The NGO Innovation

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, a government that seeks to circumvent constitutional restrictions could contract the despotism out, rather than do it in house. In other words, pay a non governmental organization (NGO) to do the dirty work. As Machiavelli told the wise Prince, If an evil needs to be done to the people, have someone else do it, then execute them and the people will call you a hero. In this an NGO is handy. They can undermine the culture for the elite, using tax money, without the elite getting their manicured nails dirty. Moreover, there are plenty of people willing to do the wet work of killing the country. This way the elite can impose whatever nonsense they want on us and pretend it’s organic. As those same NGO’s silence anyone with the audacity to speak truth to power.

 

Censorship can be subcontracted out to the payola press in league with the dominant governing faction. As USAID has exposed, tax money was paid to the media that calls itself unbiased for, “mass deception.” I guess bureaucrats need not heed the advice, never in writing and always in cash. Though there is that four trillion of unaccounted money. NGOs taking tax money can lobby to destroy the Second Amendment, and the politicians can claim the demand is organic… its from NGOs. Why should government even be limited? NGOs can solve that issue by creating problems that cause people to turn to government for a solution. Expanding the scope, role and power of government. Paid for by the people who are being abused, stolen from and conned.

Money laundering can be done by NGOs as well. They get money, donate some back to the faction that gave it to them, insuring the money go round keeps playing calliope music. It’s a win win lose. A win for the cronies in the NGOs, a win for the politicians getting kickbacks from those NGOs and a lose for the people. Without the money laundering of NGOs, the progressive faction wouldn’t be able to put up a sustained political fight. Because nothing they say is magnetic. Perpetual diminishment of the human condition isn’t a winning message. Especially as we approach the zero unit cost of labor and the unimaginable wealth that will create. Which is another advantage of using NGOs to tyrannize, to concentrate all that unimaginable wealth in the hands of a very few.

NGOs also pervert the nation from within. I have to wonder how much of the funding of the BLM and ANTIFA riots in 2020, were paid for by NGOs, out of the public purse. It was odd how there was a construction site with a handy pallet of bricks, delivered just before and next to, every George Floyd riot. Then there’s the perfect harmony of the media that calls itself unbiased. Of course everyone wants to pay for tranny story hour in Downtown Guatemala. Then there are the NGOs that flooded the US with illegal aliens. They pay destitute people to come to America for the glistening opportunity to get welfare. Then become a permanent voting bloc for the globalist progressive faction. Who needs enemies when you have a government that pays an NGO to oppress us?

It really is a handy scheme the globalist progressive faction has worked out to game the system. Using non governmental organizations to oppress us for them. Thereby getting around Constitutional restrictions. As SCOTUS itself has backed the constitutional usurpation. The NGO con is a self perpetuating mechanism, like fire, that operates until the fuel is exhausted. In this case, until the nation is bankrupt. Then the operators will move to a private island to luxuriate in their riches. Rationalized by altruism NGOs deliver suffering on an industrial scale. Which is one reason I think NGO’s shouldn’t be allowed to get a penny of government funding. They can do whatever they want on their own dime… but the time of using our money to unconstitutionally oppress us has to be over.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Shame

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the elite have normalized a total, utter and complete lack of shame. Leading by example, they have eradicated that feeling from the Western emotional lexicon. There was a time when shame reared its ugly head, limiting the actions of the proud elite, but not today. Nowadays the elites do whatever they want right out in the open. The Nazis were ashamed of exterminating the Jews and Gypsies, so they kept it hidden. Not today, modern Jew haters openly call for genocide, in their absolute lack of shame. Many people with a conscience are still restrained by their pride and the specter of shame. The elite however, leading by example, are trying to diligently stamp out shame, humility and pride, once and for all. So the shameless scoundrels can make us all shameless scoundrels.

Imagine a faction that defends waste, fraud, and abuse. Well, you don’t have to, the courts are doing it right now. The anti American partisans have to be incredibly smart, to defend the indefensible. So far the most effective tactic is usurpation of presidential power by the courts. Forcing unconstitutional spending, regulations, and actions to continue. Though such rulings are the exact opposite of the Constitutional role of the courts. Their utter lack of shame allows them to do anything they want. Even as their void of pride puts themselves above our Constitution. Prosecutors and judges are effectively above the law. Because a prosecutor can suborn perjury without consequence or dishonor. Judges are now free to change constitutional norms by fiat. Lacking remorse, wisdom or pride in their work.

