Dear Friends,
It seems to me, progressives often justify their usurpations, by saying, “if it saves just one life…” well let’s turn it around and ask, what if it costs one life? How many lives have the absurd response to covid cost? How many babies have been dismembered at the hands of abortionists with the full backing of democrats? What is the cost in human lives of their open boarders policy? Yet progressives constantly take the moral high ground, even as they cause the deaths of millions, to save no one. It is the thought that counts I suppose. If the opposite of a democrat is someone who values all human life, liberty and prosperity, then democrats stand against life, liberty and prosperity. Meanwhile, the progressives claim they want to save a single life, by causing the deaths of millions.
Someone who supports abortion is not someone who cares about human life. A democrat will justify the slaughter by saying the mother’s life may be in jeopardy. So, what they are really saying, is that thousands must die, to save one random woman from dying in childbirth. Then again, that is a lie, since no one argues abortion should be illegal if the woman will die, if a pregnancy is allowed to go on. Those Faustian bargains are best done by progressives. Trading ten lives, to save just one, is a bargain to someone who hates humans. To someone who cares about human life though, that seems a poor deal, a fraud instead. The evil of the babies that have been murdered by democrat abortionists, dwarfs the crimes against humanity, of the Nazis. Who also wanted to save just one life.
Those who have no problem with the mass slaughter along the US Mexican boarder, because it enhances their election chances, are not people who care about human lives, all they care about is power. Of course, there are the rapes, slavery and drug importation the democrat policies abet. The open boarders are critical though, if they save just one single life. Someone trapped in the city of their birth might live a long healthy happy life, filled with purpose and love, but in poverty, when instead they can be raped, enslaved and used as a drug mule. A much better situation… for the progressives lusting after power. If the immigrants are killed by human smugglers, then left in the desert to rot in the sun, their lives were well spent, because maybe just one life was saved… not theirs though.
Gain of function research is not done to save lives but to take lives. You don’t make poison to promote health… you make poison to kill. What else is the use of poison? Zyklon B was created to kill rats, then the German progressives thought of another use for it, the final solution. Covid is similar but it was not made to kill rats but to kill people. Now a university in Boston has upgraded covid to kill 80% of the infected. I am certain they did that to save one single life, and if it takes 80% of the human population to do it, it was well worth it! Their vaccine was another way to save just one single life, at the cost to millions of children, who now sport enlarged hearts, VAIDS and reproduction issues. I have yet to find the single life they saved by gain of function, but if one is, all the millions of deaths will be worth it.
When a democrat says that if this or that usurpation saves just one life, it is worth it, ask them, how many other lives will it cost to save that one life? If hundreds or thousands will die to save that dubious one life, and our Rights will be crushed, is it really worth it? It depends on your perspective. If lowering the population is a goal, then spending millions to save one is a great deal. If you are the least human hearted though, that cost is far too high for any profit. Which tells me, the elite in general, and democrats in particular, care nothing for human lives, their rhetoric is only that, rhetoric. Know this, when a politician says this or that usurpation will be worth it, if it saves just one life, they are going to kill millions and trample your Rights to do it. Is it as worth it to you as it is to them?
Sincerely,
John Pepin
