Dear Friends,
It seems to me, the term hate speech, is a euphemism for thought crime… very progressive. You see, openly admitting you want to implement thought crime legislation is a political no no… today. So those that seek to limit our very thoughts must go about it in an underhanded fashion. Thus the ingenious term, hate speech. Once you control what someone can say, you then control what they can think. Because speech is preceded by thought, and if speech is controlled, then by extension, thought is also controlled, else a hate speech crime may be inadvertently committed. Which serves to keep our thoughts under the control of the elite and at the same time, training us to accept our diminution of status, from human being, to something less… based on an arbitrary definition of “hate.”
The only way to limit speech is through violence. You can shout someone down, but the only way to truly silence another is through violence, or the threat of violence. The intolerant use intimidation, threats and actual physical force to control others. ANTIFA for example, beats up innocents to make the point… that good is evil, violence is peace, limited government is fascism and total government is freedom. Their ideals appear to clash with their methods… but not really. When governments pass laws limiting speech they enforce those laws with the State’s monopoly on violence. People that are responsible for the ills of humanity, those in charge, don’t want to be criticized for their incompetence, or evil, and so use State and mob violence to silence critics. That is the way it is done.
Violence to silence begets violence to speak. Once speech is limited, violence is not only possible, it becomes certain. When disagreements cannot be argued out, violence is the only solution, the final solution. Two adjacent landowners with a claim to a piece of land, who cannot come to terms through discourse, will turn to violence. Without the ability of human beings to talk, come to terms and agree on solutions, we could not be a civilized people. Civilization itself springs from our ability to communicate and hammer out agreements that we can all accept. When some are excluded, if they want their point of view heard, violence must become their voice. In this case, the violence is the fault of those who punish, silence and malign, but is an effective propaganda tool against the maligned.
Once the hoi polloi have been effectively silenced and our thoughts controlled, we will become passive to the next phase, our total subjugation in mind, soul and body… to the whims of the elite. In the 1930’s in Germany Hitler took the guns from the Jews. Some, I am sure, complained that without guns, they were at the mercy of the government’s “benevolence,” or malevolence. Others called them conspiracy nuts, fools and paranoids… until the death camps opened for business. The point being… it is impossible to underestimate the malevolence of government. To do so is often fatal. Ever heard of MK Ultra? Sheep are not armed, slaves cannot speak, and robots have their thoughts put into their minds for them. To control speech, and thus thought, is to reduce human beings to sheep, slaves and robots.
Hypocrite is the term for someone who does not follow the golden rule. They do unto others that which they would never accept for themselves. Thrasymachus’ great men. Psychopaths by description, they seek to get us to agree we should have our thoughts controlled, by limiting our speech, something they would never tolerate for themselves. Putting all of us at the mercy of a merciless state. A state that is so sinister it seeks to manipulate our thoughts. Such a state proves it’s malevolence by its actions. So if you want to be a lamb… servile and programmed, you should be a strong proponent of hate crime, hate speech and any legislation with the word hate in it. On the other hand, if you believe in liberty, individualism and constitutionalism… hate crime legislation is an anathema to you.
Sincerely,
John Pepin