The media that calls itself unbiased has soiled it’s reputation to the point it’s a laughing stock. Without humiliation they soldier on like they’re still trusted. Many businesses that claim to be news would be abashed at the discovery they’re mockingbird media. Like Politico getting most of its funding from USAID. Not them. Politico continues spewing propaganda without a hint of red in their faces. DOGE has exposed that all the legacy media was taking government payola. A fact they shrug off as if someone accused you of taking an extra doughnut. CNN couldn’t care less that everyone considers them fake news. They even report the talking points word for word. Without even the gumption to reword it, to garble the univoice. Yet, without pride in their work, why work so hard?

A total utter and complete lack of shame is really a superpower. It allows open and notorious hypocrisy. Epstein’s pedo Isle was a huge draw to the shameless elite. Bill Clinton had frequent flier miles to the isle. Then, when Epstein died in police custody, under what could only be described as a Hogan’s Heroes style arrangement, the elite shamelessly stood before us and claimed, he strangled himself with strangle proof paper sheets. That’s proof enough of the superpower that a lack of shame bestows. However, the Biden administration was the acme of the shamelessness, leading by example. Biden was charged with a far more egregious mishandling of classified document than Trump, but while Trump was prosecuted, Biden wasn’t… due to mental incompetence. Talk about a void of pride!

Today, the elite have normalized shamelessness. Why be ashamed you rape children, advocate for their sterilization, defend pedophiles, murder a man in prison, are caught taking payola, violate your duty, pervert the law, try to shut down food production, call for genocide on college campuses, seek despotic power, get caught in lies that kill millions, have openly double standards, use tax money to destroy the nation, abuse people under color of law, etc…? When you’re above the law, shame only limits you, if you have pride. Those without shame have a hypocrisy superpower. They can do anything, get caught, and go right back to doing it again. Right out in the open. Leading by example and normalizing shamelessness. I wonder though, wouldn’t it be better for us to self-limit, out of humility and pride?

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Organic Versus Fabricated Movements

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, almost nothing we see today is organic, instead most everything is fabricated, bought and paid for. Do you honestly think the George Floyd protests were organic? How about gay marriage? Is it even possible that the “trans” movement arose from a deep seated desire to help the mentally ill… by surgery? The whole culture war thing is a manipulation. Where the elite at Davos or the Bohemian Grove decide what to drive down our throats. Then they use our tax money to do it. The univoice speaks up and the media, academia and government chant the message. Dissent is wrongthink and wrongspeak so is crushed mercilessly. Which is another way to know everything is a psi op. The elite call any debate, misinformation. Proving the Trump movement organic, since the elite despise it.

The elite have been manipulating little girls to their detriment since Edward Bernays convinced them to smoke cigarettes and wear bras. Today little girls are manipulated into the slut life. Which they are told, is far more rewarding than having a family, home and future. Instead they can die barren, alone and with a plethora of social diseases. Abortion is sold to girls as their birthright. Because there’s nothing that keeps one warmer in their old age than knowing they killed their own children. Moreover, the trans movement is aimed directly at women. As progressive politicians mock little girls, who get brain injuries from competing with boys, they cry rivers for rape gangs. Which, if you think of it, is consistent. Girls have an innate need to fit in and that need is exploited.

If consent has to be manufactured, it isn’t consent, it’s slavery by mind control. Moreover, manufactured consent is the antonym of organic. Ideas like freedom, justice and honesty are organic. In that everyone understands them and they come from our own hearts. Legalized abortion, on the other hand, was the opposite of organic. It was imposed by SCOTUS from the top down, no debate, no legislation and no protesting it. In fact, even praying silently outside an abortion clinic got people arrested and sent to prison. Until Trump released them. That’s manufactured consent. Dissent and go to jail. Then there’s censorship of wrongthink. In the UK, any criticism of Islam is met with immediate jail, while Muslims can call for the murder of Brits, without consequence. A naked double standard.

