Dear Friends,
It seems to me that, the more evil a group is the greater the crimes against humanity we will accept from them as normal. This is because they normalize it for themselves. Meanwhile, groups that are not evil are outraged at their own members for doing anything remotely criminal. This gives evil groups a strong advantage in propaganda wars. They can hypocritically libel their enemy as ginning up societal tension for engaging in self-defense, speaking up, or leaving. Meanwhile, evil groups will engage in actual crimes against humanity like intimidation, rape, and murder. They then decry speaking up about it as racist hatemongering that threatens the very stability of the nation. Evil groups can do this because they have no ethics, no shame, and no goal but power.
Those who vilify others who speak up about crimes against humanity are either the perpetrators of those crimes, accessories, or stupid. That makes them criminals. They’re not simply law breakers (a drunk breaks the law with no ill intent) but monsters who prey on society. If calling attention to an atrocity endangers the public good, how much more the atrocity itself? Moreover, when an atrocity is hidden it can continue but when it is exposed it must stop else risk public outcry. I suspect it’s the public outcry that stops the atrocities that so enrages them. So they arrest those who speak up. This makes the process the punishment. The deep evil that arises from this paradigm is that atrocities continue, because people who speak up are intimidated by arrest for “endangering the public good.”
When someone is arrested for speech that endangers the public good, and their speech exposes a crime against humanity, the public good being protected… is atrocity. No one would openly claim that crimes against humanity are a public good, not to mention one that needs protecting with the full force and wrath of law, but there it is. Those who abet a crime before or after the fact are considered accessories before or after the fact. Therefore, those who abet crimes against humanity by covering them up are accessories to those atrocities. This goes from the policeman who enforces such unjust laws through the judges who uphold them to those who enact them. Such an inversion of justice is only possible when the whole apparatus is corrupted. Double standards then arise.
Double standards are adored by evil groups. Standards on the other hand are detested by them. This is another way we can distinguish an evil group from a good one. Evil groups cling to double standards as a sacrament. Censorship is a form of double standard such groups cling to. Their speech is sacrosanct while that of others is misinformation, disinformation, or hate speech. In other words… speech that evil groups hate. This way they can twist public perception. Propaganda is the icing on the cake. Evil groups engage in propaganda without shame. This is because hypocrites have no shame. Moreover, propaganda is another form of double standard. Some are reduced to automatons while others are their masters. Could there be a more glaring double standard?
From this we see that evil groups can be identified by several characteristics. They embrace double standards and all they entail… censorship, propaganda, and lawfare. Evil groups identify atrocity and crimes against humanity as public goods. They don’t do it overtly but covertly, by jailing anyone who threatens the existence of such “public goods.” Slander and libel are tools of evil groups. They slander in speeches those who expose them and libel in the press those who defend themselves. Such groups normalize their crimes against humanity. Rape, murder and other atrocities are normalized so are acceptable when done by evil groups. It’s complaining about them that’s being not normalized so is illegal. Now that we can identify the characteristics of evil groups… what groups fit this category?
Sincerely,
John Pepin
