Dear Friends,
It seems to me, progressives use the pejorative, “hate speech” to stifle debate on issues they know they cannot logically argue. Hate speech has become a euphemism for any pointing out any weakness in the progressive lexicon. This has worked pretty well in the past because no one want’s to think their arguments are based in hate. Progressives understand that their points are illogical, and that if people actually thought about their rhetoric, progressivism would wither on the vine. This is unacceptable, because political power is their God, and that power is based on lies, fear, and most of all… envy.
The absurdity of the progressive arguments are so clear to anyone with an open mind they cannot be defended with logic, only emotional rhetoric. Progressives constantly claim their policies and programs are “for the children.” But, how can someone who advocates execution by dismemberment of children, simply because the name has been changed from baby to fetus, ever claim to be for children? Would they argue for the same treatment for a dog? What if we changed the name dogs, to grundlsnitch… would that make dismembering a grundlsnitch acceptable? Anyone who points out the irony is called a hater, even though it is the person who advocates dismemberment for babies that must harbor hate in their hearts. To say those who seek to protect the most innocent are haters, and those who seek to dismember them are not, brings absurdity to epic heights.
The race baiters in our society are universally progressives. They gin up hatred for Jews in every statement they make. Louis Farrakhan is a perfect example. He absurdly claims the Jews are responsible for all the problems of his people. Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson are other examples of blatant racists who spew hate and vitriol. They rant against other people, not for the actions of those individuals, but the perceived group transgressions, the race baiters can exploit to political and monetary advantage. Just like their ancestors in the progressive movement did.
The heroes of the progressive movement were universally racists. Take Margret Sanger. She advocated for abortion because, she claimed, African Americans would kill their own children and render themselves extinct as a result. Can anyone argue she didn’t nurture hate in her black heart? Woodrow Wilson was a well known racist. The movie, Birth of a Nation, a blatantly racist movie written by the Klu Klux Klan, was originally aired in the Oval Office for Woodrow Wilson. The list of progressive heroes that were evil man and women is endless.
Progressives don’t seem to realize, when they point the finger of hatred at someone else, three fingers point back at them. How do progressives argue any point? They use derision and envy to motivate. Both emotions are based in hatred, and can only motivate people to damage others, never uplift them. To do this requires as a prerequisite hatred in the heart of the person who does it. Damaging the interests of another cannot ever be called love, it can only be inspired by hate.
Calling someone who harbors love in his or her heart, a hater, is very effective at stifling debate. This has the effect of stunting the growth of society and culture. When good is shut down by evil, and evil is allowed to go unchallenged, evil must grow and good must shrink. It is only when good people call the progressives out in their spurious rhetoric that we can resume honest debate. People must be allowed to have open and honest conversations, else we all fall back into the dark ages of hatred, envy and racism. Those that pit groups of people against other groups are the political descendents of Hitler, Mao and Stalin. That progressives advocate for the exact same policies is proof enough, but that they use the same tactics of envy, hate and shutting down honest debate… should be a wake up call to every person on the planet.
Sincerely,
John Pepin