Organic movements, like the reticence to take the Covid shot, are crushed by the elite. Remember how hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin and natural immunity were vilified? They were attacked because true organic movements are a threat to the elite’s Hegelian manipulations. The elite, through their lackeys in the payola media, create a narrative and shout down everyone else. Those who only have one view of a problem will only see the solution offered. When several views are offered the better solution becomes obvious. If all you are allowed to know of an elephant, is by feeling its trunk, you’ll think it’s a snake. Although if you were allowed to open your eyes and see the whole thing its physicality becomes clear. That’s a way to know if we’re being manipulated. Are we allowed to see the whole problem?

With an elite that are so self serving, immoral and manipulative, its hard to believe anything today. Their every sentence follows the Bernays maze exactly. As Goebbels’ protege’s, they control the narrative, strictly limiting others speech. Because control of the narrative keeps people from seeing the whole picture. Even as actual solutions are vilified as dangerous. Perhaps the threat of imprisonment needs to be brought into the conversation… If some follow their conscience instead of the narrative. Of course, little girls, because of their need to fit in make great puppets. They can be convinced to act vehemently against their own interests. Allowing the manipulative few to control the masses. That’s why I say, almost nothing we see today is organic, it’s bought by the elite and paid for by us.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Weighing Keynes Demand

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, Keynes understood part of the truth, but only a small part. The reason I say this is because he gathered all demand under the same umbrella. Which is clearly not the case. Does demand for cocaine contribute to economic well being as much as food, or demand for the goods of production? Obviously not. Which is why I propose aggregate demand should have subcategories, unproductive demand and productive demand, and there should probably be a third, negative demand. Clearly though the aggregate demand aggregate supply equation has some relevance to the economic well being of a nation, it can’t be correct, or it would better model historic recessions. The Great Depression where Keynesian policies were used proved their ineffectiveness. So it needs improvement.

Unproductive demand is the purchase of necessities. Things that sustain life but don’t add to production. It costs us money to buy and keep these things. Necessities are usually the largest line item in aggregate demand. People need to eat, we need clothes and diversion. All of which constitutes a huge portion of any economy. Indeed much of the “productive” demand is to meet unproductive demand. It’s the baseline demand of an economy. Moreover, if supply of food is sufficient but people can’t afford it, there’s a price problem. If demand is insufficient to supply, price will naturally drop until people can afford it. Because pragmatic suppliers won’t let their wares rot, they’ll lower the price until they sell. Unless government gets in the way. If we apply a factor to this demand it would be a 1.

Productive demand would purchase the means of production. You could say productive demand is demand for assets. Things that pay us to own them. If you buy a lathe and don’t use it, it’s unproductive. If you use that lathe to make parts and sell them, that lathe is an asset, or… it produces supply. Productive demand is far smaller than unproductive demand. It grows the economy however. While unproductive demand drives the economy, productive demand expands it. Therefore, the greater the percent of productive to unproductive demand in an economy the greater the rate of expected growth. Economies with no or negative productive demand then are shrinking. Shrinking the ability to meet unproductive demand creates inflation. Productive growth then would have a factor of 2.

Negative demand includes drugs, and government spending that drains resources, by waste, fraud and abuse. These demands lower productive and unproductive demand. Many believe that government can pay for unproductive demand therefor increasing it. But people only eat a few meals a day. So increasing the money available for food only increases the price. As it transfers unproductive and productive demand into negative demand. People use the money freed up by government welfare to spend on drugs, tattoos and piercings. Leading to demand for medical services down the road. Warfare is always and everywhere a bad investment. If used it destroys productive capacity and if not it diminishes money available for other demand. A factor for this would be -1.

