Dear Friends,
It seems to me, our courts have become the pawl in the winch that is globalist progressivism. Just as a pawl only allows a winch to take up cable, our courts only allow the deep state to take up our rights. They rule that enlarging the deep state is perfectly constitutional, no matter how much it violates the plain wording of our Constitution. While at the same time ruling that any diminishment of the deep state is unconstitutional. Regardless of how that diminishment brings the State into compliance with our Constitution. They were always supposed to be a pawl, but in the other direction. It was quite a feat to flip the courts into doing the opposite of their intended constitutional role. Make no mistake though, the judges who have committed this crime know exactly what they’ve done.
When Obama gave the “Dreamers” legal status, despite breaking the law, everyone agreed it was an unconstitutional order, the courts however, opened the door for him. When Trump sought to bring US immigration enforcement back into compliance with our Constitution, the courts freaked out and shut him down. Because feelings were elevated over Constitutional rule. SCOTUS has bent over backwards to give authoritarian powers to Presidents it liked. Such as when FDR imprisoned American citizens of Japanese descent without charge or trial. Jimmy Carter established the energy department with the stroke of a pen… but what do you bet if Trump tries to eliminate it, the world would have standing. Heck, the pawl might even find, it’s unconstitutional…
The only reason a court system would operate in such a manner is if the judges are captured by an idea. In this case the glittering lie of globalist progressivism is what’s so mesmerizing. The promise of globalist progressivism is wonderful, no war, crime or poverty. They believe they’ll usher in a Star Trek like utopia. All they need do is commit a few atrocities first and heaven on Earth will result. Basically, the globalist progressives have the same mindset as Pol Pot, Mao and Lenin. Their goals are so worthy, they justify any atrocity. A judge with such a way of thinking can’t help herself. If the law is a means to improve the lives of mankind, then why wouldn’t she do everything in her power to make the US and the world a utopia… just like Pol Pot’s Cambodia?
Our courts role under the US Constitution is to protect the Constitution from usurpation, not protect usurpers from the Constitution. In other words, it’s supposed to be a pawl, limiting government, as the framers envisioned it anyway. Today’s experts and elites know better. Like when Ruth Badder Ginsburg told a foreign audience, if she was drafting a constitution, she would follow the South African model. Experts at the time had reached consensus that the South African constitution was the ideal. Until the genocide of white farmers started. Now they’ve memory holed that assurance. Though progressive globalism is still the untarnished ideology of many judges today. That the world must be under the stern hand of experts, trained and bred to be world leaders.
Leading to now, where our courts have become a pawl in the winch of global progressivism. Those judges who are usurping power in the name of globalist progressives, are certain history will show they were right. Their utopia won’t end like all the others, in rivers of blood… no, they’ll bring in a world totalitarian government by experts. A thousand year Reich… with no war, no crime and no rights. As many experts have said in the past, the US Constitution stands in the way of their vision. Which is how judges justify, in their own heads, being a backwards pawl, limiting attempts to reign in government, and allowing any usurpation that comes along. Because they honestly believe the world would be better off, as an inescapable planetary prison, watched over and administered by experts.
Sincerely,
John Pepin