If we accept that part of John Maynard Keynes aggregate supply aggregate demand model is correct, but flawed, I think these additions might help. By adding weight to each demand. Productive demand would get doubled, unproductive demand would be multiplied by 1 and negative demand would subtract from aggregate demand. I think by weighting these factors of demand we can gain insight to inflation, growth and recessions, in the past, today and in the future. The Great Depression falsified Keynes theory, yet not my variation of his theme. In the 1930s, government demand replaced productive demand, harming the economy. Else there wouldn’t have been bread lines. Until WWII, when Lend Lease created productive demand to offset negative demand… and regulations were cut.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, economy, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Raiding The Treasury

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, communism, socialism and fascism are simply means for a faction to raid the treasury. Proved pragmatically by history and reason. Criminals who would raid the public treasury aren’t the type to balk at a lie or ten. Moreover, such people epitomize the adage, evil men will burn their nations to the ground to rule over the ashes. The history of all factions that has claimed a socialistic mantle is of despotism, gulags and famine. This supposition can be falsified… if there’s an example of a socialist, fascist or communist economy, that didn’t result in the political elite getting rich, while the rest of the nation became impoverished. Since there isn’t even a single example, even in the Norse nations, the idea hasn’t been falsified. This is important to understand for all of our well beings.

Elites say a lot of things… most of them untrue. Like when a bureaucrat, politician or judge claims he or she serves us. When the exact opposite is the truth. Remember the recent BOIR form small businesses had to fill out, or get a five hundred dollar a day fine? The same bureaucrats that thought such an unconstitutional demand was fine, are livid at being asked to list five things they did last week. The administrative state believes we serve it. The most trustworthy appearing people are usually cons. Because appearing trustworthy is their business. While a regular Joe will have some tells he isn’t. Then there’s the millionaire who stands before us and claims she will harm the rich to benefit us. Which is obviously a lie, because no one harms themselves, especially the self serving.

Pragmatists judge by outcomes. By that standard, the history of the socialistic factions is one of self enrichment, and national impoverishment. An idealist might argue, just because it’s never worked in the past, doesn’t mean the underlying idea is unsound. It’s just that no one has discovered a way to implement it. In other words, communism would work if they were the despot. Which makes idealists easy prey, for those selling the lie, government has a valid role to play in helping people improve their lives. A pragmatist might question the authenticity of the speaker, judging by past outcomes, while the idealist will swallow the bait hook line and sinker. Which doesn’t make the idealist a bad person, simply one who is easily manipulated and captured by ideas. Even evil ones pretending to be good.

The fact is, all the socialistic factions must become irrational oligarchies, then despots. When the pie is large, many people can take from it. Allowing an oligarchy of takers to arise. Since the pie isn’t added to by the actual economy, it gets ever smaller. As we’ve seen in Argentina, the USSR, North Korea and Nazi Germany, while the Nordic nations had to give up even petite socialism. As the pie gets ever smaller, the demand for the scraps becomes ever more aggressive. The government becomes molten with scheming and the dross rises to the top. The most self serving are purified until one remains. The Stalin, Mao or Pol Pot becomes dictator, in the name of the people. Who then lives in opulence while the nation starves to death. Forty five million starved in China under Mao, for example.

That all the socialistic ideologies are means to raid the treasury should be taught to all students as early and often as possible. To prevent cons from gaining power so they can raid the treasury. The reason it isn’t is because the education system is run by the scammers. Which is why Animal Farm isn’t taught anymore. The people who want to raid the treasury are teaching kids to be robots instead of individuals. Facilitating the con. We know liars lie, history is unambiguous and outcomes matter. Teach our kids, get it in the schools and inculcate this idea to our peers. Until everyone knows, socialism, communism and fascism are only means to raid the treasury, it will happen again and again. Make it common knowledge for our sake and that of our kids. Or do you think it could work?

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in business, economy, Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, Mercy, philosophy, polictics of class envy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

 

There once was an oligarch from Brussels,

She had a beard chest hair and rippling muscles,

A Globalist at heart,

She played her part,

To help rid the world of Peter Pauls and Russels.

 

Governments that protect the predator

Using little girls to pay their creditor,

Are unjust you see,

Engaging in atrocity,

And in truth are naught but a traitor.

 

No great change has been done without sway,

Doing nothing hands are tied and feet in clay,

Allowing outrage,

You’re in a cage,

Because the sheep can’t vote the wolves away.

 

The Tories and Labour are peas in a pod,

Ruling the masses with an iron rod,

Oligarchs by design,

Will they win this time,

They think so as they claim to be a god.

 

Failure here failure there failure everywhere,

But you have to admit they do have a flair,

Pretend to be an ace,

Then burn down the place,

Is rule by political favor and flaming hair.

 

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, International Power, media, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

 

British Labor protects the rape gangs you see,

As democrats defend pedos from you and me,

Birds of a feather,

Do flock together,

And scumbags that harm children gather politically.

 

The cultural elite are mere political shills,

Pushing elitism with Bernaysian skills,

You can tell by the joke,

What fun they don’t poke,

When dancing around absurdity with bitter pills.

 

It’s hard to get a car to surge ahead,

Standing on the brakes glowing red,

Vilifying the fuel,

Unlimited rule,

And with communists and fascists they sleep in bed.

 

The elite are saving democracy from the populists,

Lit blue by monitors censoring and making lists,

Cancel the election right now,

The oligarch said in a row,

As he pounded the table with his closed fists.

 

Of all the hills to fight over,

Defending a national horror,

Are they deaf to the cry,

And blind in one eye,

But that’s what you can expect from Labour.

 

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, Judicial Sysytem, media, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Christianity Is Europe’s Source Of Vitality

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, the reason Europe went from besieged on all sides in the 1400s, to conquering the world by the 1800s, is because of Christianity. Others would point to warfare, technology or maybe forced evolution, from the existential catastrophes Middle Ages Europeans had to suffer through. Like the Plague, Islamic invasions from the south, and the Vikings from the north. I argue Christianity is the first cause, the rest are resulting causes. Why? Because philosophy presages science, technology and innovation. Moreover, Christianity introduced several philosophic innovations. The idea we are made in the image of God himself, our sins can be forgiven, and the Golden Rule. Each mundane sounding but seismic in outcome. Leading to Europe’s vitality and conquering the world.

Philosophy must come before new science, technology or innovation. Because a new philosophy gives people a new way of thinking. That new way of thinking opens up a multitude of possibilities, that were unthinkable before. Which allows science to advance. With the follow on increase in technology. Both of which further open the minds of men allowing for innovation. All based on a new philosophy, or new way of looking at the world. If someone went back in time to ancient Rome, and told them how to become an industrialized modern society, that time traveler would have been crucified. Because the changes needed would so upset the society and elites, the promoter of it would have to be made an example of. Because the philosophy of ancient Rome wasn’t up to the task.

Christianity introduced several critical philosophies to Europe that completely changed the paradigm. The idea you and I are made in the image of God is one. It opened up a whole new way of looking at people. From then on, no Christian could enslave another human being, because that would be figuratively enslaving and abusing God himself. Which made human slavery unthinkable. An idea that circled the world along with colonization. The divine nature of Man opened up the possibility that people could voluntarily work for pay instead of as slaves. Who then could buy the output of the economy, increasing aggregate demand. Leading to an economy with high and growing productivity, the need for industrialization, as well as free speech and thought, opening up innovation.

Some claim the unlimited power of European monarchs was a deciding factor. They say, the constant religious wars generated innovations, that allowed European armies to outmatch any other on the planet. Unlimited power then, they claim, was the primary cause. To which I might say, unlimited power was certainly not limited to Europe. The Islamic caliphs had far more power, as did many other despotic governments around the world. Moreover, tyrannical power was nothing new. Plus, history is unambiguous, tyranny leads to poverty, across cultures and time. So tyranny couldn’t have been the primary cause of European dominance of the world in 400 years. The primary cause must have been local, significant and unique. Otherwise Europe’s advancement would have been mirrored in the past.

In 1453, Constantinople fell to the Caliphate, Spain was fighting Islamic rule, Vikings were raiding the northern coasts of Europe, Islamic Pirates in the Mediterranean were taking Europeans as slaves, the Silk Road was closed, and the plague had several more rounds to go. Europe was on the rocks and about to go under for the third time. Christianity, which had once been the religion of the Holy Roman Empire, had been concentrated to a small section of the world. Yet European civilization not only survived but thrived. As the Caliphate rotted, that took young Christian men as slaves who would serve as Janissary. While Europe grew healthy. Leading to a world dominated by Europeans in 400 years. Sadly, a people who have abandoned that source of vitality, and it shows.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, International Power, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Limericks

Dear Friends,

 

General Smedley Butler said “War is a racket.”

It’s hard to understand so let’s unpack it,

Some people in blood pay,

Others get money and sway,

So the elite can wear a new leather jacket.

 

When politics has the power to ruin people,

We must seek power to insure we’re equal,

Then sold a lie,

To take our pie,

Because the elite have made theft legal.

 

Trudeau is no innocent prankster,

He’s more of a political gangster,

Truth dost bespoke,

He does promote,

The politics of a searing canker.

 

There once was a demagogue called Brandon,

In everything bad and evil he had a hand in,

Destroying a nation,

With sly ingratiation,

And he was lost in space with the finesse of a cannon.

 

Wrongthink and wrongspeak are a terrible sin,

Putting ideas and concepts in a rubbish bin,

The hypocrite knows best,

Censoring us ignorant rest,

And an Orwellian oligarchy they’re ushering in.

 

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in economy, Group Politics, International Power, media, Mercy, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Tipping Point Between Tyranny And Liberty

Dear Friends,

It seems to me, there are two modes of governing, one where the government is limited and the people are unlimited, or one where the people are limited and the government is unlimited. There is no middle ground. Because the two states are like sinks next to one another. One is limited government the other is unlimited government. The rest state is either despotism or liberty. Any state between is a traveling state, that either takes energy, or releases energy. It releases the potential energy built up pushing the ball to the tipping point. If the force is taken away, the ball will return to the rest state of the sink it’s in. Up to the twenty first century, the rest state in the West was that of freedom. Since then the elite have been expending huge amounts of energy pushing the ball towards despotism.

When a state is moving away from liberty and toward unlimited government, the sides are steep, until the rest state (the bottom of the next basin) is reached again. Initially its hard to get up to the lip, but once the lip is passed, the slide to totalitarianism is rapid. Like the old saying, “Slow at first then all at once.” The same can be said of both states. It’s as hard to move a free people to despotism as it is to move tyrannized people to freedom. It requires huge amounts of energy. Once a tipping point is reached though, the slide to the other side becomes rapid. Converting the potential energy built up in the climb to kinetic energy in the descent. Our elites have used titanic volumes of political energy, moving us up that steep side, striving to get us past the tipping point to totalitarianism.

The rest state of a free people is limited government. Which is a problem to those seeking to rule. The globalist elite want unlimited government tyrannizing a limited people. They want the ball in the other basin. The problem for the would be despots is the longer a ball rests in a basin, the deeper that basin becomes. So it takes that much more energy to surpass the tipping point. The West has become very used to freedom though. So used to it our basin is deep. So it takes a great deal of shock to wake us up. Those who do, find themselves way up on the side of the basin, being pushed inexorably towards totalitarianism. That awareness adds to the gravity pulling the ball back into the basin. Amounting to more energy needed to over come each aware person.

Meanwhile the rest state of abused people is unlimited government. Plus the longer a people live under despotism, the deeper that basin becomes. In the Middle East, people have incorporated totalitarianism into their psyche. Making that basin of despotism very deep and steep indeed. Proven by the titanic effort the US and Europe expended, in money and blood, to introduce freedom to people used to tyranny. Who then rejected ill fitting liberty in favor of comfortable tyranny. Because the energy expelled wasn’t sufficient to get them over the tipping point. Who knows how much it would take to make any state there, other than Israel, a liberal democratic republic that practices free enterprise? Maybe nothing short of an existential crisis. God forbid.

I believe the global elites thought they had reached the tipping point, where people become comfortable with tyranny, making despotism inevitable. The governments of the West have spent huge amounts of energy. They’ve enacted laws against wrongthink, and wrong speak, that are far more enthusiastically enforced than laws against the rape of little girls. In the UK, the government refused to investigate multi generational rape gangs, yet imprisoned Tommy Robinson for speaking out against it. The UN demands farms, nuclear power plants and industry in Europe be shut down. Even as the globalists wax their mustaches for war. What they haven’t counted on is the depth of the West’s loathing of despots, making our sides as difficult to overcome as the Middle East’s.

Sincerely,

John Pepin

Posted in Group Politics, International Power, Judicial Sysytem, Law, media, philosophy, Societal Myth | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment